The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2104.10553 · v4 · pith:MCPAP2OB · submitted 2021-04-21 · eess.IV · cs.CV

Rethinking Annotation Granularity for Overcoming Shortcuts in Deep Learning-based Radiograph Diagnosis: A Multicenter Study

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:MCPAP2OBrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification eess.IV cs.CV
keywords chexdetchexnetmodelslesionperformancecomparedjafroc-fomannotations
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Two DL models were developed using radiograph-level annotations (yes or no disease) and fine-grained lesion-level annotations (lesion bounding boxes), respectively named CheXNet and CheXDet. The models' internal classification performance and lesion localization performance were compared on a testing set (n=2,922), external classification performance was compared on NIH-Google (n=4,376) and PadChest (n=24,536) datasets, and external lesion localization performance was compared on NIH-ChestX-ray14 dataset (n=880). The models were also compared to radiologists on a subset of the internal testing set (n=496). Given sufficient training data, both models performed comparably to radiologists. CheXDet achieved significant improvement for external classification, such as in classifying fracture on NIH-Google (CheXDet area under the ROC curve [AUC]: 0.67, CheXNet AUC: 0.51; p<.001) and PadChest (CheXDet AUC: 0.78, CheXNet AUC: 0.55; p<.001). CheXDet achieved higher lesion detection performance than CheXNet for most abnormalities on all datasets, such as in detecting pneumothorax on the internal set (CheXDet jacknife alternative free-response ROC-figure of merit [JAFROC-FOM]: 0.87, CheXNet JAFROC-FOM: 0.13; p<.001) and NIH-ChestX-ray14 (CheXDet JAFROC-FOM: 0.55, CheXNet JAFROC-FOM: 0.04; p<.001). To summarize, fine-grained annotations overcame shortcut learning and enabled DL models to identify correct lesion patterns, improving the models' generalizability.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.