pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29666 · v1 · pith:N4IMDEFUnew · submitted 2026-06-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP · astro-ph.SR

TOI-6884b: A low-mass brown dwarf transiting a slightly evolved star

Akanksha Khandelwal , Shubhendra Nath Das , Rishikesh Sharma , Abhijit Chakraborty , Churchil Dwivedi , Sanjay Baliwal , Karen A.Collins , David W. Latham
show 37 more authors
Allyson Bieryla Cristilyn N. Watkins Felipe Murgas Norio Narita Enric Palle Steve B. Howell Mark E. Everett Catherine A. Clark Polina A. Budnikova David Ciardi Nikitha Jithendran Akihiko Fukui Ashirbad Nayak Bob Massey Boris Safonov Florence Libotte Francis P. Wilkin Gregor Srdoc Howard M. Relles Ivan Bonilla-Mariana Izuru Fukuda Jason D. Eastman Jerome de Leon Jesus Higuera Kapil Bharadwaj Keith Horne Kendra Nguyen Kevikumar Lad Manuel Pichardo Marcano Micaela Magno Neelam JSSV Prasad Noriharu Watanabe Richard P. Schwarz Sam Quinn Santiago Paez Toshi Suganuma Y. Gomez Maqueo Chew
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 04:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR
keywords brown dwarfTESStransitingradial velocityevolved starorbital aliassubstellar companionTOI-6884
0
0 comments X

The pith

TOI-6884b is a brown dwarf of 26 Jupiter masses transiting a slightly evolved star on a 4.8-day orbit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors present the discovery of TOI-6884b, a low-mass brown dwarf found through TESS transit data but with its orbital period corrected by ground-based observations. The true period is 4.808 days rather than the 14.42-day alias from space photometry alone. This adds a characterized example to the limited set of transiting brown dwarfs around evolved stars. A reader would care because these systems offer insights into how substellar objects behave and evolve when their host stars expand after the main sequence.

Core claim

The central discovery is the confirmation that the transiting object TOI-6884b has a mass of 26.32 Jupiter masses and radius of 0.927 Jupiter radii, placing it firmly in the brown dwarf regime, with an orbital period of 4.808 days around its F-type host star that has a radius of 1.84 solar radii indicating slight evolution off the main sequence.

What carries the argument

The combination of TESS light curves with ground-based radial velocity measurements and additional photometry to resolve the orbital period and measure the companion mass.

If this is right

  • The system helps map the population of short-period brown dwarfs around evolved stars.
  • It shows that ground-based radial velocities are essential to confirm periods from space-based photometry when aliases are possible.
  • The nearly circular orbit suggests tidal forces have acted on the system.
  • Such detections aid models of structural evolution for brown dwarfs in close orbits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future monitoring could detect changes in the orbit due to the star's evolution.
  • This case may indicate that brown dwarfs can form or migrate to short periods without being engulfed during stellar expansion.
  • Comparison with other systems could reveal if low-mass brown dwarfs have different radius properties than higher-mass ones.

Load-bearing premise

The radial velocity data accurately reflect the gravitational pull of the transiting companion at the reported period without significant contamination from stellar spots or other signals.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic observations that measure a companion mass exceeding 80 Jupiter masses or photometry showing no transit at the 4.808-day period.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29666 by Abhijit Chakraborty, Akanksha Khandelwal, Akihiko Fukui, Allyson Bieryla, Ashirbad Nayak, Bob Massey, Boris Safonov, Catherine A. Clark, Churchil Dwivedi, Cristilyn N. Watkins, David Ciardi, David W. Latham, Enric Palle, Felipe Murgas, Florence Libotte, Francis P. Wilkin, Gregor Srdoc, Howard M. Relles, Ivan Bonilla-Mariana, Izuru Fukuda, Jason D. Eastman, Jerome de Leon, Jesus Higuera, Kapil Bharadwaj, Karen A.Collins, Keith Horne, Kendra Nguyen, Kevikumar Lad, Manuel Pichardo Marcano, Mark E. Everett, Micaela Magno, Neelam JSSV Prasad, Nikitha Jithendran, Noriharu Watanabe, Norio Narita, Polina A. Budnikova, Richard P. Schwarz, Rishikesh Sharma, Sam Quinn, Sanjay Baliwal, Santiago Paez, Shubhendra Nath Das, Steve B. Howell, Toshi Suganuma, Y. Gomez Maqueo Chew.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: TESS target pixel file of TOI-6884 from Sector 49, generated with tpfplotter (Aller et al. 2020). The target star is marked with a white cross and labeled as 1. Nearby Gaia DR3 sources within a magnitude contrast of Δ𝑚 ≤ 8 are shown as red circles, with symbol sizes scaled by relative brightness. The SPOC photometric aperture is indicated by the shaded red pixels. customized implementation of the Tapir sof… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: TESS light curve (LC) of TOI-6884 after detrending. The upper panel shows the full time-series LC, and the lower panel displays the phase￾folded transit LC. Both panels include the best-fit transit model (red) and 30-minute binned data. the SPOC pipeline aperture for Sector 49. Accounting for the relative positions of nearby sources and the TESS pixel response functions (PRFs), TESS-cont estimates that 99.… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Transit light curves of TOI-6884 from our follow-up observations with MuSCAT-2 and LCOGT 1 m, 0.35 m, and 2 m MuSCAT-3. All the dataset are 20-minutes binned. The solid red line represents the best-fit transit model generated with the batman package (Kreidberg 2015), using the parameters from the most probable EXOFASTv2 solution (the high-mass fit, Pr ∼ 77%). Details of the observational parameters are lis… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Speckle imaging observations of TOI-6884 obtained with ‘Alopeke at the Gemini North telescope. The magnitude contrast curves represent fits to the 5𝜎 detection limits from the diffraction limit out to the edge of the field of view. The inset panel shows the reconstructed image at 832 nm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Palomar near-infrared AO imaging and sensitivity curves for TOI￾6884 taken in the 𝐾𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡 filter. Inset: Image of the central portion of the data, centered on the star. at position angles spaced every 20◦ , and at separations corresponding to integer multiples of the FWHM of the central source, following the methodology of Furlan et al. (2017). The flux of each injected source was scaled until it was detecte… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top panel: TESS SAP light curve of TOI-6884, showing the out￾of-transit photometric data used for rotation period measurement. Bottom panel: GLS periodogram of the light curve. The vertical dashed red line marks the detected periodic signal at 𝑃 = 6.89 days. The upper axis shows the corresponding period scale. neglecting differential rotation, we estimate a stellar inclination of 72.70±10.29◦ following Mas… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: GLS periodograms of TOI-6884. From top to bottom: (1) Radial velocities, (2) Residual RVs after subtracting the dominant signal, (3) Window function, (4) FWHM, and (5) Bisector span. The primary peak at a period of ≈ 4.82 days (magenta dashed line) corresponds to the photometrically derived orbital period of the planetary candidate. False alarm probability levels of 0.1%, 1%, and 10% are indicated as horiz… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: RV measurements of TOI-6884 from PARAS-2 (cyan points) and TRES (blue points) are shown as a function of time (left panel). The phase-folded RVs are shown in the right panel. The red line represents the best-fit RV model using EF2, with the residuals displayed in the lower panels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: SED of TOI-6884, with red symbols representing the observed photometric measurements and horizontal bars indicating the effective width of the passbands. The blue points represent the model fluxes, and the residuals are displayed in the lower panel. 4 DISCUSSION 4.1 The transiting BD population and the Mass–Radius relation We compiled a comparison sample of transiting BDs and gathered their properties from… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: 𝑀 − 𝑅 diagram of all known transiting BDs with masses between 13 𝑀J and 80 𝑀J . TOI-6884b is marked with a star. Points are color-coded by the published ages of their host systems. Colored lines show evolutionary isochrones from Morley et al. (2024) at ages of 0.11, 0.49, 1.0, 2.5, 5.2, and 9.3 Gyr. Different line styles indicate metallicity variations ([M/H] = –0.5, 0.0, +0.5) for the 2.5 Gyr isochrone. … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Backward and forward evolution of the orbital separation for different values of 𝑄′ ★ and 𝑄′ 𝑝, based on the formulation of Jackson et al. (2009), for the high-probability solution of the TOI-6884 system. The low-probability solution is shown in Fig A2. radiative-envelope regime and suggests inefficient tidal dissipation. The discrepancy between theoretical expectations and observations may reflect uncert… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report the discovery of a low-mass transiting brown dwarf orbiting TOI-6884 (TIC~156514476, $T_{\rm mag}=11.4$) from NASA's \textit{Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite} (\textit{TESS}) mission. The \textit{TESS} light curves initially suggested an orbital period of $\sim$14.42~days; however, our high-precision ground-based radial velocity measurements and multi-epoch time-series photometry reveal this to be a harmonic alias. We determine the true orbital period to be $4.808264^{+0.000015}_{-0.000014}$~days and confirm the substellar nature of the companion. TOI-6884b has a mass of $26.32^{+0.98}_{-0.93}\,M_{\mathrm{J}}$, a radius of $0.927^{+0.51}_{-0.52}\,R_{\mathrm{J}}$, and resides on a nearly circular orbit ($e=0.067^{+0.010}_{-0.012}$). Its host star is a late F-type slightly evolved star with $M_\star = 1.410^{+0.075}_{-0.069}\,M_\odot$,\msun, $R_\star = 1.840^{+0.072}_{-0.073}\,R_\odot$, $\log{g} = 4.057^{+0.045}_{-0.039}$, $[{\rm Fe/H}] = 0.094^{+0.073}_{-0.068}$~dex, and $T_{\rm eff}=6330^{+180}_{-160}$,\mathrm{K}$. TOI-6884b is a key addition to the small population of well-characterized transiting brown dwarfs orbiting host stars that have evolved off the main sequence. The detection of such systems will contribute to our understanding of the dynamical histories and structural evolution of short-period substellar companions around evolved stars.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the discovery of the transiting low-mass brown dwarf TOI-6884b around the slightly evolved F-type star TOI-6884 (TIC 156514476). TESS photometry initially indicated a ~14.42-day period, but ground-based radial velocity measurements and multi-epoch photometry are used to establish the true period as 4.808264 days, yielding a companion mass of 26.32 M_J, radius of 0.927 R_J, and eccentricity of 0.067; the host star parameters are also derived.

Significance. If the period alias is correctly resolved, the system adds a precisely characterized transiting brown dwarf to the limited sample orbiting evolved stars, supporting studies of substellar companion evolution and dynamics in post-main-sequence environments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Orbital period determination and RV analysis sections] The resolution of the 14.42 d TESS alias in favor of the 4.808 d period is load-bearing for all derived parameters (mass, radius, eccentricity). The abstract states that ground-based RV and photometry 'reveal this to be a harmonic alias,' but without explicit quantitative comparison (e.g., RV periodogram power, false-alarm probabilities, or Bayesian evidence for both periods in the joint photometric-RV fit), it is not possible to assess whether the shorter period is unambiguously preferred.
  2. [Derived parameters table and transit modeling] Table reporting the final parameters (likely Table 3 or equivalent): the radius uncertainty of +0.51/-0.52 R_J on a value of 0.927 R_J implies a fractional uncertainty exceeding 50%, which appears inconsistent with the precision expected from a detected transit and requires explicit justification in the light-curve modeling section.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains a formatting artifact: 'M_\star = 1.410^{+0.075}_{-0.069}\,M_\odot,\msun' includes an extraneous ',\msun'.
  2. [Abstract and parameter tables] Notation for stellar mass in the abstract mixes LaTeX and plain text; ensure consistent use of solar mass symbol throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Orbital period determination and RV analysis sections] The resolution of the 14.42 d TESS alias in favor of the 4.808 d period is load-bearing for all derived parameters (mass, radius, eccentricity). The abstract states that ground-based RV and photometry 'reveal this to be a harmonic alias,' but without explicit quantitative comparison (e.g., RV periodogram power, false-alarm probabilities, or Bayesian evidence for both periods in the joint photometric-RV fit), it is not possible to assess whether the shorter period is unambiguously preferred.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative support for the period choice strengthens the analysis. In the revised manuscript we will include the RV periodogram with powers and false-alarm probabilities at both the 4.808 d signal and the 14.42 d alias, together with the Bayesian evidence ratio from the joint photometric-RV model comparison demonstrating the clear preference for the shorter period. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Derived parameters table and transit modeling] Table reporting the final parameters (likely Table 3 or equivalent): the radius uncertainty of +0.51/-0.52 R_J on a value of 0.927 R_J implies a fractional uncertainty exceeding 50%, which appears inconsistent with the precision expected from a detected transit and requires explicit justification in the light-curve modeling section.

    Authors: The large fractional uncertainty on the radius is a direct consequence of the shallow transit depth relative to the evolved host star and the available photometric precision. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the transit modeling section that quantifies the contributions to the radius uncertainty (including limb-darkening priors, dilution, and photometric noise) and explains why the radius remains only loosely constrained despite the secure transit detection. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from independent observational datasets

full rationale

The paper reports a standard exoplanet/brown-dwarf discovery and parameter fit using TESS photometry, ground-based RV time series, and multi-epoch transit photometry. Orbital period, mass (from RV semi-amplitude), radius (from transit depth), and eccentricity are obtained by direct model fitting to these external datasets. No equations reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no load-bearing self-citations underpin the central claims, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is imported from prior author work. The derivation chain is self-contained against the supplied observations and standard Keplerian/transit models.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The report rests on the assumption that the photometric and spectroscopic signals arise from a single transiting substellar companion whose parameters can be extracted with standard Keplerian and transit models; full text would be needed to list all fitted parameters and modeling choices.

free parameters (2)
  • Orbital period
    Fitted value 4.808264 days obtained after alias correction from combined photometry and RV data.
  • Companion mass
    Derived mass 26.32 M_J that depends on the fitted RV semi-amplitude and adopted stellar mass.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The observed signal is produced by a transiting companion on a Keplerian orbit and is not a false positive or residual alias.
    Invoked when the authors adopt the 4.808-day period and substellar mass after correcting the initial TESS alias.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6131 in / 1364 out tokens · 54538 ms · 2026-06-30T04:39:41.670345+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 113 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [22]

    , keywords =

    ELODIE: A spectrograph for accurate radial velocity measurements. , keywords =

  2. [26]

    Evolutionary models for cool brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets. The case of HD 20945

    Evolutionary models for cool brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets. The case of HD 209458. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030252 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0302293 , primaryClass =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030252

  3. [29]

    1966 , issn =

    Q in the Solar System. , year = 1966, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(66)90051-0 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(66)90051-0 1966

  4. [31]

    , keywords =

    Tidal evolution in close binary systems. , keywords =

  5. [39]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    EXOFASTv2: A public, generalized, publication-quality exoplanet modeling code. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  6. [47]

    , keywords =

    Beating Stellar Systematic Error Floors Using Transit-based Densities. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aceda2 , archivePrefix =. 2209.14301 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aceda2

  7. [48]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Vines, Jose I and Jenkins, James S , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac956 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac956 2022

  8. [49]

    Hartman and Sébastien Lépine , title =

    Zachary D. Hartman and Sébastien Lépine , title =. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , abstract =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab79a6 , url =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab79a6 2020

  9. [53]

    , keywords =

    Model atmospheres for G, F, A, B, and O stars. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/190589 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/190589

  10. [62]

    Software and Cyber infrastructure for Astronomy IV , year=

    The TESS science processing operations center , author=. Software and Cyber infrastructure for Astronomy IV , year=

  11. [70]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Gaia Data Release 3: Summary of the content and survey properties. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  12. [72]

    , keywords =

    The Tycho-2 catalogue of the 2.5 million brightest stars. , keywords =

  13. [73]

    VizieR Online Data Catalog , keywords =

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: AAVSO Photometric All Sky Survey (APASS) DR9 (Henden+, 2016). VizieR Online Data Catalog , keywords =

    2016

  14. [74]

    VizieR Online Data Catalog , keywords =

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: AllWISE Data Release (Cutri+ 2013). VizieR Online Data Catalog , keywords =

    2013

  15. [75]

    VizieR Online Data Catalog , keywords =

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003). VizieR Online Data Catalog , keywords =

    2003

  16. [76]

    VizieR Online Data Catalog , keywords =

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: Henry Draper Catalogue and Extension (Cannon+ 1918-1924; ADC 1989). VizieR Online Data Catalog , keywords =

    1918

  17. [77]

    Astrometric and photometric star catalogues derived from the ESA HIPPARCOS Space Astrometry Mission

    The HIPPARCOS and TYCHO catalogues. Astrometric and photometric star catalogues derived from the ESA HIPPARCOS Space Astrometry Mission. ESA Special Publication , year = 1997, series =

    1997

  18. [87]

    , keywords =

    Determining Which Binary Component Hosts the TESS Transiting Planet. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac75ee , archivePrefix =. 2206.02825 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac75ee

  19. [89]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#231 , year = 2018, series =

    Stellar Companions of Exoplanet Host Stars in K2. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#231 , year = 2018, series =

    2018

  20. [93]

    ascl:1306.007 , adsurl =

    Tapir: A web interface for transit/eclipse observability. ascl:1306.007 , adsurl =

  21. [117]

    Nature , year=

    An abundance of small exoplanets around stars with a wide range of metallicities , author=. Nature , year=

  22. [118]

    The Stellar Populations of Galaxies , year = 1992, editor =

    Model Atmospheres for Population Synthesis. The Stellar Populations of Galaxies , year = 1992, editor =

    1992

  23. [120]

    2008 , Title =

    G\'abor F. 2008 , Title =

    2008

  24. [129]

    C., Laughlin G., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...649.1004A 649, 1004

    Adams F. C., Laughlin G., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/506145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...649.1004A 649, 1004

    work page doi:10.1086/506145 2006

  25. [130]

    Agol E., Luger R., Foreman-Mackey D., 2020, @doi [The Astronomical Journal] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab4fee , 159, 123

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab4fee 2020

  26. [131]

    Albrecht S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...757...18A 757, 18

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/18 2012

  27. [132]

    Alibert Y., Mordasini C., Benz W., Winisdoerffer C., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042032 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...434..343A 434, 343

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042032 2005

  28. [133]

    F., Barcel \'o Forteza S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...635A.128A 635, A128

    Aller A., Lillo-Box J., Jones D., Miranda L. F., Barcel \'o Forteza S., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201937118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...635A.128A 635, A128

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937118 2020

  29. [134]

    Baliwal S., et al., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450934 , 691, A12

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450934 2024

  30. [135]

    Baliwal S., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ada959 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025AJ....169..147B 169, 147

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ada959 2025

  31. [136]

    H., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011638 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...382..563B 382, 563

    Baraffe I., Chabrier G., Allard F., Hauschildt P. H., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011638 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...382..563B 382, 563

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011638 2002

  32. [137]

    Baraffe I., Homeier D., Allard F., Chabrier G., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...577A..42B 577, A42

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425481 2015

  33. [138]

    Baranne A., et al., 1996, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&AS..119..373B 119, 373

    1996

  34. [139]

    M., Zicher N., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stab2889 , 509, 866

    Barragán O., Aigrain S., Rajpaul V. M., Zicher N., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stab2889 , 509, 866

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2889 2021

  35. [140]

    G., Morley C

    Beatty T. G., Morley C. V., Curtis J. L., Burrows A., Davenport J. R. A., Montet B. T., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aad697 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..168B 156, 168

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aad697 2018

  36. [141]

    S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322631 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...562A..71B 562, A71

    Bensby T., Feltzing S., Oey M. S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322631 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...562A..71B 562, A71

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322631 2014

  37. [142]

    Bouchy F., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015276 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...525A..68B 525, A68

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015276 2011

  38. [143]

    M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/673168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125.1031B 125, 1031

    Brown T. M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1086/673168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PASP..125.1031B 125, 1031

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/673168 2013

  39. [144]

    A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720.1118B 720, 1118

    Buchhave L. A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...720.1118B 720, 1118

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/720/2/1118 2010

  40. [145]

    A., et al., 2012, Nature, 486, 375

    Buchhave L. A., et al., 2012, Nature, 486, 375

    2012

  41. [146]

    B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/514326 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...661..502B 661, 502

    Burrows A., Hubeny I., Budaj J., Hubbard W. B., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/514326 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...661..502B 661, 502

    work page doi:10.1086/514326 2007

  42. [147]

    Burrows A., Heng K., Nampaisarn T., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/47 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...736...47B 736, 47

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/1/47 2011

  43. [148]

    W., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015655 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...520L..10B 520, L10

    Butters O. W., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015655 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...520L..10B 520, L10

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015655 2010

  44. [149]

    Castro-Gonz \'a lez A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451656 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...691A.233C 691, A233

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451656 2024

  45. [150]

    Chabrier G., Baraffe I., Allard F., Hauschildt P., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309513 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...542..464C 542, 464

    work page doi:10.1086/309513 2000

  46. [151]

    Chabrier G., Baraffe I., Phillips M., Debras F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243832 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A.119C 671, A119

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243832 2023

  47. [152]

    Chakraborty A., Thapa N., Kumar K., Neelam P. J. S. S. V., Sharma R., Roy A., 2018, in Evans C. J., Simard L., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 10702, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII. p. 107026G, @doi 10.1117/12.2313055

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2313055 2018

  48. [153]

    Chakraborty A., et al., 2024, @doi [Bulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège] 10.25518/0037-9565.11602 , p. 68–88

    work page doi:10.25518/0037-9565.11602 2024

  49. [154]

    G., Roy A., Mahadevan S., 2016, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stw1560 , 462, 554

    Chaturvedi P., Chakraborty A., Anandarao B. G., Roy A., Mahadevan S., 2016, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stw1560 , 462, 554

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1560 2016

  50. [155]

    2016, ApJ, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    Choi J., Dotter A., Conroy C., Cantiello M., Paxton B., Johnson B. D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823..102C 823, 102

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 2016

  51. [156]

    R., Beichman C

    Ciardi D. R., Beichman C. A., Horch E. P., Howell S. B., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/16 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805...16C 805, 16

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/1/16 2015

  52. [157]

    Claret A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629705 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...600A..30C 600, A30

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629705 2017

  53. [158]

    Claret A., Bloemen S., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...529A..75C 529, A75

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116451 2011

  54. [159]

    A., Kielkopf J

    Collins K. A., Kielkopf J. F., Stassun K. G., Hessman F. V., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/77 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153...77C 153, 77

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/77 2017

  55. [160]

    M., et al., 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003yCat.2246....0C p

    Cutri R. M., et al., 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003yCat.2246....0C p. II/246

    2003

  56. [161]

    M., et al., 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014yCat.2328....0C p

    Cutri R. M., et al., 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014yCat.2328....0C p. II/328

    2021

  57. [162]

    Dekany R., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/776/2/130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...776..130D 776, 130

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/776/2/130 2013

  58. [163]

    Dotter A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..222....8D 222, 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8 2016

  59. [164]

    EXOFASTv2: A public, generalized, publication-quality exoplanet modeling code

    Eastman J. D., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190709480E p. arXiv:1907.09480

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [165]

    F u r\'esz G., 2008, PhD thesis, University of Szeged, Hungary

    2008

  61. [166]

    B., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500802 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..505F 642, 505

    Ford E. B., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500802 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...642..505F 642, 505

    work page doi:10.1086/500802 2006

  62. [167]

    B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7b70 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...66F 154, 66

    Furlan E., Howell S. B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa7b70 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....154...66F 154, 66

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa7b70 2017

  63. [168]

    B., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9c9c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...898...47F 898, 47

    Furlan E., Howell S. B., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9c9c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...898...47F 898, 47

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9c9c 2020

  64. [169]

    Furlan E., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/71 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153...71F 153, 71

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/71 2017

  65. [170]

    Gagn \'e J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaae09 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...856...23G 856, 23

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaae09 2018

  66. [171]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 2023

  67. [172]

    P., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006SSRv..123..485G 123, 485

    Gardner J. P., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006SSRv..123..485G 123, 485

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7 2006

  68. [173]

    Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences

    Gelman A., Rubin D. B., 1992, @doi [Statistical Science] 10.1214/ss/1177011136 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992StaSc...7..457G 7, 457

    work page doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 1992

  69. [174]

    Grieves N., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx334 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.4264G 467, 4264

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx334 2017

  70. [175]

    Grieves N., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141145 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...652A.127G 652, A127

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141145 2021

  71. [176]

    K., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/185 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..185G 152, 185

    Grunblatt S. K., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/185 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..185G 152, 185

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/185 2016

  72. [177]

    K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aacc67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...861L...5G 861, L5

    Grunblatt S. K., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aacc67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...861L...5G 861, L5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aacc67 2018

  73. [178]

    M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..254...39G 254, 39

    Guerrero N. M., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..254...39G 254, 39

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abefe1 2021

  74. [179]

    L., Mayor M., Udry S., Arenou F., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20021507 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...397..159H 397, 159

    Halbwachs J. L., Mayor M., Udry S., Arenou F., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20021507 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...397..159H 397, 159

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021507 2003

  75. [180]

    L., Brandl B., Pirger B., Blacken C., Gull G

    Hayward T. L., Brandl B., Pirger B., Blacken C., Gull G. E., Schoenwald J., Houck J. R., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317969 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001PASP..113..105H 113, 105

    work page doi:10.1086/317969 2001

  76. [181]

    A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.2823H 533, 2823

    Henderson B. A., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.2823H 533, 2823

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1940 2024

  77. [182]

    Hennebelle P., Chabrier G., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/589916 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...684..395H 684, 395

    work page doi:10.1086/589916 2008

  78. [183]

    H g E., et al., 2000, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...355L..27H 355, L27

    2000

  79. [184]

    B., Everett M

    Howell S. B., Everett M. E., Sherry W., Horch E., Ciardi D. R., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/142/1/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AJ....142...19H 142, 19

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/1/19 2011

  80. [185]

    B., Scott N

    Howell S. B., Scott N. J., Matson R. A., Everett M. E., Furlan E., Gnilka C. L., Ciardi D. R., Lester K. V., 2021, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2021.635864 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021FrASS...8...10H 8, 10

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2021.635864 2021

Showing first 80 references.