Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Bag of Tricks: Benchmarking of Jailbreak Attacks on LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.09324 v3 pith:ICWAAAGR submitted 2024-06-13 cs.CR cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.CL
keywords attacksjailbreakllmsevaluatebenchmarkingdefense-enhancedfactorsjailtrickbench
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant capabilities in executing complex tasks in a zero-shot manner, they are susceptible to jailbreak attacks and can be manipulated to produce harmful outputs. Recently, a growing body of research has categorized jailbreak attacks into token-level and prompt-level attacks. However, previous work primarily overlooks the diverse key factors of jailbreak attacks, with most studies concentrating on LLM vulnerabilities and lacking exploration of defense-enhanced LLMs. To address these issues, we introduced $\textbf{JailTrickBench}$ to evaluate the impact of various attack settings on LLM performance and provide a baseline for jailbreak attacks, encouraging the adoption of a standardized evaluation framework. Specifically, we evaluate the eight key factors of implementing jailbreak attacks on LLMs from both target-level and attack-level perspectives. We further conduct seven representative jailbreak attacks on six defense methods across two widely used datasets, encompassing approximately 354 experiments with about 55,000 GPU hours on A800-80G. Our experimental results highlight the need for standardized benchmarking to evaluate these attacks on defense-enhanced LLMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/usail-hkust/JailTrickBench.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MoGU V2: Toward a Higher Pareto Frontier Between Model Usability and Security

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MoGUv2 embeds small routers in the deeper layers of LLMs to dynamically blend a helpful variant and a refusal variant, improving safety against jailbreak and fine-tuning attacks while preserving usability.

  2. One Model Transfer to All: On Robust Jailbreak Prompts Generation against LLMs

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ArrAttack fine-tunes a judge on the SmoothLLM defense, uses it to filter rewriting-attack data, and trains a generator that produces jailbreak prompts transferring across defenses.

  3. Stateful Cooperative Agents Safeguarding LLMs Against Evolving Multi-Turn Attacks

    cs.CR 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    CoopGuard's defer-tempt-analyze-coordinate agents cut reported jailbreak success and raise attacker token costs on the new EMRA benchmark, but the deceptive-rate metric is partly defined by the paper's own scoring rubric.

  4. Advancing Jailbreak Strategies: A Hybrid Approach to Exploiting LLM Vulnerabilities and Bypassing Modern Defenses

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    GCG+PAIR and GCG+WordGame hybrids show mixed attack-success improvements, but methodological flaws, including a questionable GCG loss term and a pre-generated baseline, undermine the paper's main claims.

Pith tools