REVIEW 4 cited by
Astraios: Parameter-Efficient Instruction Tuning Code Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The high cost of full-parameter fine-tuning (FFT) of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to a series of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods. However, it remains unclear which methods provide the best cost-performance trade-off at different model scales. We introduce Astraios, a suite of 28 instruction-tuned OctoCoder models using 7 tuning methods and 4 model sizes up to 16 billion parameters. Through investigations across 5 tasks and 8 different datasets encompassing both code comprehension and code generation tasks, we find that FFT generally leads to the best downstream performance across all scales, and PEFT methods differ significantly in their efficacy based on the model scale. LoRA usually offers the most favorable trade-off between cost and performance. Further investigation into the effects of these methods on both model robustness and code security reveals that larger models tend to demonstrate reduced robustness and less security. At last, we explore the relationships among updated parameters, cross-entropy loss, and task performance. We find that the tuning effectiveness observed in small models generalizes well to larger models, and the validation loss in instruction tuning can be a reliable indicator of overall downstream performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
An Empirical Study of Vulnerabilities in Python Packages and Their Detection
PyVul is a new benchmark of 1,157 Python-package vulnerabilities with LLM-cleaned labels; current static detectors detect only a small fraction of them.
-
Rethinking Code Performance Benchmarks for LLMs
Re-evaluating four LLM code-efficiency benchmarks with 30-run statistical testing shows 93.89% of 'performant' implementations are indistinguishable from baselines; a multi-agent test-generation framework reveals hidd...
-
The Impact of Fine-tuning Large Language Models on Automated Program Repair
On three Java APR benchmarks, LoRA and IA3 adapters match or beat full-model fine-tuning for most tested code LLMs while training less than one percent of parameters.
-
ParaStudent: Generating and Evaluating Realistic Student Code by Teaching LLMs to Struggle
Fine-tuning a 7B code model on real student submissions produces code that better matches student error patterns, style, and incremental revision trajectories than prompting-only models across two temporal resolutions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.