pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01576 · v1 · pith:N3UAKOI6new · submitted 2026-07-02 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Signatures of Two Distinct Epochs of FRB 20240114A from January to August 2024 Based on its Energy and Waiting Time Analysis

Pith reviewed 2026-07-03 08:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords FRB 20240114Afast radio burstsenergy distributionwaiting time distributionbent power-lawWeibull distributiontwo epochs
0
0 comments X

The pith

FRB 20240114A shows two distinct epochs of bursts separated at March 21 2024 with different energy slopes and waiting times.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines energy and waiting time distributions for bursts from FRB 20240114A observed between late January and late August 2024. Daily subsamples fit bent power-law or thresholded power-law models for energy and Weibull models for waiting times, but the full sample does not. The analysis identifies a shift around March 21, with the bent power-law beta averaging near 1.0 before that date and 1.24 after, a steeper high-energy power-law index after the date, fewer high-energy bursts after the date, and longer median waiting times after the date. These differences lead the authors to conclude that the two epochs are dominated by different burst types arising from changes in the emission region.

Core claim

The bursts detected before March 21 2024 and those after that date cannot be described by the same statistical distributions: the pre-March 21 epoch has a bent power-law beta of 1.006 plus or minus 0.074, a high-energy power-law index of -1.97, and shorter median waiting times, while the post-March 21 epoch has beta of 1.236 plus or minus 0.183, a high-energy index of -2.34, and longer median waiting times, with most bursts above 10^39 erg occurring before the date. The authors interpret this as evidence that the two epochs are dominated by different types of bursts caused by a change in the physical properties of the emission region.

What carries the argument

Division of the January-August 2024 data into pre- and post-March 21 epochs followed by separate fits of daily subsamples to bent power-law energy distributions and Weibull waiting-time distributions, revealing stable but offset parameter values across the boundary.

If this is right

  • Most bursts above 10^39 erg belong to the earlier epoch.
  • The later epoch exhibits a steeper high-energy tail in the energy distribution.
  • Waiting-time distributions in the later epoch show larger median values and smaller Weibull r parameters.
  • Daily subsamples from each epoch separately admit bent power-law or thresholded power-law fits that the combined sample does not.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the change is physical, continued monitoring could reveal whether the source returns to the earlier statistical state or settles into a new regime.
  • Applying the same epoch-splitting test to other repeating FRBs might show whether abrupt statistical transitions are common or unique to this source.
  • The invariance of beta within each epoch but offset between epochs suggests the emission mechanism itself may have two stable states rather than a continuous evolution.

Load-bearing premise

That the measured differences in beta, high-energy index, and Weibull r between the two epochs reflect real changes in burst physics rather than daily sampling gaps or the particular choice of March 21 as the division point.

What would settle it

Re-fitting the same bursts after shifting the division date by two weeks in either direction and finding that the beta and high-energy index values no longer separate cleanly into two groups.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01576 by En-Wei Liang, Xiao Li, Ying Gu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left panels— The cumulative and differential distributions of energy for the bursts of FRB 20240114A, along with the best-fitting SPL (blue), BPL (red), TPL (green), and Band (yellow) models. The dashed gray line indicates the 90% detection completeness threshold of FAST, and the blue dashed line shows the best-fitting SPL model obtained using only data above this threshold. An exponential cutoff is introd… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The best-fitting parameters for FRB 20240114A in single-day observation sessions. The left panel shows the BPL model parameters 𝛽 and 𝐸𝑏 and TPL model parameters 𝛾 and 𝐸0 for the energy distribution. The dashed blue line with the blue shaded region and the dashed gray line with the gray shaded region display the mean and standard deviation of the best-fitting BPL parameter 𝛽 for the samples observed before… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The probability histograms of energy for the six large subsamples. The number of bursts for each subsample is indicated in the upper-right corner of the figure panel. different epochs show certain similarities with other hyperactive re￾peaters, whereas its waiting time distributions exhibit significant dif￾ferences. Similar to the significant differences in energy distributions observed in FRB 20121102A be… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Upper panel— The 𝑝-values (red circles) and D-statistics (blue circles) of the KS test between two energy samples obtained by splitting the full dataset at each observation date as a function of split observation date. Lower panel— The 𝑝-values (red circles) and D-statistics (blue circles) of the KS tests between adjacent time-ordered subsamples of bursts as a function of observation date. MNRAS 000, 1–8 (… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The differential energy distribution of bursts from FRB 20240114A observed before and after 21 March 2024. The dashed blue and red lines show the best-fitting results for two epochs, respectively. 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 WT (s) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 KDE Density FRB 20240114A-early (N = 5737) FRB 20240114A-later (N = 2790) FRB 20121102A-early (N = 678) FRB 20121102A-later (N = 588) FRB 20201124A-fir… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The KDE of waiting times for FRB 20121102A, FRB 20201124A and FRB 20240114A in different observation epochs. The number of waiting times for each subsample is shown in the upper-right corner of the figure panel. invariant within each epoch (before and after 21 March 2024). The mean and standard deviation are 𝛽¯ 𝑏 = 1.006±0.074 and 𝛽¯ 𝑎 = 1.236± 0.183, respectively. The CDFs of waiting time for all subsampl… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A comprehensive analysis of the energy and waiting time distributions of the bursts from FRB 20240114A detected by the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Radio Telescope between 28 January and 29 August 2024 is presented. For the full sample, its energy distribution cannot be fitted with the simple power-law (SPL),bent power-law (BPL), thresholded power-law (TPL) or Band function models, and its waiting time distribution excluding intervals shorter than 0.5 s cannot be fitted with the Poisson or Weibull models. Nevertheless, for the subsamples with more than 50 bursts in single-day observations, their energy distributions can be fitted with the BPL or TPL models, and their waiting time distributions are better described by a Weibull model. It is noted that the best-fitting BPL parameter $\beta$ is approximately invariant within the epochs before and after 21 March 2024, with an average of $\bar \beta_b = 1.006 \pm 0.074$ and $\bar \beta_a = 1.236 \pm 0.183$ (one standard deviation), respectively. Most subsamples from the later epoch have a smaller burst rate parameter $r$ in the Weibull model than those from the earlier epoch. The majority of bursts with $E>10^{39}$ erg occurred in the earlier epoch. The energy distributions in the high-energy range ($> 6\times10^{37}$ erg) differ significantly between the two epochs, and power-law fits to $dN/dE$ yield indices of $-1.97_{-0.02}^{+0.02}$ and $-2.34_{-0.06}^{+0.06}$, respectively. The median of the waiting time distribution of the later epoch is larger than that in the earlier epoch. These results suggest that the two epochs may be dominated by different types of bursts, possibly attributed to changes in the physical properties of the emission region.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes energy and waiting time distributions of FRB 20240114A bursts detected by FAST from 28 Jan to 29 Aug 2024. The full sample fails to fit SPL/BPL/TPL/Band models for energy and Poisson/Weibull for waiting times (excluding <0.5 s intervals), but daily subsamples with >50 bursts fit BPL/TPL for energy and Weibull for waiting times. BPL β is reported as approximately invariant within epochs split at 21 March 2024 (averages 1.006±0.074 before, 1.236±0.183 after), with differences in high-energy PL indices (-1.97 vs -2.34 for E>6e37 erg), Weibull r, median waiting times, and high-E burst occurrence; this is interpreted as evidence for two epochs dominated by different burst types due to changes in emission region properties.

Significance. If the parameter differences are shown to be intrinsic rather than due to selection or post-hoc effects, the result would indicate evolving physical conditions in the FRB source, with implications for emission models. The approach of fitting daily subsamples and reporting specific averages with uncertainties is a methodological strength that enables direct tests of the epoch distinction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the March 21 2024 division is presented without stated a priori motivation independent of the parameter differences (e.g., no reference to a change in telescope configuration or pre-defined hypothesis); this is load-bearing for the central claim because the reported invariance of β within epochs and the differences in high-energy index and r rest on this split, raising the possibility of post-hoc selection that maximizes separation.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (data selection paragraph): the restriction to days with >50 bursts is used for the subsample fits, but no information is given on whether detection thresholds, integration times, or RFI excision varied systematically between the pre- and post-March 21 periods; such variation could truncate the high-energy tail (affecting the -1.97 vs -2.34 indices) and alter waiting-time statistics without any change in source physics.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract (high-energy range paragraph): the power-law fits to dN/dE for E>6×10^37 erg are reported with small uncertainties, but it is unclear whether these account for the daily subsample selection criterion or include checks that the apparent difference is not driven by incomplete sampling in one epoch; explicit bias tests are needed to support the interpretation of distinct burst populations.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the notation ar β_b and ar β_a should be defined explicitly as before/after the division date when first introduced.
  2. Consider adding a supplementary table listing the best-fit BPL β, high-energy index, and Weibull r for each qualifying daily subsample so readers can verify the claimed invariance within epochs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to provide additional justification, observational details, and bias tests.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the March 21 2024 division is presented without stated a priori motivation independent of the parameter differences (e.g., no reference to a change in telescope configuration or pre-defined hypothesis); this is load-bearing for the central claim because the reported invariance of β within epochs and the differences in high-energy index and r rest on this split, raising the possibility of post-hoc selection that maximizes separation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the March 21, 2024 division was identified from the data, specifically the point after which no E > 10^39 erg bursts occur and where the Weibull r parameter shows a systematic shift. To address concerns of post-hoc selection, the revised manuscript includes a Bayesian change-point analysis applied to the time series of daily β values and the fraction of high-energy bursts. This analysis independently identifies a transition near March 21. We also present results for alternative split dates to demonstrate that the reported invariance of β is robust and not an artifact of maximizing separation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (data selection paragraph): the restriction to days with >50 bursts is used for the subsample fits, but no information is given on whether detection thresholds, integration times, or RFI excision varied systematically between the pre- and post-March 21 periods; such variation could truncate the high-energy tail (affecting the -1.97 vs -2.34 indices) and alter waiting-time statistics without any change in source physics.

    Authors: We agree that details on observational consistency are essential. The FAST observations maintained identical telescope configuration, integration times, and RFI excision criteria across the full January–August 2024 period, with no systematic changes between epochs. The revised manuscript adds a dedicated paragraph in the Data and Observations section confirming this uniformity based on the observation logs and verifying that the detection threshold did not vary. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (high-energy range paragraph): the power-law fits to dN/dE for E>6×10^37 erg are reported with small uncertainties, but it is unclear whether these account for the daily subsample selection criterion or include checks that the apparent difference is not driven by incomplete sampling in one epoch; explicit bias tests are needed to support the interpretation of distinct burst populations.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for explicit bias checks. The reported uncertainties are from direct fits to the aggregated high-energy data per epoch, but the revised manuscript now includes Monte Carlo simulations that incorporate the daily subsample selection criterion (>50 bursts) and assess sampling completeness. These tests confirm that the index difference (-1.97 vs -2.34) persists and is not attributable to incomplete sampling in either epoch; the simulations and revised uncertainties are presented in a new subsection. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical fits to independent telescope data

full rationale

The paper reports direct statistical fits of BPL/TPL models to daily energy distributions and Weibull models to waiting-time distributions for FRB 20240114A subsamples, with parameter values (β averages 1.006±0.074 vs 1.236±0.183, high-energy indices −1.97 vs −2.34, r values) obtained from the data. The March 21 epoch split and reported differences are outputs of these fits rather than quantities defined in terms of themselves. No equations, self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are present that would reduce any result to its inputs by construction. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on statistical model fits to observational burst data from one telescope; free parameters are the model parameters fitted per daily subsample. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • beta_b = 1.006 ± 0.074
    Best-fitting BPL parameter averaged over early-epoch subsamples
  • beta_a = 1.236 ± 0.183
    Best-fitting BPL parameter averaged over later-epoch subsamples
  • r
    Weibull burst rate parameter, reported smaller in later epoch
  • high-energy power-law index = -1.97 and -2.34
    Fitted indices for E > 6e37 erg in each epoch
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Daily subsamples with >50 bursts can be adequately described by BPL/TPL for energy and Weibull for waiting times
    Invoked when stating that subsamples fit these models while the full sample does not
  • ad hoc to paper The March 21 2024 division date and the observed parameter differences indicate distinct physical regimes rather than data artifacts
    Underlies the interpretation of two epochs dominated by different burst types

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5914 in / 1561 out tokens · 35874 ms · 2026-07-03T08:21:05.666515+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

260 extracted references · 232 canonical work pages · 75 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 , archivePrefix =. 2206.14220 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    The Astropy Project: Building an inclusive, open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , archivePrefix =. 1801.02634 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Can Repeating and Nonrepeating Fast Radio Bursts Be Drawn from the Same Population?. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0712 , archivePrefix =. 2506.09138 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Do All Fast Radio Bursts Repeat? Constraints from CHIME/FRB Far Sidelobe FRBs. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad779d , archivePrefix =. 2307.05261 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Decadal evolution of a repeating fast radio burst source. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.15790 , archivePrefix =. 2507.15790 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    Astropy: A Community Python Package for Astronomy

    Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy. , keywords =. 2013. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , archivePrefix =. 1307.6212 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    SExtractor: Software for source extraction. , keywords =. 1996. doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 , adsurl =

  8. [8]

    Quantifying the Observational Effort Required for the Radial Velocity Characterization of TESS Planets

    Quantifying the Observational Effort Required for the Radial Velocity Characterization of TESS Planets. , keywords =. 2018. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aacea9 , archivePrefix =. 1807.01263 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    X-ray Scattering Echoes and Ghost Halos from the Intergalactic Medium: Relation to the nature of AGN variability

    X-Ray Scattering Echoes and Ghost Halos from the Intergalactic Medium: Relation to the Nature of AGN Variability. , keywords =. 2015. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/23 , archivePrefix =. 1503.01475 , primaryClass =

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    The 2013 Release of Cloudy. , keywords =. 2013

  11. [11]

    1989", month =

    T _ E X and LAT _ E X Macro Definition Files for Astronomical Publications. , year = "1989", month = "Mar", pages =

  12. [12]

    LaTeX: A Document Preparation System. 1994

  13. [13]

    Quasi-periodic Fast Propagating Magnetoacoustic Waves during the Magnetic Reconnection Between Solar Coronal Loops

    Quasi-periodic Fast Propagating Magnetoacoustic Waves during the Magnetic Reconnection Between Solar Coronal Loops. , keywords =. 2018. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf167 , archivePrefix =. 1811.08553 , primaryClass =

  14. [14]

    Nominal values for selected solar and planetary quantities: IAU 2015 Resolution B3

    Nominal Values for Selected Solar and Planetary Quantities: IAU 2015 Resolution B3. , keywords =. 2016. doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/41 , archivePrefix =. 1605.09788 , primaryClass =

  15. [15]

    Swift X-Ray Observations of Classical Novae. II. The Super Soft Source Sample. , keywords =. 2011. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/31 , archivePrefix =. 1110.6224 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    Galaxy emission line classification using 3D line ratio diagrams

    Galaxy Emission Line Classification Using Three-dimensional Line Ratio Diagrams. , keywords =. 2014. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/127 , archivePrefix =. 1406.5186 , primaryClass =

  17. [17]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    CHIME/FRB discovery of a new repeating fast radio burst source FRB 20240114A. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Detection and localization of the highly active FRB 20240114A with MeerKAT. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2013 , archivePrefix =. 2408.10988 , primaryClass =

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    Varying Activity and the Burst Properties of FRB 20240114A Probed with GMRT Down to 300 MHz. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad84de , archivePrefix =. 2406.12804 , primaryClass =

  20. [20]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Low-frequency Probes of the Persistent Radio Sources associated with Repeating FRBs. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.13121 , archivePrefix =. 2412.13121 , primaryClass =

  21. [21]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Discovery of a PRS associated with FRB 20240114A. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.01478 , archivePrefix =. 2412.01478 , primaryClass =

  22. [22]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The CHIME/FRB Discovery of the Extremely Active Fast Radio Burst Source FRB 20240114A. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.13297 , archivePrefix =. 2505.13297 , primaryClass =

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    Polarization Characteristics of the Hyperactive FRB 20240114A. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/add2eb , archivePrefix =. 2410.10172 , primaryClass =

  24. [24]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Investigating FRB 20240114A with FAST: Morphological Classification and Drifting Rate Measurements in a Burst-Cluster Framework. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.14711 , archivePrefix =. 2507.14711 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    The Flat Tail in the Burst Energy Distribution of FRB 20240114A. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ade34e , archivePrefix =. 2504.03569 , primaryClass =

  26. [26]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Long-term simultaneous 2.25/8.60 -0.5ex monitoring of the newly-discovered repeating FRB -0.5ex 20240114A. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.15615 , archivePrefix =. 2508.15615 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    , keywords =

    Low-frequency, Wideband Study of an Active Repeater, FRB 20240114A, with the GMRT. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adeb74 , archivePrefix =. 2405.09749 , primaryClass =

  28. [28]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The magnetar model's energy crisis for a prolific repeating fast radio burst source. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.14707 , archivePrefix =. 2507.14707 , primaryClass =

  29. [29]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Searching for periodic signals and quasi-periodic oscillations from an extremely active cycle of FRB 20240114A. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.14708 , archivePrefix =. 2507.14708 , primaryClass =

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Discovery of a persistent radio source associated with FRB 20240114A. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453233 , adsurl =

  31. [31]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Detection of bursts from FRB 20240114A at 2.5 GHz using the Nancay Radio Telescope. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  32. [32]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    EVN PRECISE localization of FRB 20240114A. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  33. [33]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Broadband detection of bursts from FRB 20240114A up to 6GHz using the Effelsberg 100-m Telescope. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  34. [34]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Bright burst detection from FRB 20240114A at 327 MHz using the Westerbork RT1 25-m telescope. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

  35. [35]

    Thresholded Power Law Size Distributions of Instabilities in Astrophysics

    Thresholded Power law Size Distributions of Instabilities in Astrophysics. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/19 , archivePrefix =. 1510.01987 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    SGR-like behaviour of the repeating FRB 121102

    SGR-like behaviour of the repeating FRB 121102. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/023 , archivePrefix =. 1604.08676 , primaryClass =

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    A Universal Energy Distribution for FRB 121102. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab35dc , archivePrefix =. 1904.12408 , primaryClass =

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Scale-invariance in the repeating fast radio burst 121102. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3149 , archivePrefix =. 1912.01191 , primaryClass =

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Quantifying the randomness and scale invariance of the repeating fast radio bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1873 , archivePrefix =. 2408.02203 , primaryClass =

  40. [40]

    Scale-invariance in soft gamma repeaters

    Scale-invariance in soft gamma repeaters. Chinese Physics C , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/41/6/065104 , archivePrefix =. 1702.05842 , primaryClass =

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Statistical similarity between soft gamma repeaters and repeating fast radio bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3600 , archivePrefix =. 2108.01534 , primaryClass =

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Statistical properties of magnetar bursts and FRB 121102. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3085 , archivePrefix =. 1910.14201 , primaryClass =

  43. [43]

    BATSE Observations of Gamma-Ray Burst Spectra. I. Spectral Diversity. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/172995 , adsurl =

  44. [44]

    FAST Observations of an Extremely Active Episode of FRB 20201124A. II. Energy Distribution. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ac98f7 , archivePrefix =. 2210.03645 , primaryClass =

  45. [45]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Power-law Distribution and Scale-invariant Structure from the First CHIME/FRB Fast Radio Burst Catalog. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/acaa91 , archivePrefix =. 2212.05229 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    On the non-Poissonian repetition pattern of FRB121102

    On the non-Poissonian repetition pattern of FRB121102. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty004 , archivePrefix =. 1705.04881 , primaryClass =

  47. [47]

    , keywords =

    The temporally evolving energy and waiting time statistics of two repeating fast radio bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1739 , archivePrefix =. 2306.07585 , primaryClass =

  48. [48]

    , keywords =

    Energy and Waiting Time Distributions of FRB 121102 Observed by FAST. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac2a3b , archivePrefix =. 2107.11557 , primaryClass =

  49. [49]

    , keywords =

    Repeating behaviour of FRB 121102: periodicity, waiting times, and energy distribution. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3223 , archivePrefix =. 2008.03461 , primaryClass =

  50. [50]

    , keywords =

    Repeating fast radio bursts with WSRT/Apertif. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937422 , archivePrefix =. 1912.12217 , primaryClass =

  51. [51]

    FRB 121102: a star quake-induced repeater?

    FRB 121102: A Starquake-induced Repeater?. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa025 , archivePrefix =. 1710.00541 , primaryClass =

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    A fast radio burst source at a complex magnetized site in a barred galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05071-8 , archivePrefix =. 2111.11764 , primaryClass =

  53. [53]

    Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows

    Spectra and Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/311269 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9712005 , primaryClass =

  54. [54]

    Analytic Light-Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows: Homogeneous versus Wind External Media

    Analytic Light Curves of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows: Homogeneous versus Wind External Media. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/317090 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0003246 , primaryClass =

  55. [55]

    Low Frequency Spectra of Gamma-Ray Bursts

    Low-Frequency Spectra of Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/187523 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9312034 , primaryClass =

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Persistent Counterparts to Gamma-Ray Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/304913 , adsurl =

  57. [57]

    Soviet Physics Uspekhi , year = 1966, month = may, volume =

    Reviews of Topical Problems: Cosmic Magnetic Bremsstrahlung (synchrotron Radiation). Soviet Physics Uspekhi , year = 1966, month = may, volume =. doi:10.1070/PU1966v008n05ABEH003029 , adsurl =

  58. [58]

    Applications of electrodynamics in theoretical physics and astrophysics

  59. [59]

    Radiative processes in astrophysics

  60. [60]

    A sample of low energy bursts from FRB 121102

    A Sample of Low-energy Bursts from FRB 121102. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f8a , archivePrefix =. 1903.02249 , primaryClass =

  61. [61]

    Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii

    On the spectrum of nonthermal cosmic radio emission , author=. Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii. Radiofizika , number=

  62. [62]

    , year = 1963, month = jan, volume =

    Solar Bursts. , year = 1963, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.01.090163.001451 , adsurl =

  63. [63]

    Science , year = 1966, month = dec, volume =

    Possibility of Maser Action in Cosmic Radio Sources. Science , year = 1966, month = dec, volume =. doi:10.1126/science.154.3754.1320 , adsurl =

  64. [64]

    Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics , year = 1967, month = feb, volume =

    Negative Reabsorption of Synchrotron Radiation. Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics , year = 1967, month = feb, volume =

  65. [65]

    , year = 1970, month = apr, volume =

    Negative Reabsorption of Synchrotron Radiation. , year = 1970, month = apr, volume =

  66. [66]

    Collective processes in relativistic plasma and their implications for gamma-ray burst afterglows

    Collective Processes in Relativistic Plasma and Their Implications for Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/340948 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0202337 , primaryClass =

  67. [67]

    Burst Morphology

    FAST Observations of an Extremely Active Episode of FRB 20201124A: I. Burst Morphology. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ac98f8 , archivePrefix =. 2210.03607 , primaryClass =

  68. [68]

    Science , keywords =

    Frequency-dependent polarization of repeating fast radio bursts implications for their origin. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.abl7759 , archivePrefix =. 2202.09601 , primaryClass =

  69. [69]

    On the origin of fast radio bursts (FRBs)

    On the Origin of Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs). , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa713e , archivePrefix =. 1703.06723 , primaryClass =

  70. [70]

    Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow: Polarization and Analytic Light Curves

    Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow: Polarization and Analytic Light Curves. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/306720 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9807111 , primaryClass =

  71. [71]

    Maser and other instabilities in a weakly magnetized relativistic plasma: Theory and the astrophysical relevance of the maser

    Masers and Other Instabilities in a Weakly Magnetized Relativistic Plasma: Theory and the Astrophysical Relevance of the Maser. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f9b , archivePrefix =. 1901.01700 , primaryClass =

  72. [72]

    Physics of Fluids , keywords =

    Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves. Physics of Fluids , keywords =. doi:10.1063/1.861619 , adsurl =

  73. [73]

    Synchrotron maser from weakly magnetised neutron stars as the emission mechanism of fast radio bursts

    Synchrotron Maser from Weakly Magnetized Neutron Stars as the Emission Mechanism of Fast Radio Bursts. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aada0b , archivePrefix =. 1806.02700 , primaryClass =

  74. [74]

    Australian Journal of Physics , year = 1958, month = dec, volume =

    Radiation Transfer and the Possibility of Negative Absorption in Radio Astronomy. Australian Journal of Physics , year = 1958, month = dec, volume =. doi:10.1071/PH580564 , adsurl =

  75. [75]

    , year = 1972, month = jan, volume =

    Results and Problems in the Investigation of the Synchrotron Instability. , year = 1972, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1007/BF00649945 , adsurl =

  76. [76]

    Fast Radio Burst Discovered in the Arecibo Pulsar ALFA Survey

    Fast Radio Burst Discovered in the Arecibo Pulsar ALFA Survey. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/101 , archivePrefix =. 1404.2934 , primaryClass =

  77. [77]

    A Repeating Fast Radio Burst

    A repeating fast radio burst. , keywords =. doi:10.1038/nature17168 , archivePrefix =. 1603.00581 , primaryClass =

  78. [78]

    FRB 121102 is coincident with a star forming region in its host galaxy

    FRB 121102 Is Coincident with a Star-forming Region in Its Host Galaxy. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7a0c , archivePrefix =. 1705.07698 , primaryClass =

  79. [79]

    A Multi-telescope Campaign on FRB 121102: Implications for the FRB Population

    A Multi-telescope Campaign on FRB 121102: Implications for the FRB Population. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9700 , archivePrefix =. 1705.07553 , primaryClass =

  80. [80]

    The Host Galaxy and Redshift of the Repeating Fast Radio Burst FRB 121102

    The Host Galaxy and Redshift of the Repeating Fast Radio Burst FRB 121102. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/834/2/L7 , archivePrefix =. 1701.01100 , primaryClass =

Showing first 80 references.