REVIEW 8 cited by
Persuasion for Good: Towards a Personalized Persuasive Dialogue System for Social Good
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Developing intelligent persuasive conversational agents to change people's opinions and actions for social good is the frontier in advancing the ethical development of automated dialogue systems. To do so, the first step is to understand the intricate organization of strategic disclosures and appeals employed in human persuasion conversations. We designed an online persuasion task where one participant was asked to persuade the other to donate to a specific charity. We collected a large dataset with 1,017 dialogues and annotated emerging persuasion strategies from a subset. Based on the annotation, we built a baseline classifier with context information and sentence-level features to predict the 10 persuasion strategies used in the corpus. Furthermore, to develop an understanding of personalized persuasion processes, we analyzed the relationships between individuals' demographic and psychological backgrounds including personality, morality, value systems, and their willingness for donation. Then, we analyzed which types of persuasion strategies led to a greater amount of donation depending on the individuals' personal backgrounds. This work lays the ground for developing a personalized persuasive dialogue system.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
ProactiveEval: A Unified Evaluation Framework for Proactive Dialogue Agents
A unified evaluation framework for proactive dialogue agents, built with 328 synthetic environments across six domains, shows that thinking modes improve target planning but not dialogue guidance in a 22-model comparison.
-
Enhancing User Engagement in Socially-Driven Dialogue through Interactive LLM Alignments
Dialogue agents aligned via DPO on preference pairs mined from simulated conversations improve engagement scores against the same simulator, with smaller and partially inconsistent human evaluation evidence.
-
Communication is All You Need: Persuasion Dataset Construction via Multi-LLM Communication
A six-role multi-LLM communication framework generates persuasive dialogue data that human judges find nearly indistinguishable from human-written rewrites.
-
Simulation-Free Hierarchical Latent Policy Planning for Proactive Dialogues
LDPP automatically discovers latent dialogue policies from raw records and uses offline hierarchical reinforcement learning to plan in that latent space, outperforming strong baselines on proactive dialogue benchmarks.
-
Unraveling SITT: Social Influence Technique Taxonomy and Detection with LLMs
A new 58-technique taxonomy and 746-dialogue dataset for social influence detection, on which the best LLM achieves 0.45 category F1.
-
Will you donate money to a chatbot? The effect of chatbot anthropomorphic features and persuasion strategies on willingness to donate
Adding name and background to a donation chatbot increased perceived humanness but did not increase donations; a plain chatbot with logical appeals was viewed most favorably.
-
From Hallucinations to Facts: Enhancing Language Models with Curated Knowledge Graphs
Grounding chatbot replies with curated knowledge-graph triples raises human-rated factual consistency by roughly two points on a five-point scale, but the metric mostly rewards including the provided triple.
-
Strategic Prompting for Conversational Tasks: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models Across Diverse Conversational Tasks
No single open-source LLM among Llama, OPT, Falcon, Alpaca, and MPT performs best across reservation, empathy, counseling, persuasion, and negotiation tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.