pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.00845 · v1 · pith:K55N4UA6new · submitted 2026-07-01 · 🌀 gr-qc

Environmental effects vs. modified gravity in the LISA massive black hole binary population

Lorenzo Copparoni , Enrico Barausse This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 09:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords LISAmassive black hole binariesenvironmental effectsmodified gravitygravitational waveshierarchical inferencepost-Newtonian
0
0 comments X

The pith

Environmental effects are unlikely to bias LISA tests of general relativity with massive black hole binaries.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper checks whether gas accretion and viscous migration around massive black hole binaries could produce LISA signals that imitate a time-varying gravitational constant. These three processes all shift the waveform phase at the same negative post-Newtonian order and share a single leading deformation parameter, so they are indistinguishable from one another in any individual event. The authors generate large synthetic catalogs from astrophysical population models, then apply Fisher-matrix forecasts followed by hierarchical nested-sampling inference across the whole population. Even when they adopt the most extreme assumptions—an active-environment fraction of 50 percent plus a tail of super-Eddington accretion—the combined posteriors stay consistent with pure vacuum general relativity. This indicates that realistic environmental contamination will not spoil LISA’s ability to test gravity with these sources.

Core claim

All three effects—accretion, viscous migration in a circumbinary disk, and a time-varying Newton constant—enter the waveform at the same negative post-Newtonian order and are described at leading order by a common phase-deformation parameter. Hierarchical nested-sampling analysis of synthetic catalogs drawn from astrophysically motivated population models shows that the population-level posteriors remain fully compatible with the vacuum case, even under extreme assumptions of a 50 percent active fraction and a super-Eddington accretion tail.

What carries the argument

The single common phase-deformation parameter that encodes the leading waveform effect of both environmental processes and modified gravity, together with hierarchical Bayesian population analysis that breaks the single-event degeneracy.

If this is right

  • A hierarchical population-wide analysis can return a non-trivial upper limit on the fraction of binaries experiencing active environmental effects.
  • The same analysis can produce a mild lower bound on the slope of the Eddington-ratio distribution.
  • Single-event degeneracies between environment and modified gravity do not propagate to the population level under the modeled conditions.
  • LISA tests of general relativity with massive black hole binaries remain robust against environmental contamination in astrophysically realistic scenarios.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same hierarchical separation technique could be tested on other waveform degeneracies expected in future gravitational-wave catalogs.
  • A detected population-level signal would favor modified gravity over the modeled environmental channels once the active fraction is marginalized.
  • Extending the models to include additional environmental processes such as dynamical friction would provide a direct test of how sensitive the vacuum-compatible conclusion is to channel choice.

Load-bearing premise

That accretion, viscous migration, and a time-varying Newton constant all produce their leading effects through the same single phase-deformation parameter, so that population-level statistics can separate them from the vacuum case.

What would settle it

A statistically significant population-wide deviation from the vacuum waveform model in actual LISA data that persists after the hierarchical analysis has marginalized over the active fraction and Eddington-ratio distribution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.00845 by Enrico Barausse, Lorenzo Copparoni.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Sky-averaged 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Number and fraction of events detectable in 10 yr of LISA observation whose Fisher-predicted single-event uncertainty [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Population-level statistical error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Population-level posteriors on the hyperparameters ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Population-level posteriors on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Gravitational-wave signals from massive black hole binaries observed by LISA can carry imprints of both the astrophysical environment of the source and possible deviations from general relativity. We investigate whether environmental effects leave a detectable imprint on the LISA binary population, and whether they can mimic modified-gravity effects with the same frequency dependence. As representative channels we adopt accretion and viscous migration in a circumbinary disk for the environmental sector, and a time-varying Newton constant $\dot G$ for the modified-gravity sector. All three effects enter the waveform at the same negative post-Newtonian order and are described, at leading order, by a common phase-deformation parameter, which makes them formally degenerate at the single-event level. Combining Fisher-matrix forecasts with a hierarchical nested-sampling analysis of synthetic catalogs from astrophysically motivated population models, we find that, even under extreme astrophysical assumptions -- an active fraction of $50\%$, together with a super-Eddington accretion tail -- the population-level posteriors remain fully compatible with vacuum. However, a hierarchical population-wide analysis may yield a non-trivial upper limit on the active fraction and a mild lower bound on the slope of the Eddington-ratio distribution. Environmental effects are therefore unlikely to bias LISA's tests of general relativity with massive black hole binaries in astrophysically realistic scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that environmental effects (accretion and viscous migration in circumbinary disks) and a modified-gravity effect (time-varying Newton constant) in LISA massive black hole binaries enter the waveform at the same negative post-Newtonian order and are captured by a single common phase-deformation parameter, rendering them degenerate at the single-event level. Using Fisher-matrix forecasts to construct individual-event likelihoods followed by hierarchical nested-sampling inference on synthetic catalogs drawn from astrophysically motivated population models, the authors find that even under extreme assumptions (50% active fraction with super-Eddington tail) the population-level posteriors remain compatible with vacuum general relativity. They additionally report that the hierarchical analysis can place a non-trivial upper limit on the active fraction and a mild lower bound on the Eddington-ratio slope, concluding that environmental effects are unlikely to bias LISA tests of GR.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work is significant because it supplies a quantitative population-level argument that a key class of potential systematics will not contaminate LISA's tests of general relativity with massive black hole binaries. The explicit combination of Fisher-matrix waveform forecasts with hierarchical nested sampling on synthetic catalogs generated from external astrophysical population models is a methodological strength that enables separation of formally degenerate effects; this framework and the reported upper limits on the two population hyperparameters constitute concrete, falsifiable outputs.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and the modeling framework described therein): the central claim that population-level hierarchical analysis can separate environmental effects from modified gravity rests on the assumption that accretion, viscous migration, and ˙G are all captured by the identical leading-order phase-deformation parameter at the same negative PN order. The manuscript tests only this leading-order common-parameter case and does not quantify the sensitivity of the 'compatible with vacuum' posteriors when sub-leading terms introduce additional frequency dependence, amplitude corrections, or explicit scalings with mass ratio or disk viscosity. Because the single-event degeneracy is constructed by this modeling choice, relaxing it directly affects whether the hierarchical separation remains valid.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to 'two population hyperparameters' without naming them; the main text should state explicitly which parameters (active fraction and Eddington-ratio slope) are varied and how their priors are chosen.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review and for highlighting an important modeling assumption. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and the modeling framework described therein): the central claim that population-level hierarchical analysis can separate environmental effects from modified gravity rests on the assumption that accretion, viscous migration, and ˙G are all captured by the identical leading-order phase-deformation parameter at the same negative PN order. The manuscript tests only this leading-order common-parameter case and does not quantify the sensitivity of the 'compatible with vacuum' posteriors when sub-leading terms introduce additional frequency dependence, amplitude corrections, or explicit scalings with mass ratio or disk viscosity. Because the single-event degeneracy is constructed by this modeling choice, relaxing it directly affects whether the hierarchical separation remains valid.

    Authors: We agree that the analysis is performed at leading order in the common phase-deformation parameter, which is the order at which the three effects (accretion, viscous migration, and ˙G) produce identical frequency dependence and are therefore formally degenerate at the single-event level. This choice is deliberate: it isolates the strongest potential source of confusion between environmental and modified-gravity signals. Sub-leading corrections would generally carry distinct frequency scalings, mass-ratio dependence, or amplitude effects that could, in principle, break the degeneracy already at the individual-event stage and thereby strengthen (rather than weaken) the population-level separation. Because the leading term dominates the accumulated phase over the LISA band for the relevant binaries, we expect the reported population posteriors to remain qualitatively robust. Nevertheless, a quantitative assessment of sub-leading contributions would require extended waveform models that lie outside the present scope. We will add a concise paragraph in the discussion section acknowledging this limitation and stating that the current results apply strictly to the leading-order degeneracy case. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: central result follows from external population models and standard inference without reduction to inputs by construction

full rationale

The paper generates synthetic catalogs from independent astrophysical population models, applies Fisher-matrix forecasts for individual-event likelihoods, and performs hierarchical nested-sampling inference. The shared leading-order phase-deformation parameter is an explicit modeling assumption for the three effects at negative PN order, not a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work are invoked to force the compatibility-with-vacuum conclusion. The reported upper limits on active fraction and Eddington-ratio slope are outputs of the hierarchical analysis rather than reparameterizations of the input catalogs. This satisfies the criteria for a self-contained derivation against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard waveform modeling in general relativity, LISA noise curves, and astrophysical population synthesis assumptions. Free parameters include the active fraction (varied up to 50%) and parameters of the Eddington-ratio distribution. No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • active fraction
    Varied up to 50% as an extreme assumption in the population models; directly affects the strength of environmental effects in the synthetic catalogs.
  • Eddington-ratio distribution slope
    Mild lower bound reported; this parameter controls the tail of super-Eddington accretion in the models.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption All three effects (accretion, viscous migration, time-varying G) enter at the same negative post-Newtonian order and share a common phase-deformation parameter
    Stated in the abstract as the source of single-event degeneracy.
  • domain assumption Synthetic catalogs drawn from astrophysically motivated population models accurately represent the true LISA-detectable massive black hole binary population
    Central to the hierarchical analysis; invoked when generating the data used for Fisher and nested-sampling forecasts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5766 in / 1609 out tokens · 32641 ms · 2026-07-02T09:00:14.080965+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 44 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Making Sense of the Un- expected in the Gravitational-Wave Sky

    The discarded events contribute the same multiplica- tive factor to the evidence of bothH V andH E within our priors, and therefore drop out of the Bayes factor. After this cut, no catalog retains usable events in the pure-accretion case, so we drop that comparison; for the viscous-migration injections most catalogs are left with fewer than 10 events over...

    2024

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), 1602.03837

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), 2111.03606

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), arXiv e-prints (2025), 2508.18082

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    The population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3

    R. Abbott et al. (KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 011048 (2023), 2111.03634

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett.818, L22 (2016), 1602.03846

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett.900, L13 (2020), 2009.01190

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021), 2010.14529

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

    R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Phys. Rev. D112, 084080 (2025), 2112.06861

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), arXiv e-prints (2026), 2603.19019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), arXiv e-prints (2026), 2603.19020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    A. G. Abac et al. (LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), arXiv e-prints (2026), 2603.19021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    M. Colpi et al.,LISA Definition Study Report(2024), URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07571v1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Amaro-Seoane et al., Living Reviews in Relativity 26, 2 (2023), ISSN 1433-8351, URLhttps://link

    P. Amaro-Seoane et al., Living Reviews in Relativity 26, 2 (2023), ISSN 1433-8351, URLhttps://link. springer.com/10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y 2023

  15. [15]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. I: Supermassive black hole binaries

    A. Klein, E. Barausse, A. Sesana, A. Petiteau, E. Berti, S. Babak, J. Gair, S. Aoudia, I. Hinder, F. Ohme, et al., Physical Review D93, 024003 (2016), ISSN 2470- 0010, 2470-0029, arXiv:1511.05581 [astro-ph, physics:gr- qc], URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05581

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    The imprint of massive black hole formation models on the LISA data stream

    A. Sesana, M. Volonteri, and F. Haardt, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.377, 1711 (2007), astro-ph/0701556

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  17. [17]

    The evolution of massive black holes and their spins in their galactic hosts

    E. Barausse, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.423, 2533 (2012), 1201.5888

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  18. [18]

    Post-Newtonian Evolution of Massive Black Hole Triplets in Galactic Nuclei: IV. Implications for LISA

    M. Bonetti, A. Sesana, F. Haardt, E. Barausse, and M. Colpi, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486, 4044 (2019), 1812.01011

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    Barausse, I

    E. Barausse, I. Dvorkin, M. Tremmel, M. Volonteri, and M. Bonetti, Astrophys. J.904, 16 (2020), 2006.03065

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sop- uerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Pe- titeau, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017), 1703.09722

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    C. P. L. Berry, S. A. Hughes, C. F. Sopuerta, A. J. K. Chua, A. Heffernan, K. Holley-Bockelmann, D. P. Mi- haylov, M. C. Miller, and A. Sesana, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 42 (2019), 1903.03686

    work page arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    The promise of multi-band gravitational wave astronomy

    A. Sesana, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 231102 (2016), 1602.06951

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Sberna et al., Phys

    L. Sberna et al., Phys. Rev. D106, 064056 (2022), 2205.08550

    work page arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    R. Chen, R. S. Chandramouli, F. Pozzoli, R. Buscic- chio, and E. Barausse, Phys. Rev. D112, 084053 (2025), 2507.00694

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazie et al. (NANOGrav), Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023), 2306.16213

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

    J. Antoniadis et al. (EPTA, InPTA:), Astron. Astrophys. 678, A50 (2023), 2306.16214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Tarafdar et al., Publ

    P. Tarafdar et al., Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.39, e053 (2022), 2206.09289

    work page arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    D. J. Reardon et al., Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L6 (2023), 2306.16215. 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    H. Xu et al., Res. Astron. Astrophys.23, 075024 (2023), 2306.16216

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    The influence of the hydrodynamic drag from an accretion torus on extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    E. Barausse and L. Rezzolla, Phys. Rev. D77, 104027 (2008), 0711.4558

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  31. [31]

    Can environmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?

    E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Physical Re- view D89, 104059 (2014), ISSN 1550-7998, 1550-2368, arXiv:1404.7149 [astro-ph, physics:gr-qc], URLhttp:// arxiv.org/abs/1404.7149

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  32. [32]

    Caputo, L

    A. Caputo, L. Sberna, A. Toubiana, S. Babak, E. Ba- rausse, S. Marsat, and P. Pani, The Astrophysical Jour- nal892, 90 (2020), ISSN 1538-4357, arXiv:2001.03620 [astro-ph, physics:gr-qc], URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/ 2001.03620

    work page arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    Toubiana et al., Phys

    A. Toubiana et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 101105 (2021), 2010.06056

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Observable Signatures of EMRI Black Hole Binaries Embedded in Thin Accretion Disks

    B. Kocsis, N. Yunes, and A. Loeb, Phys. Rev. D84, 024032 (2011), 1104.2322

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [35]

    Imprint of Accretion Disk-Induced Migration on Gravitational Waves from Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals

    N. Yunes, B. Kocsis, A. Loeb, and Z. Haiman, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 171103 (2011), 1103.4609

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  36. [36]

    Speri, A

    L. Speri, A. Antonelli, L. Sberna, S. Babak, E. Barausse, J. R. Gair, and M. L. Katz, Phys. Rev. X13, 021035 (2023), 2207.10086

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Copparoni, E

    L. Copparoni, E. Barausse, L. Speri, L. Sberna, and A. Derdzinski, Phys. Rev. D111, 104079 (2025), 2502.10087

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Post-Newtonian evolution of massive black hole triplets in galactic nuclei -- III. A robust lower limit to the nHz stochastic background of gravitational waves

    M. Bonetti, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, and F. Haardt, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.477, 2599 (2018), 1709.06095

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  39. [39]

    M. Garg, A. Derdzinski, L. Zwick, P. R. Capelo, and L. Mayer, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society517, 1339 (2022), ISSN 0035-8711, 1365-2966, arXiv:2206.05292 [astro-ph, physics:gr-qc], URLhttp:// arxiv.org/abs/2206.05292

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Zwick, arXiv e-prints (2026), 2601.06684

    L. Zwick, arXiv e-prints (2026), 2601.06684

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Constraining the evolutionary history of Newton's constant with gravitational wave observations

    N. Yunes, F. Pretorius, and D. Spergel, Phys. Rev. D81, 064018 (2010), 0912.2724

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  42. [42]

    Tahura and K

    S. Tahura and K. Yagi, Physical Review D98, 084042 (2018), ISSN 2470-0010, 2470-0029, arXiv:1809.00259 [gr-qc], URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00259

    work page arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    Theory-Agnostic Constraints on Black-Hole Dipole Radiation with Multi-Band Gravitational-Wave Astrophysics

    E. Barausse, N. Yunes, and K. Chamberlain, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 241104 (2016), 1603.04075

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Bambi, M

    C. Bambi, M. Giannotti, and F. L. Villante, Phys- ical Review D71, 123524 (2005), ISSN 1550-7998, 1550-2368, URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.71.123524

    2005

  45. [45]

    Theoretical Physics Implications of the Binary Black-Hole Mergers GW150914 and GW151226

    N. Yunes, K. Yagi, and F. Pretorius, Physical Re- view D94, 084002 (2016), ISSN 2470-0010, 2470-0029, arXiv:1603.08955 [gr-qc], URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/ 1603.08955

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    Kejriwal, E

    S. Kejriwal, E. Barausse, and A. J. K. Chua, Phys. Rev. D113, 064001 (2026), 2510.17398

    work page arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Toubiana, K

    A. Toubiana, K. W. K. Wong, S. Babak, E. Barausse, E. Berti, J. R. Gair, S. Marsat, and S. R. Taylor, Phys. Rev. D104, 083027 (2021), 2106.13819

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Barausse, K

    E. Barausse, K. Dey, M. Crisostomi, A. Panayada, S. Marsat, and S. Basak, Physical Review D108, 103034 (2023), ISSN 2470-0010, 2470-0029, arXiv:2307.12245 [astro-ph], URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12245

    work page arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework

    N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. D80, 122003 (2009), 0909.3328

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    Varying constants, Gravitation and Cosmology

    J.-P. Uzan, Living Rev. Rel.14, 2 (2011), 1009.5514

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  51. [51]

    Damour and K

    T. Damour and K. Nordtvedt, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2217 (1993)

    1993

  52. [52]

    Damour and K

    T. Damour and K. Nordtvedt, Phys. Rev. D48, 3436 (1993)

    1993

  53. [53]

    The Effect of Cosmological Evolution on Solar System Constraints and on the Scalarization of Neutron Stars in Massless Scalar-Tensor Theories

    D. Anderson, N. Yunes, and E. Barausse, Phys. Rev. D 94, 104064 (2016), 1607.08888

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    T. M. Heckman and P. Best, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astro- phys.52, 589 (2014), 1403.4620

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  55. [55]

    Self-Consistent Models of the AGN and Black Hole Populations: Duty Cycles, Accretion Rates, and the Mean Radiative Efficiency

    F. Shankar, D. H. Weinberg, and J. Miralda-Escude, As- trophys. J.690, 20 (2009), 0710.4488

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  56. [56]

    J. C. Mihos and L. Hernquist, Astrophys. J.464, 641 (1996), astro-ph/9512099

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  57. [57]

    J. E. Barnes and L. Hernquist, Astrophys. J.471, 115 (1996)

    1996

  58. [58]

    P. F. Hopkins and E. Quataert, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.407, 1529 (2010), 0912.3257

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  59. [59]

    Rapid Formation of Supermassive Black Hole Binaries in Galaxy Mergers with Gas

    L. Mayer, S. Kazantzidis, P. Madau, M. Colpi, T. R. Quinn, and J. Wadsley, Science316, 1874 (2007), 0706.1562

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  60. [60]

    E. E. Salpeter, Astrophys. J.140, 796 (1964)

    1964

  61. [61]

    M. Garg, A. Derdzinski, S. Tiwari, J. Gair, and L. Mayer, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.532, 4060 (2024), 2402.14058

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    A. J. Dittmann and G. Ryan, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society513, 6158 (2022), ISSN 0035-8711, https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/513/4/6158/43913351/stac935.pdf, URL https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac935

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac935 2022

  63. [63]

    Linking the spin evolution of massive black holes to galaxy kinematics

    A. Sesana, E. Barausse, M. Dotti, and E. M. Rossi, As- trophys. J.794, 104 (2014), 1402.7088

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    Co-evolution of nuclear star clusters, massive black holes and their host galaxies

    F. Antonini, E. Barausse, and J. Silk, Astrophys. J.812, 72 (2015), 1506.02050

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    Barausse,Black holes across cosmic history(2023), URLhttps://people.sissa.it/ ~barausse/catalogs/ models_LISA_after_PTAs

    E. Barausse,Black holes across cosmic history(2023), URLhttps://people.sissa.it/ ~barausse/catalogs/ models_LISA_after_PTAs

    2023

  66. [66]

    The evolution of massive black hole seeds

    M. Volonteri, G. Lodato, and P. Natarajan, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.383, 1079 (2008), 0709.0529

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  67. [67]

    Massive Black Holes as Population III Remnants

    P. Madau and M. J. Rees, Astrophys. J. Lett.551, L27 (2001), astro-ph/0101223

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  68. [68]

    Blossoms from black hole seeds: properties and early growth regulated by supernova feedback

    M. Habouzit, M. Volonteri, and Y. Dubois, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.468, 3935 (2017), 1605.09394

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    Cutler and M

    C. Cutler and M. Vallisneri, Phys. Rev. D76, 104018 (2007), URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.76.104018

    2007

  70. [70]

    P. C. Duffell, D. D’Orazio, A. Derdzinski, Z. Haiman, A. MacFadyen, A. L. Rosen, and J. Zrake, Astrophys. J.901, 25 (2020), URLhttps://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/abab95

    2020

  71. [71]

    M. L. Jones, R. C. Hickox, C. S. Black, K. N. Hainline, M. A. DiPompeo, and A. D. Goulding, The Astrophysi- cal Journal826, 12 (2016), URLhttps://doi.org/10. 3847/0004-637X/826/1/12

    2016

  72. [72]

    Thrane and C

    E. Thrane and C. Talbot, Publications of the Astronom- ical Society of Australia36, e010 (2019)

    2019

  73. [73]

    Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases

    I. Mandel, W. M. Farr, and J. R. Gair, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486, 1086 (2019), 1809.02063

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Fishbach, D

    M. Fishbach, D. E. Holz, and W. M. Farr, The Astro- physical Journal Letters863, L41 (2018), URLhttps: //doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aad800

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad800 2018

  75. [75]

    Sadiq, K

    J. Sadiq, K. Dey, T. Dent, and E. Barausse, Phys. Rev. D111, 063051 (2025), 2410.17056

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Skilling, Bayesian Analysis1, 833 (2006)

    J. Skilling, Bayesian Analysis1, 833 (2006)

    2006

  77. [77]

    J. S. Speagle, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.493, 3132 (2020), 1904.02180

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Tak´ atsy, L

    J. Tak´ atsy, L. Zwick, K. Hendriks, P. Saini, G. Fabj, and J. Samsing, Class. Quant. Grav.42, 215006 (2025), 2505.09513

    work page arXiv 2025

  79. [79]

    Zwick, K

    L. Zwick, K. Hendriks, P. Saini, J. Tak´ atsy, C. Rowan, 12 J. Samsing, and J. Stegmann, arXiv e-prints (2025), 2511.04540

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    C. R. Harris, K. J. Millman, S. J. van der Walt, R. Gom- mers, P. Virtanen, D. Cournapeau, E. Wieser, J. Taylor, S. Berg, N. J. Smith, et al., Nature585, 357 (2020), ISSN 1476-4687

    2020

Showing first 80 references.