pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26951 · v1 · pith:PGQLHDGRnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 💻 cs.HC

What Holds Back Brain-Computer Interfaces? Uncovering Challenges and Opportunities in BCI-controlled Games for Cerebral Palsy Rehabilitation

Bastian Ils{\o} Hougaard , Kirstine Schultz Dalgaard , Kirstine Johanne Stougaard Kleb{\ae}k , Hendrik Knoche , Mads Jochumsen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 02:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords brain-computer interfacescerebral palsyrehabilitationgamesuser experienceagencyassistive technology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Assistance in BCI games for cerebral palsy eases monotony but raises doubts about user agency, based on experiences from ten individuals and one therapist.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper gathers preliminary feedback from ten people with cerebral palsy who tried BCI-controlled game prototypes and from one therapist who observed the sessions. It reports that occasional computer help during play reduced boredom yet made users uncertain about their own influence over the game. The therapist described the approach as useful alongside conventional exercises, serving mainly to move users from guided play toward independent, self-directed training. These accounts are used to flag specific design issues around control and support that future BCI rehabilitation tools would need to resolve.

Core claim

Experiential accounts from ten individuals with cerebral palsy using BCI game prototypes and clinical input from a single therapist show that sporadic assistance eases monotony but fosters doubts regarding agency, while positioning BCI rehabilitation as complementary to traditional training to support the transition to autonomous, self-managed exercises.

What carries the argument

User experiential accounts from ten individuals with CP and therapist insights on BCI game prototypes, centered on how assistance affects sense of control and supports progression to independent training.

If this is right

  • Designers must calibrate assistance levels in BCI games so they reduce monotony without undermining users' sense of control.
  • BCI systems can function as a bridge from clinic-based playful exercises to home-based independent training.
  • Rehabilitation programs could combine BCI games with traditional methods to sustain engagement during the shift to self-management.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Testing different frequencies of assistance in controlled sessions could isolate which patterns best preserve agency while maintaining engagement.
  • Linking BCI game data to progress metrics from traditional therapy might show whether the transition to self-managed training accelerates overall outcomes.
  • Home deployment trials could check whether resolved agency concerns lead to higher daily training adherence in real-world settings.

Load-bearing premise

The experiences of the ten individuals with cerebral palsy and the single therapist are representative enough to identify general design constraints for BCI-based rehabilitation.

What would settle it

A larger study with a more diverse sample of participants with cerebral palsy that finds assistance does not create agency doubts or that BCI does not aid transition to self-managed training would undermine the reported challenges and opportunities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26951 by Bastian Ils{\o} Hougaard, Hendrik Knoche, Kirstine Johanne Stougaard Kleb{\ae}k, Kirstine Schultz Dalgaard, Mads Jochumsen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Our mixed-method approach, visualized as a Development Oriented Triangulation framework [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: In the kiwi game (A), users used BCI to help a kiwi jump over obstacles to rescue its babies in a race against an eagle, with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Between- and within-participant variation in BCI recognition rates and added game help. Each bar is a play-through of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The participants ranked their help preference of the playthroughs of the kiwi (leftmost chart, from 1st to 3rd) and fishing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) offer promising avenues for cerebral palsy (CP) rehabilitation at home and in the clinic, using games that promote engagement and sustained training effort. Nonetheless, the design constraints of BCI-based CP rehabilitation remain unclear, especially how individuals with CP experience a sense of control through BCI, and how they experience computer-mediated game assistance. To address this gap, we present preliminary clinical and user perspectives on BCI-based CP rehabilitation, drawing on in-clinic insights from a CP therapist and experiential accounts from ten individuals with CP engaging with BCI game prototypes. Sporadic help in BCI games eased monotony, but also fostered doubts regarding agency. The therapist saw BCI rehabilitation as complementary to traditional training, facilitating the transition from playful exercises to autonomous, self-managed training. We outline key challenges and opportunities to inform and empower further design and research of BCI training for CP.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents preliminary qualitative insights from one CP therapist and ten individuals with CP who interacted with BCI game prototypes. It claims that sporadic in-game assistance reduces monotony yet raises doubts about user agency, while positioning BCI-based training as complementary to traditional rehabilitation by supporting the transition to autonomous, self-managed practice. The work aims to outline resulting challenges and opportunities to guide future BCI game design for CP rehabilitation.

Significance. If the reported experiential accounts hold, the observations on agency and complementarity could usefully inform BCI game mechanics that avoid undermining perceived control while bridging playful and independent training. The qualitative framing is suitable for surfacing user and therapist perspectives on control and assistance, though the small convenience sample inherently limits the strength and scope of any resulting design guidelines.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / participant description] Abstract and participant description: the central claim that the study identifies 'key challenges and opportunities to inform and empower further design and research' of BCI training for CP rests on experiential accounts from a sample of ten CP users plus one therapist. No selection criteria, demographics, CP severity or motor-function distribution, age range, or justification of representativeness/saturation are supplied, which is load-bearing for generalizing the agency and complementarity observations into population-level design constraints.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract already labels the work 'preliminary'; this qualifier could be carried more explicitly into the discussion of design implications to better align scope with sample size.
  2. [Methods (implied)] The manuscript would benefit from a short methods subsection or table summarizing participant characteristics even if only at a high level, to allow readers to assess the reported accounts directly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our preliminary qualitative study. We address the major comment on participant description and scope of claims below, and will revise the manuscript accordingly to better position the work as exploratory.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / participant description] Abstract and participant description: the central claim that the study identifies 'key challenges and opportunities to inform and empower further design and research' of BCI training for CP rests on experiential accounts from a sample of ten CP users plus one therapist. No selection criteria, demographics, CP severity or motor-function distribution, age range, or justification of representativeness/saturation are supplied, which is load-bearing for generalizing the agency and complementarity observations into population-level design constraints.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript should more explicitly delimit the scope of its claims. The study is positioned throughout as providing preliminary insights from a convenience sample of ten individuals with CP and one therapist, with the explicit aim of surfacing experiential accounts to generate hypotheses for future design rather than deriving population-level constraints. We will revise the abstract, participant description, and discussion sections to: (1) include all available demographic details, age range, CP severity, and motor-function information from the study records; (2) state the convenience sampling approach and absence of formal saturation or representativeness claims; and (3) rephrase the contribution as identifying challenges and opportunities to inform subsequent research, not as generalizable design guidelines. This aligns with the qualitative framing and the referee's note on the inherent limits of the sample size. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: qualitative claims drawn directly from participant statements

full rationale

This is a qualitative interview study whose central claims (agency doubts from sporadic assistance; BCI as bridge to autonomous training) are presented as summaries of the ten CP users' and one therapist's reported experiences. No equations, parameters, predictions, or derivations exist; no self-citation is invoked to justify uniqueness or force a result; the paper contains no ansatz, renaming of known results, or fitted-input-as-prediction structure. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as direct reporting of external statements rather than any internal reduction to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a qualitative HCI study with no mathematical model, parameters, or invented physical entities; the central observations rest on the assumption that the small participant set yields transferable design insights.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5720 in / 1109 out tokens · 47173 ms · 2026-06-26T02:46:27.481338+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    de Ridder, Joris A.J

    Max Alberts, Ellen A.M. de Ridder, Joris A.J. Lodewijks, Tamara V. Pinos Cisneros, Kayleigh Schoorl, Albert Ali Salah, and Ben A.M. Schouten

  2. [2]

    InExtended Abstracts of the 2022 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY ’22)

    Designing a Smartphone Exergame for Children with Cerebral Palsy in the Home Environment. InExtended Abstracts of the 2022 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 183–188. doi:10. 1145/3505270.3558325

    arXiv 2022

  3. [3]

    Joanna Bergström, Jarrod Knibbe, Henning Pohl, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2022. Sense of Agency and User Experience: Is There a Link?ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.29, 4 (March 2022), 28:1–28:22. doi:10.1145/3490493

    work page doi:10.1145/3490493 2022

  4. [4]

    Biasiucci, R

    A. Biasiucci, R. Leeb, I. Iturrate, S. Perdikis, A. Al-Khodairy, T. Corbet, A. Schnider, T. Schmidlin, H. Zhang, M. Bassolino, D. Viceic, P. Vuadens, A. G. Guggisberg, and J. d. R. Millán. 2018. Brain-actuated functional electrical stimulation elicits lasting arm motor recovery after stroke.Nature Communications9 (June 2018), 2421. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z 2018

  5. [5]

    PD Bobrov, EV Biryukova, BA Polyaev, OA Lajsheva, EL Usachjova, AV Sokolova, DI Mihailova, KN Dement’Eva, and IR Fedotova. 2020. Rehabilitation of patients with cerebral palsy using hand exoskeleton controlled by brain-computer interface.Bulletin of Russian State Medical University4 (2020), 33–40

    2020

  6. [6]

    Ian Daly, Martin Billinger, José Laparra-Hernández, Fabio Aloise, Mariano Lloria García, Josef Faller, Reinhold Scherer, and Gernot Müller-Putz

  7. [7]

    On the control of brain-computer interfaces by users with cerebral palsy.Clinical Neurophysiology124, 9 (2013), 1787–1797

    2013

  8. [8]

    Moritz Grosse-Wentrup, Donatella Mattia, and Karim Oweiss. 2011. Using brain–computer interfaces to induce neural plasticity and restore function. Journal of neural engineering8, 2 (2011), 025004

    2011

  9. [9]

    Hernandez, Mallory Ketcheson, Adrian Schneider, Zi Ye, Darcy Fehlings, Lauren Switzer, Virginia Wright, Shelly K

    Hamilton A. Hernandez, Mallory Ketcheson, Adrian Schneider, Zi Ye, Darcy Fehlings, Lauren Switzer, Virginia Wright, Shelly K. Bursick, Chad Richards, and T.C. Nicholas Graham. 2014. Design and evaluation of a networked game to supportsocial connection of youth with cerebral palsy. In Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Comput...

    work page doi:10.1145/2661334.2661370 2014

  10. [10]

    Hernandez, Zi Ye, T.C

    Hamilton A. Hernandez, Zi Ye, T.C. Nicholas Graham, Darcy Fehlings, and Lauren Switzer. 2013. Designing action-based exergames for children with cerebral palsy. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1261–1270. doi:10.1145/2470654.2466164

    work page doi:10.1145/2470654.2466164 2013

  11. [11]

    Bastian I Hougaard, Hendrik Knoche, Mathias Sand Kristensen, and Mads Jochumsen. 2022. Modulating frustration and agency using fabricated input for motor imagery BCIs in stroke rehabilitation.IEEE Access10 (2022), 72312–72327

    2022

  12. [12]

    Bastian Ilsø Hougaard, Ingeborg Goll Rossau, Jedrzej Jacek Czapla, Mozes Adorjan Miko, Rasmus Bugge Skammelsen, Hendrik Knoche, and Mads Jochumsen. 2021. Who Willed It? Decreasing Frustration by Manipulating Perceived Control through Fabricated Input for Stroke Rehabilitation BCI 14 ... Games.Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interacti...

    2021

  13. [13]

    Jessup Schneider, Daniel Clarke, Alexander Macintosh, Lauren Switzer, Darcy Fehlings, and T.C

    Susan Hwang, Adrian L. Jessup Schneider, Daniel Clarke, Alexander Macintosh, Lauren Switzer, Darcy Fehlings, and T.C. Nicholas Graham. 2017. How Game Balancing Affects Play: Player Adaptation in an Exergame for Children with Cerebral Palsy. InProceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery...

    work page doi:10.1145/3064663.3064664 2017

  14. [14]

    Zeanna Jadavji, Adam Kirton, Megan J Metzler, and Ephrem Zewdie. 2023. BCI-activated electrical stimulation in children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis: A pilot study.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience17 (2023), 1006242

    2023

  15. [15]

    Mads Jochumsen, Bastian Ilsø Hougaard, Mathias Sand Kristensen, and Hendrik Knoche. 2022. Implementing performance accommodation mechanisms in online BCI for stroke rehabilitation: a study on perceived control and frustration.Sensors22, 23 (2022), 9051

    2022

  16. [16]

    Mads Jochumsen, Muhammad Shafique, Ali Hassan, and Imran Khan Niazi. 2018. Movement intention detection in adolescents with cerebral palsy from single-trial EEG.Journal of Neural Engineering15, 6 (2018), 066030

    2018

  17. [17]

    Mads Jochumsen, Cecilie Sørenbye Sulkjær, and Kirstine Schultz Dalgaard. 2025. Comparison of Classifier Calibration Schemes for Movement Intention Detection in Individuals with Cerebral Palsy for Inducing Plasticity with Brain–Computer Interfaces.Sensors25, 23 (2025), 7347

    2025

  18. [18]

    Mads Jochumsen, Cecilie Sørenbye Sulkjær, and Kirstine Schultz Dalgaard. 2025. Comparison of Classifier Calibration Schemes for Movement Intention Detection in Individuals with Cerebral Palsy for Inducing Plasticity with Brain-Computer Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)25, 23 (Dec. 2025). doi:10.3390/s25237347

    work page doi:10.3390/s25237347 2025

  19. [19]

    Maximus D Kaos, Mark R Beauchamp, Shelly Bursick, Amy E Latimer-Cheung, Hamilton Hernandez, Darren E R Warburton, Christopher Yao, Zi Ye, T C Nicholas Graham, and Ryan E Rhodes. 2018. Efficacy of Online Multi-Player Versus Single-Player Exergames on Adherence Behaviors Among Children: A Nonrandomized Control Trial.Annals of Behavioral Medicine52, 10 (Sept...

    work page doi:10.1093/abm/kax061 2018

  20. [20]

    , year = 2020, month = jul, pages =

    D. Kelly, Z. Jadavji, E. Zewdie, E. Mitchell, K. Summerfield, A. Kirton, and E. Kinney-Lang. 2020. A Child’s Right to Play: Results from the Brain-Computer Interface Game Jam 2019 (Calgary Competition). In2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). 6099–6102. doi:10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176272

    work page doi:10.1109/embc44109.2020.9176272 2020

  21. [21]

    , year = 2020, month = jul, pages =

    E. Kinney-Lang, S. Murji, D. Kelly, B. Paffrath, E. Zewdie, and A. Kirton. 2020. Designing a flexible tool for rapid implementation of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) in game development. In2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). 6078–6081. doi:10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175801

    work page doi:10.1109/embc44109.2020.9175801 2020

  22. [22]

    Jonathan Lazar, Adam Jones, Mary Hackley, and Ben Shneiderman. 2006. Severity and impact of computer user frustration: A comparison of student and workplace users.Interacting with Computers18, 2 (March 2006), 187–207. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.06.001 2006

  23. [23]

    Dario Maggiorini, Marco Granato, Laura Anna Ripamonti, Matteo Marras, and Davide Gadia. 2019. Evolution of Game Controllers: Toward the Support of Gamers with Physical Disabilities. InComputer-Human Interaction Research and Applications, Andreas Holzinger, Hugo Plácido Silva, and Markus Helfert (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 66–89. doi:1...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32965-5_4 2019

  24. [24]

    Ravikiran Mane, Tushar Chouhan, and Cuntai Guan. 2020. BCI for stroke rehabilitation: motor and beyond.Journal of neural engineering17, 4 (2020), 041001

    2020

  25. [25]

    Miller and Regan L

    Matthew K. Miller and Regan L. Mandryk. 2016. Differentiating in-Game Frustration from at-Game Frustration using Touch Pressure. InProceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 225–234. doi:10.1145/2992154.2992185

    work page doi:10.1145/2992154.2992185 2016

  26. [26]

    Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting, Ning Jiang, Andrew James Thomas Stevenson, Imran Khan Niazi, Vladimir Kostic, Aleksandra Pavlovic, Sasa Radovanovic, Milica Djuric-Jovicic, Federica Agosta, Kim Dremstrup, et al. 2016. Efficient neuroplasticity induction in chronic stroke patients by an associative brain-computer interface.Journal of neurophysiology115, 3 (2016)...

    2016

  27. [27]

    Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting, Signe Rom Kristensen, Imran Khan Niazi, and Dario Farina. 2012. Precise temporal association between cortical potentials evoked by motor imagination and afference induces cortical plasticity.The Journal of physiology590, 7 (2012), 1669–1682

    2012

  28. [28]

    Imran Khan Niazi, Muhammad Samran Navid, Usman Rashid, Imran Amjad, Sharon Olsen, Heidi Haavik, Gemma Alder, Nitika Kumari, Nada Signal, Denise Taylor, et al. 2022. Associative cued asynchronous BCI induces cortical plasticity in stroke patients.Annals of clinical and translational neurology9, 5 (2022), 722–733

    2022

  29. [29]

    Atefeh Omrani, Joanna Wakefield-Scurr, Jenny Smith, and Nicola Brown. 2019. Survey Development for Adolescents Aged 11–16 Years: A Developmental Science Based Guide.Adolescent Research Review4, 4 (Dec. 2019), 329–340. doi:10.1007/s40894-018-0089-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s40894-018-0089-0 2019

  30. [30]

    Cohen, Joaquin P

    Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Nguyet Dang, Leonardo G. Cohen, Joaquin P. Brasil-Neto, A. Cammarota, and M. Hallett. 1995. Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills.Journal of Neurophysiology74, 3 (1995), 1037–1045

    1995

  31. [31]

    Yannakakis

    Chris Pedersen, Julian Togelius, and Georgios N. Yannakakis. 2009. Modeling player experience in Super Mario Bros. In2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games. 132–139. doi:10.1109/CIG.2009.5286482

    work page doi:10.1109/cig.2009.5286482 2009

  32. [32]

    Reid, Stephen E

    Lee B. Reid, Stephen E. Rose, and Roslyn N. Boyd. 2015. Rehabilitation and neuroplasticity in children with unilateral cerebral palsy.Nature Reviews Neurology11, 7 (July 2015), 390–400. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.97

    work page doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.97 2015

  33. [33]

    Yann Renard, Fabien Lotte, Guillaume Gibert, Marco Congedo, Emmanuel Maby, Vincent Delannoy, Olivier Bertrand, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2010. OpenViBE: An Open-Source Software Platform to Design, Test, and Use Brain–Computer Interfaces in Real and Virtual Environments.Presence19, 1 (Feb. 2010), 35–53. doi:10.1162/pres.19.1.35

    work page doi:10.1162/pres.19.1.35 2010

  34. [34]

    Müller-Putz, Viktoria Pammer-Schindler, and Mariano Lloria Garcia

    Reinhold Scherer, Andreas Schwarz, Gernot R. Müller-Putz, Viktoria Pammer-Schindler, and Mariano Lloria Garcia. 2015. Game-Based BCI Training: Interactive Design for Individuals with Cerebral Palsy. In2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 3175–3180. What Holds Back Brain-Computer Interfaces? 15 doi:10.1109/SMC.2015.551

    work page doi:10.1109/smc.2015.551 2015

  35. [35]

    Müller-Putz, Viktoria Pammer-Schindler, and Mariano Lloria Garcia

    Reinhold Scherer, Andreas Schwarz, Gernot R. Müller-Putz, Viktoria Pammer-Schindler, and Mariano Lloria Garcia. 2016. Lets play Tic-Tac-Toe: A Brain-Computer Interface case study in cerebral palsy. In2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). 003736–003741. doi:10.1109/SMC.2016.7844815

    work page doi:10.1109/smc.2016.7844815 2016

  36. [36]

    Claire Davies

    Sarvnaz Taherian, Dmitry Selitskiy, James Pau, and T. Claire Davies. 2017. Are we there yet? Evaluating commercial grade brain–computer interface for control of computer applications by individuals with cerebral palsy.Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology12, 2 (Feb. 2017), 165–174. doi:10.3109/17483107.2015.1111943 _eprint: https://doi.org/1...

    work page doi:10.3109/17483107.2015.1111943 2017

  37. [37]

    Thompson, Wade Armstrong, and Craig Thomas

    Suzanne C. Thompson, Wade Armstrong, and Craig Thomas. 1998. Illusions of control, underestimations, and accuracy: A control heuristic explanation.Psychological Bulletin123, 2 (1998), 143–161. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.143

    work page doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.143 1998

  38. [38]

    Koen van Turnhout, Arthur Bennis, Sabine Craenmehr, Robert Holwerda, Marjolein Jacobs, Ralph Niels, Lambert Zaad, Stijn Hoppenbrouwers, Dick Lenior, and René Bakker. 2014. Design patterns for mixed-method research in HCI. InProceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI ’14). Association for Compu...

    work page doi:10.1145/2639189.2639220 2014

  39. [39]

    S. A. G. Wensveen, J. P. Djajadiningrat, and C. J. Overbeeke. 2004. Interaction frogger: a design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward. InProceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17...

    work page doi:10.1145/1013115.1013140 2004

  40. [40]

    2022.Operationalization of Goal Frustration

    Mingming Zhou. 2022.Operationalization of Goal Frustration. Springer Nature, Singapore, 23–47. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-7477-9_2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-19-7477-9_2 2022