Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

DistRL: An Asynchronous Distributed Reinforcement Learning Framework for On-Device Control Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14803 v5 pith:JWKLYADB submitted 2024-10-18 cs.LG cs.AIcs.DCcs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.DCcs.SYeess.SY
keywords trainingdistrlcontrolagentsdataefficiencyfine-tuningframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

On-device control agents, especially on mobile devices, are responsible for operating mobile devices to fulfill users' requests, enabling seamless and intuitive interactions. Integrating Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) into these agents enhances their ability to understand and execute complex commands, thereby improving user experience. However, fine-tuning MLLMs for on-device control presents significant challenges due to limited data availability and inefficient online training processes. This paper introduces DistRL, a novel framework designed to enhance the efficiency of online RL fine-tuning for mobile device control agents. DistRL employs centralized training and decentralized data acquisition to ensure efficient fine-tuning in the context of dynamic online interactions. Additionally, the framework is backed by our tailor-made RL algorithm, which effectively balances exploration with the prioritized utilization of collected data to ensure stable and robust training. Our experiments show that, on average, DistRL delivers a 3X improvement in training efficiency and enables training data collection 2.4X faster than the leading synchronous multi-machine methods. Notably, after training, DistRL achieves a 20% relative improvement in success rate compared to state-of-the-art methods on general Android tasks from an open benchmark, significantly outperforming existing approaches while maintaining the same training time. These results validate DistRL as a scalable and efficient solution, offering substantial improvements in both training efficiency and agent performance for real-world, in-the-wild device control tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CLEANER: Self-Purified Trajectories Boost Agentic Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Replacing execution-error segments in RL trajectories with the model's own successful self-corrections improves accuracy on math and code benchmarks while cutting training steps by roughly two-thirds.

  2. Thinking vs. Doing: Agents that Reason by Scaling Test-Time Interaction

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Scaling the number of interaction steps, trained via a curriculum over rollout horizon, improves web-agent task success and outperforms scaling per-step reasoning under fixed token budgets.

  3. Self-Challenging Language Model Agents

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A language model agent can generate its own verifiable training tasks and improve its tool-use success rate by about 2x without human-annotated data.

  4. ProgRM: Build Better GUI Agents with Progress Rewards

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ProgRM, a per-step progress reward model trained with LCS-based self-annotated labels, improves RL-trained GUI agent success rates on WikiHow relative to outcome reward models.

  5. Atomic-to-Compositional Generalization for Mobile Agents with A New Benchmark and Scheduling System

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AI phone agents succeed on single-step commands but fail on multi-step compositions; a new benchmark measures this gap and a scheduler that decomposes tasks recovers most of it.

Pith tools