Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Evaluating Scenario-based Decision-making for Interactive Autonomous Driving Using Rational Criteria: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.01886 v1 pith:M2XPW3KN submitted 2025-01-03 cs.RO cs.AIcs.SYeess.SY

Evaluating Scenario-based Decision-making for Interactive Autonomous Driving Using Rational Criteria: A Survey

classification cs.RO cs.AIcs.SYeess.SY
keywords algorithmsdrivingdecision-makingscenariosautonomousefficiencyhoweverinteractive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) can significantly promote the advances in road transport mobility in terms of safety, reliability, and decarbonization. However, ensuring safety and efficiency in interactive during within dynamic and diverse environments is still a primary barrier to large-scale AV adoption. In recent years, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has emerged as an advanced AI-based approach, enabling AVs to learn decision-making strategies adaptively from data and interactions. DRL strategies are better suited than traditional rule-based methods for handling complex, dynamic, and unpredictable driving environments due to their adaptivity. However, varying driving scenarios present distinct challenges, such as avoiding obstacles on highways and reaching specific exits at intersections, requiring different scenario-specific decision-making algorithms. Many DRL algorithms have been proposed in interactive decision-making. However, a rationale review of these DRL algorithms across various scenarios is lacking. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation is essential to assess these algorithms from multiple perspectives, including those of vehicle users and vehicle manufacturers. This survey reviews the application of DRL algorithms in autonomous driving across typical scenarios, summarizing road features and recent advancements. The scenarios include highways, on-ramp merging, roundabouts, and unsignalized intersections. Furthermore, DRL-based algorithms are evaluated based on five rationale criteria: driving safety, driving efficiency, training efficiency, unselfishness, and interpretability (DDTUI). Each criterion of DDTUI is specifically analyzed in relation to the reviewed algorithms. Finally, the challenges for future DRL-based decision-making algorithms are summarized.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Enhanced Mean Field Game for Interactive Decision-Making with Varied Stylish Multi-Vehicles

    cs.RO 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0

    A mean-field-game lane-change planner with six hand-set driving styles claims collision-free simulation results, but its promised NGSIM calibration and baseline comparisons do not appear in the body.

  2. Adaptive Evolution Factor Risk Ellipse Framework for Reliable and Safe Autonomous Driving

    cs.RO 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0

    An adaptive risk-field-plus-MPC controller with a sigmoid evolution factor and TTC/TWH-based risk ellipses is claimed to achieve collision-free overtaking and lane changes in simulation.

  3. Safe and Efficient Lane-Changing for Autonomous Vehicles: An Improved Double Quintic Polynomial Approach with Time-to-Collision Evaluation

    cs.RO 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0

    An optimization-based double quintic lane-change planner that penalizes low time-to-collision is proposed and tested in simulation.

  4. Context-Aware Multi-Turn Visual-Textual Reasoning in LVLMs via Dynamic Memory and Adaptive Visual Guidance

    cs.CV 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0

    The proposed CAMVR framework is not supported by verifiable evidence, and the manuscript itself labels its experimental results as fabricated.

  5. Scenario-based Decision-making Using Game Theory for Interactive Autonomous Driving: A Survey

    cs.RO 2025-09 reject novelty 1.0

    A scenario-based survey of game-theoretic autonomous driving decision-making that claims comprehensiveness but is undermined by a non-systematic methodology and numerous internal errors.