pith. sign in

arxiv: 2607.01226 · v1 · pith:NRKDSA35new · submitted 2026-07-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Intertwined Constraints in Extended Cosmologies: Dark Energy, Curvature, Neutrinos, and Inflation

William Giar\`e , Dong Ha Lee , Eleonora Di Valentino This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-02 06:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords dynamical dark energycurvatureneutrino massinflationary parametersHubble tensionCMB constraintsBAO dataextended cosmologies
0
0 comments X

The pith

Preference for dynamical dark energy persists across extensions that free curvature, neutrinos, and inflation parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reassesses constraints from latest CMB data combined with DESI BAO and supernova catalogues by successively allowing dynamical dark energy, nonzero curvature, variable neutrino number and mass, and inflationary runnings. It finds that evidence for evolving dark energy remains the only clear departure from LambdaCDM and that this choice alters the inferred limits on curvature and neutrinos while leaving the Hubble tension intact. A reader cares because the sectors are coupled, so the choice of dark-energy model directly changes what the same data imply for the universe's geometry and particle content. The analysis also shows that neutrino-mass upper bounds and the apparent tension with oscillation data depend strongly on which other extensions are included.

Core claim

Using Planck CMB data together with DESI BAO and multiple supernova catalogues, dynamical dark energy continues to be preferred at similar significance in every extended model examined. Curvature remains consistent with zero, though a 2.2-sigma hint for positive Omega_k is strongly reduced once dynamical dark energy is allowed. Effective neutrino number stays compatible with the standard value while the upper limit on total neutrino mass ranges from 0.06 eV to 0.2 eV depending on the model. No primordial tensor modes are detected and the spectral index shows model dependence that can be partly absorbed by allowing small runnings, yet none of the extensions resolve the Hubble tension.

What carries the argument

Progressive relaxation of assumptions on dark energy, curvature, neutrinos and inflation within a single combined dataset analysis, revealing how parameter shifts in one sector propagate to the others.

If this is right

  • Allowing dynamical dark energy substantially weakens any apparent preference for positive curvature.
  • Upper limits on the sum of neutrino masses vary by more than a factor of three across the cosmologies considered.
  • The apparent tension between cosmological neutrino-mass bounds and oscillation data is strongly model-dependent.
  • Small positive runnings of the spectral index can absorb the mild excess of power on small scales without requiring a large shift in the tilt itself.
  • No combination of the extensions considered brings the inferred Hubble constant into agreement with local measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the dynamical dark energy preference survives future surveys with tighter error bars, model builders will need to treat evolving dark energy as a baseline rather than an optional extension.
  • The strong framework dependence of neutrino-mass limits suggests that any claimed cosmological detection of neutrino mass should be presented together with the dark-energy assumption used.
  • The lack of resolution to the Hubble tension in these models implies that either new physics outside the four sectors examined or unaccounted systematics in the data will be required.
  • Inflationary model comparisons that fix the dark-energy sector to a cosmological constant may reach different conclusions about viable slow-roll potentials once dynamical dark energy is allowed.

Load-bearing premise

The latest CMB data together with DESI BAO and different SN catalogues can be combined without significant unaccounted systematics or dataset inconsistencies that would alter the reported parameter shifts.

What would settle it

A re-analysis of the same CMB plus DESI plus supernova combination that removes the statistical preference for w0 not equal to minus one or wa not equal to zero while leaving the other extensions free.

read the original abstract

We present a systematic reassessment of cosmological constraints beyond $\Lambda$CDM by progressively relaxing the assumptions underlying Dark Energy (DE), Curvature, Neutrinos, and Inflation. Using the latest CMB data together with DESI BAO and different SN catalogues, we show that the preference for dynamical DE persists across all the extended cosmologies considered. $\Omega_k$ remains compatible with flatness, despite a mild $2.2\sigma$ preference for $\Omega_k>0$ that is substantially degraded in dynamical DE extensions. Constraints on $N_{\rm eff}$ are broadly consistent with $N_{\rm eff}=3.04$, while cosmological upper limits on the total neutrino mass vary substantially across the cosmologies explored, ranging from $\sum m_\nu\lesssim 0.06$ eV to $\lesssim 0.2$ eV. We quantify both the preference for the mass ordering and the apparent tension between cosmology and oscillation experiments, showing that they are strongly framework dependent. We find no evidence for inflationary tensor modes, with $r\lesssim 0.035$. Constraints on the spectral index $n_s$ show significant model dependence. Allowing for the scalar runnings produces a mild shift toward $\alpha_s>0$ and $\beta_s>0$ that can reabsorb the preference for larger $n_s$ found in small-scale CMB data, although both $\alpha_s$ and $\beta_s$ remain consistent with zero at $\sim 1.5\sigma$. We highlight the implications for slow-roll inflation and benchmark models. None of the extensions considered here can resolve the $H_0$ tension. We discuss the implications for $\Omega_m$ and $S_8$. Overall, dynamical DE is the only significant deviation from $\Lambda$CDM and has the strongest impact on the inferred conclusions in the other sectors of the model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reassesses cosmological constraints beyond ΛCDM by progressively extending the model to include dynamical dark energy (w0, wa), spatial curvature Ω_k, effective neutrino species N_eff, neutrino mass sum, tensor-to-scalar ratio r, and inflationary parameters (ns, α_s, β_s). Using Planck/PR4 CMB data combined with DESI BAO and multiple SN catalogues, it reports that the preference for dynamical DE persists in all extensions considered; Ω_k remains compatible with flatness (mild 2.2σ preference for Ω_k > 0 is degraded when dynamical DE is allowed); N_eff is consistent with 3.04; neutrino mass upper limits range from ≲0.06 eV to ≲0.2 eV depending on the framework; no evidence for tensors (r ≲ 0.035); ns shows model dependence that can be partially reabsorbed by runnings (both α_s, β_s consistent with zero at ~1.5σ); and none of the extensions resolve the H0 tension. Dynamical DE is identified as the only significant deviation from ΛCDM with the strongest impact on other sectors.

Significance. If the joint dataset consistency holds, the work provides a useful systematic mapping of parameter degeneracies, showing the robustness of the dynamical DE signal and its downstream effects on neutrino mass bounds, curvature, and inflationary constraints. The framework-dependent nature of the neutrino mass-ordering preference and the H0 tension statements are valuable for guiding model-building and future data analyses.

major comments (1)
  1. [Analysis and Results sections (as implied by the abstract and the absence of such tests in the provided text)] The central claim—that the dynamical DE preference persists across all extensions and that none resolve the H0 tension—rests on the joint likelihood from Planck/PR4 CMB + DESI BAO + multiple SN catalogues. No dedicated consistency diagnostics (e.g., parameter shifts when dropping individual probes, interchanging SN compilations, or testing for offsets between BAO and CMB) are reported. This is load-bearing because unrecognized systematics or tensions between datasets could alter the reported significances and the persistence conclusion.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract quotes specific numerical results and significances (e.g., 2.2σ, r ≲ 0.035) without referencing the priors, likelihood implementations, or convergence checks used; these details should be summarized or pointed to in the main text for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. We address the major comment below and agree that additional consistency diagnostics will strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Analysis and Results sections (as implied by the abstract and the absence of such tests in the provided text)] The central claim—that the dynamical DE preference persists across all extensions and that none resolve the H0 tension—rests on the joint likelihood from Planck/PR4 CMB + DESI BAO + multiple SN catalogues. No dedicated consistency diagnostics (e.g., parameter shifts when dropping individual probes, interchanging SN compilations, or testing for offsets between BAO and CMB) are reported. This is load-bearing because unrecognized systematics or tensions between datasets could alter the reported significances and the persistence conclusion.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the submitted manuscript does not present explicit consistency diagnostics of the type suggested (e.g., parameter shifts upon removal of individual probes or direct tests for offsets between BAO and CMB). While the abstract and text already note the use of multiple independent SN catalogues as a partial robustness check, this does not substitute for the dedicated tests requested. We agree that such diagnostics are important given the load-bearing nature of the joint likelihood for the central claims. In the revised manuscript we will add these tests in the Analysis section (or a dedicated appendix), including constraints obtained by successively dropping BAO or SN data, and direct comparisons of results across the different SN compilations employed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; all claims are direct outputs of external-data fits

full rationale

The paper performs standard Bayesian parameter estimation on extended cosmological models using Planck/PR4 CMB, DESI BAO and SN catalogues. Reported preferences (dynamical DE, flatness, N_eff, neutrino mass limits, r, n_s, etc.) are posterior constraints; none are obtained by re-deriving a fitted quantity from itself or by renaming an input as a prediction. No self-citation is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or load-bearing premise that would force the central results. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external likelihoods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard cosmological model assumptions and external data likelihoods; no new entities are introduced and the free parameters are the usual cosmological parameters being constrained rather than fitted ad hoc to produce the result.

free parameters (6)
  • w0, wa (dynamical DE equation of state)
    Time-varying dark energy parameters allowed to vary in extended models.
  • Omega_k
    Spatial curvature density parameter.
  • N_eff
    Effective number of relativistic neutrino species.
  • sum m_nu
    Total neutrino mass sum.
  • r
    Tensor-to-scalar ratio.
  • ns, alpha_s, beta_s
    Scalar spectral index and its runnings.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption General relativity plus standard model particle content provide the correct background and perturbation equations for all extended cosmologies.
    Invoked throughout the model definitions and likelihood calculations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5888 in / 1501 out tokens · 32987 ms · 2026-07-02T06:12:14.055944+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 263 canonical work pages · 78 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Peebles,Primordial Helium Abundance and the Primordial Fireball

    P.J.E. Peebles,Primordial Helium Abundance and the Primordial Fireball. 2,Astrophys. J. 146(1966) 542

    1966

  2. [2]

    Wagoner, W.A

    R.V. Wagoner, W.A. Fowler and F. Hoyle,On the Synthesis of elements at very high temperatures,Astrophys. J.148(1967) 3

    1967

  3. [3]

    Steigman, D.N

    G. Steigman, D.N. Schramm and J.E. Gunn,Cosmological Limits to the Number of Massive Leptons,Phys. Lett. B66(1977) 202

    1977

  4. [4]

    Yang, D.N

    J.-M. Yang, D.N. Schramm, G. Steigman and R.T. Rood,Constraints on Cosmology and Neutrino Physics from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,Astrophys. J.227(1979) 697

    1979

  5. [5]

    Walker, G

    T.P. Walker, G. Steigman, D.N. Schramm, K.A. Olive and H.-S. Kang,Primordial Nucleosynthesis Redux,Astrophys. J.376(1991) 51

    1991

  6. [6]

    Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis and the Baryon Density of the Universe

    C.J. Copi, D.N. Schramm and M.S. Turner,Big bang nucleosynthesis and the baryon density of the universe,Science267(1995) 192 [astro-ph/9407006]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  7. [7]

    Big-bang Nucleosynthesis Enters the Precision Era

    D.N. Schramm and M.S. Turner,Big Bang Nucleosynthesis Enters the Precision Era,Rev. Mod. Phys.70(1998) 303 [astro-ph/9706069]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    Primordial Nucleosynthesis in the Precision Cosmology Era

    G. Steigman,Primordial Nucleosynthesis in the Precision Cosmology Era,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.57(2007) 463 [0712.1100]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  9. [9]

    Primordial Nucleosynthesis: from precision cosmology to fundamental physics

    F. Iocco, G. Mangano, G. Miele, O. Pisanti and P.D. Serpico,Primordial Nucleosynthesis: from precision cosmology to fundamental physics,Phys. Rept.472(2009) 1 [0809.0631]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  10. [10]

    Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: 2015

    R.H. Cyburt, B.D. Fields, K.A. Olive and T.-H. Yeh,Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: 2015,Rev. Mod. Phys.88(2016) 015004 [1505.01076]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    One percent determination of the primordial deuterium abundance

    R.J. Cooke, M. Pettini and C.C. Steidel,One Percent Determination of the Primordial Deuterium Abundance,Astrophys. J.855(2018) 102 [1710.11129]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Fields, K.A

    B.D. Fields, K.A. Olive, T.-H. Yeh and C. Young,Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis after Planck, JCAP03(2020) 010 [1912.01132]

    work page arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    The Cosmic Microwave Background Spectrum from the Full COBE/FIRAS Data Set

    D.J. Fixsen, E.S. Cheng, J.M. Gales, J.C. Mather, R.A. Shafer and E.L. Wright,The Cosmic Microwave Background spectrum from the full COBE FIRAS data set,Astrophys. J.473 (1996) 576 [astro-ph/9605054]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  14. [14]

    4-Year COBE DMR Cosmic Microwave Background Observations: Maps and Basic Results

    C.L. Bennett, A. Banday, K.M. Gorski, G. Hinshaw, P. Jackson, P. Keegstra et al.,Four year COBE DMR cosmic microwave background observations: Maps and basic results,Astrophys. J. Lett.464(1996) L1 [astro-ph/9601067]. [15]Boomerangcollaboration,Cosmology from MAXIMA-1, BOOMERANG and COBE / DMR CMB observations,Phys. Rev. Lett.86(2001) 3475 [astro-ph/000733...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  15. [15]

    The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Final Redshift Release (DR3) and Southern Large-Scale Structures

    D.H. Jones et al.,The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Final Redshift Release (DR3) and Southern Large-Scale Structures,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.399(2009) 683 [0903.5451]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  16. [16]

    The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Local Hubble Constant

    F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D.H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, L. Campbell et al.,The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Local Hubble Constant,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.416(2011) 3017 [1106.3366]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  17. [17]

    The 6dF Galaxy Survey: z \approx 0 measurement of the growth rate and sigma_8

    F. Beutler, C. Blake, M. Colless, D.H. Jones, L. Staveley-Smith, G.B. Poole et al.,The 6dF Galaxy Survey:z≈0measurement of the growth rate andσ 8,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 423(2012) 3430 [1204.4725]. [30]WiggleZcollaboration,The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: Joint measurements of the expansion and growth history at z<1,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.425(2012)...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  18. [18]

    KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo-Degree Survey

    A.H. Wright et al.,KiDS-Legacy: Cosmological constraints from cosmic shear with the complete Kilo-Degree Survey,Astron. Astrophys.703(2025) A158 [2503.19441]. [45]DEScollaboration,Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing,2601.14559. [46]Supernova Search Teamcollaboration,Observational evidence fro...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release

    D. Scolnic et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Data Set and Light-curve Release, Astrophys. J.938(2022) 113 [2112.03863]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints

    D. Brout et al.,The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,Astrophys. J.938(2022) 110 [2202.04077]. [51]DEScollaboration,The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: A Reanalysis Of Cosmology Results And Evidence For Evolving Dark Energy With An Updated Type Ia Supernova Calibration,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.548(2026) stag632 [2511.07517]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    Rubin, T

    D. Rubin, T. Hoyt, G. Aldering and S. Perlmutter,Banana Split: Improved Cosmological Constraints with Two Light-Curve-Shape and Color Populations Using Union3.1+UNITY1.8, 2601.19854

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Peebles,Large scale background temperature and mass fluctuations due to scale invariant primeval perturbations,Astrophys

    P.J.E. Peebles,Large scale background temperature and mass fluctuations due to scale invariant primeval perturbations,Astrophys. J. Lett.263(1982) L1

    1982

  23. [23]

    Blumenthal, S.M

    G.R. Blumenthal, S.M. Faber, J.R. Primack and M.J. Rees,Formation of Galaxies and Large Scale Structure with Cold Dark Matter,Nature311(1984) 517

    1984

  24. [24]

    Davis, G

    M. Davis, G. Efstathiou, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White,The Evolution of Large Scale Structure in a Universe Dominated by Cold Dark Matter,Astrophys. J.292(1985) 371

    1985

  25. [25]

    The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy

    P.J.E. Peebles and B. Ratra,The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy,Rev. Mod. Phys. 75(2003) 559 [astro-ph/0207347]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  26. [26]

    Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys

    A.H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

    1981

  27. [27]

    Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 99. – 82 –

    1980

  28. [28]

    Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys

    A.D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108 (1982) 389

    1982

  29. [29]

    Albrecht and P.J

    A. Albrecht and P.J. Steinhardt,Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,Phys. Rev. Lett.48(1982) 1220

    1982

  30. [30]

    Mukhanov and G.V

    V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov,Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe, JETP Lett.33(1981) 532

    1981

  31. [31]

    Hawking,The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe, Phys

    S.W. Hawking,The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe, Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 295

    1982

  32. [32]

    Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys

    A.A. Starobinsky,Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,Phys. Lett. B117(1982) 175

    1982

  33. [33]

    Guth and S.Y

    A.H. Guth and S.Y. Pi,Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.49 (1982) 1110

    1982

  34. [34]

    Bardeen, P.J

    J.M. Bardeen, P.J. Steinhardt and M.S. Turner,Spontaneous Creation of Almost Scale - Free Density Perturbations in an Inflationary Universe,Phys. Rev. D28(1983) 679

    1983

  35. [35]

    Goodman and E

    M.W. Goodman and E. Witten,Detectability of Certain Dark Matter Candidates,Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 3059

    1985

  36. [36]

    Drukier, K

    A.K. Drukier, K. Freese and D.N. Spergel,Detecting Cold Dark Matter Candidates,Phys. Rev. D33(1986) 3495

    1986

  37. [37]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  38. [38]

    A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter

    D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A.H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S.W. Randall, C. Jones et al.,A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter,Astrophys. J. Lett.648(2006) L109 [astro-ph/0608407]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  39. [39]

    Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection

    J.L. Feng,Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection,Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.48(2010) 495 [1003.0904]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  40. [40]

    A History of Dark Matter

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper,History of dark matter,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 045002 [1605.04909]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    A New Era in the Quest for Dark Matter

    G. Bertone and T. Tait, M. P.,A new era in the search for dark matter,Nature562(2018) 51 [1810.01668]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    The landscape of QCD axion models

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi and L. Visinelli,The landscape of QCD axion models, Phys. Rept.870(2020) 1 [2003.01100]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Dark Matter

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and J. Zupan,Dark Matter,2406.01705

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    The Waning of the WIMP? A Review of Models, Searches, and Constraints

    G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre et al.,The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 203 [1703.07364]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Schumann,Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status,J

    M. Schumann,Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status,J. Phys. G46 (2019) 103003 [1903.03026]

    work page arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett.30(1979) 682

    A.A. Starobinsky,Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe, JETP Lett.30(1979) 682

    1979

  47. [47]

    Rubakov, M.V

    V.A. Rubakov, M.V. Sazhin and A.V. Veryaskin,Graviton Creation in the Inflationary Universe and the Grand Unification Scale,Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 189

    1982

  48. [48]

    Fabbri and M.d

    R. Fabbri and M.d. Pollock,The Effect of Primordially Produced Gravitons upon the Anisotropy of the Cosmological Microwave Background Radiation,Phys. Lett. B125(1983) 445. – 83 –

    1983

  49. [49]

    Abbott and M.B

    L.F. Abbott and M.B. Wise,Constraints on Generalized Inflationary Cosmologies,Nucl. Phys. B244(1984) 541

    1984

  50. [50]

    Statistics of Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and A. Stebbins,Statistics of cosmic microwave background polarization,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 7368 [astro-ph/9611125]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  51. [51]

    Signature of Gravity Waves in Polarization of the Microwave Background

    U. Seljak and M. Zaldarriaga,Signature of gravity waves in polarization of the microwave background,Phys. Rev. Lett.78(1997) 2054 [astro-ph/9609169]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  52. [52]

    An All-Sky Analysis of Polarization in the Microwave Background

    M. Zaldarriaga and U. Seljak,An all sky analysis of polarization in the microwave background,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 1830 [astro-ph/9609170]. [84]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]. [85]BICEP, Keckcollaboration,Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, ...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  53. [53]

    Weinberg,The Cosmological Constant Problem,Rev

    S. Weinberg,The Cosmological Constant Problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.61(1989) 1

    1989

  54. [54]

    The Cosmological Constant

    S.M. Carroll,The Cosmological constant,Living Rev. Rel.4(2001) 1 [astro-ph/0004075]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  55. [55]

    Chameleon Fields: Awaiting Surprises for Tests of Gravity in Space

    J. Khoury and A. Weltman,Chameleon fields: Awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space, Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 171104 [astro-ph/0309300]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  56. [56]

    Chameleon Cosmology

    J. Khoury and A. Weltman,Chameleon cosmology,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 044026 [astro-ph/0309411]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  57. [57]

    P. Brax, C. van de Bruck, A.-C. Davis, J. Khoury and A. Weltman,Detecting dark energy in orbit: The cosmological chameleon,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 123518 [astro-ph/0408415]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  58. [58]

    Probing Dark Energy with Atom Interferometry

    C. Burrage, E.J. Copeland and E.A. Hinds,Probing Dark Energy with Atom Interferometry, JCAP03(2015) 042 [1408.1409]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Vagnozzi, L

    S. Vagnozzi, L. Visinelli, P. Brax, A.-C. Davis and J. Sakstein,Direct detection of dark energy: The XENON1T excess and future prospects,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 063023 [2103.15834]

    work page arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Direct detection of solar chameleons with electron recoil data from XENONnT

    G.-W. Yuan, A.-C. Davis, M. Giannotti, S. Vagnozzi, L. Visinelli and J.K. Vogel,Direct detection of solar chameleons with electron recoil data from XENONnT,2511.01655

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Freedman, B.F

    W.L. Freedman, B.F. Madore, T. Hoyt, I.S. Jang, R. Beaton, M.G. Lee et al.,Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch,Astrophys. J.891(2020) 57 [2002.01550]

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Birrer, A.J

    S. Birrer et al.,TDCOSMO - IV. Hierarchical time-delay cosmography – joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles,Astron. Astrophys.643(2020) A165 [2007.02941]

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team

    A.G. Riess et al.,A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys. J. Lett.934(2022) L7 [2112.04510]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Anderson, N.W

    R.I. Anderson, N.W. Koblischke and L. Eyer,Small-amplitude Red Giants Elucidate the Nature of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch as a Standard Candle,Astrophys. J. Lett.963 (2024) L43 [2303.04790]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Scolnic, A

    D. Scolnic, A.G. Riess, J. Wu, S. Li, G.S. Anand, R. Beaton et al.,CATS: The Hubble Constant from Standardized TRGB and Type Ia Supernova Measurements,Astrophys. J. Lett. 954(2023) L31 [2304.06693]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Jones et al.,Cosmological Results from the RAISIN Survey: Using Type Ia Supernovae in the Near Infrared as a Novel Path to Measure the Dark Energy Equation of State, Astrophys

    D.O. Jones et al.,Cosmological Results from the RAISIN Survey: Using Type Ia Supernovae in the Near Infrared as a Novel Path to Measure the Dark Energy Equation of State, Astrophys. J.933(2022) 172 [2201.07801]. – 84 –

    work page arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    Anand, R.B

    G.S. Anand, R.B. Tully, L. Rizzi, A.G. Riess and W. Yuan,Comparing Tip of the Red Giant Branch Distance Scales: An Independent Reduction of the Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program and the Value of the Hubble Constant,Astrophys. J.932(2022) 15 [2108.00007]

    work page arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    Freedman,Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective,Astrophys

    W.L. Freedman,Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective,Astrophys. J.919(2021) 16 [2106.15656]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    S.A. Uddin et al.,Carnegie Supernova Project I and II: Measurements of H 0 Using Cepheid, Tip of the Red Giant Branch, and Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distance Calibration to Type Ia Supernovae*,Astrophys. J.970(2024) 72 [2308.01875]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Huang et al.,The Mira Distance to M101 and a 4% Measurement of H 0,Astrophys

    C.D. Huang et al.,The Mira Distance to M101 and a 4% Measurement of H 0,Astrophys. J. 963(2024) 83 [2312.08423]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    S. Li, A.G. Riess, S. Casertano, G.S. Anand, D.M. Scolnic, W. Yuan et al.,Reconnaissance with JWST of the J-region Asymptotic Giant Branch in Distance Ladder Galaxies: From Irregular Luminosity Functions to Approximation of the Hubble Constant,Astrophys. J.966 (2024) 20 [2401.04777]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Pesce et al.,The Megamaser Cosmology Project

    D.W. Pesce et al.,The Megamaser Cosmology Project. XIII. Combined Hubble constant constraints,Astrophys. J. Lett.891(2020) L1 [2001.09213]

    work page arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    Kourkchi, R

    E. Kourkchi, R.B. Tully, G.S. Anand, H.M. Courtois, A. Dupuy, J.D. Neill et al., Cosmicflows-4: The Calibration of Optical and Infrared Tully–Fisher Relations,Astrophys. J. 896(2020) 3 [2004.14499]

    work page arXiv 2020

  74. [74]

    Schombert, S

    J. Schombert, S. McGaugh and F. Lelli,Using the Baryonic Tully–Fisher Relation to Measure H o,Astron. J.160(2020) 71 [2006.08615]

    work page arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Blakeslee, J.B

    J.P. Blakeslee, J.B. Jensen, C.-P. Ma, P.A. Milne and J.E. Greene,The Hubble Constant from Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances,Astrophys. J.911(2021) 65 [2101.02221]

    work page arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    de Jaeger, L

    T. de Jaeger, L. Galbany, A.G. Riess, B.E. Stahl, B.J. Shappee, A.V. Filippenko et al.,A 5 per cent measurement of the Hubble–Lemaˆ ıtre constant from Type II supernovae,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.514(2022) 4620 [2203.08974]

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Murakami, A.G

    Y.S. Murakami, A.G. Riess, B.E. Stahl, W.D. Kenworthy, D.-M.A. Pluck, A. Macoretta et al., Leveraging SN Ia spectroscopic similarity to improve the measurement of H 0,JCAP11 (2023) 046 [2306.00070]

    work page arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    Breuval, A

    L. Breuval, A.G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L.M. Macri, M. Romaniello et al.,Small Magellanic Cloud Cepheids Observed with the Hubble Space Telescope Provide a New Anchor for the SH0ES Distance Ladder,Astrophys. J.973(2024) 30 [2404.08038]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Freedman, B.F

    W.L. Freedman, B.F. Madore, T.J. Hoyt, I.S. Jang, A.J. Lee and K.A. Owens,Status Report on the Chicago-Carnegie Hubble Program (CCHP): Measurement of the Hubble Constant Using the Hubble and James Webb Space Telescopes,Astrophys. J.985(2025) 203 [2408.06153]

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Riess et al.,JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0,Astrophys

    A.G. Riess et al.,JWST Validates HST Distance Measurements: Selection of Supernova Subsample Explains Differences in JWST Estimates of Local H 0,Astrophys. J.977(2024) 120 [2408.11770]

    work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.