Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Fine-Tuning Language Models via Epistemic Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.01568 v2 pith:KRKG5LU2 submitted 2022-11-03 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords dataneuralepinetlanguagemodelsnetworkperformanceprioritize
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Language models often pre-train on large unsupervised text corpora, then fine-tune on additional task-specific data. However, typical fine-tuning schemes do not prioritize the examples that they tune on. We show that, if you can prioritize informative training data, you can achieve better performance while using fewer labels. To do this we augment a language model with an epinet: a small additional network that helps to estimate model uncertainty and forms an \textit{epistemic neural network} (ENN). ENNs are neural networks that can know what they don't know. Using an epinet to prioritize uncertain data, we can fine-tune BERT on GLUE tasks to the same performance while using 2x less data than training without prioritization. We also investigate performance in synthetic neural network generative models designed to build understanding. In each setting, using an epinet outperforms heuristic active learning schemes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Random-Set Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Random-Set LLMs predict belief functions over token clusters and report higher QA accuracy and credal-width uncertainty signals.

  2. A Survey on Uncertainty Quantification of Large Language Models: Taxonomy, Open Research Challenges, and Future Directions

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A review that organizes LLM uncertainty quantification into token-level, self-verbalized, semantic-similarity, and mechanistic interpretability categories.

  3. Epistemic Artificial Intelligence is Essential for Machine Learning Models to Truly 'Know When They Do Not Know'

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Machine learning should use second-order uncertainty measures, such as credal sets and random sets, so models can explicitly represent ignorance and avoid overconfident predictions on unfamiliar data.

Pith tools