Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Efficient Benchmarking of Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.11696 v5 pith:LTLUJA5A submitted 2023-08-22 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
keywords benchmarkevaluationreliabilityefficientbenchmarkingbenchmarkscomputationcosts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The increasing versatility of language models (LMs) has given rise to a new class of benchmarks that comprehensively assess a broad range of capabilities. Such benchmarks are associated with massive computational costs, extending to thousands of GPU hours per model. However, the efficiency aspect of these evaluation efforts had raised little discussion in the literature. In this work, we present the problem of Efficient Benchmarking, namely, intelligently reducing the computation costs of LM evaluation without compromising reliability. Using the HELM benchmark as a test case, we investigate how different benchmark design choices affect the computation-reliability trade-off. We propose to evaluate the reliability of such decisions, by using a new measure -- Decision Impact on Reliability, DIoR for short. We find, for example, that a benchmark leader may change by merely removing a low-ranked model from the benchmark, and observe that a correct benchmark ranking can be obtained by considering only a fraction of the evaluation examples. Based on our findings, we outline a set of concrete recommendations for efficient benchmark design and utilization practices. To take a step further, we use our findings to propose an evaluation algorithm, that, when applied to the HELM benchmark, leads to dramatic cost savings with minimal loss of benchmark reliability, often reducing computation by x100 or more.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Metritocracy: Representative Metrics for Lite Benchmarks

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Defines positional representation and positional proportionality for metric subset selection, with nearly tight worst-case bounds, greedy algorithms, and case studies on LLM and hospital benchmarks.

  2. AutoJudger: An Agent-Driven Framework for Efficient Benchmarking of MLLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An agent-driven framework adaptively selects a small subset of benchmark questions for MLLMs, preserving over 90% ranking accuracy with roughly 4-5% of the data.

  3. Capability Salience Vector: Fine-grained Alignment of Loss and Capabilities for Downstream Task Scaling Law

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A fitted token-level loss weighting, optimized against known model accuracies, predicts held-out downstream task performance more accurately than mean validation loss on five of six benchmarks.

Pith tools