Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Leveraging Lecture Content for Improved Feedback: Explorations with GPT-4 and Retrieval Augmented Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.06681 v1 pith:P4JRGWRM submitted 2024-05-05 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY
keywords feedbacklecturegpt-4studentsgenerationcorrespondinggeneratedprogramming
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents the use of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to improve the feedback generated by Large Language Models for programming tasks. For this purpose, corresponding lecture recordings were transcribed and made available to the Large Language Model GPT-4 as external knowledge source together with timestamps as metainformation by using RAG. The purpose of this is to prevent hallucinations and to enforce the use of the technical terms and phrases from the lecture. In an exercise platform developed to solve programming problems for an introductory programming lecture, students can request feedback on their solutions generated by GPT-4. For this task GPT-4 receives the students' code solution, the compiler output, the result of unit tests and the relevant passages from the lecture notes available through the use of RAG as additional context. The feedback generated by GPT-4 should guide students to solve problems independently and link to the lecture content, using the time stamps of the transcript as meta-information. In this way, the corresponding lecture videos can be viewed immediately at the corresponding positions. For the evaluation, students worked with the tool in a workshop and decided for each feedback whether it should be extended by RAG or not. First results based on a questionnaire and the collected usage data show that the use of RAG can improve feedback generation and is preferred by students in some situations. Due to the slower speed of feedback generation, the benefits are situation dependent.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unimib Assistant: designing a student-friendly RAG-based chatbot for all their needs

    cs.HC 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A six-user qualitative pilot shows a custom GPT RAG chatbot for university students is liked for tone and structure but suffers from inaccuracy, omitted information, and broken links.

  2. Evaluating the Performance of RAG Methods for Conversational AI in the Airport Domain

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    On a Schiphol flight-information test set, knowledge-graph RAG (91.49%) beat SQL RAG (80.85%) and traditional RAG (84.84%) on accuracy and did far better on reasoning questions (68.75% vs 6.25% and 9.38%).

Pith tools