pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14670 · v1 · pith:IZLUHAYHnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · ⚛️ physics.geo-ph · gr-qc

Laboratory rivers extremize friction and are cosmological analogues

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 19:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.geo-ph gr-qc
keywords laboratory riversshallow water approximationFriedmann equationAnti-de Sitter universefriction forceenergy dissipationcosmological analogyriver profiles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Laboratory river cross-sections obey the Friedmann equation of an Anti-de Sitter universe and extremize friction at the bottom.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In the shallow water approximation the cross-sectional profiles of laboratory rivers obey a differential equation formally identical to the Friedmann equation that governs an Anti-de Sitter universe. This equivalence supplies a Lagrangian for the transverse river profile whose action can be extremized. Extremizing that action maximizes both the friction force exerted on the river bottom and the rate of energy dissipation. The second variation of the action shows that the stationary point is a maximum.

Core claim

The cross-sectional profiles of laboratory rivers satisfy a differential equation formally identical to the Friedmann equation of cosmology ruling the evolution of an Anti-de Sitter universe. The ensuing cosmic analogy provides a counterintuitive Lagrangian for the transverse river profile. Extremizing the corresponding action corresponds to extremizing the friction force on the river bottom and the energy dissipation rate. Analysis of the second variation establishes that this extremum is a maximum.

What carries the argument

The formal identity between the river cross-section differential equation and the Friedmann equation for an Anti-de Sitter universe, which supplies the Lagrangian whose extremum maximizes friction and dissipation.

If this is right

  • Extremizing the action maximizes the friction force on the river bottom.
  • Extremizing the action maximizes the rate of energy dissipation.
  • The stationary point is a maximum, confirmed by the second variation of the action.
  • The cosmic analogy supplies a Lagrangian for the transverse river profile.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same differential-equation structure may appear in other shallow-water or free-surface flows.
  • Cosmological solution methods could be repurposed to obtain explicit river profiles under different boundary conditions.
  • The maximum-dissipation condition might select stable river shapes in natural settings beyond controlled laboratory flows.

Load-bearing premise

The shallow water approximation is valid and reduces the river cross-section dynamics to a differential equation identical to the AdS Friedmann equation.

What would settle it

Laboratory measurements of river cross-sectional profiles that deviate from the solutions of the Anti-de Sitter Friedmann equation while the shallow-water conditions hold would falsify the claimed equivalence.

read the original abstract

In the shallow water approximation, the cross-sectional profiles of laboratory rivers satisfy a differential equation here shown to be formally the Friedmann equation of cosmology ruling the evolution of Anti-de Sitter universe. The ensuing cosmic analogy provides a counterintuitive Lagrangian for the transverse river profile. Extremizing the corresponding action corresponds to extremizing the friction force on the river bottom and the energy dissipation rate. Analysis of the second variation establishes that this extremum is a maximum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that, in the shallow water approximation, the cross-sectional profiles of laboratory rivers obey a differential equation formally identical to the Friedmann equation governing an Anti-de Sitter universe. It derives a Lagrangian for the transverse profile from this identification, shows that extremizing the associated action extremizes the bottom friction force and energy dissipation rate, and uses a second-variation analysis to establish that the extremum is a maximum.

Significance. If the formal equivalence and variable mapping can be shown to hold exactly without additional assumptions or redefinitions, the result supplies a concrete physical realization of an AdS cosmological action in a laboratory setting and links it directly to measurable dissipation. This would constitute a rare, parameter-free bridge between geomorphology and cosmology, with potential for falsifiable predictions in both domains.

major comments (2)
  1. [shallow-water reduction and variable identification] The central claim rests on the reduction of the shallow-water equations to an ODE identical to the AdS Friedmann equation (including coefficient and sign of the curvature term). The manuscript must explicitly display every neglected term, the hydrostatic and vertical-velocity assumptions, and the precise mapping of river width, depth, and slope onto the scale factor and time coordinate; any residual term or redefinition would invalidate both the formal identity and the subsequent variational statement.
  2. [Lagrangian derivation] The action whose extremum is identified with friction dissipation must be derived directly from the mapped variables rather than postulated; the manuscript should show the step-by-step substitution that converts the river energy-dissipation integral into the cosmological action without introducing extra factors.
minor comments (1)
  1. Clarify the notation for the transverse coordinate and the time-like variable in the river profile to avoid confusion with cosmological time.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying points where greater explicitness will strengthen the manuscript. We agree that the shallow-water reduction and the Lagrangian derivation require more detailed presentation to make the formal equivalence fully transparent. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested derivations.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [shallow-water reduction and variable identification] The central claim rests on the reduction of the shallow-water equations to an ODE identical to the AdS Friedmann equation (including coefficient and sign of the curvature term). The manuscript must explicitly display every neglected term, the hydrostatic and vertical-velocity assumptions, and the precise mapping of river width, depth, and slope onto the scale factor and time coordinate; any residual term or redefinition would invalidate both the formal identity and the subsequent variational statement.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit reduction is necessary. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated appendix that begins from the two-dimensional shallow-water equations, states the hydrostatic-pressure assumption together with the neglect of vertical velocity, lists every neglected term with order-of-magnitude justification based on the small aspect-ratio regime, and gives the precise one-to-one mapping (transverse coordinate to cosmological time, local depth to scale factor, and the constant slope term to the negative curvature term with its AdS sign). This will confirm that the ODE identity holds without residual terms or auxiliary redefinitions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Lagrangian derivation] The action whose extremum is identified with friction dissipation must be derived directly from the mapped variables rather than postulated; the manuscript should show the step-by-step substitution that converts the river energy-dissipation integral into the cosmological action without introducing extra factors.

    Authors: We accept that the passage from the dissipation integral to the cosmological action must be shown explicitly rather than asserted. The revision will insert a new subsection immediately after the variable mapping in which the river-bed friction dissipation rate is written in terms of the mapped variables, the integral is transformed term by term, and the resulting expression is shown to coincide with the AdS action integral without the insertion of any numerical prefactors or additional assumptions beyond those already used for the ODE reduction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from shallow-water equations

full rationale

The paper derives a formal equivalence between the river cross-section ODE (under shallow-water approximation) and the AdS Friedmann equation directly from the governing fluid equations, followed by an independent variational analysis of the action to identify the extremum as a maximum for friction dissipation. No steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-citations that bear the central load, or renamings of known results; the variable mapping and second-variation check are presented as consequences of the model rather than inputs. This is the most common honest outcome for a derivation paper whose central claim rests on explicit reduction steps rather than tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on the standard shallow-water approximation as its primary modeling assumption; no free parameters, new entities, or additional ad-hoc axioms are indicated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Shallow water approximation holds for the laboratory rivers under consideration
    Invoked to obtain the differential equation for the transverse river profile that is then identified with the Friedmann equation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5589 in / 1255 out tokens · 28329 ms · 2026-06-30T19:48:32.423769+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 22 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Experimental black hole evapo- ration,

    W. G. Unruh,“Experimental black hole evapo- ration,” Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 1351-1353 (1981) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.46.1351

  2. [2]

    Dumb Holes and the Effects of High Frequencies on Black Hole Evaporation

    W. G. Unruh, “Sonic analog of black holes and the effects of high frequencies on black hole evap- oration,” Phys. Rev. D51, 2827-2838 (1995) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.2827 [arXiv:gr-qc/9409008 [gr-qc]]

  3. [3]

    Acoustic black holes: Horizons, ergospheres, and Hawking radiation,

    M. Visser, “Acoustic black holes: Horizons, ergospheres, and Hawking radiation,” Class. Quant. Grav.15, 1767- 1791 (1998) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/6/024 [arXiv:gr- qc/9712010 [gr-qc]]

  4. [4]

    Riemannian geometry of ir- rotational vortex acoustics,

    U. R. Fischer and M. Visser, “Riemannian geometry of ir- rotational vortex acoustics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 110201 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.110201 [arXiv:cond- mat/0110211 [cond-mat]]

  5. [6]

    Superradiant scattering from a hydrodynamic vortex

    T. R. Slatyer and C. M. Savage, “Superradiant scatter- ing from a hydrodynamic vortex,” Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 3833-3839 (2005) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/19/002 [arXiv:cond-mat/0501182 [cond-mat]]

  6. [7]

    Spectral dynamics of learning in restricted Boltzmann machines

    D. Bini and S. Succi, “Analogy between capillary mo- tion and Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology”, Eu- rophys. Lett.82, 34003 (2008), doi: 10.1209/0295- 5075/82/34003

  7. [8]

    Measurement of stimulated Hawking emission in an analogue system

    S. Weinfurtner, E. W. Tedford, M. C. J. Penrice, W. G. Unruh and G. A. Lawrence, “Measure- ment of stimulated Hawking emission in an ana- logue system,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 021302 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.021302 [arXiv:1008.1911 [gr-qc]]

  8. [9]

    Observation of superradiance in a vortex flow

    T. Torres, S. Patrick, A. Coutant, M. Richartz, E. W. Tedford and S. Weinfurtner, “Observation of su- perradiance in a vortex flow,” Nature Phys.13, 833-836 (2017) doi:10.1038/nphys4151 [arXiv:1612.06180 [gr-qc]]

  9. [10]

    Black hole quasibound states from a draining bathtub vortex flow

    S. Patrick, A. Coutant, M. Richartz and S. Weinfurtner, “Black hole quasibound states from a draining bathtub vortex flow,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, no.6, 061101 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.061101 [arXiv:1801.08473 [gr-qc]]

  10. [11]

    Backreaction in an analogue black hole ex- periment,

    S. Patrick, H. Goodhew, C. Gooding and S. Wein- furtner, “Backreaction in an analogue black hole ex- periment,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, no.4, 041105 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.041105 [arXiv:1905.03045 [gr-qc]]

  11. [12]

    Visco-elastic cos- mology for a sparkling universe?,

    G. Rousseaux and S. C. Mancas, “Visco-elastic cos- mology for a sparkling universe?,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 52, no.6, 55 (2020) doi:10.1007/s10714-020-02705-y [arXiv:2002.12123 [physics.gen-ph]]

  12. [13]

    Induced Gravity in Superfluid 3He

    G. E. Volovik, “Induced gravity in superfluid He- 3,” J. Low Temp. Phys.113, 667-680 (1997) doi:10.1023/A:1022545226102 [arXiv:cond-mat/9806010 [cond-mat]]

  13. [14]

    Effective spacetime and Hawking radiation from moving domain wall in thin film of 3He-A

    T. A. Jacobson and G. E. Volovik, “Effective space- time and Hawking radiation from moving domain wall in thin film of He-3-A,” JETP Lett.68, 874-880 (1998) doi:10.1134/1.567808 [arXiv:gr-qc/9811014 [gr-qc]]

  14. [15]

    Resonance NLS solitons as black holes in Madelung fluid,

    O. K. Pashaev and J. H. Lee, “Resonance NLS solitons as black holes in Madelung fluid,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A17, 1601 (2002) doi:10.1142/S0217732302007995 [arXiv:hep- th/9810139 [hep-th]]

  15. [16]

    Links between gravity and dynamics of quantum liquids

    G. E. Volovik, “Links between gravity and dynamics of quantum liquids,” Grav. Cosmol. Suppl.6, 187-203 (2000) [arXiv:gr-qc/0004049 [gr-qc]]

  16. [17]

    Superfluid analogies of cosmo- logical phenomena,

    G. E. Volovik, “Superfluid analogies of cosmo- logical phenomena,” Phys. Rept.351, 195-348 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00139-3 [arXiv:gr- qc/0005091 [gr-qc]]

  17. [19]

    Sonic black holes in dilute Bose-Einstein condensates

    L. J. Garay, J. R. Anglin, J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, “Sonic black holes in dilute Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A63, 023611 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.63.023611 [arXiv:gr-qc/0005131 [gr-qc]]

  18. [20]

    Analog models for FRW cosmologies,

    C. Barcelo, S. Liberati and M. Visser, “Analog models for FRW cosmologies,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D12, 1641- 1650 (2003) doi:10.1142/S0218271803004092 [arXiv:gr- qc/0305061 [gr-qc]]

  19. [21]

    Analog grav- ity from Bose-Einstein condensates

    C. Barcelo, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, “Analog grav- ity from Bose-Einstein condensates”,Class. Quant. Grav. 18, 1137 (2001), DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/18/6/312

  20. [22]

    A rapidly expanding Bose-Einstein condensate: an expanding universe in the lab

    S. Eckel, A. Kumar, T. Jacobson, I. B. Spielman and G. K. Campbell, “A rapidly expanding Bose- Einstein condensate: an expanding universe in the lab,” Phys. Rev. X8, no.2, 021021 (2018) doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021021 [arXiv:1710.05800 [cond-mat.quant-gas]]. 7

  21. [23]

    Analogue Cosmological Particle Creation: Quantum Correlations in Expanding Bose Einstein Condensates

    A. Prain, S. Fagnocchi and S. Liberati, “Analogue Cosmological Particle Creation: Quantum Correlations in Expanding Bose Einstein Condensates,” Phys. Rev. D82, 105018 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.105018 [arXiv:1009.0647 [gr-qc]]

  22. [24]

    Effective gravity and quantum vacuum in superfluids

    G.E. Volovik, “Effective gravity and quantum vacuum in superfluids”, inArtificial Black Holes, M. Novello, M. Visser, and G. Volovik eds., World Scientific, Singapore, 2002, pp. 127-177

  23. [25]

    Black-hole horizon and metric singularity at the brane separating two sliding superfluids

    G. E. Volovik, “Black hole horizon and metric sin- gularity at the brane separating two sliding superflu- ids,” Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.76, 296-300 (2002) doi:10.1134/1.1520613 [arXiv:gr-qc/0208020 [gr-qc]]

  24. [26]

    The Universe in a helium droplet,

    G. E. Volovik, “The Universe in a helium droplet,” Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys.117(Clarendon Press; Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, 2003)

  25. [27]

    Gibbons-Hawking Effect in the Sonic de Sitter Space-Time of an Expanding Bose-Einstein-Condensed Gas

    P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, “Gibbons-Hawking effect in the sonic de Sitter space-time of an ex- panding Bose-Einstein-condensed gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 240407 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.240407 [arXiv:cond-mat/0304342 [cond-mat]]

  26. [28]

    ’Cosmo- logical’ quasiparticle production in harmonically trapped superfluid gases,

    P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, “’Cosmo- logical’ quasiparticle production in harmonically trapped superfluid gases,” Phys. Rev. A69, 033602 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.69.033602 [arXiv:cond- mat/0303063 [cond-mat]]

  27. [29]

    Observer depen- dence for the phonon content of the sound field liv- ing on the effective curved space-time background of a Bose-Einstein condensate,

    P. O. Fedichev and U. R. Fischer, “Observer depen- dence for the phonon content of the sound field liv- ing on the effective curved space-time background of a Bose-Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. D69, 064021 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.064021 [arXiv:cond- mat/0307200 [cond-mat]]

  28. [30]

    Quantum sim- ulation of cosmic inflation in two-component Bose- Einstein condensates,

    U. R. Fischer and R. Schutzhold, “Quantum sim- ulation of cosmic inflation in two-component Bose- Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A70, 063615 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.70.063615 [arXiv:cond- mat/0406470 [cond-mat]]

  29. [31]

    Probing the scale invariance of the inflationary power spectrum in expanding quasi-two-dimensional dipolar condensates

    S. Y. Ch¨ a and U. R. Fischer, “Probing the scale invariance of the inflationary power spectrum in expanding quasi-two-dimensional dipolar conden- sates,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, no.13, 130404 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.130404 [arXiv:1609.06155 [cond-mat.quant-gas]]

  30. [32]

    Nonlinear Dynamics of the Cold Atom Analog False Vacuum,

    J. Braden, M. C. Johnson, H. V. Peiris, A. Pontzen and S. Weinfurtner, “Nonlinear Dynamics of the Cold Atom Analog False Vacuum,” JHEP10, 174 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)174 [arXiv:1904.07873 [hep- th]]

  31. [33]

    Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold

    J. R. Mu˜ noz de Nova, K. Golubkov, V. I. Kolobov and J. Steinhauer, “Observation of thermal Hawking radia- tion and its temperature in an analogue black hole,” Na- ture569, no.7758, 688-691 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41586- 019-1241-0 [arXiv:1809.00913 [gr-qc]]

  32. [34]

    Acoustic analog of Hawking radiation in quan- tized circular superflows of Bose-Einstein con- densates,

    I. Yatsuta, B. Malomed and A. Yakimenko, “Acoustic analog of Hawking radiation in quan- tized circular superflows of Bose-Einstein con- densates,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, no.4, 043065 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043065 [arXiv:2006.12828 [cond-mat.quant-gas]]

  33. [35]

    Curved and expanding spacetime geometries in Bose-Einstein condensates,

    M. Tolosa-Sime´ on, ´A. Parra-L´ opez, N. S´ anchez- Kuntz, T. Haas, C. Viermann, M. Sparn, N. Liebster, M. Hans, E. Kath and H. Strobel,et al.“Curved and expanding spacetime geometries in Bose-Einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. A106, no.3, 033313 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.106.033313 [arXiv:2202.10441 [cond-mat.quant-gas]]

  34. [36]

    Superfluid Rayleigh–Plesset extension of FLRW cosmology,

    H. C. Rosu, S. C. Mancas and C. C. Hsieh, “Superfluid Rayleigh–Plesset extension of FLRW cosmology,” Annals Phys.429, 168490 (2021) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2021.168490 [arXiv:2010.01720 [gr-qc]]

  35. [37]

    Dielectric black hole analogs,

    R. Schutzhold, G. Plunien and G. Soff, “Dielectric black hole analogs,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 061101 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.061101 [arXiv:quant- ph/0104121 [quant-ph]]

  36. [38]

    On Slow Light as a Black Hole Analogue

    W. G. Unruh and R. Schutzhold, “On slow light as a black hole analog,” Phys. Rev. D68, 024008 (2003) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.024008 [arXiv:gr-qc/0303028 [gr-qc]]

  37. [39]

    Linear and nonlinear optics of surface plasmon toy-models of black holes and wormholes

    C. C. Davis, “Linear and nonlinear optics of surface plasmon toy models of black holes and wormholes,” Phys. Rev. B69, 205417 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.69.205417 [arXiv:gr-qc/0311062 [gr-qc]]

  38. [40]

    Hawking radiation in an electro-magnetic wave-guide?

    R. Schutzhold and W. G. Unruh, “Hawking radiation in an electro-magnetic wave-guide?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 031301 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.031301 [arXiv:quant-ph/0408145 [quant-ph]]

  39. [41]

    Superradiant scattering in fluids of light

    A. Prain, C. Maitland, D. Faccio and F. Marino, “Super- radiant scattering in fluids of light,” Phys. Rev. D100, no.2, 024037 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024037 [arXiv:1904.00684 [gr-qc]]

  40. [42]

    F. D. Belgiorno, S. L. Cacciatori, and D. Faccio,Hawking Radiation: From Astrophysical Black Holes to Analogous Systems in The Lab(World Scientific, Singapore, 2019)

  41. [43]

    Friedmann's Equations in All Dimensions and Chebyshev's Theorem

    S. Chen, G. W. Gibbons, Y. Li and Y. Yang, “Fried- mann’s Equations in All Dimensions and Chebyshev’s Theorem,” JCAP12, 035 (2014) doi:10.1088/1475- 7516/2014/12/035 [arXiv:1409.3352 [astro-ph.CO]]

  42. [44]

    Analogues of glacial valley profiles in particle mechanics and in cosmology

    V. Faraoni and A. M. Cardini, “Analogues of glacial valley profiles in particle mechanics and in cosmology,” [arXiv:1608.02542 [gr-qc]]

  43. [45]

    Lagrangian formulation, a general relativ- ity analogue, and a symmetry of the Vialov equation of glaciology,

    V. Faraoni, “Lagrangian formulation, a general relativ- ity analogue, and a symmetry of the Vialov equation of glaciology,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus135, no.11, 887 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00909-4 [arXiv:2011.00356 [physics.geo-ph]]

  44. [46]

    Maximizing friction in the erosion of glacial valleys

    V. Faraoni, “Maximizing friction in the erosion of glacial valleys”, J. Glaciology66, 876-879 (2020)

  45. [47]

    Analogy between equilibrium beach pro- files and closed universes,

    V. Faraoni, “Analogy between equilibrium beach pro- files and closed universes,” Phys. Rev. Research.1, 033002 (2019) doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033002 [arXiv:1909.02654 [physics.geo-ph]]

  46. [48]

    On the extremization of wave energy dissi- pation rates in equilibrium beach profiles

    V. Faraoni, “On the extremization of wave energy dissi- pation rates in equilibrium beach profiles”, J. Oceanog- raphy76, 459-463 (2020)

  47. [49]

    Analogy between freezing lakes and the cosmic radiation era,

    V. Faraoni, “Analogy between freezing lakes and the cosmic radiation era,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, no.1, 013187 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013187 [arXiv:2001.09533 [gr-qc]]

  48. [50]

    Freezing lakes as analogue models of $\Lambda$CDM cosmology and beyond

    L. F. Niehof, A. Venkatasubramanian, F. Toschi and S. Liberati, “Freezing lakes as analogue models of ΛCDM cosmology and beyond,” [arXiv:2602.24019 [gr-qc]]

  49. [51]

    Cosmologi- cal analogies, Lagrangians, and symmetries for con- vective–radiative heat transfer,

    V. Faraoni, F. Atieh and S. Dussault, “Cosmologi- cal analogies, Lagrangians, and symmetries for con- vective–radiative heat transfer,” Eur. Phys. J. C80, no.8, 706 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8292-0 [arXiv:2007.12039 [gr-qc]]. 8

  50. [52]

    Cosmological analogies for geo- physical flows, Lagrangians, and new analogue grav- ity systems,

    V. Faraoni and S. Jose, “Cosmological analogies for geo- physical flows, Lagrangians, and new analogue grav- ity systems,” Eur. Phys. J. C83, no.2, 130 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11292-6 [arXiv:2302.01458 [gr-qc]]

  51. [53]

    Lagrangian formulation of Omori’s law and analogy with the cosmic Big Rip,

    V. Faraoni, “Lagrangian formulation of Omori’s law and analogy with the cosmic Big Rip,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, no.5, 445 (2020) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8019-2 [arXiv:2005.03428 [gr-qc]]

  52. [54]

    Helmoltz problem for the Riccati equation from an analogous Friedmann equation,

    V. Faraoni, “Helmoltz problem for the Riccati equation from an analogous Friedmann equation,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82, no.1, 13 (2022) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09966-0 [arXiv:2112.11526 [gr-qc]]

  53. [55]

    Cosmic analogues of classic varia- tional problems,

    V. Faraoni, “Cosmic analogues of classic varia- tional problems,” Universe6, no.6, 71 (2020) doi:10.3390/universe6060071 [arXiv:2005.12053 [gr-qc]]

  54. [56]

    Faraoni,Cosmic Analogies: How Natural Systems Emulate the Universe(World Scientific, Singapore, 2022)

    V. Faraoni,Cosmic Analogies: How Natural Systems Emulate the Universe(World Scientific, Singapore, 2022)

  55. [57]

    Slow spreading of a sheet of Bingham fluid on an inclined plane

    K. O. F. Liu and C. C. Mei, “Slow spreading of a sheet of Bingham fluid on an inclined plane”, J. Fluid Mech. 207, 505-529 (1989)

  56. [58]

    Lacey,Minutes Proc

    G. Lacey,Minutes Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.229, 259-292 (1930), https://doi.org/10.1680/imotp.1930.15592

  57. [59]

    Barra and P

    G. Seizilles, O. Devauchelle, E. Lajeunesse, and F. and M´ etivier, “Width of laminar laboratory rivers”, Phys. Rev. E87, 052204 (2013), doi = 10.1103/Phys- RevE.87.052204

  58. [60]

    Stability of alluvial channels

    F. M. Henderson, “Stability of alluvial channels”, J. Hy- draulics Division ASCE87, 109-138 (1961)

  59. [61]

    The AdS/CFT Correspondence

    V. E. Hubeny, “The AdS/CFT Correspondence,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, no.12, 124010 (2015) doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/32/12/124010 [arXiv:1501.00007 [gr-qc]]

  60. [62]

    [63], using units in which the speed of lightcis unity

    We adopt the notation of Ref. [63], using units in which the speed of lightcis unity. The metric tensorg µν has signature−+++ andGis Newton’s constant

  61. [63]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity(Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1984)

  62. [64]

    C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne and J. A. Wheeler,Grav- itation, W. H. Freeman, 1973, ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0, 978-0-691-17779-3

  63. [65]

    S. M. Carroll,Spacetime and Geometry: An Introduc- tion to General Relativity(Addison Wesley, San Fran- cisco, 2004)

  64. [66]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner,The Early Universe (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 1990)

  65. [67]

    Liddle,An Introduction to Modern Cosmology(Wiley, Chichester, 2003)

    A. Liddle,An Introduction to Modern Cosmology(Wiley, Chichester, 2003)

  66. [68]

    Faraoni,Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity(Kluwer ACademic, Dordrecht, 2004), doi:10.1007/978-1-4020- 1989-0

    V. Faraoni,Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity(Kluwer ACademic, Dordrecht, 2004), doi:10.1007/978-1-4020- 1989-0

  67. [69]

    R. E. Glover and Q. L. Florey, Laboratory Report No. Hyd-325, United States Department of the Interior, Bu- reau of Reclamation (Denver, Colorado, 1951), p. 44

  68. [70]

    Goldstein,Classical Mechanics(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1980)

    H. Goldstein,Classical Mechanics(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1980)

  69. [71]

    M. L. Boas,Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sci- ences(Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 1966)

  70. [72]

    Solving the brachistochrone and other variational problems with soap films

    C. Criado and N. Alamo, “Solving the brachistochrone and other variational problems with soap films”, Am. J. Phys.78, 1400-1405 (2010), DOI: 10.1119/1.3483276

  71. [73]

    Equilibrium beach profiles under breaking and non-breaking waves

    M. Larsonet al., “Equilibrium beach profiles under breaking and non-breaking waves”, Coast. Eng.36, 59 (1999)

  72. [74]

    Thermodynamic so- lutions for equilibrium beach profiles

    S. A. Jenkins and D. L. Inman, “Thermodynamic so- lutions for equilibrium beach profiles”, J Geophys. Res. Oceans111, C02003 (2006)

  73. [75]

    Do beach profiles under non-breaking waves minimize energy dissipation?

    S. Maldonado, “Do beach profiles under non-breaking waves minimize energy dissipation?”, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans125, 5 (2020): e2019JC015876

  74. [76]

    On the thermodynamics-based equilibrium beach profile derived by Jenkins and Inman (2006)

    S. Maldonado and M. Uchasara, “On the thermodynamics-based equilibrium beach profile derived by Jenkins and Inman (2006)”, arXiv:1908.07825v1 [physics.geo-ph]

  75. [77]

    H. J. Weber and G. B. Arfken,Essential Mathematical Methods for Physicists(Elsevier/Academic Press, Ams- terdam 2004)