pith. sign in

arxiv: 2412.05196 · v2 · pith:PNWDPYVMnew · submitted 2024-12-06 · 💻 cs.AI

Exponential Speedups by Rerooting Levin Tree Search

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords searchsqrtnodererootingtextpolicyrerootertakes
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Levin Tree Search (LTS) (Orseau et al., 2018) is a search algorithm for deterministic environments that uses a user-specified policy to guide the search. It comes with a formal guarantee on the number of search steps (node visits) for finding a solution node that depends on the quality of the policy. In this paper, we introduce a new algorithm, called $\sqrt{\text{LTS}}$ (pronounce root-LTS), which implicitly starts an LTS search rooted at every node of the search tree. Each LTS search is assigned a rerooting weight by a (user-defined or learnt) rerooter, and the search effort is shared between all LTS searches proportionally to their weights. The rerooting mechanism implicitly decomposes the search space into subtasks, leading to significant speedups. We prove that the number of node visits that $\sqrt{\text{LTS}}$ takes is competitive with the best decomposition into subtasks, at the price of a factor that relates to the uncertainty of the rerooter. If LTS takes time $T$, in the best case with $q$ rerooting points, $\sqrt{\text{LTS}}$ only takes time $O(q\sqrt[q]{T})$. Like the policy, the rerooter can be learnt from data, and we expect $\sqrt{\text{LTS}}$ to be applicable to a wide range of domains.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Structure-Induced Information for Rerooting Levin Tree Search

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Three rerooter designs (clustering-based, heuristic-based, hybrid) for √LTS enable scalable search in complex single-agent environments where explicit subgoal methods fail and achieve SOTA online training efficiency.