Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Refusing Safe Prompts for Multi-modal Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.09050 v2 pith:NXI6KLT6 submitted 2024-07-12 cs.CR cs.AIcs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
keywords mllmsmllm-refusalpromptssafecompetingmllmimagerefuse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have become the cornerstone of today's generative AI ecosystem, sparking intense competition among tech giants and startups. In particular, an MLLM generates a text response given a prompt consisting of an image and a question. While state-of-the-art MLLMs use safety filters and alignment techniques to refuse unsafe prompts, in this work, we introduce MLLM-Refusal, the first method that induces refusals for safe prompts. In particular, our MLLM-Refusal optimizes a nearly-imperceptible refusal perturbation and adds it to an image, causing target MLLMs to likely refuse a safe prompt containing the perturbed image and a safe question. Specifically, we formulate MLLM-Refusal as a constrained optimization problem and propose an algorithm to solve it. Our method offers competitive advantages for MLLM model providers by potentially disrupting user experiences of competing MLLMs, since competing MLLM's users will receive unexpected refusals when they unwittingly use these perturbed images in their prompts. We evaluate MLLM-Refusal on four MLLMs across four datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness in causing competing MLLMs to refuse safe prompts while not affecting non-competing MLLMs. Furthermore, we explore three potential countermeasures-adding Gaussian noise, DiffPure, and adversarial training. Our results show that though they can mitigate MLLM-Refusal's effectiveness, they also sacrifice the accuracy and/or efficiency of the competing MLLM. The code is available at https://github.com/Sadcardation/MLLM-Refusal.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GhostPrompt: Cross-Image Adversarial Prompt for Vision-Language Models

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GhostPrompt is a universal adversarial text suffix that, after one optimization, steers VLMs to attacker-chosen outputs across diverse unseen images, reporting >30% ASR gains over prior prompt attacks.

  2. The Boy Who Cried Wolf: Adversarial Misclassification of Safe Inputs as Unsafe in Multimodal Guardrails

    cs.CR 2026-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Adversarial images aligned with the latent distribution of unsafe content can force multimodal guard models to falsely reject safe user requests with up to 84% success.

Pith tools