Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Algebraicity and integrality of solutions to differential equations

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that for Picard-Fuchs equations and for non-linear isomonodromy systems such as Painlevé VI, a formal solution through an algebro-geometric initial value is algebraic if and only if the primes dividing the denominators…

desk verdict Real conjecture, solid linear results, but the non-linear main theorem currently rests on an unproved degeneration step in Prop. 9.2.3. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13175 v1 pith:ML6RDKMA submitted 2025-01-22 math.AG math.CAmath.NT

Yeuk Hay Joshua Lam , Daniel Litt This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGmath.CAmath.NT MSC 14F4014F3014D0734M5512H05
keywords algebraicdifferentialequationsGrothendieck-Katzp-curvatureconjecturePicard-FuchsisomonodromyfoliationsPainlevéVIequationp-integralityofTaylorcoefficientsHodgefiltrationinverseCartiertransform
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish a single arithmetic criterion for algebraicity that spans linear and non-linear algebraic differential equations: a formal solution expanded at a non-singular point is algebraic if and only if the primes dividing the denominators of its Taylor coefficients form a finite set (integrality), and if and only if a weaker order-by-order $p$-integrality (the $\omega(p)$-integrality condition) holds. For linear equations the paper proves the criterion for Picard-Fuchs equations — flat bundles with regular singularities arising as the relative de Rham cohomology of a smooth projective family — at initial conditions given by cycle classes, and unconditionally for families of elliptic curves. For non-linear equations it proves the criterion for isomonodromy foliations, the setting containing the Schlesinger system and the Painlevé VI equation, at initial conditions that are themselves Picard-Fuchs equations: the leaf through such a bundle is algebraic exactly when its formal leaf is integral. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives a uniform arithmetic test — check which primes divide Taylor denominators — in a non-linear setting where algebraic solutions were previously found by case-by-case classification, and because the same conjecture would imply the classical Grothendieck-Katz $p$-curvature conjecture if it held for the isomonodromy foliations over moduli spaces of curves.

What carries the argument

The central object is the denominator test itself: $\omega(p)$-integrality, meaning that for each prime $p$ the first $\omega(p)$ Taylor coefficients of the solution have denominators prime to $p$, for some function $\omega(p)$ growing faster than $p$; ordinary integrality is the stricter statement that only finitely many primes ever divide denominators, which a nineteenth-century theorem already shows is necessary for algebraicity. The proof of the non-linear theorem is carried by a characteristic-$p$ comparison: the obstruction to extending the Hodge filtration Griffiths-transversally to the formal isomonodromic deformation is identified, over large primes, with the $p$-curvature of the isomonodromy foliation on the moduli stack of flat bundles (the foliation whose leaves keep the monodromy representation of the flat bundle fixed), using the inverse Cartier transform (a characteristic-$p$ correspondence between nilpotent Higgs bundles and flat bundles with nilpotent $p$-curvature) and the Higgs-de Rham flow (a periodicity procedure showing Picard-Fuchs bundles are fixed points of the transform). Integrality of the formal leaf forces that $p$-curvature to vanish; vanishing makes the Hodge filtration extend; the extension triggers a finiteness theorem for local systems underlying integral variations of Hodge structure; and finiteness of the monodromy orbit yields algebraicity of the leaf. In the linear theorems the same role is played by the crystalline Frobenius, which reads the Hodge filtration directly off the denominators of a formal flat section.

What would settle it

The cleanest single test: find a Picard-Fuchs equation and a cycle-class initial condition whose formal flat section is integral (or $\omega(p)$-integral) but not algebraic — that would refute Theorem 3.1.1 directly; for the non-linear theorem, an isomonodromy leaf through a Picard-Fuchs point that is $\omega(p)$-integral but not algebraic would refute Theorem 6.1.3. At the level of the missing ingredient, one concrete computation would be to exhibit a logarithmic flat bundle in characteristic $p$ for which the inverse Cartier transform fails the $p$-curvature formula of Lemma B.4.3, since that formula is the hinge of the whole reduction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated in Theorem 6.1.3, is that the paper's Conjecture 6.1.1 holds when $(E,\nabla)$ is a Picard-Fuchs equation: for a flat bundle with regular singularities that arises, with its Gauss-Manin connection, as the relative de Rham cohomology of a smooth projective family, the leaf of the isomonodromy foliation through $[(E,\nabla)]$ is algebraic if and only if the formal leaf is integral, if and only if it is $\omega(p)$-integral. In the linear case, Theorem 3.1.1 establishes the same equivalence for the formal flat section to a Picard-Fuchs equation whose initial condition lies in the image of the cycle class map; Theorem 4.1.1 goes further for $\mathrm{Sym}^n$ of the Gauss-Manin bundle of a non-isotrivial family of elliptic curves, proving that no non-zero formal section is integral or $\omega(p)$-integral, so that every integral section is algebraic. The paper also verifies the conjecture's local prediction for hypergeometric functions, where integrality of the Taylor series at a non-singular point forces either algebraicity or infinite-order local monodromy.

Load-bearing premise

The non-linear theorem rests on a version of positive-characteristic non-abelian Hodge theory for logarithmic connections that the paper itself says has not been written down (Proposition 9.2.3); if the inverse Cartier transform or its $p$-curvature computation fails there, the comparison between the Hodge-filtration obstruction and the isomonodromy $p$-curvature breaks.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Schlesinger system and Painlevé VI now have an arithmetic classification at Picard-Fuchs initial conditions: a solution is algebraic exactly when the denominators of its power series coefficients are confined to finitely many primes, and the weaker $\omega(p)$-integrality condition already suffices.
  • Non-isotrivial families of elliptic curves produce no non-zero integral formal sections in $\mathrm{Sym}^n$ of the Gauss-Manin bundle, so the concrete recurrences controlling such Taylor coefficients must have infinitely many primes dividing denominators, as Proposition 4.0.1 states for an explicit third-order recurrence.
  • For hypergeometric equations, an integral Taylor series at a non-singular point that is not algebraic forces infinite-order monodromy around the singular point, confirming the local form of the conjecture in that classical case.
  • Verifying the conjecture for the isomonodromy foliations over the moduli stacks of curves of all sufficiently large genus would imply the full Grothendieck-Katz $p$-curvature conjecture for every flat bundle, so the new criterion is strictly stronger than the classical one.
  • Flat bundles with vanishing $p$-curvature modulo almost all primes automatically admit $\omega(p)$-integral isomonodromic deformations (Lemma 13.0.1), so the non-linear conjecture specializes to a strengthening, not merely a restatement, of the $p$-curvature conjecture.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the denominator criterion survives in its conjectured generality, it gives a finite test against algebraicity: to certify that a candidate solution is not algebraic, one need not compute all Taylor coefficients, only find, for a growing sequence of primes $p$, one coefficient among the first $\omega(p)$ whose denominator is divisible by $p$; the theorems prove this obstruction necessarily appea
  • The paper's own flagged gap — that the logarithmic version of the inverse Cartier transform needed for Proposition 9.2.3 had not been written down — is the natural stress point to examine first: if that transform is supplied, Remark 10.1.2 suggests the nilpotent-residue hypothesis would drop away and the non-linear theorem would extend to arbitrary regular-singularity bundles.
  • Read through the paper's meta-conjectural lens (its Conjectures 14.2.2 and 14.2.3), the non-linear theorem supplies the first arithmetic hypothesis — $\omega(p)$-integrality of the formal leaf — under which a Griffiths-transverse Hodge filtration provably extends to the deformation; the further step, that the whole deformation underlies a true variation of Hodge structure, is what the conjectural
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper formulates an arithmetic conjecture (Conjectures 1.1.1, 2.3.1, and 6.1.1) asserting the equivalence, for formal leaves of foliations and formal flat sections, of algebraicity, integrality, and a much weaker p-adic condition called ω(p)-integrality. It then proves the conjecture for several classes of differential equations: Picard–Fuchs bundles at cycle-class initial conditions (Theorem 3.1.1), Gauss–Manin systems of non-isotrivial families of elliptic curves and their symmetric powers (Theorem 4.1.1), hypergeometric functions near a regular singular point (Proposition 5.2.2), and the non-linear isomonodromy foliation at Picard–Fuchs initial conditions (Theorems 1.2.4 and 6.1.3), with consequences for Painlevé VI and Schlesinger systems. The paper also shows that a sufficiently general instance of the isomonodromy conjecture would imply the classical Grothendieck–Katz p-curvature conjecture, and it discusses implications for relative Fontaine–Mazur-type variational conjectures.

Significance. If the main results are correct, this is a substantial contribution. The linear theorems are proven by a convincing combination of crystalline Frobenius and Chebotarev arguments with analytic finite-branching arguments, and the elliptic-curve and hypergeometric results are clean and well grounded in prior work. The non-linear theorem is an ambitious and natural analogue of Katz's p-curvature theorem, and it would give the first arithmetic, denominator-based classification of algebraic solutions for non-linear isomonodromy equations such as Painlevé VI. The authors are also explicit about the conjectural framework and about which steps rely on positive-characteristic non-abelian Hodge theory; this transparency is a strength. However, the central non-linear theorem currently depends on a degeneration statement whose proof in the logarithmic setting is incomplete, so the significance of the paper can only be fully assessed after that gap is repaired.

major comments (2)
  1. [§9.2, Proposition 9.2.3] The replacement proof of logarithmic E2-degeneration is not complete. After invoking [Sch05, Cor. 5.7], the proof considers the filtration F^m = ⊕_{i≤−m} E′_i on the Higgs complex (E′, θ)_Higgs and asserts that the resulting spectral sequence “degenerates at E2 as the filtration on (E′, θ)_Higgs splits by assumption.” The grading on E′ gives a direct-sum splitting of the underlying O_X-modules, but the Higgs differential θ shifts the grading by −1 and is not a morphism of filtered complexes compatible with that splitting; in fact θ(F^m) ⊂ F^{m+1} ⊗ Ω^1_{X/S}(log D). A filtered complex whose graded pieces are locally free direct summands need not have E2 = E∞, and the hypothesis length(F_conj) < p − dim_S(X) is not shown to produce a splitting of filtered complexes. Because the paper itself states that a filtered logarithmic version of [OV07, Thm. 3.22] has not been written down, the argument as written does not establish the logarithmic E2-degeneration claimed.
  2. [§11.2–§12, Theorem 6.1.3] The gap in Proposition 9.2.3 is load-bearing for the main non-linear theorem. Lemma 11.3.1 uses Proposition 9.2.3 to degenerate the conjugate spectral sequence for a Higgs–de Rham fixed point; that degeneration is used in the induction in Theorem 11.2.2 to prove smoothness of the deformation space Def_{F_i,∇,F}, which yields Theorem 10.1.3 and hence Theorem 6.1.3 and Theorem 1.2.4. Unless Proposition 9.2.3 is supplied with a valid proof, or replaced by a written logarithmic/filtered version of the Ogus–Vologodsky theory, the central non-linear claim is not established by the text as it stands. The statement may well be true and repairable, but the present proof does not justify it.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§12.1, Lemma 12.1.1] The displayed isomorphism has the same bundle (E′, ∇′) on both sides; the left side should be the original bundle (E, ∇). Please correct this typo.
  2. [§11.3, Lemma 11.3.1] The hypothesis “the length of s is less than p − dim_A X” appears to be a typo; presumably the intended hypothesis is that the length of the filtration F (or of the conjugate filtration) is less than p − dim_A X.
  3. [§3.1, Theorem 3.1.1] The notation H^{2i}_dR(X_s)_s has an extra subscript and should be cleaned up; the same issue appears in the statement of Proposition 3.3.1.
  4. [§8.3, Theorem 8.3.3] The term “good” is imported from [EK24, §1] without definition; since the theorem is used for pairs (X, D) with a logarithmic divisor, please state the condition or give a precise pointer to the definition.
  5. [§2.2, Definition 2.2.5] The definition of ω(f)-integrality uses a general function f while the conjecture and the rest of the paper use ω(p); aligning the notation would avoid confusion.
  6. [§10.3.1, Assumption 10.3.5] The sentence “After replacing R with a finitely-generated localization, we may assume it is Z-smooth” has an ambiguous antecedent; please clarify whether R or Spec(A) is meant.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circularity in the main derivation: ω(p)-integrality to algebraicity is a genuinely new deductive chain; self-citations are non-load-bearing, and the flagged gaps (Prop. 9.2.3, nilpotent residues) are correctness risks, not self-referential reductions.

full rationale

The central implication in Theorem 6.1.3, ω(p)-integrality implies algebraicity, is a genuine deductive chain with independent inputs: ω(p)-integrality yields an integral model over p-power subschemes (Assumption 10.3.2 and Corollary 7.5.3); Lemma B.5.1 and Proposition A.3.4 convert this into vanishing of the isomonodromy p-curvature; Lemma 10.3.9, via the Higgs-de Rham flow of [LSZ19] and [EG25], transfers this to vanishing of the Hodge-filtration obstruction; Proposition 9.2.3 and Lemma 11.3.1 supply the needed spectral-sequence degeneration; Theorem 10.1.3 then produces a Griffiths-transverse Hodge filtration; Theorem 8.3.3 (external, from Esnault-Kerz [EK24, Theorem 1.1] and Deligne [Del87]) turns that into finiteness of the monodromy orbit; and Proposition 7.7.3 converts finiteness into algebraicity. At no point is algebraicity or the p-curvature conjecture assumed, and no 'prediction' equals its input by construction. The linear theorem 3.1.1 is similarly self-contained: integrality plus crystalline Frobenius (Theorem 3.2.1, external) places the section in F^i_Hodge, and Deligne's finiteness theorem closes the argument. Self-citations are present but not load-bearing for the main claim: Remark 1.2.5 records that the result was announced in [Lit24]; Section 6.2 and Section 8 cite [Lit24, Cor. 4.4.3] only as 'see also' alongside the external [EK24] and [Del87]; Section 13 uses the authors' earlier published theorems [LL22a] and [LL22b] in the conditional proposition that Conjecture 6.1.1 would imply the p-curvature conjecture, which is independent support. The manuscript itself flags two limitations, weighed here as proof gaps rather than circularity: Proposition 9.2.3 concedes that a filtered logarithmic version of [OV07, Theorem 3.22] 'has not been written down' and substitutes an argument whose 'splits by assumption' step is not fully justified as written; Remark 10.1.2 calls the nilpotent-residue hypothesis 'probably unnecessary.' Neither passage makes the conclusion equivalent to the hypothesis; both concern the rigor of an intermediate lemma. The score of 2 reflects the presence of minor, non-load-bearing self-citation; the central claim carries independent mathematical content.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted or hand-chosen numerical parameters; the function ω(p) in the conjecture is existential, not tuned to data. The central claims rest on the background theorems listed above, which are standard in arithmetic geometry; the most fragile input is the logarithmic inverse Cartier transform, whose logarithmic version is partly unwritten (the paper patches this in Proposition 9.2.3). No new entities are postulated: the crystal-of-functors formalism of Appendices A and B is a construction developed in the paper to give the isomonodromy foliation a rigorous p-curvature theory, not an unexplained input.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Eisenstein's theorem (1852): an algebraic power series has coefficients with denominators containing only finitely many primes.
    Used as the direction (1) implies (2) in Conjectures 1.1.1 and 2.3.1; cited as [Eis52].
  • domain assumption Fontaine-Laffaille / Berthelot-Ogus-Faltings theory (Theorem 3.2.1): the Hodge filtration mod p can be read off from the crystalline Frobenius.
    Basis of the crystalline step (Proposition 3.3.1) and of the 1-periodicity of Picard-Fuchs equations under the Higgs-de Rham flow (Proposition 10.4.7(1)).
  • domain assumption Katz's formula for the p-curvature of a Gauss-Manin connection (Theorem 4.2.1).
    Used in the elliptic curve theorem 4.1.1 and as the model for the non-abelian p-curvature computation (Appendix B).
  • domain assumption The André-Bost-Chudnovsky proof of the p-curvature conjecture for extensions of (O_X,d) by itself (Lemma 4.2.2).
    External proved theorem used to establish Lemma 4.2.3.
  • domain assumption Deligne's finiteness theorem for Z-variations of Hodge structure and the Esnault-Kerz extension (Theorem 8.3.3) connecting Griffiths-transverse deformations of Hodge filtrations to finiteness of monodromy orbits.
    The analytic step that converts the Griffiths-transverse filtration from Theorem 10.1.3 into algebraicity of the isomonodromic deformation.
  • domain assumption Ogus-Vologodsky / Schepler inverse Cartier transform for Higgs bundles with nilpotent field and flat bundles with nilpotent p-curvature (Theorem 9.1.2).
    Constructs the bundles (E_B,∇) and the conjugate filtration; the logarithmic and relative versions are partly unwritten (see Proposition 9.2.3), making this the most fragile input.
  • domain assumption Lan-Sheng-Zuo Higgs-de Rham flow, as presented by Esnault-Groechenig (Construction 10.4.1, Proposition 10.4.7).
    Lifts the characteristic-p construction to characteristic zero and identifies the resulting bundle with the given isomonodromic deformation.
  • domain assumption Beukers-Heckman and Christol classification results for hypergeometric equations (Lemma 5.2.4).
    Inputs for Proposition 5.2.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Algebraicity and integrality of solutions to differential equations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ML6RDKMA

@misc{pith2026250113175,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Algebraicity and integrality of solutions to differential equations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ML6RDKMA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13175}
}
abstract

We formulate a conjecture classifying algebraic solutions to (possibly non-linear) algebraic differential equations, in terms of the primes appearing in the denominators of the coefficients of their Taylor expansion at a non-singular point. For linear differential equations, this conjecture is a strengthening of the Grothendieck-Katz $p$-curvature conjecture. We prove the conjecture for many differential equations and initial conditions of algebro-geometric interest. For linear differential equations, we prove it for Picard-Fuchs equations at initial conditions corresponding to cycle classes, among other cases. For non-linear differential equations, we prove it for isomonodromy differential equations, such as the Painlev\'e VI equation and Schlesinger system, at initial conditions corresponding to Picard-Fuchs equations. We draw a number of algebro-geometric consequences from the proofs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Nonabelian Kodaira-Spencer maps

    math.AG 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The nonabelian Kodaira-Spencer map is explicitly the composition of the usual Kodaira-Spencer map of the family with a natural cohomology map induced by the universal Higgs field.

  2. Density of integral points in the Betti moduli of quasi-projective varieties

    math.AG 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Potential density of integral points is established for relative SL2 and PGL2 character varieties of all smooth quasi-projective complex varieties with snc compactification.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [9]

    Eisenstein’s last theorem

    [hl] Daniel Litt (https://mathoverflow .net/users/6950/d aniel litt). Eisenstein’s last theorem. MathOverflow . URL:https://mathoverflow .net/q/476129 (ve rsion: 2024-08-02). [IKN05] Luc Illusie, Kazuya Kato, and Chikara Nakayama. Qua si-unipotent logarithmic Riemann- Hilbert correspondences. Journal of Mathematical Sciences-University of T okyo, 12(1):1–66,

    work page 2024

  2. [16]

    Finite braid group orbits on SL 2- character varieties

    [LLL23] Y euk Hay Joshua Lam, Aaron Landesman, and Daniel Lit t. Finite braid group orbits on SL 2- character varieties. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.01376 ,

    arXiv

  3. [17]

    Relative F ontaine–Messing theory over power series rings

    [LMP24] T ong Liu, Y ong Suk Moon, and Deepam Patel. Relative F ontaine–Messing theory over power series rings. International Mathematics Research Notices , 2024(5):4384–4455,

    work page 2024

  4. [18]

    [Sha18] Ananth N. Shankar. The p-curvature conjecture and monodromy around simple closed loops. Duke Mathematical Journal, 167(10):1951 – 1980,

    work page 1951

  5. [1852]

    A non-abelian vers ion of Deligne’s fixed part theorem

    [EK24] H´ el` ene Esnault and Moritz Kerz. A non-abelian vers ion of Deligne’s fixed part theorem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.13910,

    arXiv

  6. [1887]

    Deformation theory of periodic Higgs-de Rham flows

    [KYZ20] Raju Krishnamoorthy , Jinbang Y ang, and Kang Zuo. De formation theory of periodic Higgs- de Rham flows. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00579 ,

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  7. [1982]

    Non-abelian (p, p) classes

    [KP99] L Katzarkov and T Pantev . Non-abelian (p, p) classes. arXiv preprint math/9903163 ,

    arXiv

  8. [1986]

    Globally bounded solutions of dif ferential equations

    [Chr06] Gilles Christol. Globally bounded solutions of dif ferential equations. In Analytic Number The- ory: Proceedings of the Japanese-French Symposium held in Tokyo, Japan, October 10–13, 1988 , pages 45–64. Springer,

    work page 1988

Show all 21 references
  1. [1989]

    Tykhyy’s conject ure on finite mapping class group or- bits

    [BM24] Samuel Bronstein and Arnaud Maret. Tykhyy’s conject ure on finite mapping class group or- bits. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04379 ,

  2. [1992]

    Crystalline cohomology and p-adic G alois-representations

    [Fal89] Gerd Faltings. Crystalline cohomology and p-adic G alois-representations. In Algebraic anal- ysis, geometry, and number theory, Proceedings of the JAMI I naugural Conference, Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD, 1988 , pages 25–80. Johns Hopkins Univ . Press,

    1988

  3. [1994]

    The stacks project

    [Sta24] The Stacks project authors. The stacks project. https://stacks.math.columbia.edu, 2024

    2024

  4. [1999]

    Periodic de Rham b undles over curves

    [KS20] Raju Krishnamoorthy and Mao Sheng. Periodic de Rham b undles over curves. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.03268,

    2011 arXiv

  5. [2004]

    Alge braic solutions of linear differential equa- tions: an arithmetic approach

    [BCR23] Alin Bostan, Xavier Caruso, and Julien Roques. Alge braic solutions of linear differential equa- tions: an arithmetic approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05061 ,

    arXiv

  6. [2005]

    Harmonic bundl es on quasi-compact K¨ ahler manifolds

    [JLZ01] J ¨ urgen Jost, Jiayu Li, and Kang Zuo. Harmonic bundl es on quasi-compact K¨ ahler manifolds. arXiv preprint math/0108166 ,

    arXiv

  7. [2006]

    (p.18 of 71pp slides I II, S ummarised in this paper, p.24)

    Two talks given at Newton Institute, 14,15/9/2006. (p.18 of 71pp slides I II, S ummarised in this paper, p.24). [Boa10] Philip Boalch. T owards a non-linear Schwarz’s list . In The many facets of geometry , pages 210–

    2006

  8. [2008]

    Applica tions of Pad´ e approximations to the Grothendieck conjecture on linear differential equations

    [CC06] David V Chudnovsky and Gregory V Chudnovsky . Applica tions of Pad´ e approximations to the Grothendieck conjecture on linear differential equations. In Number Theory: A Seminar held at the Graduate School and University Center of the City Univ ersity of New Y ork 1983–...

    1983

  9. [2014]

    The Hodge filtration on nonabelian cohomolo gy , algebraic geometry–Santa Cruz 1995, 217–281

    [Sim] C Simpson. The Hodge filtration on nonabelian cohomolo gy , algebraic geometry–Santa Cruz 1995, 217–281. In Proc. Sympos. Pure Math , volume

    1995

  10. [2018]

    ¨Uber einige Anwendungen diophantischer Approximationen: Abhandlungen der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften

    [Sie14] Carl L Siegel. ¨Uber einige Anwendungen diophantischer Approximationen: Abhandlungen der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse 1929, Nr

    1929

  11. [2021]

    Motives, mapping class groups, and mon odromy .arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02234 ,

    [Lit24] Daniel Litt. Motives, mapping class groups, and mon odromy .arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02234 ,

    arXiv

  12. [2023]

    Crystalline co homology and de Rham cohomology

    [BdJ11] Bhargav Bhatt and Aise Johan de Jong. Crystalline co homology and de Rham cohomology . arXiv preprint arXiv:1110.5001 ,

    arXiv

  13. [2024]

    Canonical represe ntations of surface groups

    [LL22a] Aaron Landesman and Daniel Litt. Canonical represe ntations of surface groups. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15352v2 ,

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.