Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Formalising the intentional stance 2: a coinductive approach

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.09173 v1 pith:JGBYNM4R submitted 2025-01-09 math.OC cs.SYeess.SYmath.PR

classification math.OCcs.SYeess.SYmath.PR
keywords optimalpolicygoalteleo-environmenttransducerbehavesbehaviourbounded-rational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Given a stochastic process with inputs and outputs, how might its behaviour be related to pursuit of a goal? We model this using 'transducers', objects that capture only the external behaviour of a system and not its internal state. A companion paper summarises our results for cognitive scientists; the current paper gives formal definitions and proofs. To formalise the concept of a system that behaves as if it were pursuing a goal, we consider what happens when a transducer (a 'policy') is coupled to another transducer that comes equipped with a success condition (a 'teleo-environment'). An optimal policy is identified with a transducer that behaves as if it were perfectly rational in the pursuit of a goal; our framework also allows us to model constrained rationality. Optimal policies obey a version of Bellman's principle: a policy that's optimal in one time step will again be optimal in the next time step, but with respect to a different teleo-environment (obtained from the original one by a modified version of Bayesian filtering). This property sometimes also applies to the bounded-rational case; we give a sufficient condition. A policy is deterministic if and only if there exists a teleo-environment for which it is uniquely optimal among the set of all policies; we relate this to classical representation theorems from decision theory. This result need not hold in the bounded-rational case; we give an example related to the absent-minded driver problem. The formalism is defined using coinduction, following the style proposed by Czajka.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards chemistries in dynamical systems

    cs.DM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A finite dynamical system can be described as a Petri-net chemistry when a token map and transition map are compatible; an optional uniqueness criterion restricts when this description is least ambiguous.

  2. A "good regulator theorem" for embodied agents

    cs.AI 2025-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Every good regulator is equivalent, by construction, to an agent that an observer can interpret as holding a consistent possibilistic belief model of its environment.

Pith tools