Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Knowledge Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Schema Matching

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.08686 v1 pith:LQY2CCXP submitted 2025-01-15 cs.DB cs.CLcs.IR

classification cs.DBcs.CLcs.IR
keywords matchingschemakg-rag4smknowledgedatasetlargellmsmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Traditional similarity-based schema matching methods are incapable of resolving semantic ambiguities and conflicts in domain-specific complex mapping scenarios due to missing commonsense and domain-specific knowledge. The hallucination problem of large language models (LLMs) also makes it challenging for LLM-based schema matching to address the above issues. Therefore, we propose a Knowledge Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation model for Schema Matching, referred to as the KG-RAG4SM. In particular, KG-RAG4SM introduces novel vector-based, graph traversal-based, and query-based graph retrievals, as well as a hybrid approach and ranking schemes that identify the most relevant subgraphs from external large knowledge graphs (KGs). We showcase that KG-based retrieval-augmented LLMs are capable of generating more accurate results for complex matching cases without any re-training. Our experimental results show that KG-RAG4SM outperforms the LLM-based state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods (e.g., Jellyfish-8B) by 35.89% and 30.50% in terms of precision and F1 score on the MIMIC dataset, respectively; KG-RAG4SM with GPT-4o-mini outperforms the pre-trained language model (PLM)-based SOTA methods (e.g., SMAT) by 69.20% and 21.97% in terms of precision and F1 score on the Synthea dataset, respectively. The results also demonstrate that our approach is more efficient in end-to-end schema matching, and scales to retrieve from large KGs. Our case studies on the dataset from the real-world schema matching scenario exhibit that the hallucination problem of LLMs for schema matching is well mitigated by our solution.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. KAMR: Grounding Generation via Knowledge-Aligned Multi-hop Retrieval

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Partial-alignment contrastive pretraining plus anchor-then-expand graph retrieval improves multi-hop KG evidence recovery and downstream QA over strong dense and graph RAG baselines.

  2. A Survey of LLM $\times$ DATA

    cs.DB 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A comprehensive survey of the bidirectional links between LLMs and data management, organized as DATA4LLM and LLM4DATA with a new 'IaaS' data-quality framework.

  3. Towards Trustworthy and Cost-Efficient Data Integration: From Na\"ive RAG to Agentic RAG

    cs.DB 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper argues that agentic RAG with adaptive retrieval, iterative reasoning, and graph memory is the path to trustworthy and cost-efficient data integration, and sketches a six-agent architecture.

  4. Learning-Infused Formal Reasoning: From Contract Synthesis to Artifact Reuse and Formal Semantics

    cs.SE 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A vision paper proposing Learning-Infused Formal Reasoning (LIFR), a hybrid LLM+graph framework for contract synthesis, artifact reuse, and semantic foundations in verification.

Pith tools