REVIEW 3 cited by
DeepQTest: Testing Autonomous Driving Systems with Reinforcement Learning and Real-world Weather Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Autonomous driving systems (ADSs) are capable of sensing the environment and making driving decisions autonomously. These systems are safety-critical, and testing them is one of the important approaches to ensure their safety. However, due to the inherent complexity of ADSs and the high dimensionality of their operating environment, the number of possible test scenarios for ADSs is infinite. Besides, the operating environment of ADSs is dynamic, continuously evolving, and full of uncertainties, which requires a testing approach adaptive to the environment. In addition, existing ADS testing techniques have limited effectiveness in ensuring the realism of test scenarios, especially the realism of weather conditions and their changes over time. Recently, reinforcement learning (RL) has demonstrated great potential in addressing challenging problems, especially those requiring constant adaptations to dynamic environments. To this end, we present DeepQTest, a novel ADS testing approach that uses RL to learn environment configurations with a high chance of revealing abnormal ADS behaviors. Specifically, DeepQTest employs Deep Q-Learning and adopts three safety and comfort measures to construct the reward functions. To ensure the realism of generated scenarios, DeepQTest defines a set of realistic constraints and introduces real-world weather conditions into the simulated environment. We employed three comparison baselines, i.e., random, greedy, and a state-of-the-art RL-based approach DeepCOllision, for evaluating DeepQTest on an industrial-scale ADS. Evaluation results show that DeepQTest demonstrated significantly better effectiveness in terms of generating scenarios leading to collisions and ensuring scenario realism compared with the baselines. In addition, among the three reward functions implemented in DeepQTest, Time-To-Collision is recommended as the best design according to our study.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Real-World Perturbation Testing of Autonomous Driving Systems
Model-level and offline robustness metrics for 72 camera/LiDAR perturbations do not reliably predict closed-loop failures on a full-scale autonomous vehicle.
-
Benchmarking Image Perturbations for Testing Automated Driving Assistance Systems
A benchmark of 32 image perturbations on two ADAS shows most corruptions cause failures, and retraining on perturbed data improves robustness to simulated weather, but the retraining effect is confounded by new road data.
-
OpenCat: Improving Interoperability of ADS Testing
OpenCat converts OpenDRIVE roads to Catmull-Rom splines; re-running SensoDat in Udacity with Dave-2 raises the pass rate from 61% to 98%, suggesting the benchmark is coupled to its original ADAS and simulator.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.