pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18952 · v1 · pith:QF7E4KIAnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ✦ hep-th

A missing link: Brane networks and the Cobordism Conjecture

Markus Dierigl , Ignacio Ruiz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 08:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords Cobordism ConjectureBrane networksDiscrete symmetriesSymmetry-breaking defectsBordism groupsSupergravityString theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Discrete symmetry defects form codimension-two brane networks

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies symmetry-breaking defects for discrete groups G as predicted by the Cobordism Conjecture using bordism groups and homology. These defects turn out to be codimension two rather than three and they form brane networks with junctions. This resolves the apparent mismatch with expectations and allows more detailed predictions for effective theories in string and M-theory.

Core claim

The defects associated with non-trivial deformation classes in Ω^ξ_2(BG) and its homology subgroup H_2(BG;Z) are codimension-two branes that participate in networks, where junctions are generically needed, as shown in examples of four-dimensional supergravity with a discrete Heisenberg group.

What carries the argument

Brane networks consisting of codimension-two defects classified by bordism groups Ω^ξ_2(BG)

Load-bearing premise

The symmetry-breaking defects are fully captured by the bordism groups and the low-energy effective description determines their codimension and network structure.

What would settle it

Finding isolated codimension-three defects without brane networks in a four-dimensional supergravity theory with non-trivial discrete symmetry would falsify the result.

read the original abstract

The absence of global symmetries in a quantum gravity theory often requires the introduction of (new) symmetry-breaking defects, which appear as singular objects in the low-energy description. This has been formalized in the Cobordism Conjecture, which further relates the asymptotics of these defects to non-trivial deformation classes of the effective theory. In this work we investigate the symmetry-breaking defects for theories with a discrete symmetry $G$ encoded in the bordism groups $\Omega^{\xi}_2 (BG)$ and, in particular, its sub-class described in terms of the homology groups $H_2(BG;\mathbb{Z})$. Contrary to expectations we find that the defects are of codimension two rather than three. However, they do not appear isolated but participate in brane networks explaining the naive mismatch. While in special situations linking configurations of defects are sufficient, our strategy generically predicts the existence of junctions, thus expanding the predictive power of the Cobordism Conjecture. We demonstrate the viability of this approach in four-dimensional supergravity theories originating from string and M-theory with a discrete Heisenberg group acting on its axionic degrees of freedom.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that symmetry-breaking defects for discrete groups G, as captured by the bordism groups Ω^ξ_2(BG) and its homology subgroup H_2(BG;Z), are codimension-two objects in the low-energy effective theory rather than the expected codimension-three defects. These defects participate in brane networks with junctions, which resolves the apparent mismatch and expands the predictive power of the Cobordism Conjecture. The argument is illustrated in four-dimensional supergravity theories from string/M-theory with a discrete Heisenberg symmetry acting on axions.

Significance. If the central mapping and network construction hold, the work strengthens the Cobordism Conjecture by supplying a mechanism for defect networks and junctions, offering a concrete way to reconcile bordism predictions with effective-field-theory expectations in string-derived models. The use of standard bordism computations and explicit string-theory examples is a positive feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.1] §4.1: The assignment of generators of Ω^ξ_2(BG) to codimension-two defects in the 4D theory is stated directly from the bordism class without an explicit derivation showing why the dimension map yields codim-2 rather than codim-3 once the low-energy supergravity action and axion couplings are fixed; this step is load-bearing for the claim that overrides the naive codimension-three count.
  2. [§5.2] §5.2: The brane-network construction with junctions is introduced to reconcile the mismatch, yet the text does not demonstrate that the network topology (linking and junctions) is forced by the bordism class itself rather than supplied to match the physical codimension; this leaves the resolution of the skeptic's dimension-map concern incomplete.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'contrary to expectations' without citing the specific prior literature or calculation that leads to the codim-3 expectation.
  2. [§2] Notation for the twist ξ in Ω^ξ_2(BG) is used without a brief reminder of its physical origin in the effective theory.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive major comments. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the explicit derivations and arguments as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.1] The assignment of generators of Ω^ξ_2(BG) to codimension-two defects in the 4D theory is stated directly from the bordism class without an explicit derivation showing why the dimension map yields codim-2 rather than codim-3 once the low-energy supergravity action and axion couplings are fixed; this step is load-bearing for the claim that overrides the naive codimension-three count.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit step-by-step derivation from the 4D supergravity action is necessary to make the dimension assignment fully transparent. In the revised manuscript we have expanded §4.1 with a direct computation: starting from the axion kinetic terms and the discrete Heisenberg symmetry action, we show that a non-trivial class in Ω^ξ_2(BG) corresponds to a monodromy supported on a 2-cycle. This fixes the defect world-volume dimension to two (hence codimension two in 4D spacetime) rather than three, because the axion shift symmetry is realized by a 2-form current whose support is determined by the bordism invariant. The revised text now contains the missing intermediate steps relating the low-energy couplings to the codimension. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.2] The brane-network construction with junctions is introduced to reconcile the mismatch, yet the text does not demonstrate that the network topology (linking and junctions) is forced by the bordism class itself rather than supplied to match the physical codimension; this leaves the resolution of the skeptic's dimension-map concern incomplete.

    Authors: We accept that the original §5.2 presented the network topology without a sufficiently rigorous demonstration that it is dictated by the bordism data. In the revision we have added a new paragraph deriving the necessity of junctions directly from the homology subgroup H_2(BG;Z) ⊂ Ω^ξ_2(BG). Specifically, we show that any attempt to realize a generator of H_2(BG;Z) with isolated codimension-two defects violates the cobordism relation unless junctions are introduced to cancel the boundary contributions; the linking numbers are likewise fixed by the intersection form on the homology. This establishes that the network structure is not an auxiliary construction but a direct consequence of the bordism class, thereby closing the dimension-map argument. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: bordism classification and network proposal remain independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper's central argument classifies symmetry-breaking defects via the standard bordism groups Ω^ξ_2(BG) and its homology subgroup H_2(BG;Z), then observes that these correspond to codimension-2 objects participating in networks rather than isolated codimension-3 defects. This mapping follows from the dimension of the bordism classes themselves and is reconciled with low-energy supergravity by invoking junctions and linking, without any reduction of the codimension assignment or network structure to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation. The derivation is self-contained against external bordism computations and string-theory examples, with no quoted step equating a prediction to its own input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard algebraic topology structures (bordism and homology groups) plus domain assumptions from string theory effective actions; no free parameters or new invented entities with independent evidence are introduced beyond the network concept itself.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Discrete symmetry G is encoded in the bordism groups Ω^ξ_2(BG)
    Invoked to classify symmetry-breaking defects in the low-energy theory.
  • domain assumption The relevant defects form a sub-class captured by homology H_2(BG;Z)
    Used to identify the codimension and network structure.
invented entities (1)
  • Brane networks with junctions no independent evidence
    purpose: To resolve the apparent mismatch between expected codimension-three and observed codimension-two defects
    Postulated configuration that explains the naive mismatch while preserving the Cobordism Conjecture.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5724 in / 1300 out tokens · 51227 ms · 2026-05-20T08:51:15.781864+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    Contrary to expectations we find that the defects are of codimension two rather than three. However, they do not appear isolated but participate in brane networks explaining the naive mismatch.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun

    S.W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199

    work page 1975

  2. [2]

    Zeldovich,A New Type of Radioactive Decay: Gravitational Annihilation of Baryons, Phys

    Y.B. Zeldovich,A New Type of Radioactive Decay: Gravitational Annihilation of Baryons, Phys. Lett. A59(1976) 254

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    Zeldovich,A Novel Type of Radioactive Decay: Gravitational Baryon Annihilation,Zh

    Y.B. Zeldovich,A Novel Type of Radioactive Decay: Gravitational Baryon Annihilation,Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.72(1977) 18

    work page 1977

  4. [4]

    Banks and L.J

    T. Banks and L.J. Dixon,Constraints on String Vacua with Space-Time Supersymmetry,Nucl. Phys.B307(1988) 93

    work page 1988

  5. [5]

    GRAVITY AND GLOBAL SYMMETRIES

    R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, D.A. Linde and L. Susskind,Gravity and global symmetries,Phys.Rev. D52(1995) 912 [hep-th/9502069]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  6. [6]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (12, 2007), 10.1017/CBO9780511618123. – 31 –

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511618123 2007

  7. [7]

    Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg,Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity,Phys. Rev.D83 (2011) 084019 [1011.5120]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    TASI Lectures on the Emergence of the Bulk in AdS/CFT

    D. Harlow,TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT,PoST ASI2017 (2018) 002 [1802.01040]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    McNamara and C

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa,Cobordism Classes and the Swampland,1909.10355

    work page arXiv 1909

  10. [10]

    Blumenhagen and N

    R. Blumenhagen and N. Cribiori,Open-closed correspondence of K-theory and cobordism,JHEP 08(2022) 037 [2112.07678]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Dierigl, R

    M. Dierigl, R. Minasian and D. Noviˇ ci´ c,Modified Abelian Gauge Theories,2602.21282

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Twisted topological structures related to M-branes II: Twisted Wu and Wu^c structures

    H. Sati,Twisted topological structures related to M-branes II: Twisted Wu andW u c structures, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.09(2012) 1250056 [1109.4461]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Duality group actions on fermions

    T. Pantev and E. Sharpe,Duality group actions on fermions,JHEP11(2016) 171 [1609.00011]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Tachikawa and K

    Y. Tachikawa and K. Yonekura,Why are fractional charges of orientifolds compatible with Dirac quantization?,SciPost Phys.7(2019) 058 [1805.02772]

    work page arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Freed and M.J

    D.S. Freed and M.J. Hopkins,Consistency of M-Theory on Non-Orientable Manifolds,Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.72(2021) 603 [1908.09916]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Debray, M

    A. Debray, M. Dierigl, J.J. Heckman and M. Montero,The Chronicles of IIBordia: Dualities, Bordisms, and the Swampland,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.28(2024) 805 [2302.00007]

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Basile, A

    I. Basile, A. Debray, M. Delgado and M. Montero,Global anomalies & bordism of non-supersymmetric strings,JHEP02(2024) 092 [2310.06895]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Debray and C

    A. Debray and C. Krulewski,Smith homomorphisms and spinˆhstructures,Proc. Am. Math. Soc.153(2024) 897 [2406.08237]

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Chakrabhavi, A

    V. Chakrabhavi, A. Debray, M. Dierigl and J.J. Heckman,Reflection branes, bordisms, and U dualities,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 066015 [2509.03573]

    work page arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Dierigl, J.J

    M. Dierigl, J.J. Heckman, M. Montero and E. Torres,IIB string theory explored: Reflection 7-branes,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 086015 [2212.05077]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Kaidi, K

    J. Kaidi, K. Ohmori, Y. Tachikawa and K. Yonekura,Nonsupersymmetric Heterotic Branes, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 121601 [2303.17623]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Dierigl, J.J

    M. Dierigl, J.J. Heckman, M. Montero and E. Torres,R7-branes as charge conjugation operators,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 046004 [2305.05689]

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Debray,Bordism for the 2-group symmetries of the heterotic and CHL strings,Contemp

    A. Debray,Bordism for the 2-group symmetries of the heterotic and CHL strings,Contemp. Math.802(2024) 227 [2304.14764]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Kaidi, Y

    J. Kaidi, Y. Tachikawa and K. Yonekura,On non-supersymmetric heterotic branes,JHEP03 (2025) 211 [2411.04344]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Fukuda, S.K

    M. Fukuda, S.K. Kobayashi, K. Watanabe and K. Yonekura,Black p-branes in heterotic string theory,JHEP05(2025) 043 [2412.02277]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Heckman, J

    J.J. Heckman, J. McNamara, J. Parra-Martinez and E. Torres,Gliozzi-Scherk-Olive defects: IIA/IIB walls and the surprisingly stable R7-brane,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 066021 [2507.21210]. – 32 –

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Torres,A Matrix Theory Construction of the IIA/IIB Wall,2603.02199

    E. Torres,A Matrix Theory Construction of the IIA/IIB Wall,2603.02199

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Anastasi, M

    E. Anastasi, M. Montero, A.M. Uranga and C. Wang,What IIB looks IIA string: String Cobordisms via Non-Compact CFTs,2603.00225

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    McNamara,Gravitational Solitons and Completeness,2108.02228

    J. McNamara,Gravitational Solitons and Completeness,2108.02228

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Garc´ ıa-Etxebarria and M

    I. Garc´ ıa-Etxebarria and M. Montero,Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics,JHEP08(2019) 003 [1808.00009]

    work page arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Yonekura,Heterotic global anomalies and torsion Witten index,JHEP10(2022) 114 [2207.13858]

    K. Yonekura,Heterotic global anomalies and torsion Witten index,JHEP10(2022) 114 [2207.13858]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Braeger, A

    N. Braeger, A. Debray, M. Dierigl, J.J. Heckman and M. Montero,Cobordism Utopia: U-Dualities, Bordisms, and the Swampland,2505.15885

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Dijkgraaf and E

    R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten,Topological Gauge Theories and Group Cohomology,Commun. Math. Phys.129(1990) 393

    work page 1990

  34. [34]

    Chern-Simons Theory with Finite Gauge Group

    D.S. Freed and F. Quinn,Chern-Simons theory with finite gauge group,Commun. Math. Phys. 156(1993) 435 [hep-th/9111004]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  35. [35]

    Hatcher,Algebraic topology, Cambridge Univ

    A. Hatcher,Algebraic topology, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (2000)

    work page 2000

  36. [36]

    Brown,Cohomology of Groups, vol

    K.S. Brown,Cohomology of Groups, vol. 87 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York (1982)

    work page 1982

  37. [37]

    Handel,On products in the cohomology of the dihedral groups,Tohoku Mathematical Journal 45(1993) 13

    D. Handel,On products in the cohomology of the dihedral groups,Tohoku Mathematical Journal 45(1993) 13

    work page 1993

  38. [38]

    Putman,Notes on Hopf’s formula and the geometry of the second homology of a group, (2020)

    A. Putman,Notes on Hopf’s formula and the geometry of the second homology of a group, (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Bruner and J

    R. Bruner and J. Greenlees,Connective real K-theory of finite groups., Mathematical surveys and monographs, American Mathematical Society (03, 2010), 10.1090/surv/169

    work page doi:10.1090/surv/169 2010

  40. [40]

    Davighi, B

    J. Davighi, B. Gripaios and N. Lohitsiri,Anomalies of non-Abelian finite groups via cobordism, JHEP09(2022) 147 [2207.10700]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    MILNOR,Introduction to Algebraic K-Theory

    J. MILNOR,Introduction to Algebraic K-Theory. (AM-72), Princeton University Press (1971)

    work page 1971

  42. [42]

    Soul´ e,The cohomology of sl3(z),Topology17(1978) 1

    C. Soul´ e,The cohomology of sl3(z),Topology17(1978) 1

    work page 1978

  43. [43]

    van der Kallen,The Schur multipliers of SL(3,Z)and SL(4,Z),Mathematische Annalen 212(1974) 47

    W. van der Kallen,The Schur multipliers of SL(3,Z)and SL(4,Z),Mathematische Annalen 212(1974) 47

    work page 1974

  44. [44]

    Bordisms between 9d type IIB supergravities and commutator widths of duality groups

    C. las Heras and I. Ruiz,Bordisms between 9d type IIB supergravities and commutator widths of duality groups,2605.15276

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Morse-Bott inequalities, Topology Change and Cobordisms to Nothing

    I. Ruiz,Morse-Bott inequalities, topology change and cobordisms to nothing,JHEP06(2025) 030 [2410.21372]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    J.W. Alexander,An example of a simply connected surface bounding a region which is not simply connected,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences10(1924) 8 [https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.10.1.8]

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.10.1.8 1924

  47. [47]

    Waldhausen,Heegaard-zerlegungen der 3-sph¨ are,Topology7(1968) 195

    F. Waldhausen,Heegaard-zerlegungen der 3-sph¨ are,Topology7(1968) 195. – 33 –

    work page 1968

  48. [48]

    Delgado, D

    M. Delgado, D. van de Heisteeg, S. Raman, E. Torres, C. Vafa and K. Xu,Finiteness and the emergence of dualities,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 047 [2412.03640]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Open P-Branes

    A. Strominger,Open p-branes,Phys. Lett. B383(1996) 44 [hep-th/9512059]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  50. [50]

    Type IIB Superstrings, BPS Monopoles, And Three-Dimensional Gauge Dynamics

    A. Hanany and E. Witten,Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics,Nucl. Phys. B492(1997) 152 [hep-th/9611230]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  51. [51]

    String Network

    A. Sen,String network,JHEP03(1998) 005 [hep-th/9711130]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  52. [52]

    Webs of (p,q) 5-branes, Five Dimensional Field Theories and Grid Diagrams

    O. Aharony, A. Hanany and B. Kol,Webs of (p,q) five-branes, five-dimensional field theories and grid diagrams,JHEP01(1998) 002 [hep-th/9710116]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  53. [53]

    String Junctions for Arbitrary Lie Algebra Representations

    O. DeWolfe and B. Zwiebach,String junctions for arbitrary Lie algebra representations,Nucl. Phys. B541(1999) 509 [hep-th/9804210]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  54. [54]

    Farb and D

    B. Farb and D. Margalit,A Primer on Mapping Class Groups, Princeton Mathematical Series, Princeton University Press (2012)

    work page 2012

  55. [55]

    Culler,Using surfaces to solve equations in free groups,Topology20(1981) 133

    M. Culler,Using surfaces to solve equations in free groups,Topology20(1981) 133

    work page 1981

  56. [56]

    Twistor Approach to String Compactifications: a Review

    S. Alexandrov,Twistor Approach to String Compactifications: a Review,Phys. Rept.522 (2013) 1 [1111.2892]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  57. [57]

    Quantum hypermultiplet moduli spaces in N=2 string vacua: a review

    S. Alexandrov, J. Manschot, D. Persson and B. Pioline,Quantum hypermultiplet moduli spaces in N=2 string vacua: a review,Proc. Symp. Pure Math.90(2015) 181 [1304.0766]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    Lee and J.A

    S.T. Lee and J.A. Packer,The cohomology of the integer heisenberg groups,Journal of Algebra 184(1996) 230

    work page 1996

  59. [59]

    New Formulations of D=10 Supersymmetry and D8-O8 Domain Walls

    E. Bergshoeff, R. Kallosh, T. Ortin, D. Roest and A. Van Proeyen,New formulations of D = 10 supersymmetry and D8 - O8 domain walls,Class. Quant. Grav.18(2001) 3359 [hep-th/0103233]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  60. [60]

    D-instantons and twistors

    S. Alexandrov, B. Pioline, F. Saueressig and S. Vandoren,D-instantons and twistors,JHEP03 (2009) 044 [0812.4219]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  61. [61]

    Non-Abelian discrete gauge symmetries in F-theory

    T.W. Grimm, T.G. Pugh and D. Regalado,Non-Abelian discrete gauge symmetries in F-theory, JHEP02(2016) 066 [1504.06272]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  62. [62]

    Shift-symmetries and gauge coupling functions in orientifolds and F-theory

    P. Corvilain, T.W. Grimm and D. Regalado,Shift-symmetries and gauge coupling functions in orientifolds and F-theory,JHEP05(2017) 059 [1607.03897]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  63. [63]

    Nevoa, S

    V. Nevoa, S. Raman and C. Vafa,Elementary Constituents Conjecture,2511.13813

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries

    C. C´ ordova, T.T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator,Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries,JHEP 02(2019) 184 [1802.04790]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    On 2-Group Global Symmetries and Their Anomalies

    F. Benini, C. C´ ordova and P.-S. Hsin,On 2-Group Global Symmetries and their Anomalies, JHEP03(2019) 118 [1803.09336]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  66. [66]

    Joyce,Compact Riemannian 7-manifolds with holonomyG 2

    D.D. Joyce,Compact Riemannian 7-manifolds with holonomyG 2. I,Journal of Differential Geometry43(1996) 291

    work page 1996

  67. [67]

    Duff, B.E.W

    M.J. Duff, B.E.W. Nilsson and C.N. Pope,Kaluza-Klein Supergravity,Phys. Rept.130(1986) 1

    work page 1986

  68. [68]

    M theory and Singularities of Exceptional Holonomy Manifolds

    B.S. Acharya and S. Gukov,M theory and singularities of exceptional holonomy manifolds, Phys. Rept.392(2004) 121 [hep-th/0409191]. – 34 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  69. [69]

    Joyce,Compact Manifolds with Special Holonomy, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2000)

    D.D. Joyce,Compact Manifolds with Special Holonomy, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (2000)

    work page 2000

  70. [70]

    M-theory on Manifolds of G_2 Holonomy and Type IIA Orientifolds

    S. Kachru and J. McGreevy,M theory on manifolds of G(2) holonomy and type IIA orientifolds,JHEP06(2001) 027 [hep-th/0103223]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  71. [71]

    RR photons

    P.G. Camara, L.E. Ibanez and F. Marchesano,RR photons,JHEP09(2011) 110 [1106.0060]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  72. [72]

    On Quantum Obstructions in Type IIA Orientifolds

    L. Kaufmann, T. Weigand and M. Wiesner,On Quantum Obstructions in Type IIA Orientifolds,2604.25988

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    Flux Compactifications of String Theory on Twisted Tori

    C.M. Hull and R.A. Reid-Edwards,Flux compactifications of string theory on twisted tori, Fortsch. Phys.57(2009) 862 [hep-th/0503114]. – 35 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009