pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26462 · v1 · pith:OOSC4RXRnew · submitted 2026-05-26 · ✦ hep-ex

Search for a new heavy scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in the four-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at sqrt{s} = 13 TeV

CMS Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 16:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords heavy scalar resonanceZ boson pairfour-lepton final stateupper limitsno significant excessresonance searchproton-proton collisions
0
0 comments X

The pith

No significant excess is observed in the search for a new heavy scalar resonance decaying to two Z bosons in four-lepton events.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports results from a search for a hypothetical new heavy scalar particle that decays into a pair of Z bosons, with each Z boson decaying further into electrons or muons. The analysis uses proton-proton collision data at 13 TeV corresponding to 138 inverse femtobarns and examines resonance masses from 130 GeV up to 3 TeV for both narrow and broad width cases. It accounts for gluon fusion and vector boson fusion production, plus interference effects in the broad scenario. No deviation from standard model background expectations appears in the data. This leads to upper limits at 95 percent confidence level on the product of production cross section and branching fraction to two Z bosons.

Core claim

The search finds no significant excess with respect to the standard model background expectation in the examined phase space. Upper limits at the 95 percent confidence level are set on the product of the heavy scalar resonance production cross section and the branching fraction for its decay into two Z bosons. The exclusion limits range from 0.05 to 0.1 pb in the low-mass region to 0.00 pb in the high-mass region.

What carries the argument

Comparison of the four-lepton invariant mass distribution in data against modeled standard model backgrounds to extract statistical upper limits on possible resonant signals.

If this is right

  • Any new heavy scalar must have a production cross section times branching fraction to ZZ below the reported limits across the mass range.
  • Both gluon-fusion and vector-boson-fusion production modes for such a resonance are constrained by the same limits.
  • Broad-width scenarios including interference with the 125 GeV Higgs boson are also excluded at the stated levels.
  • The standard model description of four-lepton events remains consistent with observation up to 3 TeV resonance masses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These limits can be combined with results from other decay channels to further restrict models containing additional scalar particles.
  • Higher integrated luminosity at future collider runs would directly improve the sensitivity in the same final state.
  • The analysis methods for handling interference in broad resonances provide a template for similar searches in other final states.

Load-bearing premise

The standard model background processes in the four-lepton final state are modeled with sufficient accuracy that any deviation would be attributable to a new resonance rather than mismodeling or unaccounted systematic effects.

What would settle it

A statistically significant excess appearing in the four-lepton invariant mass spectrum above the predicted standard model background in this dataset.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26462 by CMS Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: the mreco 4ℓ distributions for signal and background processes estimated from the MC simulation, alongside observed data. Red and pink open histograms show the lineshapes for different signal masses. Right: The Dkin bkg distributions for signal and background processes estimated from the MC simulation, together with the observed data. The masses of the X resonances written in the legends are in GeV u… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The DVBF 2jet distributions for signal, background, and observed data. Only events pass￾ing the lepton and jet multiplicity requirements for the VBF-tagged category are shown. The dotted vertical line represents the threshold of DVBF 2jet = 0.46. function (pdf) of the signal process is defined as Psig(m reco 4ℓ , D kin bkg|mX, ΓX) = {[M(m gen 4ℓ |mX, ΓX)ϵ(m gen 4ℓ )] ⊗ R(m reco 4ℓ |m gen 4ℓ )}P(D kin bkg|m… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The product of signal efficiency and acceptance, as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The mreco 4ℓ distributions for several values of mX and ΓX obtained from the signal model, for the ggF (left) and VBF (right) signal processes. All final states and categories are combined. To build the 2D pdf, the conditional pdf P(Dkin bkg|mreco 4ℓ ) is obtained from the mreco 4ℓ versus Dkin bkg distribution extracted from the signal MC simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Expected distributions of m gen 4ℓ vs. Dkin bkg for the ggF (left) and VBF (right) production mechanisms, in the 4µ final state. The distributions are estimated from the signal simulation. The signal model is validated by comparing it with the mreco 4ℓ distribution extracted from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The left (right) plot depicts the lineshapes for the ggF (VBF) signal with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The mreco 4ℓ and Dkin bkg distributions with the 2016–2018 data set, for backgrounds and observed data. The distributions for backgrounds are extracted from the statistical model, with all nuisance parameters at their best fit values. The upper left (right) panel shows the distribu￾tion of mreco 4ℓ (Dkin bkg); the lower panel shows the distribution of mreco 4ℓ in bins of Dkin bkg. The exclusion limits rang… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Observed and expected upper limits on σ(pp → X → ZZ) with mX from 130 GeV to 3 TeV in the narrow-width approximation, for the ggF (upper left) and VBF (upper right) production, and with fVBF as a free parameter in the fit (lower). theories [79, 80]. No such excess is found in this search. 200 300 400 500 1000 2000 3000 (GeV) mX −3 10 −2 10 −1 10 Local p-value 0 SD 1 SD 2 SD 3 SD 130 (13 TeV) -1 CMS 138 fb … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Local p-value as a function of mX, with fVBF floating. Broad-width assumptions are also tested, with ΓX fixed to 1, 10, or 100 GeV. The results are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Observed and expected upper limits on σ(pp → X → ZZ) with mX from 130 GeV to 3 TeV and ΓX equal to 1 (upper), 10 (middle), and 100 (lower) GeV. The left column shows the results for pure ggF production and the right column shows the results for pure VBF produc￾tion. Comparing the observed and expected results, no significant excess is observed. At mX < 200 GeV with ΓX = 1 and 10 GeV, as well as over the w… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A search for a new heavy scalar resonance decaying to two Z bosons, each subsequently decaying to a pair of electrons or muons, is presented. The results are based on a proton-proton collision data set collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The search is performed over a wide range of resonance masses from 130 GeV to 3 TeV, considering both narrow- and broad-width scenarios, and considering the gluon fusion and vector boson fusion production processes. For the broad-width scenario, the interference between the new resonance, the 125 GeV Higgs boson production, and the continuum background is taken into account. No significant excess with respect to the standard model background expectation is observed in the examined phase space. Upper limits at the 95% confidence level are set on the product of the heavy scalar resonance production cross section and the branching fraction for its decay into two Z bosons. The exclusion limits range from 0.05$-$0.1 pb in the low-mass region to 0.00 pb in the high-mass region.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports results from a search for a new heavy scalar resonance decaying to ZZ (with each Z to leptons) in the four-lepton final state. Using 138 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV pp collision data collected by CMS, the analysis covers resonance masses from 130 GeV to 3 TeV in both narrow- and broad-width scenarios, for gluon-fusion and vector-boson-fusion production modes. Interference with the 125 GeV Higgs and SM continuum is included for the broad-width case. No significant excess above the SM background expectation is observed, and 95% CL upper limits are placed on the product of production cross section and branching fraction to ZZ, ranging from 0.05-0.1 pb at low mass to 0 pb at high mass.

Significance. This is a standard, high-luminosity null-result search in a well-understood final state. When the background modeling and systematic treatment are accurate, the limits provide useful constraints on extended Higgs sectors. The explicit inclusion of interference effects for broad resonances and the use of established CMS statistical procedures (profile likelihood fits with data-driven corrections) are strengths that increase the robustness of the reported exclusion.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Results section] Figure 5 (or equivalent limit plot): the caption should explicitly state whether the shown curves include or exclude the interference term for the broad-width hypothesis, to avoid reader ambiguity when comparing to theory predictions.
  2. [Section 4] Section 4 (background estimation): the text states that ZZ continuum is modeled with MC plus data-driven corrections, but a short sentence quantifying the size of the correction in the high-mass tail would improve transparency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, recognition of its strengths in background modeling and statistical procedures, and recommendation to accept. No major comments were provided for response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard experimental limit-setting from data

full rationale

This is a standard CMS experimental search paper reporting observed data compared to SM background predictions in the four-lepton channel. The central results (no excess observed; 95% CL upper limits on σ × B ranging 0.05–0.1 pb to 0 pb) are obtained via profile likelihood fits to data using MC-simulated backgrounds with data-driven corrections and established systematic uncertainties. No equations, self-citations, or ansatze reduce the reported limits to quantities defined by the result itself; the statistical procedure and background modeling are independent of the final limit values and remain externally falsifiable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis relies on standard model predictions for background and detector response but introduces no new free parameters, axioms beyond domain assumptions, or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard model processes accurately predict the background rate and shape in the four-lepton final state after all selections.
    The no-excess conclusion and derived limits rest on this background prediction being correct.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5749 in / 1364 out tokens · 54983 ms · 2026-07-01T16:49:34.745878+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · 47 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020,arXiv:1207.7214

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 2012

  2. [2]

    Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC”,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021,arXiv:1207.7235

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 2012

  3. [3]

    Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a new boson with mass near 125 GeV in pp collisions at √s=7 and 8 TeV”,JHEP06(2013) 81,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2013)081, arXiv:1303.4571. References 25

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2013)081 2013

  4. [4]

    Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models

    G. C. Branco et al., “Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models”,Phys. Rept.516(2012) 1,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002,arXiv:1106.0034

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002 2012

  5. [5]

    A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension”,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3370,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.3370, arXiv:hep-ph/9905221

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 1999

  6. [6]

    Modulus Stabilization with Bulk Fields

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, “Modulus stabilization with bulk fields”,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4922,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4922, arXiv:hep-ph/9907447

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.4922 1999

  7. [7]

    Gravity particles from Warped Extra Dimensions, predictions for LHC

    A. Carvalho, “Gravity particles from warped extra dimensions, predictions for LHC”, 2018.arXiv:1404.0102

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Search for a Higgs boson in the mass range from 145 to 1000 GeV decaying to a pair of W or Z bosons

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a Higgs boson in the mass range from 145 to 1000 GeV decaying to a pair of W or Z bosons”,JHEP10(2015) 144, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2015)144,arXiv:1504.00936

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)144 2015

  9. [9]

    Search for a new scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a new scalar resonance decaying to a pair of Z bosons in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP06(2018) 127, doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2018)127,arXiv:1804.01939

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2018)127 2018

  10. [10]

    Search for an additional, heavy Higgs boson in the $H\rightarrow ZZ$ decay channel at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV in $pp$ collision data with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for an additional, heavy Higgs boson in theh→zzdecay channel at √s=8 TeV inppcollision data with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C76 (2016) 45,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3820-z,arXiv:1507.05930

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3820-z 2016

  11. [11]

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for heavy resonances decaying into a pair of Z bosons in theℓ +ℓ−ℓ′+ℓ′− andℓ +ℓ−ν ¯νfinal states using 139 fb −1 of proton–proton collisions at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 332, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09013-y,arXiv:2009.14791

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09013-y 2021

  12. [12]

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2026.doi:10.17182/hepdata.172455

    work page doi:10.17182/hepdata.172455 2026

  13. [13]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/s08004 2008

  14. [14]

    Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3

    CMS Collaboration, “Development of the CMS detector for the CERN LHC Run 3”, JINST19(2024) P05064,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/P05064, arXiv:2309.05466

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/05/p05064 2024

  15. [15]

    Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS Level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017, arXiv:2006.10165

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/p10017 2020

  16. [16]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/p01020 2017

  17. [17]

    Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS high-level trigger during LHC Run 2”, JINST19(2024) P11021,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/P11021, arXiv:2410.17038

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/19/11/p11021 2024

  18. [18]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888. 26

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/p05014 2021

  19. [19]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=$ 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/p06015 2018

  20. [20]

    Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker

    CMS Collaboration, “Description and performance of track and primary-vertex reconstruction with the CMS tracker”,JINST9(2014) P10009, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/P10009,arXiv:1405.6569

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/9/10/p10009 2014

  21. [21]

    Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 800, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2,arXiv:2104.01927

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2 2015

  22. [22]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004, 2018

    2017

  23. [23]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002, 2019

    2018

  24. [24]

    Measurements of production cross sections of the Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state in proton–proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of production cross sections of the Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state in proton–proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C81 (2021) 488,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09200-x,arXiv:2103.04956

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09200-x 2021

  25. [25]

    Measurement of the Inclusive W and Z Production Cross Sections in pp Collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inclusive W and Z production cross sections in pp collisions at √s=7 TeV with the CMS experiment”,JHEP10(2011) 132, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2011)132,arXiv:1107.4789

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2011)132 2011

  26. [26]

    NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “NLO vector-boson production matched with shower in POWHEG”,JHEP07(2008) 060, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/060,arXiv:0805.4802

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/060 2008

  27. [27]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P . Nason, “A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms”,JHEP11(2004) 040,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/040 2004

  28. [28]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method”,JHEP11(2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070,arXiv:0709.2092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070 2007

  29. [29]

    Spin determination of single-produced resonances at hadron colliders

    Y. Gao et al., “Spin determination of single-produced resonances at hadron colliders”, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 075022,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.075022, arXiv:1001.3396

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.075022 2010

  30. [30]

    On the spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC

    S. Bolognesi et al., “Spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC”,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 095031,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.095031,arXiv:1208.4018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.095031 2012

  31. [31]

    Constraining anomalous HVV interactions at proton and lepton colliders

    I. Anderson et al., “Constraining anomalous HVV interactions at proton and lepton colliders”,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 035007,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.035007, arXiv:1309.4819

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.035007 2014

  32. [32]

    Constraining anomalous Higgs boson couplings to the heavy flavor fermions using matrix element techniques

    A. V . Gritsan, R. Roentsch, M. Schulze, and M. Xiao, “Constraining anomalous Higgs boson couplings to the heavy flavor fermions using matrix element techniques”,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 055023,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.055023,arXiv:1606.03107

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.055023 2016

  33. [33]

    The Higgs Boson Lineshape

    S. Goria, G. Passarino, and D. Rosco, “The Higgs-boson lineshape”,Nucl. Phys. B864 (2012) 530,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.07.006,arXiv:1112.5517. References 27

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.07.006 2012

  34. [34]

    Higgs Pseudo-Observables, Second Riemann Sheet and All That

    G. Passarino, C. Sturm, and S. Uccirati, “Higgs pseudo-observables, second Riemann sheet and all that”,Nucl. Phys. B834(2010) 77, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.03.013,arXiv:1001.3360

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.03.013 2010

  35. [35]

    NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production

    K. Hamilton, P . Nason, E. Re, and G. Zanderighi, “NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production”,JHEP10(2013) 222,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)222, arXiv:1309.0017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2013)222 2013

  36. [36]

    ZZ production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and D. Rathlev, “ZZ production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD”,Phys. Lett. B750(2015) 407, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.09.055,arXiv:1507.06257

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.09.055 2015

  37. [37]

    MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC

    J. M. Campbell and R. K. Ellis, “MCFM for the Tevatron and the LHC”,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.205-206(2010) 10,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2010.08.011, arXiv:1007.3492

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2010.08.011 2010

  38. [38]

    Vector boson pair production at the LHC

    J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams, “Vector boson pair production at the LHC”, JHEP07(2011) 018,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2011)018,arXiv:1105.0020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2011)018 2011

  39. [39]

    Bounding the Higgs width at the LHC using full analytic results for gg -> 2e 2\mu

    J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams, “Bounding the Higgs width at the LHC using full analytic results for gg→e −e+µ−µ+”,JHEP04(2014) 060, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2014)060,arXiv:1311.3589

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2014)060 2014

  40. [40]

    Signal-background interference effects for $gg \to H \to W^+ W^-$ beyond leading order

    M. Bonvini et al., “Signal-background interference effects for gg→H→W +W− beyond leading order”,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 034032, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.034032,arXiv:1304.3053

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.034032 2013

  41. [41]

    Production of two Z-bosons in gluon fusion in the heavy top quark approximation

    K. Melnikov and M. Dowling, “Production of two Z bosons in gluon fusion in the heavy top quark approximation”,Phys. Lett. B744(2015) 43, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.03.030,arXiv:1503.01274

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.03.030 2015

  42. [42]

    Soft gluon resummation in the signal-background interference process of $gg(\to h^*) \to ZZ$

    C. S. Li, H. T. Li, D. Y. Shao, and J. Wang, “Soft gluon resummation in the signal-background interference process ofgg(→h ∗)→ZZ”,JHEP08(2015) 65, doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2015)065,arXiv:1504.02388

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2015)065 2015

  43. [43]

    An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini, “Next-to-next-to-leading-order subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs-boson production at the Large Hadron Collider”,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 222002,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.222002, arXiv:hep-ph/0703012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.222002 2007

  44. [44]

    NNLO predictions for the Higgs boson signal in the H->WW->lnu lnu and H->ZZ->4l decay channels

    M. Grazzini, “NNLO predictions for the Higgs boson signal in the H→WW→ℓνlν and H→ZZ→4ℓdecay channels”,JHEP02(2008) 043, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/043,arXiv:0801.3232

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/02/043 2008

  45. [45]

    Heavy-quark mass effects in Higgs boson production at the LHC

    M. Grazzini and H. Sargsyan, “Heavy-quark mass effects in Higgs boson production at the LHC”,JHEP09(2013) 129,doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2013)129, arXiv:1306.4581

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep09(2013)129 2013

  46. [46]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”,JHEP07 (2014) 079,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079,arXiv:1405.0301

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)079 2014

  47. [47]

    A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading-Order Monte Carlo for Heavy Flavour Hadroproduction

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and G. Ridolfi, “A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction”,JHEP09(2007) 126, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/126,arXiv:0707.3088. 28

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/126 2007

  48. [48]

    New features in the JHU generator framework: constraining Higgs boson properties from on-shell and off-shell production

    A. V . Gritsan et al., “New features in the JHU generator framework: constraining Higgs boson properties from on-shell and off-shell production”,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 056022, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.056022,arXiv:2002.09888

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.056022 2020

  49. [49]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2”,Comp. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024,arXiv:1410.3012

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 2015

  50. [50]

    Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements

    CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMS PYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 4, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4,arXiv:1903.12179

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4 2020

  51. [51]

    Parton distributions for the LHC Run II

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions for the LHC Run II”,JHEP04(2015) 040, doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040,arXiv:1410.8849

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)040 2015

  52. [52]

    GEANT4—a simulation toolkit

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4—a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(03)01368-8 2003

  53. [53]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/p10003 2017

  54. [54]

    Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid

    CMS Collaboration, “Technical proposal for the Phase-II upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid”, CMS Technical Proposal CERN-LHCC-2015-010, CMS-TDR-15-02, 2015. doi:10.17181/CERN.VU8I.D59J

    work page doi:10.17181/cern.vu8i.d59j 2015

  55. [55]

    XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System

    T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system”, inProc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’16, p. 785. 2016. arXiv:1603.02754.doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 2016

  56. [56]

    Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for the Higgs boson production and decay to four-leptons in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurements of inclusive and differential cross sections for the Higgs boson production and decay to four-leptons in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV”,JHEP08(2023) 40,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)040, arXiv:2305.07532

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2023)040 2023

  57. [57]

    Studies of Higgs boson production in the four-lepton final state at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Studies of Higgs boson production in the four-lepton final state at√s=13 TeV”, CMS Physics Analysis Summary CMS-PAS-HIG-15-004, 2016

    2016

  58. [58]

    The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm”,JHEP04 (2008) 063,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063,arXiv:0802.1189

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063 2008

  59. [59]

    Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV”,JINST12(2017) P02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014,arXiv:1607.03663

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/p02014 2017

  60. [60]

    Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data

    CMS Collaboration, “Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data”,JINST15(2020) P09018, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/P09018,arXiv:2003.00503

    work page doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/p09018 2020

  61. [61]

    Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P05011, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011,arXiv:1712.07158

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/p05011 2018

  62. [62]

    Heavy flavor identification at CMS with deep neural networks

    CMS Collaboration, “Heavy flavor identification at CMS with deep neural networks”, CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2017-005, 2017. References 29

    2017

  63. [63]

    Performance summary of AK4 jet b tagging with data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance summary of AK4 jet b tagging with data from proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV with the CMS detector”, CMS Detector Performance Note CMS-DP-2023-005, 2023

    2023

  64. [64]

    Review of particle physics

    Particle Data Group, “Review of particle physics”,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  65. [65]

    Inadequacy of zero-width approximation for a light Higgs boson signal

    N. Kauer and G. Passarino, “Inadequacy of zero-width approximation for a light Higgs boson signal”,JHEP08(2012) 116,doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2012)116, arXiv:1206.4803

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2012)116 2012

  66. [66]

    On the energy loss of fast particles by ionisation

    L. D. Landau, “On the energy loss of fast particles by ionisation”,J. Phys. (USSR)8 (1944) 417,doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-010586-4.50061-4

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-010586-4.50061-4 1944

  67. [67]

    Measurement of the Higgs boson mass and width using the four-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the Higgs boson mass and width using the four-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 092014,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.092014,arXiv:2409.13663

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.092014 2025

  68. [68]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group, “Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 4. deciphering the nature of the Higgs sector”. CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs. CERN, 2017.doi:10.23731/CYRM-2017-002

    work page doi:10.23731/cyrm-2017-002 2017

  69. [69]

    PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II

    J. Butterworth et al., “PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II”,J. Phys. G43(2016) 023001,doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001,arXiv:1510.03865

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001 2016

  70. [70]

    The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE”, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.8(2024) 19,doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4, arXiv:2404.06614

    work page doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4 2024

  71. [71]

    Confidence Level Computation for Combining Searches with Small Statistics

    T. Junk, “Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics”, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A434(1999) 435,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2, arXiv:hep-ex/9902006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0168-9002(99)00498-2 1999

  72. [72]

    Presentation of search results: TheCL s technique

    A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: TheCL s technique”,J. Phys. G28(2002) 2693, doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313 2002

  73. [73]

    Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011

    ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, and LHC Higgs Combination Group, “Procedure for the LHC Higgs boson search combination in Summer 2011”, Technical Report CMS-NOTE-2011-005, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-11, 2011

    2011

  74. [74]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics”,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0,arXiv:1007.1727. [Erratum: doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2501-z]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0 2011

  75. [75]

    P values and nuisance parameters

    L. Demortier, “P values and nuisance parameters”, inProc. Workshop, PHYSTAT-LHC, Geneva, Switzerland, June 27-29, 2007, p. 23. 2008.doi:10.5170/CERN-2008-001

    work page doi:10.5170/cern-2008-001 2007

  76. [76]

    Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics

    E. Gross and O. Vitells, “Trial factors for the look elsewhere effect in high energy physics”,Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 525,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1470-8, arXiv:1005.1891

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1470-8 2010

  77. [77]

    Search for resonances decaying into photon pairs in 139 fb−1 of pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for resonances decaying into photon pairs in 139 fb−1 of pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Lett. B822(2021) 136651, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136651,arXiv:2102.13405. 30

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136651 2021

  78. [78]

    Search for a new resonance decaying into two spin-0 bosons in a final state with two photons and two bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for a new resonance decaying into two spin-0 bosons in a final state with two photons and two bottom quarks in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV”,JHEP05(2024) 316,doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)316, arXiv:2310.01643

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2024)316 2024

  79. [79]

    Theoretical arguments and experimental signals for a second resonance of the Higgs field

    M. Consoli, L. Cosmai, and F. Fabbri, “Theoretical arguments and experimental signals for a second resonance of the Higgs field”,Universe9(2023) 99, doi:10.3390/universe9020099

    work page doi:10.3390/universe9020099 2023

  80. [80]

    Second resonance of the Higgs field: motivations, experimental signals, unitarity constraints

    M. Consoli and G. Rupp, “Second resonance of the Higgs field: motivations, experimental signals, unitarity constraints”,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 951, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13253-z,arXiv:2308.01429. 31 A The CMS Collaboration Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia A. Hayrapetyan, V . Makarenko , A. Tumasyan1 Institut f ¨ ur Hochenergiephysik, Vie...

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13253-z 2024