Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.06624 v2 pith:JDUQSVIZ submitted 2021-03-11 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CRstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CRstat.ML
keywords crownverificationbetaincompleteboundefficientpropagationverifiers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Bound propagation based incomplete neural network verifiers such as CROWN are very efficient and can significantly accelerate branch-and-bound (BaB) based complete verification of neural networks. However, bound propagation cannot fully handle the neuron split constraints introduced by BaB commonly handled by expensive linear programming (LP) solvers, leading to loose bounds and hurting verification efficiency. In this work, we develop $\beta$-CROWN, a new bound propagation based method that can fully encode neuron splits via optimizable parameters $\beta$ constructed from either primal or dual space. When jointly optimized in intermediate layers, $\beta$-CROWN generally produces better bounds than typical LP verifiers with neuron split constraints, while being as efficient and parallelizable as CROWN on GPUs. Applied to complete robustness verification benchmarks, $\beta$-CROWN with BaB is up to three orders of magnitude faster than LP-based BaB methods, and is notably faster than all existing approaches while producing lower timeout rates. By terminating BaB early, our method can also be used for efficient incomplete verification. We consistently achieve higher verified accuracy in many settings compared to powerful incomplete verifiers, including those based on convex barrier breaking techniques. Compared to the typically tightest but very costly semidefinite programming (SDP) based incomplete verifiers, we obtain higher verified accuracy with three orders of magnitudes less verification time. Our algorithm empowered the $\alpha,\!\beta$-CROWN (alpha-beta-CROWN) verifier, the winning tool in VNN-COMP 2021. Our code is available at http://PaperCode.cc/BetaCROWN

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 13 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Lipschitz-Based Robustness Certification Under Floating-Point Execution

    cs.LG 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10 partial

    Lipschitz-based robustness certificates that assume real arithmetic can be unsound under floating-point execution; a formal FP-aware theory and certifier close that gap for dense ReLU networks.

  2. IoUCert: Robustness Verification for Anchor-based Object Detectors

    cs.LG 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    IoUCert derives exact IoU bounds over anchor-offset boxes via a coordinate transformation and uses them to formally verify single-object SSD, YOLOv2, and YOLOv3 models under brightness, contrast, and motion-blur pertu...

  3. Glitches in Decision Tree Ensemble Models

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    Introduces glitches as monotonic-oscillation anomalies in decision models and shows that detecting them in tree ensembles is NP-complete.

  4. Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Superposition

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper argues that adversarial examples arise from superposition, and shows that changing superposition changes robustness and vice versa in toy models and ResNet18.

  5. Efficient Certified Reasoning for Binarized Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A native BNN-aware solver and proof-checking pipeline certifies 99% of qualitative and 86% of quantitative robustness queries, with 9x and 218x speedups over prior certified baselines.

Pith tools