Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

RDBench: ML Benchmark for Relational Databases

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.16837 v2 pith:NRTWDTXL submitted 2023-10-25 cs.LG cs.AIcs.DBcs.SI

RDBench: ML Benchmark for Relational Databases

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.DBcs.SI
keywords rdbenchbenchmarkdatabasesrelationaldiversedomainsdatasetdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Benefiting from high-quality datasets and standardized evaluation metrics, machine learning (ML) has achieved sustained progress and widespread applications. However, while applying machine learning to relational databases (RDBs), the absence of a well-established benchmark remains a significant obstacle to the development of ML. To address this issue, we introduce ML Benchmark For Relational Databases (RDBench), a standardized benchmark that aims to promote reproducible ML research on RDBs that include multiple tables. RDBench offers diverse RDB datasets of varying scales, domains, and relational structures, organized into 4 levels. Notably, to simplify the adoption of RDBench for diverse ML domains, for any given database, RDBench exposes three types of interfaces including tabular data, homogeneous graphs, and heterogeneous graphs, sharing the same underlying task definition. For the first time, RDBench enables meaningful comparisons between ML methods from diverse domains, ranging from XGBoost to Graph Neural Networks, under RDB prediction tasks. We design multiple classification and regression tasks for each RDB dataset and report averaged results over the same dataset, further enhancing the robustness of the experimental findings. RDBench is implemented with DBGym, a user-friendly platform for ML research and application on databases, enabling benchmarking new ML methods with RDBench at ease.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Parameter-Free Encoders Remain Viable for RDB Foundation Models

    cs.LG 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Trainable RDB encoders cannot robustly exploit neighborhood labels as fixed foundation-model features or feature-importance signals, so simple parameter-free encoders stay near-SOTA.

  2. No Need to Train Your RDB Foundation Model

    cs.AI 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Column-wise, parameter-free JUICE encodings let single-table ICL models solve multi-table RDB prediction tasks with no training or fine-tuning.

  3. Parameter-Free Encoders Remain Viable for RDB Foundation Models

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A parameter-free relational encoder combined with a single-table foundation model matches or beats parameterized, pre-trained RDB encoders on six benchmarks.