Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.10117 v1 pith:Q5S2VLFS submitted 2022-09-21 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CRcs.LG
keywords systemsrecommenderaspectssocialtrustworthycomprehensivehelpmedia
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As one of the most successful AI-powered applications, recommender systems aim to help people make appropriate decisions in an effective and efficient way, by providing personalized suggestions in many aspects of our lives, especially for various human-oriented online services such as e-commerce platforms and social media sites. In the past few decades, the rapid developments of recommender systems have significantly benefited human by creating economic value, saving time and effort, and promoting social good. However, recent studies have found that data-driven recommender systems can pose serious threats to users and society, such as spreading fake news to manipulate public opinion in social media sites, amplifying unfairness toward under-represented groups or individuals in job matching services, or inferring privacy information from recommendation results. Therefore, systems' trustworthiness has been attracting increasing attention from various aspects for mitigating negative impacts caused by recommender systems, so as to enhance the public's trust towards recommender systems techniques. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of Trustworthy Recommender systems (TRec) with a specific focus on six of the most important aspects; namely, Safety & Robustness, Nondiscrimination & Fairness, Explainability, Privacy, Environmental Well-being, and Accountability & Auditability. For each aspect, we summarize the recent related technologies and discuss potential research directions to help achieve trustworthy recommender systems in the future.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EMPRA: Embedding Perturbation Rank Attack against Neural Ranking Models

    cs.IR 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A sentence-level embedding perturbation attack can promote target documents into top-10 neural ranking results, but its headline success depends on a surrogate ranker despite claiming to be surrogate-free.

  2. Fuzzy Norm-Explicit Product Quantization for Recommender Systems

    cs.IR 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A fuzzy type-2 clustering codebook construction for NEQ improves recall on Netflix, Audio, and Cifar60k by a few points at similar runtime, though without released code or recall error bars.

Pith tools