Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

8-bit Numerical Formats for Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.02915 v1 pith:PNAGIFK6 submitted 2022-06-06 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords formatstrainingdeepdifferentfloating-pointlearningaccuracyactivations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Given the current trend of increasing size and complexity of machine learning architectures, it has become of critical importance to identify new approaches to improve the computational efficiency of model training. In this context, we address the advantages of floating-point over fixed-point representation, and present an in-depth study on the use of 8-bit floating-point number formats for activations, weights, and gradients for both training and inference. We explore the effect of different bit-widths for exponents and significands and different exponent biases. The experimental results demonstrate that a suitable choice of these low-precision formats enables faster training and reduced power consumption without any degradation in accuracy for a range of deep learning models for image classification and language processing.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Novel Aspects of IEEE SA P3109 Arithmetic Formats for Machine Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10 partial

    IEEE P3109 defines a family of adjustable low-precision floating-point formats for ML with decoding to extended reals, multiple rounding modes, block operations, kappa-approximation for approximations, and mechanical ...

  2. Why Low-Precision Transformer Training Fails: An Analysis on Flash Attention

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Low-precision Flash Attention fails due to similar low-rank attention representations combined with biased rounding errors that accumulate and corrupt weight updates; a minimal fix to reduce rounding bias stabilizes training.

  3. Hadamard-Domain Model Quantization for Learned Image Coding

    eess.IV 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Uniform INT8 quantization of learned image codecs becomes more accurate when tensors are first re-expressed in a layer-adaptive Hadamard basis.

  4. StoSignSGD: Unbiased Structural Stochasticity Fixes SignSGD for Training Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    StoSignSGD resolves SignSGD divergence on non-smooth objectives via structural stochasticity, matching optimal convex rates and improving non-convex bounds while delivering 1.44-2.14x speedups in FP8 LLM pretraining.

  5. Compute Requirements for Algorithmic Innovation in Frontier AI Models

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Estimated development compute for 36 LLM pretraining innovations shows half would remain possible under GPT-2-level or 8-H100 compute caps.

  6. FP8 Formats for Deep Learning

    cs.LG 2022-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    FP8 formats E4M3 and E5M2 match 16-bit training accuracy on CNNs, RNNs, and Transformers up to 175B parameters without hyperparameter changes.

  7. An 83-Format Numeric Catalog with Bit-Exact Conformance Vectors: A Vendor-Neutral Reference for FP8, BF16, MXFP4, and Microscaling Formats

    cs.AR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    An 83-format numeric catalog with bit-exact conformance vectors and IEEE P3109 cross-walk serving as a vendor-neutral reference for FP8, BF16, MXFP4, and microscaling formats.

  8. DeepSeek: Paradigm Shifts and Technical Evolution in Large AI Models

    cs.AI 2025-07 unverdicted

    A survey of DeepSeek's V3 and R1 models covering MLA, MoE, MTP, GRPO, and training engineering, with no new experimental results.

Pith tools