Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Accounting for AI and Users Shaping One Another: The Role of Mathematical Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.12366 v1 pith:LRKD2FN7 submitted 2024-04-18 cs.LG cs.CYcs.GTcs.IR

classification cs.LGcs.CYcs.GTcs.IR
keywords modelsformalinteractiondesignsystemsusersanothershape
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As AI systems enter into a growing number of societal domains, these systems increasingly shape and are shaped by user preferences, opinions, and behaviors. However, the design of AI systems rarely accounts for how AI and users shape one another. In this position paper, we argue for the development of formal interaction models which mathematically specify how AI and users shape one another. Formal interaction models can be leveraged to (1) specify interactions for implementation, (2) monitor interactions through empirical analysis, (3) anticipate societal impacts via counterfactual analysis, and (4) control societal impacts via interventions. The design space of formal interaction models is vast, and model design requires careful consideration of factors such as style, granularity, mathematical complexity, and measurability. Using content recommender systems as a case study, we critically examine the nascent literature of formal interaction models with respect to these use-cases and design axes. More broadly, we call for the community to leverage formal interaction models when designing, evaluating, or auditing any AI system which interacts with users.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Recommender Systems as Control Systems

    eess.SY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Modeling recommender systems as control systems shows that time-optimized fairness interventions can improve overall long-term performance rather than merely trading off against utility.

  2. Reactive Users vs. Social Recommender Systems: Managing Opinion Drifts with Adaptive Policies

    cs.GT 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    An adaptive 'pull back after drift' content consumption policy can prevent recommendation-induced opinion drift and, when users value opinion preservation, can yield higher expected utility than a fixed engagement policy.

Pith tools