Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Handling the Alignment for Wake Word Detection: A Comparison Between Alignment-Based, Alignment-Free and Hybrid Approaches

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.08950 v3 pith:KRK6UFMZ submitted 2023-02-17 cs.CL cs.SDeess.AS

Handling the Alignment for Wake Word Detection: A Comparison Between Alignment-Based, Alignment-Free and Hybrid Approaches

classification cs.CL cs.SDeess.AS
keywords modelalignment-basedalignment-freeapproacheshybridtrainedwakealignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Wake word detection exists in most intelligent homes and portable devices. It offers these devices the ability to "wake up" when summoned at a low cost of power and computing. This paper focuses on understanding alignment's role in developing a wake-word system that answers a generic phrase. We discuss three approaches. The first is alignment-based, where the model is trained with frame-wise cross-entropy. The second is alignment-free, where the model is trained with CTC. The third, proposed by us, is a hybrid solution in which the model is trained with a small set of aligned data and then tuned with a sizeable unaligned dataset. We compare the three approaches and evaluate the impact of the different aligned-to-unaligned ratios for hybrid training. Our results show that the alignment-free system performs better than the alignment-based for the target operating point, and with a small fraction of the data (20%), we can train a model that complies with our initial constraints.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.