Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Threat of Offensive AI to Organizations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.15764 v1 pith:QWPWZJ5F submitted 2021-06-30 cs.AI cs.CRcs.CYcs.LG

The Threat of Offensive AI to Organizations

classification cs.AI cs.CRcs.CYcs.LG
keywords offensiveorganizationsadversariesthreatadversaryattackscyberenhance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

AI has provided us with the ability to automate tasks, extract information from vast amounts of data, and synthesize media that is nearly indistinguishable from the real thing. However, positive tools can also be used for negative purposes. In particular, cyber adversaries can use AI (such as machine learning) to enhance their attacks and expand their campaigns. Although offensive AI has been discussed in the past, there is a need to analyze and understand the threat in the context of organizations. For example, how does an AI-capable adversary impact the cyber kill chain? Does AI benefit the attacker more than the defender? What are the most significant AI threats facing organizations today and what will be their impact on the future? In this survey, we explore the threat of offensive AI on organizations. First, we present the background and discuss how AI changes the adversary's methods, strategies, goals, and overall attack model. Then, through a literature review, we identify 33 offensive AI capabilities which adversaries can use to enhance their attacks. Finally, through a user study spanning industry and academia, we rank the AI threats and provide insights on the adversaries.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Black-Box Detection of LLM-Generated Text Using Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    A reference-based detector that scores text by the generalized Jensen–Shannon gap between its surprisal-state transition matrix and fixed human/machine references.

  2. Black-Box Detection of LLM-Generated Text Using Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SurpMark detects machine-generated text by estimating state-transition matrices from discretized surprisals and scoring them with generalized Jensen-Shannon divergence to human versus machine references.