REVIEW 2 cited by
What's the Magic Word? A Control Theory of LLM Prompting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Prompt engineering is crucial for deploying LLMs but is poorly understood mathematically. We formalize LLM systems as a class of discrete stochastic dynamical systems to explore prompt engineering through the lens of control theory. We offer a mathematical analysis of the limitations on the controllability of self-attention as a function of the singular values of the parameter matrices. We present complementary empirical results on the controllability of a panel of LLMs, including Falcon-7b, Llama-7b, and Falcon-40b. Given initial state $\mathbf x_0$ from Wikitext and prompts of length $k \leq 10$ tokens, we find that the "correct" next token is reachable at least 97% of the time, and that the top 75 most likely next tokens are reachable at least 85% of the time. Intriguingly, short prompt sequences can dramatically alter the likelihood of specific outputs, even making the least likely tokens become the most likely ones. This control-theoretic analysis of LLMs demonstrates the significant and poorly understood role of input sequences in steering output probabilities, offering a foundational perspective for enhancing language model system capabilities.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Steering Robustness into World Action Models via Mechanistic Interpretability and Optimal Control
Contrastive activation directions and a reduced-order LQR (WA-LQR) steer world-action models to recover robustness under camera, gripper, and noise shifts whenever the models' activations are linearly separable for th...
-
Benchmarking Prompt Sensitivity in Large Language Models
PromptSET is a benchmark of 11,469 questions with nine LLM-generated rephrasings each, and current classifiers and self-evaluation methods predict prompt answerability poorly, especially on multi-hop questions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.