Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Agentic AI Systems Applied to tasks in Financial Services: Modeling and model risk management crews

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.05439 v2 pith:P6JHRJOB submitted 2025-02-08 cs.AI cs.CEcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CEcs.CLcs.LG
keywords modelmodelingagentictaskscreditcrewsdocumentationperform
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The advent of large language models has ushered in a new era of agentic systems, where artificial intelligence programs exhibit remarkable autonomous decision-making capabilities across diverse domains. This paper explores agentic system workflows in the financial services industry. In particular, we build agentic crews with human-in-the-loop module that can effectively collaborate to perform complex modeling and model risk management (MRM) tasks. The modeling crew consists of a judge agent and multiple agents who perform specific tasks such as exploratory data analysis, feature engineering, model selection/hyperparameter tuning, model training, model evaluation, and writing documentation. The MRM crew consists of a judge agent along with specialized agents who perform tasks such as checking compliance of modeling documentation, model replication, conceptual soundness, analysis of outcomes, and writing documentation. We demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of modeling and MRM crews by presenting a series of numerical examples applied to credit card fraud detection, credit card approval, and portfolio credit risk modeling datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating the Sensitivity of LLMs to Prior Context

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Prior conversational context, especially from a different knowledge domain, can sharply reduce LLM multiple-choice accuracy, and repeating the task near the query mitigates the drop.

  2. Governing Generative AI Across Financial Institutions: A Framework for Generative AI Risk Control

    q-fin.RM 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    GAICF maps SR 26-2 model-risk principles into approved-use gates, risk tiers, evidence checks, and output monitoring for generative AI outside the formal model boundary.

Pith tools