pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18209 · v1 · pith:NV2ACH7Ynew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI

SPATIOROUTE: Dynamic Prompt Routing for Zero-Shot Spatial Reasoning

Pawat Chunhachatrachai , Gueter Josmy Faure , Hung-Ting Su , Winston H. Hsu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 11:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AI
keywords spatial reasoningzero-shot learningprompt routingegocentric videovisual question answeringvision-language modelsdynamic prompting
0
0 comments X

The pith

SpatioRoute routes questions to tailored prompts to lift zero-shot spatial video reasoning by up to 5 percent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a dynamic router can assign each spatial question to a specialized prompt template, either by fixed rules that link question words such as What or How to preset templates or by letting an LLM craft a prompt from the question text alone. This routing happens before any video is seen and requires no training or 3D data. On the SQA3D benchmark the method raises accuracy across several vision-language models compared with using one fixed prompt for every question. The authors also report that adding chain-of-thought instructions actually lowers scores on some model families, suggesting that question-specific wording matters more than generic reasoning steps.

Core claim

SpatioRoute is a prompt-generation system that routes each incoming question to a semantically matched template without training, fine-tuning, or 3D input. In its rule-based mode it maps typologies such as What, Is, How, Can, and Which to distinct templates; in its LLM mode it generates a task-specific prompt from the question and situational context alone. Evaluated on SQA3D, the approach yields consistent accuracy gains up to 5 percent over fixed-prompt baselines and sets a new state of the art for zero-shot video-only spatial visual question answering.

What carries the argument

A question router that deterministically or generatively selects a specialized prompt template from the question text and context without access to the video.

If this is right

  • Question-aware routing outperforms a single fixed prompt for spatial video tasks.
  • Rule-based typology mapping provides deterministic gains without extra model calls.
  • LLM-driven prompt generation works using only the question and context, with no video required.
  • Chain-of-thought prompting reduces accuracy on Qwen-series models for this task.
  • The gains hold across multiple VLM families without 3D sensors or fine-tuning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same typology-based router could be tested on other reasoning domains by swapping the prompt templates.
  • Combining the router with lightweight adapters might compound the zero-shot gains.
  • If the routing decision proves stable across datasets, it could reduce the need for task-specific fine-tuning in egocentric video systems.

Load-bearing premise

That question typologies or content can be mapped to prompt templates that reliably improve spatial reasoning performance even when the router never sees the video.

What would settle it

Running the same router on a non-spatial VQA benchmark and finding no accuracy gain, or finding that the single best fixed template matches SpatioRoute performance on SQA3D.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18209 by Gueter Josmy Faure, Hung-Ting Su, Pawat Chunhachatrachai, Winston H. Hsu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of existing fixed-prompt methods and S [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the SPATIOROUTE. Given a question q and situational context s, Method I: SPATIOROUTE-R (top) classifies the question type via lightweight string matching and deterministically selects a prompt template from a curated library Method II: SPATIOROUTE-L (bottom) feeds q and s into a text-only LLM conditioned on K=6 few-shot demonstrations Dfew-shot to synthesize a task-specific prompt —with no vide… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spatial question answering over egocentric video is a challenging task that requires Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to reason about 3D object positions, scene affordances, and directional relationships, particularly in the zero-shot setting where no task-specific fine-tuning is available. We introduce SpatioRoute, a dynamic prompt generation approach that routes each incoming question to a semantically tailored prompt template -- without any additional training, fine-tuning, or 3D sensor input. SpatioRoute operates in two complementary modes: SpatioRoute-R, a rule-based router that deterministically maps question typologies (e.g., What, Is, How, Can, Which) to specialized prompt templates; and SpatioRoute-L, an LLM-driven approach that generates task-specific prompts from the question and situational context alone, with no video input at routing time. We evaluate SpatioRoute on the SQA3D benchmark across VLMs spanning model families. SpatioRoute achieves consistent overall accuracy gains up to 5% over fixed prompt baselines, establishing a new state-of-the-art for zero-shot video-only spatial VQA without requiring 3D point-cloud inputs. As an additional finding, we observe that Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, implemented via the Think it Twice architecture, consistently degrades performance in this setting on Qwen series models, confirming that question-aware routing is more effective than uniform reasoning instructions for spatial video understanding.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces SpatioRoute, a dynamic prompt routing method for zero-shot spatial visual question answering on egocentric videos with VLMs. SpatioRoute-R is a rule-based router that maps question typologies (e.g., What, Is, How, Can, Which) to specialized prompt templates. SpatioRoute-L is an LLM-driven router that generates task-specific prompts from the question and situational context alone, without video input at routing time. Evaluated on the SQA3D benchmark, the method reports consistent accuracy gains of up to 5% over fixed prompt baselines across model families and claims a new state-of-the-art for zero-shot video-only spatial VQA without 3D point-cloud inputs. It additionally observes that Chain-of-Thought prompting via the Think it Twice architecture degrades performance on Qwen-series models.

Significance. If the reported gains are robust, this work offers a practical, training-free technique to improve spatial reasoning in VLMs for video inputs by tailoring prompts to question characteristics rather than using uniform strategies. It provides empirical support for question-aware routing over generic CoT in spatial video tasks and demonstrates gains without 3D sensors or fine-tuning, which could inform prompt design in multimodal and robotics applications.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 (Experiments)] §4 (Experiments): The results report accuracy gains up to 5% and a new SOTA but provide no details on statistical significance, error bars, exact baseline implementations, or data splits used on SQA3D. This is load-bearing for the central empirical claim of consistent improvements.
  2. [§3 (Method)] §3 (Method): Both SpatioRoute-R and SpatioRoute-L perform routing without access to video frames or 3D cues, relying solely on question typology or situational context. The paper should explicitly discuss the risk that scene-specific spatial relations (e.g., occlusions or affordances) may require different templates, as this assumption is central to the zero-shot video-only SOTA claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrase 'Think it Twice architecture' for CoT is used without a citation or brief definition, which reduces clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive recommendation for minor revision. We address each major comment below and have prepared revisions to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (Experiments): The results report accuracy gains up to 5% and a new SOTA but provide no details on statistical significance, error bars, exact baseline implementations, or data splits used on SQA3D. This is load-bearing for the central empirical claim of consistent improvements.

    Authors: We agree that additional experimental details are necessary to fully support the empirical claims. In the revised manuscript, we will expand Section 4 to include: (1) error bars or standard deviations computed across multiple inference runs with different random seeds where feasible; (2) explicit descriptions of the fixed-prompt baseline implementations, including the exact template text used for each comparison; and (3) confirmation that all evaluations follow the official SQA3D data splits and evaluation protocol from the benchmark authors. While we did not originally report formal statistical significance tests due to space constraints, we will add a brief analysis noting the consistency of gains across model families and include confidence intervals. These changes will be made without altering the reported accuracy numbers. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §3 (Method): Both SpatioRoute-R and SpatioRoute-L perform routing without access to video frames or 3D cues, relying solely on question typology or situational context. The paper should explicitly discuss the risk that scene-specific spatial relations (e.g., occlusions or affordances) may require different templates, as this assumption is central to the zero-shot video-only SOTA claim.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important assumption. While our method deliberately avoids video input at routing time to maintain a purely zero-shot, training-free pipeline, we acknowledge the potential limitation that certain scene-specific factors (such as heavy occlusions or nuanced affordances) could in principle benefit from visual feedback for template selection. In the revised Section 3, we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing this risk, noting that our empirical results on SQA3D demonstrate robust performance under the current assumption, but that future extensions could incorporate optional visual features for hybrid routing in more complex scenes. This addition will explicitly qualify the scope of the zero-shot video-only SOTA claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely empirical benchmark comparisons

full rationale

The paper reports accuracy gains from rule-based and LLM-driven prompt routing on the SQA3D benchmark using fixed prompt baselines as controls. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains appear in the described methodology or results. Claims rest on direct measurement of performance differences rather than any reduction of outputs to inputs by construction, making the evaluation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the domain assumption that VLMs can leverage semantically tailored prompts for spatial reasoning without video at routing time and that question typology provides sufficient signal for effective routing.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption VLMs respond differently to prompt templates based on question typology in zero-shot spatial video tasks
    Invoked implicitly when claiming gains from routing without video input

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5801 in / 1183 out tokens · 36924 ms · 2026-05-20T11:02:24.067550+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Inves- tigating prompting techniques for zero- and few-shot visual question answering.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09996, 2023

    Md Rabiul Awal, Hanxue Jiang, Yifan Peng, et al. Inves- tigating prompting techniques for zero- and few-shot visual question answering.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09996, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Qwen3-VL Technical Report

    Shuai Bai, Yuxuan Cai, Ruizhe Chen, Keqin Chen, et al. Qwen3-VL technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21631, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report

    Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, et al. Qwen2.5-VL technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    SpatialVLM: En- dowing vision-language models with spatial reasoning capa- bilities

    Boyuan Chen, Zhuo Xu, Sean Kirmani, Brian Ichter, Dorsa Sadigh, Leonidas Guibas, and Fei Xia. SpatialVLM: En- dowing vision-language models with spatial reasoning capa- bilities. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 14455–14465, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Enhancing spatial reasoning in vision-language models via chain-of-thought prompting and reinforcement learning,

    Jiaxin Chen et al. Enhancing spatial reasoning in vision- language models via chain-of-thought prompting and rein- forcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.13362, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Spatial- RGPT: Grounded spatial reasoning in vision-language mod- els

    An-Chieh Cheng, Hongxu Yin, Yang Fu, Qiushan Guo, Rui- han Yang, Jan Kautz, Xiaolong Wang, and Sifei Liu. Spatial- RGPT: Grounded spatial reasoning in vision-language mod- els. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Chang, Manolis Savva, Maciej Hal- ber, Thomas Funkhouser, and Matthias Nießner

    Angela Dai, Angel X. Chang, Manolis Savva, Maciej Hal- ber, Thomas Funkhouser, and Matthias Nießner. Scan- Net: Richly-annotated 3D reconstructions of indoor scenes. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    The Llama 3 Herd of Models

    Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, et al. The Llama 3 herd of models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Video-of-thought: Step-by-step video reasoning from perception to cognition

    Hao Fei, Shengqiong Wu, Wei Ji, Hanwang Zhang, Meishan Zhang, Mong-Li Lee, and Wynne Hsu. Video-of-thought: Step-by-step video reasoning from perception to cognition. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    From im- ages to textual prompts: Zero-shot visual question answering with frozen large language models

    Jiaxian Guo, Junnan Li, Dongxu Li, Anthony Meng Huat Tiong, Boyang Li, Dacheng Tao, and Steven Hoi. From im- ages to textual prompts: Zero-shot visual question answering with frozen large language models. InIEEE/CVF Confer- ence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    3D-LLM: In- jecting the 3D world into large language models

    Yining Hong, Haoyu Zhen, Peihao Chen, Shuhong Zheng, Yilun Du, Zhenfang Chen, and Chuang Gan. 3D-LLM: In- jecting the 3D world into large language models. InAd- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Zero-shot 3D question answering via voxel-based dynamic token compression

    Chenming Huang et al. Zero-shot 3D question answering via voxel-based dynamic token compression. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2025

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Chat- scene: Bridging 3D scene and large language models with object identifiers

    Haifeng Huang, Zehan Wang, Rongjie Huang, Luping Liu, Xize Cheng, Yang Zhao, Tao Jin, and Zhou Zhao. Chat- scene: Bridging 3D scene and large language models with object identifiers. InAdvances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems (NeurIPS), 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    An embodied generalist agent in 3D world

    Jiangyong Huang, Silong Yong, Xiaojian Ma, Xiongkun Linghu, Puhao Li, Yan Wang, Qing Li, Song-Chun Zhu, Baoxiong Jia, and Siyuan Huang. An embodied generalist agent in 3D world. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Large language models are zero-shot reasoners

    Takeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo, and Yusuke Iwasawa. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. InAdvances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems (NeurIPS), pages 22199–22213, 2022

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

    Tamera Lanham, Anna Chen, Ansh Radhakrishnan, Benoit Steiner, Carson Denison, Danny Hernandez, Dustin Li, Esin Durmus, Evan Hubinger, Jackson Kernion, et al. Measuring faithfulness in chain-of-thought reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13702, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Vision-language memory for spatial reasoning

    Zuntao Liu, Yi Du, Taimeng Fu, Shaoshu Su, Cherie Ho, and Chen Wang. Vision-language memory for spatial reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.20644, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    SQA3D: Situ- ated question answering in 3D scenes

    Xiaojian Ma, Silong Yong, Zilong Zheng, Qing Li, Yitao Liang, Song-Chun Zhu, and Siyuan Huang. SQA3D: Situ- ated question answering in 3D scenes. InInternational Con- ference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Compositional chain-of-thought prompting for large multimodal models

    Chancharik Mitra, Brandon Huang, Trevor Darrell, and Roei Herzig. Compositional chain-of-thought prompting for large multimodal models. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    When more is less: A systematic analysis of spatial and commonsense information for visual spatial reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.21619, 2025

    Ruizhe Quan et al. When more is less: A systematic analysis of spatial and commonsense information for visual spatial reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.21619, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    SpatialPrompting: Keyframe-driven zero-shot spatial reasoning with off-the-shelf multimodal large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04911, 2025

    Shun Taguchi et al. SpatialPrompting: Keyframe-driven zero-shot spatial reasoning with off-the-shelf multimodal large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04911, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Think twice: Enhancing LLM reasoning by scaling multi-round test-time thinking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19855, 2025

    Xiaoyu Tian, Sitong Zhao, Haotian Wang, Shuaiting Chen, Yunjie Ji, Yiping Peng, Han Zhao, and Xiangang Li. Think twice: Enhancing LLM reasoning by scaling multi-round test-time thinking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19855, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Miles Turpin, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, and Samuel R. Bowman. Language models don’t always say what they think: Unfaithful explanations in chain-of-thought prompt- ing. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution

    Peng Wang, Shuai Bai, Sinan Tan, Shijie Wang, Zhihao Fan, Jinze Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, et al. Qwen2-VL: Enhancing vision-language model’s perception of the world at any resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12191, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models

    Xuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc Le, Ed Chi, Sharan Narang, Aakanksha Chowdhery, and Denny Zhou. Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. InInternational Conference on Learn- ing Representations (ICLR), 2023

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models

    Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. InAdvances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems (NeurIPS), pages 24824–24837, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Gupta, Rilyn Han, Li Fei-Fei, and Saining Xie

    Jihan Yang, Shusheng Yang, Anjali W. Gupta, Rilyn Han, Li Fei-Fei, and Saining Xie. Thinking in space: How multimodal large language models see, remember, and re- call spaces. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 10632–10643, 2025. Oral Presentation

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Multi-modal situated reasoning in 3D scenes

    Xiongkun Yang et al. Multi-modal situated reasoning in 3D scenes. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Sys- tems (NeurIPS), 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Video-3D LLM: Learning position-aware video representation for 3D scene understanding

    Duo Zheng, Shijia Huang, and Liwei Wang. Video-3D LLM: Learning position-aware video representation for 3D scene understanding. InIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vi- sion and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2025

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Large lan- guage models are human-level prompt engineers

    Yongchao Zhou, Andrei Ioan Muresanu, Ziwen Han, Keiran Paster, Silviu Pitis, Harris Chan, and Jimmy Ba. Large lan- guage models are human-level prompt engineers. InInter- national Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    LLaV A-3D: A simple yet effective pathway to empowering LMMs with 3D-awareness

    Chenming Zhu, Tai Wang, Wenwei Zhang, Jiangmiao Pang, and Xihui Liu. LLaV A-3D: A simple yet effective pathway to empowering LMMs with 3D-awareness. InInternational Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2025

    work page 2025