pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01813 · v1 · pith:JALZQVRKnew · submitted 2026-07-02 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

MMBench-Live: A Continuously Evolving Benchmark for Multimodal Models

Yuanzhi Liu , Shousheng Zhao , Bo Zhou , Kongming Liang , Zhanyu Ma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 16:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords multimodal benchmarkvision-language modelsbenchmark evolutiondata contaminationmulti-agent pipelineautomated evaluationdistribution consistency
0
0 comments X

The pith

A multi-agent automated pipeline creates continuously updating multimodal benchmarks that preserve original properties at low cost.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents MMBench-Live as a method to overcome the staleness and contamination risks of fixed multimodal evaluation sets. It builds the benchmark through an automated system that acquires new data in real time and generates verifiable questions while enforcing consistency with the source distribution. This produces thousands of fresh instances that keep model rankings stable and show reduced memorization effects. A reader would care because current benchmarks lose reliability over time as models train on public data, making ongoing, aligned testing essential for tracking actual progress in vision-language capabilities.

Core claim

MMBench-Live is instantiated from MMBench via a multi-agent-driven automated pipeline that integrates structured benchmark specification, feedback-controlled real-time data acquisition, and verifiable QA generation with executable reasoning. A distribution-consistent update strategy extracts task-related visual patterns from the original benchmark to guide collection and filtering. The resulting set contains 5.9K new evaluation instances with high answer correctness, where each update costs about USD 30 and takes 1-2 hours. Evaluations confirm that the live version preserves stable model rankings, maintains semantic alignment with the original, and exhibits weaker contamination-related memor

What carries the argument

Multi-agent-driven automated pipeline with distribution-consistent update strategy, which automates real-time data acquisition and filtering while enforcing cross-version comparability through extracted visual patterns.

If this is right

  • Model performance rankings remain consistent between successive benchmark versions.
  • New instances reduce measurable contamination effects relative to the static original.
  • Updates become feasible on a frequent schedule without large resource expenditure.
  • The same visual patterns and task requirements continue to be measured across versions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same pipeline structure could be applied to other static multimodal or language benchmarks to address staleness.
  • Frequent low-cost refreshes would allow finer tracking of capability changes over short time periods.
  • If the alignment mechanism generalizes, evaluation sets could shift from one-time human curation toward ongoing automated maintenance.

Load-bearing premise

The multi-agent pipeline produces new instances whose semantic alignment and correctness can be trusted without introducing new biases or contamination.

What would settle it

Direct side-by-side testing in which models show substantially different accuracy patterns or stronger memorization signals on the new instances compared with the original benchmark.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01813 by Bo Zhou, Kongming Liang, Shousheng Zhao, Yuanzhi Liu, Zhanyu Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the MMBench-Live framework. MMBench-Live is constructed by converting the original MMBench into structured descriptions, acquiring new data in a task-aware manner, and generating executable and verified QA pairs for evaluation. the structural form of an evaluation instance, including the modalities involved, the input–output interface, and the ex￾pected response type. An evaluation instance can… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Rank change heatmap between MMBench and MMBench-Live. Each cell shows the rank difference ∆Rank = RankLive − RankMMBench for a given model–task pair. All tasks are denoted using abbreviated names and full task names are provided in the appendix C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows a representative failure case from a spatial-relation question about toy cars. The question asks: “Comparing the toy cars in the image, which statement regarding their colors and positions is correct?” One candidate option states that “There is a yellow car and an orange car in the same diagonal row starting from the left.” In this case, the perception modules correctly identify the toy cars and the … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Evaluation benchmarks are essential for assessing vision-language models (VLMs), but most multimodal benchmarks are static, making them vulnerable to temporal staleness, data contamination, and costly maintenance. We present MMBench-Live, a continuously evolving multimodal benchmark built by a multi-agent-driven automated pipeline. Our framework treats benchmark evolution as task-guided dataset construction, integrating structured benchmark specification, feedback-controlled real-time data acquisition, and verifiable QA generation with executable reasoning. To maintain cross-version comparability, we introduce a distribution-consistent update strategy that extracts task-related visual patterns from the original benchmark to guide data collection and filtering. Instantiated from MMBench, MMBench-Live contains 5.9K newly generated evaluation instances with a high answer correctness rate, while each update costs about USD 30 and takes 1-2 hours. Extensive evaluations show that MMBench-Live preserves stable model rankings, maintains semantic alignment with the original benchmark, and exhibits weaker contamination-related memorization signals, suggesting a practical and scalable paradigm for sustainable multimodal benchmark evolution. The project is available at https://github.com/PRIS-CV/MMBench-Live.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces MMBench-Live, a continuously evolving multimodal benchmark for vision-language models constructed from the original MMBench via a multi-agent pipeline. The pipeline integrates benchmark specification, feedback-controlled data acquisition, and verifiable QA generation; a distribution-consistent update strategy extracts visual patterns to guide new instances. The work reports 5.9K new instances at ~USD 30 and 1-2 hours per update, with claims of high answer correctness, stable model rankings across versions, maintained semantic alignment, and weaker memorization signals than the static original.

Significance. If the pipeline outputs prove trustworthy, the approach offers a low-cost, scalable method for maintaining multimodal benchmarks against temporal staleness and contamination, with potential to influence how dynamic evaluation suites are built in the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of 'high answer correctness rate,' 'maintains semantic alignment,' and 'exhibits weaker contamination-related memorization signals' rest on internal pipeline outputs (feedback loops and pattern extraction) without any reported independent human validation, error analysis, or external ground-truth baselines. This leaves open whether the automated assessments detect systematic issues such as hallucinated reasoning or shifted difficulty.
  2. [Evaluations] The evaluations section: Stable rankings and reduced memorization are presented as evidence of successful evolution, yet these metrics are computed on instances whose correctness and alignment were themselves judged by the same multi-agent system; no cross-check against human annotators or comparison to held-out original MMBench subsets is described to confirm the distribution-consistent strategy preserves task semantics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our work. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the validation aspects of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of 'high answer correctness rate,' 'maintains semantic alignment,' and 'exhibits weaker contamination-related memorization signals' rest on internal pipeline outputs (feedback loops and pattern extraction) without any reported independent human validation, error analysis, or external ground-truth baselines. This leaves open whether the automated assessments detect systematic issues such as hallucinated reasoning or shifted difficulty.

    Authors: The multi-agent pipeline incorporates feedback-controlled data acquisition and verifiable QA generation with executable reasoning precisely to reduce risks such as hallucinated reasoning. The reported correctness rate and alignment metrics are outputs of these mechanisms. We agree, however, that independent human validation provides stronger corroboration. In the revised manuscript we will add a human evaluation study on a sampled subset of generated instances, reporting inter-annotator agreement and error analysis. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Evaluations] The evaluations section: Stable rankings and reduced memorization are presented as evidence of successful evolution, yet these metrics are computed on instances whose correctness and alignment were themselves judged by the same multi-agent system; no cross-check against human annotators or comparison to held-out original MMBench subsets is described to confirm the distribution-consistent strategy preserves task semantics.

    Authors: The distribution-consistent update strategy extracts task-related visual patterns directly from the original MMBench to guide collection and filtering, with the explicit goal of preserving semantics and difficulty. Stable model rankings across versions and weaker memorization signals constitute empirical evidence that this goal is met. To provide an explicit cross-check, the revision will include (i) direct comparison of model performance on held-out original MMBench subsets and (ii) human judgments of semantic alignment for the new instances. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; pipeline construction uses external acquisition with independent external evaluations

full rationale

The paper describes an automated multi-agent pipeline for generating new benchmark instances from MMBench patterns via distribution-consistent updates, feedback loops, and verifiable QA. No equations, fitted parameters, or predictions reduce to inputs by construction. Reported outcomes (stable rankings, semantic alignment, reduced memorization) rely on external model evaluations rather than internal self-assessment alone. Any reference to the original MMBench is not load-bearing for the core claims in a self-referential way. This is a standard low-circularity empirical construction paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The multi-agent pipeline and distribution strategy are presented as engineering choices without listed assumptions or new entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5741 in / 1000 out tokens · 26638 ms · 2026-07-03T16:08:52.188943+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2023 , eprint=

    LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models , author=. 2023 , eprint=

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Overestimation in

    Kocyigit, Muhammed Yusuf and Briakou, Eleftheria and Deutsch, Daniel and Luo, Jiaming and Cherry, Colin and Freitag, Markus , booktitle =. Overestimation in. 2025 , editor =

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , month = dec, year =

    NLP Evaluation in trouble: On the Need to Measure LLM Data Contamination for each Benchmark , author =. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 , month = dec, year =. doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.722 , pages =

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.722 2023

  4. [4]

    Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025 , month = nov, year =

    Both Text and Images Leaked! A Systematic Analysis of Data Contamination in Multimodal LLM , author =. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025 , month = nov, year =. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.556 , pages =

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.556 2025

  5. [5]

    Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , month = jul, year =

    AntiLeakBench: Preventing Data Contamination by Automatically Constructing Benchmarks with Updated Real-World Knowledge , author =. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , month = jul, year =

    work page

  6. [6]

    P a C o ST : Paired Confidence Significance Testing for Benchmark Contamination Detection in Large Language Models

    Zhang, Huixuan and Lin, Yun and Wan, Xiaojun. P a C o ST : Paired Confidence Significance Testing for Benchmark Contamination Detection in Large Language Models. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024. 2024. doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.97

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.97 2024

  7. [7]

    and Khashabi, Daniel and Hajishirzi, Hannaneh

    Wang, Yizhong and Kordi, Yeganeh and Mishra, Swaroop and Liu, Alisa and Smith, Noah A. and Khashabi, Daniel and Hajishirzi, Hannaneh. Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023. doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.754

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.754 2023

  8. [8]

    Can Xu and Qingfeng Sun and Kai Zheng and Xiubo Geng and Pu Zhao and Jiazhan Feng and Chongyang Tao and Qingwei Lin and Daxin Jiang , booktitle=. Wizard

    work page

  9. [9]

    Visual Instruction Tuning , volume =

    Liu, Haotian and Li, Chunyuan and Wu, Qingyang and Lee, Yong Jae , booktitle =. Visual Instruction Tuning , volume =

    work page

  10. [10]

    Zhen Guo and Adriana Meza Soria and Wei Sun and Yikang Shen and Rameswar Panda , booktitle=

    work page

  11. [11]

    2023 , note =

    Qiantong Xu and Fenglu Hong and Bo Li and Changran Hu and Zhengyu Chen and Jian Zhang , title =. 2023 , note =

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    2024 , note =

    Minghao Liu and Zonglin Di and Jiaheng Wei and Zhongruo Wang and Hengxiang Zhang and Ruixuan Xiao and Haoyu Wang and Jinlong Pang and Hao Chen and Ankit Shah and Hongxin Wei and Xinlei He and Zhaowei Zhao and Haobo Wang and Lei Feng and Jindong Wang and James Davis and Yang Liu , title =. 2024 , note =

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Enhanced Data Synthesis for

    Bu, Tianpeng and Zhang, Minying and Duan, Hongtao and Li, Shurui and Hu, Lulu and Li, Yu , booktitle =. Enhanced Data Synthesis for. 2025 , address =. doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.821 , pages =

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.821 2025

  14. [14]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London , volume =

    Notes on Regression and Inheritance in the Case of Two Parents , author =. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London , volume =

    work page

  15. [15]

    The American Journal of Psychology , volume =

    The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things , author =. The American Journal of Psychology , volume =

    work page

  16. [16]

    The 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , year=

    Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answering , author=. The 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , year=

    work page

  17. [17]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =

    Li, Bohao and Ge, Yuying and Ge, Yixiao and Wang, Guangzhi and Wang, Rui and Zhang, Ruimao and Shan, Ying , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , month =. 2024 , pages =

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    European conference on computer vision , pages=

    Mmbench: Is your multi-modal model an all-around player? , author=. European conference on computer vision , pages=. 2024 , organization=

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models

    MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.13394 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Both Text and Images Leaked! A Systematic Analysis of Data Contamination in Multimodal

    Dingjie Song and Sicheng Lai and Mingxuan Wang and Shunian Chen and Lichao Sun and Benyou Wang , booktitle=. Both Text and Images Leaked! A Systematic Analysis of Data Contamination in Multimodal. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  21. [21]

    ArXiv , year=

    LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models , author=. ArXiv , year=

    work page

  22. [22]

    The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models? , author=. The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    work page

  23. [23]

    2025 , eprint=

    Native Visual Understanding: Resolving Resolution Dilemmas in Vision-Language Models , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    2025 , url=

    Mohan Jiang and Jin Gao and Jiahao Zhan and Dequan Wang , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    LiveXiv - A Multi-Modal live benchmark based on Arxiv papers content , author=. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    work page

  26. [26]

    The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code , author=. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    work page

  27. [27]

    LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited

    Colin White and Samuel Dooley and Manley Roberts and Arka Pal and Benjamin Feuer and Siddhartha Jain and Ravid Shwartz-Ziv and Neel Jain and Khalid Saifullah and Sreemanti Dey and Shubh-Agrawal and Sandeep Singh Sandha and Siddartha Venkat Naidu and Chinmay Hegde and Yann LeCun and Tom Goldstein and Willie Neiswanger and Micah Goldblum , booktitle=. LiveB...

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    Dynamic Multimodal Evaluation with Flexible Complexity by Vision-Language Bootstrapping , author=. The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    work page

  29. [29]

    2026 , eprint=

    KBE-DME: Dynamic Multimodal Evaluation via Knowledge Enhanced Benchmark Evolution , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    work page 2026

  30. [30]

    2026 , eprint=

    SDEval: Safety Dynamic Evaluation for Multimodal Large Language Models , author=. 2026 , eprint=

    work page 2026

  31. [31]

    Dysca: A Dynamic and Scalable Benchmark for Evaluating Perception Ability of

    Jie Zhang and Zhongqi Wang and Mengqi Lei and Zheng Yuan and Bei Yan and Shiguang Shan and Xilin Chen , booktitle=. Dysca: A Dynamic and Scalable Benchmark for Evaluating Perception Ability of. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Spot the Fake: Large Multimodal Model-Based Synthetic Image Detection with Artifact Explanation , author=. The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    work page

  33. [33]

    2025 , howpublished =

    Introducing GPT-5 , author =. 2025 , howpublished =

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    2025 , eprint=

    Gemma 3 Technical Report , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    2024 , eprint=

    DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understanding , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Instruct

    Wenliang Dai and Junnan Li and Dongxu Li and Anthony Tiong and Junqi Zhao and Weisheng Wang and Boyang Li and Pascale Fung and Steven Hoi , booktitle=. Instruct. 2023 , url=

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    mPLUG-OwI2: Revolutionizing Multi-modal Large Language Model with Modality Collaboration , year=

    Ye, Qinghao and Xu, Haiyang and Ye, Jiabo and Yan, Ming and Hu, Anwen and Liu, Haowei and Qian, Qi and Zhang, Ji and Huang, Fei , booktitle=. mPLUG-OwI2: Revolutionizing Multi-modal Large Language Model with Modality Collaboration , year=

    work page

  38. [38]

    2025 , eprint=

    Qwen3 Technical Report , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    2025 , eprint=

    Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    2024 , eprint=

    MTVQA: Benchmarking Multilingual Text-Centric Visual Question Answering , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    2025 , url=

    Shiyue Zhang and David Wan and Arie Cattan and Ayal Klein and Ido Dagan and Mohit Bansal , booktitle=. 2025 , url=

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , month =

    Chen, Chongyan and Tseng, Yu-Yun and Li, Zhuoheng and Venkatesh, Anush and Gurari, Danna , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , month =. 2025 , pages =

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    BetterBench: Assessing

    Anka Reuel and Amelia Hardy and Chandler Smith and Max Lamparth and Malcolm Hardy and Mykel Kochenderfer , booktitle=. BetterBench: Assessing. 2024 , url=

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track , year=

    BenchmarkCards: Standardized Documentation for Large Language Model Benchmarks , author=. The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track , year=

    work page

  45. [45]

    OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledge , year=

    Marino, Kenneth and Rastegari, Mohammad and Farhadi, Ali and Mottaghi, Roozbeh , booktitle=. OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledge , year=

    work page

  46. [46]

    and Manning, Christopher D

    Hudson, Drew A. and Manning, Christopher D. , booktitle=. GQA: A New Dataset for Real-World Visual Reasoning and Compositional Question Answering , year=

    work page

  47. [47]

    2025 , url=

    Ling Fu and Zhebin Kuang and Jiajun Song and Mingxin Huang and Biao Yang and Yuzhe Li and Linghao Zhu and Qidi Luo and Xinyu Wang and Hao Lu and Zhang Li and Guozhi Tang and Bin Shan and Chunhui Lin and Qi Liu and Binghong Wu and Hao Feng and Hao Liu and Can Huang and Jingqun Tang and Wei Chen and Lianwen Jin and Yuliang Liu and Xiang Bai , booktitle=. 20...

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    The Fourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    VisionReasoner: Unified Reasoning-Integrated Visual Perception via Reinforcement Learning , author=. The Fourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

    work page

  49. [49]

    The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Depth Anything V2 , author=. The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    work page

  50. [50]

    NeurIPS , year =

    Liu, Haotian and Li, Chunyuan and Wu, Qingyang and Lee, Yong Jae , title =. NeurIPS , year =

    work page

  51. [51]

    2024 , eprint=

    General OCR Theory: Towards OCR-2.0 via a Unified End-to-end Model , author=. 2024 , eprint=

    work page 2024