pith. sign in

arxiv: 2401.06786 · v1 · pith:P6Y254ROnew · submitted 2023-11-10 · 💻 cs.DC · cs.AI

CloudEval-YAML: A Practical Benchmark for Cloud Configuration Generation

classification 💻 cs.DC cs.AI
keywords cloudeval-yamldatasetgenerationpracticalbenchmarkcloudcloud-nativeevaluation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Among the thriving ecosystem of cloud computing and the proliferation of Large Language Model (LLM)-based code generation tools, there is a lack of benchmarking for code generation in cloud-native applications. In response to this need, we present CloudEval-YAML, a practical benchmark for cloud configuration generation. CloudEval-YAML tackles the diversity challenge by focusing on YAML, the de facto standard of numerous cloud-native tools. We develop the CloudEval-YAML benchmark with practicality in mind: the dataset consists of hand-written problems with unit tests targeting practical scenarios. We further enhanced the dataset to meet practical needs by rephrasing questions in a concise, abbreviated, and bilingual manner. The dataset consists of 1011 problems that take more than 1200 human hours to complete. To improve practicality during evaluation, we build a scalable evaluation platform for CloudEval-YAML that achieves a 20 times speedup over a single machine. To the best of our knowledge, the CloudEval-YAML dataset is the first hand-written dataset targeting cloud-native applications. We present an in-depth evaluation of 12 LLMs, leading to a deeper understanding of the problems and LLMs, as well as effective methods to improve task performance and reduce cost.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Empirical Software Engineering TerraProbe: A Layered-Oracle Framework for Detecting Deceptive Fixes in LLM-Assisted Terraform

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TerraProbe shows that targeted Checkov removal overstates LLM Terraform repair success, with 71.4% of plan-compared real-world repairs being deceptive fixes that leave vulnerabilities intact.