Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

PokerBench: Training Large Language Models to become Professional Poker Players

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.08328 v2 pith:PHG5MNBF submitted 2025-01-14 cs.CL cs.AIcs.GT

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.GT
keywords modelspokerpokerbenchllmslanguagebenchmarkgameslarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce PokerBench - a benchmark for evaluating the poker-playing abilities of large language models (LLMs). As LLMs excel in traditional NLP tasks, their application to complex, strategic games like poker poses a new challenge. Poker, an incomplete information game, demands a multitude of skills such as mathematics, reasoning, planning, strategy, and a deep understanding of game theory and human psychology. This makes Poker the ideal next frontier for large language models. PokerBench consists of a comprehensive compilation of 11,000 most important scenarios, split between pre-flop and post-flop play, developed in collaboration with trained poker players. We evaluate prominent models including GPT-4, ChatGPT 3.5, and various Llama and Gemma series models, finding that all state-of-the-art LLMs underperform in playing optimal poker. However, after fine-tuning, these models show marked improvements. We validate PokerBench by having models with different scores compete with each other, demonstrating that higher scores on PokerBench lead to higher win rates in actual poker games. Through gameplay between our fine-tuned model and GPT-4, we also identify limitations of simple supervised fine-tuning for learning optimal playing strategy, suggesting the need for more advanced methodologies for effectively training language models to excel in games. PokerBench thus presents a unique benchmark for a quick and reliable evaluation of the poker-playing ability of LLMs as well as a comprehensive benchmark to study the progress of LLMs in complex game-playing scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward Adaptable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: An Assumption-Aware Review

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A survey proposing adaptability as a three-part taxonomy (learning, policy, scenario-driven) for organizing and evaluating MARL under changing conditions.

  2. Think in Games: Learning to Reason in Games via Reinforcement Learning with Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A reinforcement-learning pipeline for predicting macro-actions in Honor of Kings improves action prediction accuracy, but the method is imitation of human replay labels, not the claimed environmental interaction.

Pith tools