Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Can Large Language Models Trade? Testing Financial Theories with LLM Agents in Market Simulations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.10789 v1 pith:KDZDWLBM submitted 2025-04-15 q-fin.CP econ.GNq-fin.ECq-fin.GNq-fin.TR

classification q-fin.CPecon.GNq-fin.ECq-fin.GNq-fin.TR
keywords marketagentsfinancialframeworklanguagellmsfunctionlarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a realistic simulated stock market where large language models (LLMs) act as heterogeneous competing trading agents. The open-source framework incorporates a persistent order book with market and limit orders, partial fills, dividends, and equilibrium clearing alongside agents with varied strategies, information sets, and endowments. Agents submit standardized decisions using structured outputs and function calls while expressing their reasoning in natural language. Three findings emerge: First, LLMs demonstrate consistent strategy adherence and can function as value investors, momentum traders, or market makers per their instructions. Second, market dynamics exhibit features of real financial markets, including price discovery, bubbles, underreaction, and strategic liquidity provision. Third, the framework enables analysis of LLMs' responses to varying market conditions, similar to partial dependence plots in machine-learning interpretability. The framework allows simulating financial theories without closed-form solutions, creating experimental designs that would be costly with human participants, and establishing how prompts can generate correlated behaviors affecting market stability.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Compression Becomes an Attack Surface: Black-Box Attacks on Prompt-Compressed LLM Agents

    cs.CR 2025-10 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper claims prompt compression is a new attack surface, but the abstract's COMA attack never appears in the body and the body's SoftCom requires white-box access.

  2. To Trade or Not to Trade: An Agentic Approach to Estimating Market Risk Improves Trading Decisions

    q-fin.ST 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-discovered stochastic models of price paths provide risk metrics that improve trader-agent decisions, raising average Sharpe ratios from 0.88 to 1.40 in the paper's backtests.

Pith tools