pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31335 · v1 · pith:NYKU74FVnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph

High-Power Polarization-Controlled Attosecond-Scale Soft X-ray Pulses

Zhaoheng Guo , Carlo Vicario , Andre Al Haddad , Christopher Arrell , Andreas Dax , Umit Demirbas , Nicole Hiller , Martin Huppert
show 13 more authors
Christoph Kittel Gregor Knopp Eduard Prat Sven Reiche Antoine Sarracini Thomas Schietinger Kirsten Schnorr Alexandre Trisorio Didier Voulot Tobias Weilbach Hankai Zhang Christoph Bostedt Philipp Dijkstal
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 02:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph
keywords attosecond pulsessoft X-raypolarization controlelectron beam spikeundulator radiationtwo-color pulseshigh-power X-rayfree-electron laser
0
0 comments X

The pith

An isolated spike in an electron beam produces high-power attosecond soft X-ray pulses with controllable polarization and photon energy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that an isolated high-current spike inside a longer electron beam pedestal can drive soft X-ray emission with single-spike spectra and multi-eV bandwidths when passed through undulators with tunable magnetic fields. These pulses span photon energies from 450 to 1070 eV, support both circular and linear polarization, and reach energies from tens to over 100 microjoules. Orbit tuning of the beam allows rapid switching between attosecond and few-femtosecond durations, while chicanes enable two-color pairs with adjustable delay or multi-stage amplification above 200 microjoules. Phase-space measurements, start-to-end simulations, and spectral data together indicate attosecond-scale durations. If correct, the platform supports element-specific studies of spin and chiral dynamics on the natural timescale of electron motion.

Core claim

An isolated high-current spike embedded within a long electron-beam pedestal emits soft X-ray pulses with single-spike spectra and multi-electronvolt bandwidths when the beam traverses undulators with tunable magnetic fields. The resulting pulses cover a photon energy range of 450-1070 eV, circular as well as linear polarization, and energies from tens to above 100 microjoules. Longitudinal phase-space measurements, start-to-end simulations, and spectral data provide consistent evidence for attosecond-scale durations. Tuning the slice-dependent transverse orbit switches the duration to few femtoseconds, while magnetic chicanes produce two-color pairs with tunable delay or raise energy above

What carries the argument

The isolated high-current spike embedded within a long electron-beam pedestal, which acts as the source for the isolated pulses whose duration and polarization are controlled by undulator fields and orbit tuning.

If this is right

  • Two-color pulse pairs with tunable delay become available through magnetic chicanes.
  • Pulse energies can exceed 200 microjoules via multi-stage amplification schemes.
  • Rapid switching between attosecond and few-femtosecond lengths is achieved by adjusting the transverse electron orbit.
  • Element-specific investigations of spin and chiral dynamics become feasible on the timescale of electron motion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The spike-based approach could be tested at other free-electron laser facilities to check whether similar isolated pulses appear under comparable beam conditions.
  • The combination of high pulse energy and polarization control may open neighboring experiments on ultrafast magnetic switching that currently lack sufficient intensity or selectivity.
  • Direct time-domain diagnostics could be added in follow-up work to convert the indirect duration evidence into a measured autocorrelation trace.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that phase-space measurements, start-to-end simulations, and spectral data together reliably establish attosecond durations rather than few-femtosecond scales.

What would settle it

A direct streaking or autocorrelation measurement on the emitted X-ray pulses that returns durations of several femtoseconds rather than attoseconds would disprove the attosecond-scale claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31335 by Alexandre Trisorio, Andre Al Haddad, Andreas Dax, Antoine Sarracini, Carlo Vicario, Christoph Bostedt, Christopher Arrell, Christoph Kittel, Didier Voulot, Eduard Prat, Gregor Knopp, Hankai Zhang, Kirsten Schnorr, Martin Huppert, Nicole Hiller, Philipp Dijkstal, Sven Reiche, Thomas Schietinger, Tobias Weilbach, Umit Demirbas, Zhaoheng Guo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: We can effectively extend the locations of current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We demonstrate a versatile platform for high-power attosecond soft X-ray pulse generation with polarization and photon energy control at the SwissFEL free-electron laser. An isolated high-current spike embedded within a long electron-beam pedestal emits soft X-ray pulses with single-spike spectra and multi-electronvolt bandwidths in the tunable magnetic fields of Apple-X undulators. Demonstrated pulse parameters include a photon energy range of 450--1070 eV, circular as well as linear polarization, and pulse energies from tens to above hundred microjoules. By tuning the longitudinal slice-dependent transverse electron beam orbit we can rapidly switch between attosecond and few femtosecond pulse length. By exploiting magnetic chicanes in the undulator line we can produce two-colour pulse pairs with tunable delay or increase the pulse energy beyond 200~\textmu J through multi-stage amplification schemes. High-resolution longitudinal phase-space measurements and start-to-end simulations in addition to spectral measurements provide consistent evidence for attosecond-scale pulse durations. This unique combination of high pulse energy and polarization control of attosecond-scale soft X-ray pulses enables the element-specific investigations of spin and chiral dynamics on the natural time scale of electron motion.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript demonstrates a platform at SwissFEL for generating high-power soft X-ray pulses (450–1070 eV, tens to >100 μJ) with controllable linear/circular polarization and attosecond-scale durations. An isolated high-current spike in a long electron-beam pedestal is used in Apple-X undulators; slice-dependent orbit tuning switches between attosecond and few-fs regimes, while chicanes enable two-color pairs or multi-stage amplification. Evidence consists of high-resolution longitudinal phase-space data, start-to-end FEL simulations, and single-spike spectral measurements with multi-eV bandwidths.

Significance. If the attosecond duration mapping holds, the result would enable element-specific studies of spin and chiral dynamics on electron timescales with high pulse energy and polarization control, a combination not previously available in this photon-energy range at FEL facilities.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (temporal characterization paragraph) and associated results section on phase-space and simulations] The central attosecond-duration claim rests on indirect inference: longitudinal phase-space measurements of the electron beam, start-to-end simulations, and observed single-spike spectra. No direct X-ray temporal diagnostic (autocorrelation, streaking, or similar) is reported. If the simulations contain even modest unmodeled effects (wakefields, orbit jitter, residual chirp), the actual X-ray pulse length could remain few-fs while still reproducing the reported spectra and energies. This mapping is load-bearing for the title claim and the abstract statement that the data 'provide consistent evidence for attosecond-scale pulse durations.'
  2. [Results on orbit tuning and pulse-length switching] The ability to 'rapidly switch between attosecond and few femtosecond pulse length' by slice-dependent orbit tuning is presented as a key feature, yet the quantitative threshold used to classify a given orbit setting as attosecond versus few-fs is not stated. Without an explicit criterion (e.g., FWHM < 1 fs from simulation) tied to a specific figure or table, it is unclear whether the distinction is robust or sensitive to simulation assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and experimental parameters] The abstract states pulse energies 'from tens to above hundred microjoules' and 'beyond 200 μJ'; a table or figure summarizing measured energies versus photon energy and polarization would improve clarity.
  2. [Methods/undulator line description] Notation for the Apple-X undulator fields and chicane settings could be standardized (e.g., explicit definition of the slice-dependent orbit offset parameter) to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and detailed review. The comments highlight important aspects of our temporal characterization approach and the presentation of the orbit-tuning results. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and robustness where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (temporal characterization paragraph) and associated results section on phase-space and simulations] The central attosecond-duration claim rests on indirect inference: longitudinal phase-space measurements of the electron beam, start-to-end simulations, and observed single-spike spectra. No direct X-ray temporal diagnostic (autocorrelation, streaking, or similar) is reported. If the simulations contain even modest unmodeled effects (wakefields, orbit jitter, residual chirp), the actual X-ray pulse length could remain few-fs while still reproducing the reported spectra and energies. This mapping is load-bearing for the title claim and the abstract statement that the data 'provide consistent evidence for attosecond-scale pulse durations.'

    Authors: We agree that the evidence is indirect and that direct X-ray temporal diagnostics would strengthen the claim; such measurements remain technically challenging in this photon-energy and pulse-energy regime. However, the combination of high-resolution longitudinal phase-space data, single-spike spectra with multi-eV bandwidths, and start-to-end simulations that reproduce both the observed spectra and energies provides a self-consistent picture. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph discussing the sensitivity of the simulated pulse duration to plausible unmodeled effects (wakefields, residual energy chirp, orbit jitter). Within the range of parameters consistent with our measured beam properties, the attosecond-scale conclusion remains robust. We have also tempered the abstract wording to emphasize that the data provide consistent evidence rather than a direct measurement. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results on orbit tuning and pulse-length switching] The ability to 'rapidly switch between attosecond and few femtosecond pulse length' by slice-dependent orbit tuning is presented as a key feature, yet the quantitative threshold used to classify a given orbit setting as attosecond versus few-fs is not stated. Without an explicit criterion (e.g., FWHM < 1 fs from simulation) tied to a specific figure or table, it is unclear whether the distinction is robust or sensitive to simulation assumptions.

    Authors: We accept that an explicit classification criterion improves clarity. In the revised manuscript we now state the quantitative threshold used: orbit settings are classified as attosecond when the start-to-end simulation yields an X-ray FWHM below 1 fs (with the corresponding figure and table referenced). We also include a brief sensitivity analysis showing that the attosecond/few-fs distinction is preserved across the range of simulation assumptions consistent with our measured beam parameters. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration supported by independent measurements and simulations

full rationale

The manuscript reports facility measurements at SwissFEL of electron-beam spikes, undulator tuning, chicane schemes, and resulting X-ray spectra and energies. Central claims rest on consistency between longitudinal phase-space data, start-to-end FEL simulations, and observed single-spike spectra rather than any derivation that reduces by construction to fitted inputs or self-citations. No equations are presented that define a quantity in terms of itself or rename a simulation output as an independent prediction. The attosecond inference is model-dependent but externally falsifiable via the cited diagnostics; this is standard experimental practice and does not constitute circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work is an experimental demonstration relying on standard FEL physics assumptions not detailed here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5817 in / 1150 out tokens · 47156 ms · 2026-07-01T02:37:05.569127+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Equation 3 shows that the LSC field is di- rectly proportional to the longitudinal gradient of the current profile,dI(z)/dz

    Nonlinear energy chirp in bunch core In the one-dimensional (1D) limit, the LSC fieldE(z) is approximately E(z) =− Z0 4πγ 2 1 + 2 log γσz rb dI(z) dz ,(3) whereZ 0 is the impedance of free space,γis the Lorentz factor of the electron beam,σ z is the rms bunch length, rb is the transverse beam size, andI(z) is the current profile [63]. Equation 3 shows tha...

  2. [2]

    Panel (a) shows the simulated electron beam LPS, with the shaded region marking the current spike at the bunch core

    Transverse phase space Figure 8 illustrates the distinct transverse dynamics of the current spike and the surrounding pedestal in the electron beam at the entrance of the Athos soft X-ray un- dulator beamline. Panel (a) shows the simulated electron beam LPS, with the shaded region marking the current spike at the bunch core. Panels (b) and (c) show the si...

  3. [3]

    Krausz and M

    F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics, Reviews of modern physics81, 163 (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    P. B. Corkum and F. Krausz, Attosecond science, Nature physics3, 381 (2007)

    2007

  5. [5]

    St¨ ohr and H

    J. St¨ ohr and H. C. Siegmann,Magnetism: from funda- mentals to nanoscale dynamics(Springer, 2006)

    2006

  6. [6]

    Beaulieu, A

    S. Beaulieu, A. Comby, A. Clergerie, J. Caillat, D. Descamps, N. Dudovich, B. Fabre, R. G´ eneaux, F. L´ egar´ e, S. Petit, B. Pons, G. Porat, T. Ruchon, R. Ta¨ ıeb, V. Blanchet, and Y. Mairesse, Attosecond- resolved photoionization of chiral molecules, Science358, 1288 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Han, J.-B

    M. Han, J.-B. Ji, A. Blech, R. E. Goetz, C. Allison, L. Greenman, C. P. Koch, and H. J. W¨ orner, Attosec- ond control and measurement of chiral photoionization dynamics, Nature645, 95 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Siegrist, J

    F. Siegrist, J. A. Gessner, M. Ossiander, C. Denker, Y.-P. Chang, M. C. Schr¨ oder, A. Guggenmos, Y. Cui, J. Walowski, U. Martens, J. K. Dewhurst, U. Kleineberg, M. M¨ unzenberg, S. Sharma, and M. Schultze, Light-wave dynamic control of magnetism, Nature571, 240 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    C. P. Schmid, L. Weigl, P. Gr¨ ossing, V. Junk, C. Gorini, S. Schlauderer, S. Ito, M. Meierhofer, N. Hofmann, D. Afanasiev, J. Crewse, K. A. Kokh, O. E. Tereshchenko, J. G¨ udde, F. Evers, J. Wilhelm, K. Richter, U. H¨ ofer, and R. Huber, Tunable non-integer high-harmonic generation in a topological insulator, Na- ture593, 385 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    Popmintchev, M.-C

    T. Popmintchev, M.-C. Chen, D. Popmintchev, P. Arpin, S. Brown, S. Aliˇ sauskas, G. Andriukaitis, T. Balˇ ciunas, O. D. M¨ ucke, A. Pugzlys, A. Baltuˇ ska, B. Shim, S. E. Schrauth, A. Gaeta, C. Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, L. Plaja, A. Becker, A. Jaron-Becker, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, Bright coherent ultrahigh harmonics in the kev x-ray regime from mid-...

    2012

  11. [11]

    O. Kfir, P. Grychtol, E. Turgut, R. Knut, D. Zusin, D. Popmintchev, T. Popmintchev, H. Nembach, J. M. Shaw, A. Fleischer, H. Kapteyn, M. Murnane, and O. Co- hen, Generation of bright phase-matched circularly- polarized extreme ultraviolet high harmonics, Nature Photonics9, 99 (2015)

    2015

  12. [12]

    Young, E

    L. Young, E. P. Kanter, B. Kr¨ assig, Y. Li, A. M. March, S. T. Pratt, R. Santra, S. H. Southworth, N. Rohringer, L. F. DiMauro, G. Doumy, C. A. Roedig, N. Berrah, L. Fang, M. Hoener, P. H. Bucksbaum, J. P. Cryan, S. Ghimire, J. M. Glownia, D. A. Reis, J. D. Bozek, C. Bostedt, and M. Messerschmidt, Femtosecond elec- tronic response of atoms to ultra-inten...

    2010

  13. [13]

    T. E. Glover, D. M. Fritz, M. Cammarata, T. K. Allison, S. Coh, J. M. Feldkamp, H. Lemke, D. Zhu, Y. Feng, R. N. Coffee, M. Fuchs, S. Ghimire, J. Chen, S. Shwartz, D. A. Reis, S. E. Harris, and J. B. Hastings, X-ray and optical wave mixing, Nature488, 603 (2012)

    2012

  14. [14]

    Al-Haddad, S

    A. Al-Haddad, S. Oberli, J. Gonz´ alez-V´ azquez, M. Bucher, G. Doumy, P. Ho, J. Krzywinski, T. J. Lane, A. Lutman, A. Marinelli, T. J. Maxwell, S. Moeller, S. T. Pratt, D. Ray, R. Shepard, S. H. Southworth, ´A. V´ azquez-Mayagoitia, P. Walter, L. Young, A. Pic´ on, and C. Bostedt, Observation of site-selective chemical bond changes via ultrafast chemical...

    2022

  15. [15]

    Pellegrini, A

    C. Pellegrini, A. Marinelli, and S. Reiche, The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers, Reviews of Modern Physics88, 015006 (2016)

    2016

  16. [16]

    Kondratenko and E

    A. Kondratenko and E. Saldin, Generation of coherent radiation by a relativistic electron beam in an undulator, Particle Accelerators10, 207 (1980)

    1980

  17. [17]

    Bonifacio, C

    R. Bonifacio, C. Pellegrini, and L. Narducci, Collective instabilities and high-gain regime in a free electron laser, Optics Communications50, 373 (1984)

    1984

  18. [18]

    Huang, Y

    S. Huang, Y. Ding, Y. Feng, E. Hemsing, Z. Huang, J. Krzywinski, A. Lutman, A. Marinelli, T. Maxwell, and D. Zhu, Generating single-spike hard x-ray pulses with nonlinear bunch compression in free-electron lasers, Physical Review Letters119, 154801 (2017)

    2017

  19. [19]

    Malyzhenkov, Y

    A. Malyzhenkov, Y. P. Arbelo, P. Craievich, P. Dijk- stal, E. Ferrari, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, P. Jurani´ c, and E. Prat, Single-and two-color attosecond hard x-ray free- electron laser pulses with nonlinear compression, Physi- cal Review Research2, 042018 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    E. Prat, A. Malyzhenkov, C. Arrell, P. Craievich, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, and G. Wang, Coher- ent sub-femtosecond soft x-ray free-electron laser pulses with nonlinear compression, APL Photonics8, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0164666 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0164666 2023

  21. [21]

    E. Prat, A. Malyzhenkov, G. L. Orlandi, T. Weilbach, and S. Reiche, Enhanced generation of single-spike hard x-ray free-electron laser pulses with lower charge and shorter electron beams in the injector, Physical Review Research7, L042060 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Marinelli, J

    A. Marinelli, J. MacArthur, P. Emma, M. Guetg, C. Field, D. Kharakh, A. Lutman, Y. Ding, and Z. Huang, Experimental demonstration of a single-spike hard-x-ray free-electron laser starting from noise, Applied Physics Letters111, 151101 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    Zhang, J

    Z. Zhang, J. Duris, J. P. MacArthur, A. Zholents, Z. Huang, and A. Marinelli, Experimental demonstra- tion of enhanced self-amplified spontaneous emission by photocathode temporal shaping and self-compression in a magnetic wiggler, New Journal of Physics22, 083030 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    Duris, S

    J. Duris, S. Li, T. Driver, E. G. Champenois, J. P. MacArthur, A. A. Lutman, Z. Zhang, P. Rosenberger, J. W. Aldrich, R. Coffee, G. Coslovich, F.-J. Decker, J. M. Glownia, G. Hartmann, W. Helml, A. Kamalov, J. Knurr, J. Krzywinski, M.-F. Lin, M. Nantel, A. Natan, J. O’Neal, N. Shivaram, P. Walter, A. Wang, J. J. Welch, T. J. A. Wolf, J. Z. Xu, M. F. Kling...

    2020

  25. [25]

    beam ` a la carte

    S. Li, Z. Zhang, S. Alverson, D. Cesar, T. Driver, P. Franz, E. Isele, J. P. Duris, K. Larsen, M.-F. Lin, R. Obaid, J. T. O’Neal, R. Robles, N. Sudar, Z. Guo, S. Vetter, P. Walter, A. L. Wang, J. Xu, S. Carbajo, J. P. Cryan, and A. Marinelli, “beam ` a la carte”: Laser heater shaping for attosecond pulses in a multiplexed x-ray free-electron laser, Applie...

    2024

  26. [26]

    J. Yan, W. Qin, Y. Chen, W. Decking, P. Dijkstal, M. Guetg, I. Inoue, N. Kujala, S. Liu, T. Long, N. Mirian, and G. Geloni, Terawatt-attosecond hard x-ray free- electron laser at high repetition rate, Nature Photonics 18, 1293 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Broadband hard X-ray attosecond pulses from extremely chirped electron beams

    R. Robles, V. Guo, D. Cesar, P. Franz, A. Halavanau, A. Lutman, T. Sato, S. Song, N. Sudar, Y. Sun, Z. Zhang, D. Zhu, and A. Marinelli, Broadband hard x-ray attosec- ond pulses from extremely chirped electron beams (2026), arXiv:2604.09969 [physics.acc-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Drescher, M

    M. Drescher, M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, M. Uib- eracker, V. Yakovlev, A. Scrinzi, T. Westerwalbesloh, U. Kleineberg, U. Heinzmann, and F. Krausz, Time- resolved atomic inner-shell spectroscopy, Nature419, 803 (2002)

    2002

  29. [29]

    D. C. Haynes, M. Wurzer, A. Schletter, A. Al-Haddad, C. Blaga, C. Bostedt, J. Bozek, H. Bromberger, M. Bucher, A. Camper, S. Carron, R. Coffee, J. T. Costello, L. F. DiMauro, Y. Ding, K. Ferguson, I. Gr- guraˇ s, W. Helml, M. C. Hoffmann, M. Ilchen, S. Jalas, N. M. Kabachnik, A. K. Kazansky, R. Kienberger, A. R. Maier, T. Maxwell, T. Mazza, M. Meyer, H. P...

    2021

  30. [30]

    Kuschel, P

    S. Kuschel, P. J. Ho, A. Al Haddad, F. F. Zimmermann, L. Flueckiger, M. R. Ware, J. Duris, J. P. MacArthur, A. Lutman, M.-F. Lin, X. Li, K. Nakahara, J. W. Aldrich, P. Walter, L. Young, C. Bostedt, A. Marinelli, and T. Gorkhover, Non-linear enhancement of ultrafast x-ray diffraction through transient resonances, Nature Commu- nications16, 847 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    H. N. Chapman, P. Fromme, A. Barty, T. A. White, R. A. Kirian, A. Aquila, M. S. Hunter, J. Schulz, D. P. De- Ponte, U. Weierstall, R. B. Doak, F. R. N. C. Maia, A. V. Martin, I. Schlichting, L. Lomb, N. Coppola, R. L. Shoe- man, S. W. Epp, R. Hartmann, D. Rolles, A. Rudenko, L. Foucar, N. Kimmel, G. Weidenspointner, P. Holl, M. Liang, M. Barthelmess, C. C...

    2011

  32. [32]

    K. Nass, L. Foucar, T. R. M. Barends, E. Hartmann, S. Botha, R. L. Shoeman, R. B. Doak, R. Alonso-Mori, A. Aquila, S. Bajt, A. Barty, R. Bean, K. R. Beyerlein, M. Bublitz, N. Drachmann, J. Gregersen, H. O. J¨ onsson, W. Kabsch, S. Kassemeyer, J. E. Koglin, M. Krum- rey, D. Mattle, M. Messerschmidt, P. Nissen, L. Rein- hard, O. Sitsel, D. Sokaras, G. J. Wi...

    2015

  33. [33]

    A. A. Lutman, R. Coffee, Y. Ding, Z. Huang, J. Krzywin- ski, T. Maxwell, M. Messerschmidt, and H.-D. Nuhn, Ex- perimental demonstration of femtosecond two-color x-ray free-electron lasers, Physical Review Letters110, 134801 (2013)

    2013

  34. [34]

    E. Prat, P. Dijkstal, E. Ferrari, R. Ganter, P. Jurani´ c, A. Malyzhenkov, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, G. Wang, A. A. Haddad, S. Augustin, C. Bostedt, G. Knopp, J. Knurr, A. S. Morillo-Candas, Z. Sun, and K. Schnorr, Widely tunable two-color x-ray free-electron laser pulses, Physical Review Research4, L022025 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    J. T. O’Neal, E. G. Champenois, S. Oberli, R. Obaid, A. Al-Haddad, J. Barnard, N. Berrah, R. Coffee, J. Duris, G. Galinis, D. Garratt, J. M. Glownia, D. Haxton, P. Ho, S. Li, X. Li, J. MacArthur, J. P. Marangos, A. Natan, N. Shivaram, D. S. Slaughter, P. Walter, S. Wandel, L. Young, C. Bostedt, P. H. Bucksbaum, A. Pic´ on, A. Marinelli, and J. P. Cryan, E...

    2020

  36. [36]

    A. S. Morillo-Candas, S. Augustin, E. Prat, A. Sarracini, J. Knurr, S. Zerdane, Z. Sun, N. Yang, M. Rebholz, H. Zhang, Y. Deng, X. Xie, E. Zyaee, D. Rohrbach, A. Cannizzo, A. Al-Haddad, K. Schnorr, C. Ott, T. Feurer, C. Bostedt, T. Pfeifer, and G. Knopp, Co- herent nonlinear x-ray four-photon interaction with core- shell electrons, Nature649, 590 (2026)

    2026

  37. [37]

    Z. Guo, T. Driver, S. Beauvarlet, D. Cesar, J. Duris, P. L. Franz, O. Alexander, D. Bohler, C. Bostedt, V. Averbukh, X. Cheng, L. F. DiMauro, G. Doumy, R. Forbes, O. Gessner, J. M. Glownia, E. Isele, A. Ka- malov, K. A. Larsen, S. Li, X. Li, M.-F. Lin, G. A. Mc- Cracken, R. Obaid, J. T. O’Neal, R. R. Robles, D. Rolles, M. Ruberti, A. Rudenko, D. S. Slaugh...

    2024

  38. [38]

    A. A. Lutman, M. W. Guetg, T. J. Maxwell, J. P. MacArthur, Y. Ding, C. Emma, J. Krzywinski, A. Marinelli, and Z. Huang, High-power femtosecond soft x rays from fresh-slice multistage free-electron lasers, Physical Review Letters120, 264801 (2018)

    2018

  39. [39]

    G. Wang, P. Dijkstal, S. Reiche, K. Schnorr, and E. Prat, Millijoule femtosecond x-ray pulses from an efficient fresh-slice multistage free-electron laser, Physical Review Letters132, 035002 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    Franz, S

    P. Franz, S. Li, T. Driver, R. R. Robles, D. Cesar, E. Isele, Z. Guo, J. Wang, J. P. Duris, K. Larsen, J. M. Glownia, X. Cheng, M. C. Hoffmann, X. Li, M.-F. Lin, A. Ka- malov, R. Obaid, A. Summers, N. Sudar, E. Thierstein, Z. Zhang, M. F. Kling, Z. Huang, J. P. Cryan, and A. Marinelli, Terawatt-scale attosecond x-ray pulses from a cascaded superradiant fr...

    2024

  41. [41]

    R. R. Robles, K. A. Larsen, D. Cesar, T. Driver, J. Duris, P. Franz, D. Garratt, V. Guo, G. Just, R. Lemons, M.-F. Lin, R. Obaid, N. Sudar, J. Wang, Z. Zhang, J. Cryan, and A. Marinelli, Spectrotemporal shaping of attosecond x-ray pulses with a fresh-slice free-electron laser, Physical Review Letters134, 115001 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    E. Prat, R. Abela, M. Aiba, A. Alarcon, J. Alex, Y. Arbelo, C. Arrell, V. Arsov, C. Bacellar, C. Beard, P. Beaud, S. Bettoni, R. Biffiger, M. Bopp, H.-H. Braun, M. Calvi, A. Cassar, T. Celcer, M. Chergui, P. Chevtsov, C. Cirelli, A. Citterio, P. Craievich, M. C. Divall, A. Dax, M. Dehler, Y. Deng, A. Dietrich, P. Dijkstal, R. Di- napoli, S. Dordevic, S. E...

    2020

  43. [43]

    E. Prat, A. Al Haddad, C. Arrell, S. Augustin, M. Boll, C. Bostedt, M. Calvi, A. L. Cavalieri, P. Craievich, A. Dax, P. Dijkstal, E. Ferrari, R. Follath, R. Ganter, Z. Geng, N. Hiller, M. Huppert, R. Ischebeck, P. Ju- rani´ c, C. Kittel, G. Knopp, A. Malyzhenkov, F. Mar- cellini, S. Neppl, S. Reiche, N. Sammut, T. Schi- etinger, T. Schmidt, K. Schnorr, A....

    2023

  44. [44]

    E. A. Schneidmiller and M. V. Yurkov, Obtaining high degree of circular polarization at x-ray free electron lasers via a reverse undulator taper, Physical Review Special Topics—Accelerators and Beams16, 110702 (2013)

    2013

  45. [45]

    A. A. Lutman, J. P. MacArthur, M. Ilchen, A. O. Lindahl, J. Buck, R. N. Coffee, G. L. Dakovski, L. Dammann, Y. Ding, H. A. D¨ urr, L. Glaser, J. Gr¨ unert, G. Hartmann, N. Hartmann, D. Higley, K. Hirsch, Y. I. Levashov, A. Marinelli, T. Maxwell, A. Mitra, S. Moeller, T. Osipov, F. Peters, M. Planas, I. Shevchuk, W. F. Schlotter, F. Scholz, J. Seltmann, J....

    2016

  46. [46]

    Schmidt and M

    T. Schmidt and M. Calvi, Apple x undulator for the swissfel soft x-ray beamline athos, Synchrotron Radia- tion News31, 35 (2018)

    2018

  47. [47]

    Kittel, A

    C. Kittel, A. Sarracini, S. Augustin, N. Yang, A. Al Had- dad, E. Ferrari, G. Knopp, J. Knurr, A. S. Morillo- Candas, I. Swiderska, E. Prat, N. Sammut, T. Schmidt, C. Bostedt, M. Calvi, and K. Schnorr, Demonstration of full polarization control of soft X-ray pulses with Apple X undulators at SwissFEL using recoil ion momentum spectroscopy, Journal of Sync...

    2024

  48. [48]

    Kittel, M

    C. Kittel, M. Calvi, S. Reiche, N. Sammut, G. Wang, and E. Prat, Enhanced X-ray free-electron laser performance with optical klystron and helical undulators, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation31, 948 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    E. Prat, Z. Geng, C. Kittel, A. Malyzhenkov, F. Mar- cellini, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, and P. Craievich, At- tosecond time-resolved measurements of electron and photon beams with a variable polarization x-band ra- diofrequency deflector at an x-ray free-electron laser, Ad- vanced Photonics7, 10.1117/1.ap.7.2.026002 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1117/1.ap.7.2.026002 2025

  50. [50]

    E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, and M. Yurkov, On the coherent radiation of an electron bunch moving in an arc of a circle, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment398, 373 (1997)

    1997

  51. [51]

    E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, and M. V. Yurkov, Self- amplified spontaneous emission fel with energy-chirped electron beam and its application for generation of at- tosecond x-ray pulses, Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams9, 050702 (2006)

    2006

  52. [52]

    Bostedt, T

    C. Bostedt, T. Schietinger, G. Aeppli, C. Arrell, A. Arse- nault, A. Ashton, S. Augustin, C. Bacellar, J. Beale, H.- H. Braun, M. Calvi, A. Cavalieri, C. Cirelli, P. Craievich, G. Cun´ ı i Soler, C. David, P. Dijkstal, R. Follath, R. Gan- ter, Z. Geng, S. Gerber, N. Hiller, W. Hu, R. Ischebeck, P. Johnson, S. Johnson, P. Jurani´ c, R. Kalt, B. Keil, G. Kn...

    2026

  53. [53]

    Paraliev, A

    M. Paraliev, A. Alarcon, V. Arsov, S. Bettoni, R. Bif- figer, M. Boll, H. Braun, A. Citterio, P. Craievich, A. J. Dax, P. Dijkstal, S. Dordevic, E. Ferrari, F. Frei, R. Gan- ter, Z. Geng, C. Gough, N. Hiller, M. Huppert, R. Is- chebeck, P. Juranic, M. Jurcevic, B. Kalantari, R. Kalt, B. Keil, C. Kittel, W. Koprek, D. Llorente, F. L¨ ohl, A. Malyzhenkov, F...

    2022

  54. [54]

    Craievich, R

    P. Craievich, R. Ischebeck, F. Loehl, G. L. Orlandi, and E. Prat, Transverse deflecting structures for bunch length and slice emittance measurements on SwissFEL, inProceedings of FEL2013, New York, USA, edited by C. Scholl and V. R. W. Schaa (JACoW, Geneva, 2013) pp. 236–241

    2013

  55. [55]

    Ischebeck, E

    R. Ischebeck, E. Prat, V. Thominet, and C. Ozkan Loch, Transverse profile imager for ultrabright electron beams, Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams 18, 082802 (2015)

    2015

  56. [56]

    Jurani´ c and E

    P. Jurani´ c and E. Prat, Testing high-resolution trans- verse profile monitors by measuring the dependence of 21 the electron beam size on the beam energy at swissfel, Review of Scientific Instruments94, 073301 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    Schmidt, N

    B. Schmidt, N. M. Lockmann, P. Schm¨ user, and S. Wesch, Benchmarking coherent radiation spectroscopy as a tool for high-resolution bunch shape reconstruction at free-electron lasers, Physical Review Accelerators and Beams23, 062801 (2020)

    2020

  58. [58]

    Behrens, F.-J

    C. Behrens, F.-J. Decker, Y. Ding, V. A. Dolgashev, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, P. Krejcik, H. Loos, A. Lutman, T. J. Maxwell, J. Turner, J. Wang, M.-H. Wang, J. Welch, and J. Wu, Few-femtosecond time-resolved measurements of x-ray free-electron lasers, Nature Communications5, 3762 (2014)

    2014

  59. [59]

    Nordgren, G

    J. Nordgren, G. Bray, S. Cramm, R. Nyholm, J.-E. Rubensson, and N. Wassdahl, Soft x-ray emission spec- troscopy using monochromatized synchrotron radiation, Review of Scientific Instruments60, 1690 (1989)

    1989

  60. [60]

    Jurani´ c, J

    P. Jurani´ c, J. Rehanek, C. A. Arrell, C. Prader- vand, R. Ischebeck, C. Erny, P. Heimgartner, I. Gor- gisyan, V. Thominet, K. Tiedtke, A. Sorokin, R. Fol- lath, M. Makita, G. Seniutinas, C. David, C. J. Milne, H. Lemke, M. Radovic, C. P. Hauri, and L. Patthey, SwissFEL Aramis beamline photon diagnostics, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation25, 1238 (2018)

    2018

  61. [61]

    Fl¨ ottmann,ASTRA: A Space Charge Tracking Algo- rithm, Tech

    K. Fl¨ ottmann,ASTRA: A Space Charge Tracking Algo- rithm, Tech. Rep. (DESY, 2017) DESY, Hamburg

    2017

  62. [62]

    Borland,Elegant: A flexible SDDS-compliant code for accelerator simulation, Tech

    M. Borland,Elegant: A flexible SDDS-compliant code for accelerator simulation, Tech. Rep. (Argonne National Lab., IL (US), 2000)

    2000

  63. [63]

    S. Reiche, GENESIS 1.3: a fully 3D time-dependent FEL simulation code, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detec- tors and Associated Equipment429, 243 (1999)

    1999

  64. [64]

    E. Prat, P. Craievich, P. Dijkstal, S. Di Mitri, E. Ferrari, T. G. Lucas, A. Malyzhenkov, G. Perosa, S. Reiche, and T. Schietinger, Energy spread blowup by intrabeam scat- tering and microbunching at the swissfel injector, Physi- cal Review Accelerators and Beams25, 104401 (2022)

    2022

  65. [65]

    Venturini, Models of longitudinal space-charge impedance for microbunching instability, Physical Re- view Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams11, 034401 (2008)

    M. Venturini, Models of longitudinal space-charge impedance for microbunching instability, Physical Re- view Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams11, 034401 (2008)

    2008