Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 54 references

StyleAR: Customizing Multimodal Autoregressive Model for Style-Aligned Text-to-Image Generation

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read StyleAR enables autoregressive models to follow reference styles using only binary text-image data, without triplet training data.

desk verdict The method is a plausible first step for AR style-aligned generation, but the paper's own numbers undercut its headline claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.19874 v1 pith:OSZHJLH2 submitted 2025-05-26 cs.CV cs.AIcs.MM

Yi Wu , Lingting Zhu , Shengju Qian , Lei Liu , Wandi Qiao , Lequan Yu , Bin Li This is my paper
classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.MM
keywords style-alignedgenerationautoregressivemodelmultimodalstyletransfercontentleakagedatacurationCLIPimageencoderDPOpost-training
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

StyleAR is a method that lets multimodal autoregressive (AR) models perform style-aligned text-to-image generation: given a reference style image and a text prompt, the model produces a new image that matches both. The paper's central claim is that this can be done using only ordinary text-image binary data for training, instead of the harder-to-obtain text-image-to-image triplet data that AR models normally require. To achieve this, StyleAR curates a stylized binary dataset, trains the AR model to reconstruct images from their own style tokens, and adds inference-time mechanisms to suppress content leakage. If correct, the result is an AR-based alternative to diffusion-based style transfer that avoids the data-scaling bottleneck and competes favorably on style consistency and prompt adherence.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the style-enhanced token stream. A frozen CLIP image encoder plus a trainable perceiver resampler converts an input image into M=16 style tokens in the AR model's token space. During training, Gaussian noise is added to these tokens (with strength $\gamma$) to suppress content information. At inference, the reference image and its SAM-segmented version are both encoded, the features are subtracted ($F - F_S$), the result is resampled, and the residual path is blended with a ratio $\alpha$ to produce the final style tokens $\hat{s}_e = \alpha R(F) + (1-\alpha) R(F - F_S) + \gamma n$. These tokens are concatenated with the text tokens, and the AR transformer generates image tokens via next-token prediction. This design lets the model learn from binary data during training and transfer style to new content at inference.

What would settle it

Run StyleAR on a reference image whose content directly contradicts the prompt (e.g., a reference photo of a cat, prompt 'a dog') and check whether the dog's shape appears; a strong content leak would show cat-like features. Also test transfer to out-of-domain content, such as applying a Renaissance painting style to a modern skyscraper prompt, and measure whether CLIP-I and DINO gains come from copying content rather than style.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core discovery is that a multimodal autoregressive model can be tuned for style-aligned generation using only binary data by adopting a self-supervised training scheme: the model is asked to reconstruct an image from style tokens extracted from that same image, rather than from an explicit style-content pair. The authors show that combining a frozen CLIP image encoder with a trainable perceiver resampler produces style tokens that fit the AR model's unified token space, and that injecting Gaussian noise into these tokens during training weakens content-specific features enough to prevent content leakage. At inference, they further subtract features obtained from a SAM-segmented version of the reference image to strip away semantic content, leaving a style-enhanced token stream. They report state-of-the-art performance against diffusion baselines on CLIP-T (prompt adherence), CLIP-I and DINO (style consistency), and a user study, while also preserving the AR model's ability to incorporate additional structural controls such as depth maps.

Load-bearing premise

The method trains the model to reproduce an image from style tokens taken from that same image, and assumes these tokens have already separated style from content well enough that the model can apply them to a completely different image at inference, even though no explicit disentanglement loss guarantees this.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • AR models can scale style-aligned generation by training on abundant text-image data rather than scarce triplets, avoiding the upper-bound limitation of diffusion-generated ground truth.
  • StyleAR can be combined with structural control (e.g., depth maps) while keeping the original AR model's generation ability intact, opening a path to conditional stylized generation.
  • The data-curation recipe (stylized images plus raw images at a 1:3 ratio) shows that mixing domain-general and domain-specific data improves style consistency without hurting prompt adherence.
  • DPO post-training on pairwise preference data further boosts prompt adherence for style-aligned generation, suggesting the same preference-tuning paradigm transfers to stylization.
  • If the method generalizes, diffusion-based style-transfer pipelines may be replaceable by AR models with simpler data requirements and fewer per-style optimization steps.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The implicit style-content separation learned from self-reconstruction may be the key enabler; if it is robust, the same trick could apply to other AR tasks that suffer from content leakage, such as subject-driven or identity-preserving generation.
  • A likely stress test is to use reference images whose style is defined by texture or material rather than by an obvious semantic category; if StyleAR fails there, the residual-path and noise-injection mechanisms may still rely partly on content features.
  • The method's reliance on a frozen CLIP encoder ties its style vocabulary to CLIP's representation; a broader or differently trained encoder could either improve style coverage or introduce new bias, and this is not tested in the paper.
  • The 1:3 raw-to-stylized mixing ratio is an empirical finding; its dependence on dataset size, style diversity, and base model capacity is unexplored, so the ratio may need to be re-tuned when scaling up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes StyleAR, a method for style-aligned text-to-image generation with multimodal autoregressive (AR) models. To avoid the need for text-image-to-image triplet training data, the authors construct binary text-image data by generating stylized images with a diffusion model and dropping the reference style image. The model is trained in a self-supervised manner: a frozen CLIP image encoder plus a perceiver resampler converts the input image into style tokens, Gaussian noise is injected to weaken content, and the AR model is trained to reconstruct the image tokens from text and noise-augmented style tokens. At inference, a SAM-based feature subtraction and residual path produce style-enhanced tokens. Training mixes raw and stylized images at a 1:3 ratio, and DPO post-training is applied. The paper claims state-of-the-art prompt adherence and style consistency, surpassing diffusion-based baselines, and presents quantitative comparisons, a user study, and ablations.

Significance. If the claims were supported, the contribution would be significant: it would show that AR models can be adapted for style-aligned generation using only binary text-image data, sidestepping the difficulty of collecting triplet data. The data-curation idea and the style-enhanced token mechanism are interesting and potentially useful, and the paper includes ablation studies on data ratio, style-enhanced tokens, and DPO. However, the reported evidence does not support the central state-of-the-art claim. The quantitative table and user-study numbers contradict the prose, and the evaluation protocol is too small and lacks statistical grounding. The significance is therefore conditional on a substantially revised evidence base that the current manuscript does not provide.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.2, Table 1] The claim in the Abstract and Contributions that StyleAR 'achieves state-of-the-art performance in both prompt adherence and style consistency, surpassing existing diffusion-based approaches' is directly contradicted by Table 1. StyleAR ranks second on CLIP-T (0.2893 vs InstantStyle's 0.2944) and second on CLIP-I and DINO (0.7456/0.6136 vs IP-Adapter's 0.7971/0.6617). The text explains IP-Adapter's higher scores as content leakage, but no corrected or re-normalized metrics are provided. Without such corrected scores, the paper cannot claim superiority in style consistency; at best, it claims a trade-off.
  2. [Section 4.2, Figure 5] The user-study numbers in Figure 5 contradict the prose in Section 4.2. The style-consistency row sums to 400 votes and gives InstantStyle 177 votes versus StyleAR's 157, yet the text states that StyleAR 'far surpasses all others' and that InstantStyle exhibits 'poor style consistency.' Similarly, the prompt-adherence row gives StyleAR 195 votes versus InstantStyle's 17, but the text says the two methods are 'on par.' These are internal inconsistencies in the evidence base for the headline claim; the figure and the text cannot both be correct as written.
  3. [Section 4.1, Table 2] The ablation study for style-enhanced tokens is also internally inconsistent. In Table 2, the variant without style-enhanced tokens has higher CLIP-I (0.7552 vs 0.7456) and higher DINO (0.6765 vs 0.6136) than the full model, yet the text in Section 4.3 claims that removing style-enhanced tokens causes chaotic generation and that the full model improves both prompt adherence and image quality. Only CLIP-T improves (0.2893 vs 0.2683). The explanation that the higher CLIP-I/DINO values reflect content leakage is plausible, but no corrected style-consistency metric is reported, so the ablation does not substantiate the stated benefit.
  4. [Section 4.1] The evaluation protocol is too limited to support a state-of-the-art claim. It uses only 10 reference styles and 20 prompts with 4 samples each (800 images total), reports no error bars or significance tests, and does not specify whether the evaluation styles overlap with the 80 training styles. Without a held-out style split and statistical analysis, the claimed generalization and superiority over baselines cannot be verified. The absence of code release further limits reproducibility.
  5. [Section 3.3, Eq. (2)] The train-inference mismatch is load-bearing for the method's generalization. During training, the model reconstructs the input image from style tokens extracted from that same image, with Gaussian noise as the only content-suppression mechanism; during inference, a different SAM-based feature subtraction and residual path (Eq. (2)) are used. The paper provides no explicit analysis or experiment isolating whether the learned style tokens transfer to unseen content without copying the reference image's semantics. This is not a formal error, but it is a central correctness risk that the current experiments do not address.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table 1 caption] The caption says 'We conduct a comprehensive qualitative evaluation' but the table reports quantitative metrics; this should say 'quantitative evaluation.'
  2. [Section 4.3, Impact of DPO] The phrase 'without DPO pose-training' contains a typo; it should read 'post-training.'
  3. [Section 1] The sentence 'This limitation stems from that the fact that AR models require...' has a grammatical error; delete 'that the fact that' or rephrase.
  4. [Figure 3] The prompt template 'Generate an same style image' should be 'Generate an image in the same style.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation is established; the central claims are tested against external diffusion baselines rather than reduced to the method's own inputs.

full rationale

StyleAR's pipeline is not circular in the sense defined here. Its training signal is a self-supervised reconstruction objective: the model receives CLIP-derived style tokens from an input image and learns to predict that same image's tokens conditioned on the prompt (Section 3.3, Eq. 2 and Figure 3). This is a train/inference mismatch and a possible generalization risk, but it is not a logical reduction of the style-transfer claim to its input by construction. The headline performance claims are assessed against external diffusion baselines (InstantStyle, IP-Adapter, StyleAligned, StyleCrafter, StyleShot) using their official implementations, so the argument does not close a self-referential loop. The synthetic training images are generated by InstantStyle, but using a teacher model's outputs as training data is a standard distillation-style setup rather than a circular derivation; the evaluation still requires StyleAR to outperform those same baselines. The only notable overlap is that the CLIP image encoder is used both to produce the style-conditioning tokens and to compute the CLIP-I style-consistency metric (Section 3.3 and Section 4.1); this is a metric-design confound that could inflate style-consistency scores, but it is not an equation-level reduction and it applies equally to the CLIP-based diffusion baselines. No load-bearing self-citation appears, and the authors' prior works (e.g., [43,44]) are not used to justify the central claim. The internal contradictions between the user-study numbers and the prose (e.g., InstantStyle receives 177 vs. 157 style-consistency votes while the text says StyleAR 'far surpasses all others') are correctness/evidence concerns, not circularity. Therefore, no specific circular step can be quoted and exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method does not introduce new physical entities. It relies on several domain assumptions about feature separation and on tuned hyperparameters such as the 1:3 data ratio, noise strength gamma, and residual ratio alpha, which are not fully specified.

free parameters (5)
  • Style-token noise strength gamma = not specified
    Injected into style tokens during training and inference (Eq. 2 and Section 3.3). The paper never reports the value, yet it is load-bearing for the content-leakage suppression claim.
  • Residual ratio alpha = not specified
    Balances original style features and SAM-subtracted features in Eq. (2). Its value is essential for the style-enhanced token behavior but unreported.
  • Stylized-to-raw data ratio = 1:3
    Chosen through ablation experiments as optimal (Section 4.3, Table 2). This is a post-hoc selection that directly shapes the training data and the reported behavior.
  • Number of style tokens M = 16
    Fixed length of the style token sequence (Section 3.3). Reasonable but a chosen hyperparameter.
  • LoRA rank = 4
    Rank of LoRA applied to the AR model (Section 4.1). A hyperparameter that controls capacity of the fine-tune.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption CLIP image features can separate style from content
    The entire method assumes that CLIP's feature space contains a usable style/content split and that style tokens extracted from an image can condition generation of a different content.
  • ad hoc to paper Gaussian noise weakens content while preserving style in learned tokens
    No evidence is provided that additive Gaussian noise selectively suppresses semantic content rather than degrading style cues; this is asserted to prevent content leakage.
  • ad hoc to paper SAM segmentation removes content-related semantics and leaves style
    The feature subtraction F - F_S assumes the segmented version retains style but not content, which is an unverified assumption about SAM's segmentation behavior.
  • ad hoc to paper Self-reconstruction on stylized and raw images teaches generalizable style alignment
    Training reconstructs the same image from its own style tokens, while inference requires novel content. The paper does not provide a theoretical or empirical argument that this transfer is guaranteed; the ablations show it works only at the chosen 1:3 ratio.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of StyleAR: Customizing Multimodal Autoregressive Model for Style-Aligned Text-to-Image Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OSZHJLH2

@misc{pith2026250519874,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: StyleAR: Customizing Multimodal Autoregressive Model for Style-Aligned Text-to-Image Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OSZHJLH2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.19874}
}
read the original abstract

In the current research landscape, multimodal autoregressive (AR) models have shown exceptional capabilities across various domains, including visual understanding and generation. However, complex tasks such as style-aligned text-to-image generation present significant challenges, particularly in data acquisition. In analogy to instruction-following tuning for image editing of AR models, style-aligned generation requires a reference style image and prompt, resulting in a text-image-to-image triplet where the output shares the style and semantics of the input. However, acquiring large volumes of such triplet data with specific styles is considerably more challenging than obtaining conventional text-to-image data used for training generative models. To address this issue, we propose StyleAR, an innovative approach that combines a specially designed data curation method with our proposed AR models to effectively utilize text-to-image binary data for style-aligned text-to-image generation. Our method synthesizes target stylized data using a reference style image and prompt, but only incorporates the target stylized image as the image modality to create high-quality binary data. To facilitate binary data training, we introduce a CLIP image encoder with a perceiver resampler that translates the image input into style tokens aligned with multimodal tokens in AR models and implement a style-enhanced token technique to prevent content leakage which is a common issue in previous work. Furthermore, we mix raw images drawn from large-scale text-image datasets with stylized images to enhance StyleAR's ability to extract richer stylistic features and ensure style consistency. Extensive qualitative and quantitative experiments demonstrate our superior performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.19874 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Stylized samples of our StyleAR. Our StyleAR is capable of generating images that are highly consistent in style with the reference images across a diverse range of styles, and highly aligned in semantics with the input prompts of various categories. Abstract In the current research landscape, multimodal autoregressive (AR) models have shown exceptional capabilities across various domains, including visual understan… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The pipeline of our method. a) We first investigate a novel stylized image data curation to form binary data with high prompt adherence and prevent low style consistency. b) We use a mixed dataset to enhance rich stylistic features learning. c) With the designed data curation and model framework, our method achieve high prompt adherence and style consistency. resampler module to convert the input image to a unified … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The framework of our StyleAR. During training, we utilize a frozen CLIP [24] image encoder along with a trainable perceiver [13; 1] resampler module to efficiently extracted features. Subsequently, style tokens are combined with the injected Gaussian noise and concatenated with multimodal tokens by replacing the placeholder tokens. During inference, we incorporate SAM [15] to remove irrelevant semantic contents in t… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparison. We conducted a comprehensive qualitative evaluation by comparing our StyleAR with various existing methods which are all diffusion-based, including InstantStyle [38], IP-Adapter [51], StyleAligned [10], StyleCrafter [18], StyleShot [9]. resultin…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: User study. We conducted a user study by comparing StyleAR with existing methods, including InstantStyle [38], IP-Adapter [51], StyleAligned [10], StyleCrafter [18], StyleShot [9]. official open source implementations of the baseline methods, with hyperparameter settin…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Qualitative comparison of integration with additional conditions. We show the comparison results of control generation with Ours and diffusion models. Reference Stylized data 1:3 1:6 1:30 “ship” “cat” “train” “bird” [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Ablation study of composition of training datasets. We investigate the impact of the composition of training datasets in our StyleAR. The compared training datasets include pure stylized image data, the ratios of stylized image data to raw image data are 1:3, 1:6 and 1…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Ablation study of style-enhanced (SE) tokens. We investigate the style-enhanced tokens technique in our StyleAR. The ablation study demonstrates the effectiveness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:23716–23736, 2022

    Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jeff Donahue, Pauline Luc, Antoine Miech, Iain Barr, Yana Hasson, Karel Lenc, Arthur Mensch, Katherine Millican, Malcolm Reynolds, et al. Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:23716–23736, 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Training diffusion models with reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13301, 2023

    Kevin Black, Michael Janner, Yilun Du, Ilya Kostrikov, and Sergey Levine. Training diffusion models with reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13301, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Janus-pro: Unified multimodal understanding and generation with data and model scaling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17811, 2025

    Xiaokang Chen, Zhiyu Wu, Xingchao Liu, Zizheng Pan, Wen Liu, Zhenda Xie, Xingkai Yu, and Chong Ruan. Janus-pro: Unified multimodal understanding and generation with data and model scaling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17811, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Anole: An open, autoregressive, native large multimodal models for interleaved image-text generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06135, 2024

    Ethan Chern, Jiadi Su, Yan Ma, and Pengfei Liu. Anole: An open, autoregressive, native large multimodal models for interleaved image-text generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.06135, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis

    Patrick Esser, Sumith Kulal, Andreas Blattmann, Rahim Entezari, Jonas Müller, Harry Saini, Yam Levi, Dominik Lorenz, Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, et al. Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. InForty-first international conference on machine learning, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    Taming transformers for high-resolution image synthesis

    Patrick Esser, Robin Rombach, and Bjorn Ommer. Taming transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 12873–12883, 2021

    2021

  7. [7]

    Fluid: Scaling autoregressive text-to-image generative models with continuous tokens.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13863, 2024

    Lijie Fan, Tianhong Li, Siyang Qin, Yuanzhen Li, Chen Sun, Michael Rubinstein, Deqing Sun, Kaiming He, and Yonglong Tian. Fluid: Scaling autoregressive text-to-image generative models with continuous tokens.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.13863, 2024

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Dpok: Reinforcement learning for fine-tuning text-to-image diffusion models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:79858–79885, 2023

    Ying Fan, Olivia Watkins, Yuqing Du, Hao Liu, Moonkyung Ryu, Craig Boutilier, Pieter Abbeel, Mo- hammad Ghavamzadeh, Kangwook Lee, and Kimin Lee. Dpok: Reinforcement learning for fine-tuning text-to-image diffusion models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:79858–79885, 2023

    2023

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Styleshot: A snapshot on any style.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01414, 2024

    Junyao Gao, Yanchen Liu, Yanan Sun, Yinhao Tang, Yanhong Zeng, Kai Chen, and Cairong Zhao. Styleshot: A snapshot on any style.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.01414, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Style aligned image generation via shared attention

    Amir Hertz, Andrey V oynov, Shlomi Fruchter, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Style aligned image generation via shared attention. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4775–4785, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.ICLR, 1(2):3, 2022

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, Weizhu Chen, et al. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.ICLR, 1(2):3, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Artcrafter: Text-image aligning style transfer via embedding reframing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02064, 2025

    Nisha Huang, Kaer Huang, Yifan Pu, Jiangshan Wang, Jie Guo, Yiqiang Yan, and Xiu Li. Artcrafter: Text-image aligning style transfer via embedding reframing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.02064, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Perceiver: General perception with iterative attention

    Andrew Jaegle, Felix Gimeno, Andy Brock, Oriol Vinyals, Andrew Zisserman, and Joao Carreira. Perceiver: General perception with iterative attention. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 4651–

  6. [14]

    Visual style prompting with swapping self-attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12974, 2024

    Jaeseok Jeong, Junho Kim, Yunjey Choi, Gayoung Lee, and Youngjung Uh. Visual style prompting with swapping self-attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.12974, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Segment anything

    Alexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao, Chloe Rolland, Laura Gustafson, Tete Xiao, Spencer Whitehead, Alexander C Berg, Wan-Yen Lo, et al. Segment anything. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4015–4026, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Flux.https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux, 2024

    Black Forest Labs. Flux.https://github.com/black-forest-labs/flux, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Lumina-mgpt: Illuminate flexible photorealistic text-to-image generation with multimodal generative pretraining.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02657, 2024

    Dongyang Liu, Shitian Zhao, Le Zhuo, Weifeng Lin, Yu Qiao, Hongsheng Li, and Peng Gao. Lumina-mgpt: Illuminate flexible photorealistic text-to-image generation with multimodal generative pretraining.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02657, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Stylecrafter: Enhancing stylized text-to-video generation with style adapter.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00330, 2023

    Gongye Liu, Menghan Xia, Yong Zhang, Haoxin Chen, Jinbo Xing, Yibo Wang, Xintao Wang, Yujiu Yang, and Ying Shan. Stylecrafter: Enhancing stylized text-to-video generation with style adapter.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00330, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Subject- driven text-to-image generation via preference-based reinforcement learning.Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems, 37:123563–123591, 2024

    Yanting Miao, William Loh, Suraj Kothawade, Pascal Poupart, Abdullah Rashwan, and Yeqing Li. Subject- driven text-to-image generation via preference-based reinforcement learning.Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems, 37:123563–123591, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Null-text inversion for editing real images using guided diffusion models

    Ron Mokady, Amir Hertz, Kfir Aberman, Yael Pritch, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Null-text inversion for editing real images using guided diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6038–6047, 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    laion2b-en-aesthetic-square-cleaned

    opendiffusionai. laion2b-en-aesthetic-square-cleaned. https://huggingface.co/datasets/ opendiffusionai/laion2b-en-aesthetic-square-cleaned, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:27730–27744, 2022

    Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida, Carroll Wainwright, Pamela Mishkin, Chong Zhang, Sandhini Agarwal, Katarina Slama, Alex Ray, et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:27730...

    2022

  15. [23]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas Müller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. InInternational conference on machine learning, pag...

    2021

  17. [25]

    Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:53728–53741, 2023

    Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D Manning, Stefano Ermon, and Chelsea Finn. Direct preference optimization: Your language model is secretly a reward model.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:53728–53741, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Dream- booth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation

    Nataniel Ruiz, Yuanzhen Li, Varun Jampani, Yael Pritch, Michael Rubinstein, and Kfir Aberman. Dream- booth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2250...

    2023

  20. [28]

    Laion-5b: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:25278–25294, 2022

    Christoph Schuhmann, Romain Beaumont, Richard Vencu, Cade Gordon, Ross Wightman, Mehdi Cherti, Theo Coombes, Aarush Katta, Clayton Mullis, Mitchell Wortsman, et al. Laion-5b: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models.Advances in neural informat...

    2022

  21. [29]

    Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300, 2024

    Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, YK Li, Y Wu, et al. Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Styledrop: Text-to-image generation in any style.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00983, 2023

    Kihyuk Sohn, Nataniel Ruiz, Kimin Lee, Daniel Castro Chin, Irina Blok, Huiwen Chang, Jarred Barber, Lu Jiang, Glenn Entis, Yuanzhen Li, et al. Styledrop: Text-to-image generation in any style.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00983, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Personalized text-to-image generation with auto-regressive models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13162, 2025

    Kaiyue Sun, Xian Liu, Yao Teng, and Xihui Liu. Personalized text-to-image generation with auto-regressive models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13162, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Autore- gressive model beats diffusion: Llama for scalable image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06525, 2024

    Peize Sun, Yi Jiang, Shoufa Chen, Shilong Zhang, Bingyue Peng, Ping Luo, and Zehuan Yuan. Autore- gressive model beats diffusion: Llama for scalable image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06525, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Hart: Efficient visual generation with hybrid autoregressive transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10812, 2024

    Haotian Tang, Yecheng Wu, Shang Yang, Enze Xie, Junsong Chen, Junyu Chen, Zhuoyang Zhang, Han Cai, Yao Lu, and Song Han. Hart: Efficient visual generation with hybrid autoregressive transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10812, 2024

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Chameleon: Mixed-modal early-fusion foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09818, 2024

    Chameleon Team. Chameleon: Mixed-modal early-fusion foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.09818, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Neural discrete representation learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Aaron Van Den Oord, Oriol Vinyals, et al. Neural discrete representation learning.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    Attention is all you need.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  29. [37]

    Diffusion model alignment using direct preference optimization

    Bram Wallace, Meihua Dang, Rafael Rafailov, Linqi Zhou, Aaron Lou, Senthil Purushwalkam, Stefano Ermon, Caiming Xiong, Shafiq Joty, and Nikhil Naik. Diffusion model alignment using direct preference optimization. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and ...

    2024

  30. [38]

    Instantstyle: Free lunch towards style-preserving in text-to-image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02733, 2024

    Haofan Wang, Matteo Spinelli, Qixun Wang, Xu Bai, Zekui Qin, and Anthony Chen. Instantstyle: Free lunch towards style-preserving in text-to-image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02733, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Simplear: Pushing the frontier of autoregressive visual generation through pretraining, sft, and rl.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11455, 2025

    Junke Wang, Zhi Tian, Xun Wang, Xinyu Zhang, Weilin Huang, Zuxuan Wu, and Yu-Gang Jiang. Simplear: Pushing the frontier of autoregressive visual generation through pretraining, sft, and rl.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11455, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Emu3: Next-token prediction is all you need.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18869, 2024

    Xinlong Wang, Xiaosong Zhang, Zhengxiong Luo, Quan Sun, Yufeng Cui, Jinsheng Wang, Fan Zhang, Yueze Wang, Zhen Li, Qiying Yu, et al. Emu3: Next-token prediction is all you need.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18869, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Styleadapter: A unified stylized image generation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01770, 2023

    Zhouxia Wang, Xintao Wang, Liangbin Xie, Zhongang Qi, Ying Shan, Wenping Wang, and Ping Luo. Styleadapter: A unified stylized image generation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.01770, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    wikiart.https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggan/wikiart, 2022

    wikiart. wikiart.https://huggingface.co/datasets/huggan/wikiart, 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    Infinite-id: Identity-preserved personaliza- tion via id-semantics decoupling paradigm

    Yi Wu, Ziqiang Li, Heliang Zheng, Chaoyue Wang, and Bin Li. Infinite-id: Identity-preserved personaliza- tion via id-semantics decoupling paradigm. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 279–296. Springer, 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    Proxy-tuning: Tailoring multimodal autoregressive models for subject-driven image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10125, 2025

    Yi Wu, Lingting Zhu, Lei Liu, Wandi Qiao, Ziqiang Li, Lequan Yu, and Bin Li. Proxy-tuning: Tailoring multimodal autoregressive models for subject-driven image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10125, 2025

    2025

  37. [45]

    Omnigen: Unified image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11340, 2024

    Shitao Xiao, Yueze Wang, Junjie Zhou, Huaying Yuan, Xingrun Xing, Ruiran Yan, Chaofan Li, Shut- ing Wang, Tiejun Huang, and Zheng Liu. Omnigen: Unified image generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.11340, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Show-o: One single transformer to unify multimodal understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12528, 2024

    Jinheng Xie, Weijia Mao, Zechen Bai, David Junhao Zhang, Weihao Wang, Kevin Qinghong Lin, Yuchao Gu, Zhijie Chen, Zhenheng Yang, and Mike Zheng Shou. Show-o: One single transformer to unify multimodal understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12528, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Imagereward: Learning and evaluating human preferences for text-to-image generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:15903–15935, 2023

    Jiazheng Xu, Xiao Liu, Yuchen Wu, Yuxuan Tong, Qinkai Li, Ming Ding, Jie Tang, and Yuxiao Dong. Imagereward: Learning and evaluating human preferences for text-to-image generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:15903–15935, 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Dancegrpo: Unleashing grpo on visual generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07818, 2025

    Zeyue Xue, Jie Wu, Yu Gao, Fangyuan Kong, Lingting Zhu, Mengzhao Chen, Zhiheng Liu, Wei Liu, Qiushan Guo, Weilin Huang, et al. Dancegrpo: Unleashing grpo on visual generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07818, 2025. 12

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Qwen2 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.10671, 2024

    An Yang, Baosong Yang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Zhou, Chengpeng Li, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Guanting Dong, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jialong Tang, Jialin Wang, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Ma, Jin Xu, Jingren Zhou, Jinze Bai, Jinzheng...

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Qwen2.5 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.15115, 2024

    An Yang, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chengyuan Li, Dayiheng Liu, Fei Huang, Haoran Wei, Huan Lin, Jian Yang, Jianhong Tu, Jianwei Zhang, Jianxin Yang, Jiaxi Yang, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kai Dang, Keming Lu, Keqin Bao, Kexin Yang, Le Yu, Me...

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721, 2023

    Hu Ye, Jun Zhang, Sibo Liu, Xiao Han, and Wei Yang. Ip-adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to-image diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Vector-quantized image modeling with improved vqgan.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.04627, 2021

    Jiahui Yu, Xin Li, Jing Yu Koh, Han Zhang, Ruoming Pang, James Qin, Alexander Ku, Yuanzhong Xu, Jason Baldridge, and Yonghui Wu. Vector-quantized image modeling with improved vqgan.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.04627, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Dino: Detr with improved denoising anchor boxes for end-to-end object detection.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.03605, 2022

    Hao Zhang, Feng Li, Shilong Liu, Lei Zhang, Hang Su, Jun Zhu, Lionel M Ni, and Heung-Yeung Shum. Dino: Detr with improved denoising anchor boxes for end-to-end object detection.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.03605, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Transfusion: Predict the next token and diffuse images with one multi-modal model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11039, 2024

    Chunting Zhou, Lili Yu, Arun Babu, Kushal Tirumala, Michihiro Yasunaga, Leonid Shamis, Jacob Kahn, Xuezhe Ma, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Omer Levy. Transfusion: Predict the next token and diffuse images with one multi-modal model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11039, 2024. 13

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.