pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.31527 · v1 · pith:Q6CC65HMnew · submitted 2026-05-29 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-ph

Accessing Exotic Hadronic States via Charmed-Meson Femtoscopy in Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

Jiaxing Zhao , Taesoo Song , Elena Bratkovskaya , Joerg Aichelin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 19:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-ph
keywords femtoscopycharmed mesonsheavy-ion collisionshadronic moleculescorrelation functionsexotic statestransport model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Heavy-ion collisions enable sensitive femtoscopic access to charmed-meson interactions and possible exotic molecular states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how two-particle correlation functions measured in femtoscopy can reveal the interaction potentials between charmed mesons. It shows that relativistic heavy-ion collisions create conditions more favorable than proton-proton collisions, with higher charm production, reduced relative momenta from energy loss, and suppressed initial-state correlations. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach could test the existence and properties of hadronic molecules involving charm. The work combines a transport description of the collision evolution with a correlation calculation based on the Schrödinger equation to demonstrate this probe.

Core claim

The two-particle correlation function measured in femtoscopic analyses provides access to the interaction potentials between emitted particles and thereby a unique opportunity to investigate interactions among charmed mesons and to explore the nature of possible exotic hadronic states. In relativistic heavy-ion collisions the dynamical evolution and charm production are modeled with a transport approach while correlation functions are obtained from the Schrödinger equation; the resulting environment is significantly more favorable than in proton-proton collisions because of enhanced charm-quark production, reduced relative momenta due to in-medium energy loss, and strong suppression of initi

What carries the argument

The two-particle correlation function obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation for assumed interaction potentials between particles whose space-time evolution is supplied by a transport model of heavy-ion collisions.

If this is right

  • Heavy-ion collisions yield larger and cleaner charmed-meson correlation signals than proton-proton collisions.
  • The correlation functions become sensitive to the detailed form of the interaction potential between charmed mesons.
  • Possible hadronic molecular states can be distinguished from ordinary scattering states through the shape of the correlation function.
  • Femtoscopic data from existing heavy-ion experiments can be used to constrain charmed-meson potentials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same femtoscopic technique could be applied to other heavy-flavor meson pairs to map a wider set of interaction potentials.
  • Successful extraction of potentials would provide input for lattice calculations or effective theories of exotic charm states.
  • If the predicted suppression of initial-state correlations holds, it reduces one major systematic uncertainty in future analyses.

Load-bearing premise

The transport model accurately describes charm production, energy loss and space-time evolution while the correlation framework correctly converts the assumed potentials into observable functions without large unmodeled medium effects.

What would settle it

A measured correlation function for a charmed-meson pair in heavy-ion data that shows no sensitivity to the presence or absence of a molecular binding potential, or that matches the pp-collision result instead of the predicted enhancement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.31527 by Elena Bratkovskaya, Jiaxing Zhao, Joerg AICHELIN, Taesoo Song.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The PHSD results for the probability density function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The PHSD results for the distribution of the relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Correlation functions of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The correlation function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The binding energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The two-particle correlation function measured in femtoscopic analyses provides access to the interaction potentials between emitted particles. This offers a unique opportunity to investigate interactions among charmed mesons and to explore the nature of possible exotic hadronic states. In this Letter, we study femtoscopic correlations of various charmed-meson pairs in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. The dynamical evolution of the system and charm hadron production are described within the Parton-Hadron-String Dynamics (PHSD) transport approach, while the correlation functions are computed using the Correlation Analysis Tool using the Schr\"odinger equation (CATS). We demonstrate that heavy-ion collisions provide a significantly more favorable environment than $pp$ collisions for accessing charmed meson femtoscopic correlations. This arises from enhanced charm-quark production, reduced relative momenta due to in-medium energy loss, and a strong suppression of initial-state correlations. Our results indicate that femtoscopic measurements in heavy-ion collisions offer a sensitive probe of charmed meson interactions and possible hadronic molecular states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses the PHSD transport approach to simulate charm production, energy loss, and space-time evolution in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, feeding the resulting source functions and pair momenta into the CATS framework to compute two-particle correlation functions for charmed-meson pairs. It concludes that AA collisions are significantly more favorable than pp collisions for femtoscopic studies because of higher charm yields, reduced relative momenta from in-medium energy loss, and strong suppression of initial-state correlations, thereby providing a sensitive probe of charmed-meson interactions and possible exotic molecular states.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold, the work identifies a concrete experimental pathway to study charmed-meson interactions via femtoscopy in heavy-ion environments, leveraging two established, publicly documented codes (PHSD and CATS) and generating falsifiable predictions for correlation functions that differ markedly between AA and pp systems. This strengthens the case for using heavy-ion data to constrain potentials relevant to exotic hadronic states.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and PHSD modeling section] Abstract and PHSD modeling section: the claim that heavy-ion collisions are 'significantly more favorable' is obtained by feeding PHSD-generated source functions into CATS; the manuscript provides no quantitative benchmark of these source functions or low-p_T D-meson pair distributions against experimental data or alternative transport calculations, so the predicted suppression of initial-state correlations and enhancement at small q remain tied to the fidelity of this specific implementation.
  2. [CATS application and results] CATS application and results: correlation functions are computed with vacuum potentials; the manuscript does not examine possible in-medium modifications to these potentials, which directly affects the predicted signal strength at small q and is therefore load-bearing for the assertion that AA collisions offer a sensitive probe.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] The notation for the relative momentum q and the source function S(r) should be defined explicitly with an equation in the methods section for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below and outline the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and PHSD modeling section] Abstract and PHSD modeling section: the claim that heavy-ion collisions are 'significantly more favorable' is obtained by feeding PHSD-generated source functions into CATS; the manuscript provides no quantitative benchmark of these source functions or low-p_T D-meson pair distributions against experimental data or alternative transport calculations, so the predicted suppression of initial-state correlations and enhancement at small q remain tied to the fidelity of this specific implementation.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not contain direct quantitative benchmarks of the PHSD source functions or low-p_T D-meson pair distributions against data or other transport models. While PHSD has been validated for single-particle D-meson spectra and elliptic flow in earlier publications, pair-level distributions at small relative momentum are less directly constrained. In the revised version we will add a dedicated paragraph in the modeling section that (i) cites the existing single-particle validations, (ii) explicitly states the model dependence of the pair source, and (iii) qualifies the phrase “significantly more favorable” to reflect the specific PHSD+CATS implementation. This change will be reflected in both the abstract and the main text. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [CATS application and results] CATS application and results: correlation functions are computed with vacuum potentials; the manuscript does not examine possible in-medium modifications to these potentials, which directly affects the predicted signal strength at small q and is therefore load-bearing for the assertion that AA collisions offer a sensitive probe.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the calculations employ vacuum potentials and do not explore in-medium modifications. This is a genuine limitation that can influence the strength of the correlation signal. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection (or extended paragraph) under “Results” that (i) states the vacuum-potential assumption, (ii) briefly discusses possible in-medium effects on the D-meson interaction (e.g., screening or mass shifts), and (iii) notes that a quantitative study of medium-modified potentials lies beyond the present scope but is an important follow-up. The core kinematic argument for AA versus pp collisions remains unchanged, but the text will make the assumption transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; results follow from forward simulation with named external models

full rationale

The paper's central results are obtained by running the independent PHSD transport code to generate source functions and pair momenta, then feeding those into the independent CATS code to compute correlation functions. No target femtoscopic observable is used to fit any parameter, no self-citation is invoked to justify a uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and the comparison between heavy-ion and pp environments is a direct numerical output rather than a redefinition. The derivation chain therefore remains non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of two established simulation frameworks whose internal parameters and assumptions are not detailed in the abstract; no new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption PHSD correctly describes charm-quark production, energy loss, and hadronization in the evolving medium of heavy-ion collisions.
    Invoked when stating that the dynamical evolution and charm hadron production are described within PHSD.
  • domain assumption CATS accurately computes two-particle correlation functions from given interaction potentials without additional unaccounted final-state effects.
    Invoked when stating that correlation functions are computed using CATS.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5715 in / 1319 out tokens · 21499 ms · 2026-06-28T19:52:34.745753+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 34 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The Physics of Glueballs

    V. Mathieu, N. Kochelev, and V. Vento, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E18, 1 (2009), arXiv:0810.4453 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  2. [2]

    W. Ochs, J. Phys. G40, 043001 (2013), arXiv:1301.5183 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  3. [3]

    C. A. Meyer and E. S. Swanson, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 82, 21 (2015), arXiv:1502.07276 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    M. S. Chanowitz and S. R. Sharpe, Nucl. Phys. B222, 211 (1983), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 228, 588–588 (1983)]

    1983

  5. [5]

    Multiquark Resonances

    A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Phys. Rept. 668, 1 (2017), arXiv:1611.07920 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Multiquark States

    M. Karliner, J. L. Rosner, and T. Skwarnicki, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68, 17 (2018), arXiv:1711.10626 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  7. [7]

    De Rujula, H

    A. De Rujula, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 317 (1977)

    1977

  8. [8]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    S. K. Choiet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 262001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0309032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  10. [10]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 032001 (2022), arXiv:2102.13048 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Multi-quark hadrons from Heavy Ion Collisions

    S. Choet al.(ExHIC), Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 212001 (2011), arXiv:1011.0852 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  12. [12]

    Zhang, J

    H. Zhang, J. Liao, E. Wang, Q. Wang, and H. Xing, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 012301 (2021), arXiv:2004.00024 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    B. Wu, X. Du, M. Sibila, and R. Rapp, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 122 (2021), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.A 57, 314 (2021)], arXiv:2006.09945 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    B. Chen, L. Jiang, X.-H. Liu, Y. Liu, and J. Zhao, Phys. Rev. C105, 054901 (2022), arXiv:2107.00969 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    H. Yun, D. Park, S. Noh, A. Park, W. Park, S. Cho, J. Hong, Y. Kim, S. Lim, and S. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. C 107, 014906 (2023), arXiv:2208.06960 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Is the X(3872) Production Cross Section at Tevatron Compatible with a Hadron Molecule Interpretation?

    C. Bignamini, B. Grinstein, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and C. Sabelli, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 162001 (2009), arXiv:0906.0882 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  17. [17]

    S. X. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D102, 074004 (2020), 6 arXiv:1912.11830 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Exotic hadrons: review and perspectives

    J.-M. Richard, Few Body Syst.57, 1185 (2016), arXiv:1606.08593 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Hosaka, T

    A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai, and S. Yasui, PTEP2016, 062C01 (2016), arXiv:1603.09229 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    A. Ali, J. S. Lange, and S. Stone, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 123 (2017), arXiv:1706.00610 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    Pentaquark and Tetraquark states

    Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.- L. Zhu, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.107, 237 (2019), arXiv:1903.11976 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    R. H. Brown and R. Twiss, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Maga- zine and Journal of Science45, 663 (1954), https://doi.org/10.1080/14786440708520475

    work page doi:10.1080/14786440708520475 1954

  23. [23]

    Pratt, Phys

    S. Pratt, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 1219 (1984)

    1984

  24. [24]

    M. A. Lisa, S. Pratt, R. Soltz, and U. Wiedemann, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.55, 357 (2005), arXiv:nucl- ex/0505014

    work page arXiv 2005

  25. [25]

    Bose-Einstein correlations of pion pairs in central Pb+Pb collisions at CERN SPS energies

    C. Altet al.(NA49), Phys. Rev. C77, 064908 (2008), arXiv:0709.4507 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  26. [26]

    Q.-f. Li, J. Steinheimer, H. Petersen, M. Bleicher, and H. Stocker, Phys. Lett. B674, 111 (2009), arXiv:0812.0375 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  27. [27]

    U. A. Wiedemann and U. W. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C56, 3265 (1997), arXiv:nucl-th/9611031

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  28. [28]

    Femtoscopy in hydro-inspired models with resonances

    A. Kisiel, W. Florkowski, and W. Broniowski, Phys. Rev. C73, 064902 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0602039

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  29. [29]

    Proton-lambda correlations in central Au+Au collisions at sqrt (s_NN)=200 GeV

    J. Adamset al.(STAR), Phys. Rev. C74, 064906 (2006), arXiv:nucl-ex/0511003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  30. [30]

    The Proton-$\Omega$ correlation function in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV

    J. Adamet al.(STAR), Phys. Lett. B790, 490 (2019), arXiv:1808.02511 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    The $\Lambda\Lambda$ Correlation Function in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 200 GeV

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 022301 (2015), arXiv:1408.4360 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Measurement of interaction between antiprotons

    L. Adamczyket al.(STAR), Nature527, 345 (2015), arXiv:1507.07158 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  33. [33]

    p-p, p-$\Lambda$ and $\Lambda$-$\Lambda$ correlations studied via femtoscopy in pp reactions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Rev. C99, 024001 (2019), arXiv:1805.12455 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 172301 (2021), arXiv:2105.05578 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Lett. B805, 135419 (2020), arXiv:1910.14407 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 112002 (2019), arXiv:1904.12198 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Lett. B844, 137223 (2023), arXiv:2204.10258 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Femtoscopy of pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=0.9 and 7 TeV at the LHC with two-pion Bose-Einstein correlations

    K. Aamodtet al.(ALICE), Phys. Rev. D84, 112004 (2011), arXiv:1101.3665 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Phys. Rev. D106, 052010 (2022), arXiv:2201.05352 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Kamiya, T

    Y. Kamiya, T. Hyodo, and A. Ohnishi, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 131 (2022), arXiv:2203.13814 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    L. M. Abreu and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Phys. Rev. D112, 016003 (2025), arXiv:2503.13668 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Liu, J.-X

    Z.-W. Liu, J.-X. Lu, M.-Z. Liu, and L.-S. Geng, (2024), arXiv:2404.18607 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Liu, Z.-W

    H.-N. Liu, Z.-W. Liu, L. Abreu, and L.-S. Geng, (2025), arXiv:2511.19098 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Albaladejo, A

    M. Albaladejo, A. Feijoo, I. Vida˜ na, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, (2023), arXiv:2307.09873 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Ge, Z.-W

    D.-L. Ge, Z.-W. Liu, and L.-S. Geng, (2026), arXiv:2603.24980 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Parton transport and hadronization from the dynamical quasiparticle point of view

    W. Cassing and E. L. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rev. C78, 034919 (2008), arXiv:0808.0022 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  47. [47]

    Parton-Hadron-String Dynamics: an off-shell transport approach for relativistic energies

    W. Cassing and E. L. Bratkovskaya, Nucl. Phys. A831, 215 (2009), arXiv:0907.5331 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  48. [48]

    E. L. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing, V. P. Konchakovski, and O. Linnyk, Nucl. Phys. A856, 162 (2011), arXiv:1101.5793 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  49. [49]

    Moreau, O

    P. Moreau, O. Soloveva, L. Oliva, T. Song, W. Cassing, and E. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rev. C100, 014911 (2019), arXiv:1903.10257 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    T. Song, H. Berrehrah, D. Cabrera, W. Cassing, and E. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rev. C93, 034906 (2016), arXiv:1512.00891 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  51. [51]

    T. Song, H. Berrehrah, D. Cabrera, J. M. Torres-Rincon, L. Tolos, W. Cassing, and E. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rev. C92, 014910 (2015), arXiv:1503.03039 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual

    T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, JHEP05, 026 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0603175

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  53. [53]

    Theoretical predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC

    M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, N. Houdeau, M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi, JHEP10, 137 (2012), arXiv:1205.6344 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  54. [54]

    K. J. Eskola, H. Paukkunen, and C. A. Salgado, JHEP 04, 065 (2009), arXiv:0902.4154 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  55. [55]

    L. M. Abreu, D. Cabrera, F. J. Llanes-Estrada, and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Annals Phys.326, 2737 (2011), arXiv:1104.3815 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  56. [56]

    X(3872) and Other Possible Heavy Molecular States

    X. Liu, Z.-G. Luo, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C61, 411 (2009), arXiv:0808.0073 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  57. [57]

    X. Zhu, M. Bleicher, S. L. Huang, K. Schweda, H. Stoecker, N. Xu, and P. Zhuang, Phys. Lett. B647, 366 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0604178

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  58. [58]

    J. Zhao, J. Aichelin, P. B. Gossiaux, and K. Werner, Phys. Rev. C111, 014907 (2025), arXiv:2407.20919 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    S. E. Koonin, Physics Letters B70, 43 (1977)

    1977

  60. [60]

    Pratt, Physical Review D33, 1314 (1986)

    S. Pratt, Physical Review D33, 1314 (1986)

    1986

  61. [61]

    D. L. Mihaylov, V. Mantovani Sarti, O. W. Arnold, L. Fabbietti, B. Hohlweger, and A. M. Mathis, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 394 (2018), arXiv:1802.08481 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    Fabbietti, V

    L. Fabbietti, V. Mantovani Sarti, and O. Vazquez Doce, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.71, 377 (2021), arXiv:2012.09806 [nucl-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021