Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 35 references

Spectral Microlensing of Extragalactic H II Regions by Stellar-Mass Black Holes

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a Milky Way black hole aligned with a compact extragalactic H II region would brighten emission lines while preserving their intrinsic ratios, at a predicted rate near one event per million years.

desk verdict Novel idea, correct lensing, tiny rate: the paper's own numbers make it a concept note rather than a detection roadmap, but it is honest and worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.00688 v1 pith:RHHOOLWH submitted 2026-08-01 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Dezi Liu This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords isolatedstellar-massblackholesgravitationalmicrolensingHIIregionsspectralemission-linediagnosticsGalactichaloopticaldeptheventrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that isolated stellar-mass black holes in the Milky Way—especially the large population predicted at high Galactic latitudes and in the halo, where ordinary stellar microlensing is blind—can be detected when one of them drifts in front of a compact H II region in a distant star-forming galaxy. The black hole magnifies the region's emission lines without changing the galaxy's continuum, so the integrated spectrum gains a fractional excess m_i = (mu - 1) epsilon_i in each line. Since lensing is achromatic, the ratio of the excesses in any two lines equals the ratio of the region's intrinsic contributions to those lines, giving a built-in test that separates lensing from supernovae, active galactic nuclei, or calibration artifacts. The geometry is unforgiving: the H II region must be small, bright, and tightly aligned behind the black hole, and the author's rate estimate, after requiring magnification above 10, is about 10^-6 events per year. Still, a carefully searched null result would set independent upper limits on the abundance of isolated black holes in the lowest-density parts of the Galaxy.

What carries the argument

The central object is the point-mass Einstein radius of a foreground black hole projected to the source plane, compared with the physical size of an H II region, a cloud of ionized hydrogen emitting bright recombination and forbidden lines. The main identity is the fractional line excess m_i = (mu - 1) epsilon_i and its achromatic ratio m_i / m_j = epsilon_i / epsilon_j, which turns lensing into a multi-line spectroscopic diagnostic. The event-rate machinery combines a uniform-disk magnification formula, with peak magnification mu_peak = sqrt(4(theta_E / theta_S)^2 + 1), an optical-depth integral over Galactic disk and halo black-hole densities, and an impact-parameter correction N_eff = b N

What would settle it

Measure, with high-resolution H-alpha and near-infrared imaging, the joint distribution of physical size and fractional line luminosity of H II regions in face-on star-forming galaxies at z ~ 0.01-0.5. If sub-10-pc regions typically contribute less than ~0.1% of a galaxy's total line emission, then at magnification mu = 10 the line excess m_i = (mu - 1) epsilon_i is below 1%, under the 7-sigma threshold even at SNR = 110, and the proposed observable would be undetectable for typical targets.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a foreground stellar-mass black hole whose Einstein radius, projected to the source plane, is comparable to the physical size of a background H II region produces a measurable spectral microlensing signal. For an H II region that contributes a fraction epsilon_i of the galaxy's total emission in line i, the fractional line excess is m_i = (mu - 1) epsilon_i. Because gravitational lensing is achromatic, the same factor (mu - 1) multiplies every line, so m_i / m_j = epsilon_i / epsilon_j: the observed excess ratios reproduce the region's intrinsic line ratios independent of the magnification. The author shows that for typical black holes at 0.1-10 kpc the Einstein rad

Load-bearing premise

A lensed H II region must contribute about one percent of the galaxy's total light in the observed emission lines while staying spatially smaller than about ten parsecs; if dust, blending, or a different size distribution makes its effective line fraction much smaller, the predicted 9% excess at tenfold magnification falls below the stated detection significance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spectral microlensing would open a window onto isolated stellar-mass black holes in the Galactic halo and at high latitudes, regions where dense-field stellar microlensing cannot operate.
  • Candidate events can be identified by comparing lensed and unlensed epochs: coherent fractional excesses in multiple emission lines with an unchanged continuum, and with excess ratios matching known line ratios, would distinguish lensing from false positives.
  • Because the strongest magnifications come from compact, dust-obscured H II regions, the practical follow-up path lies in infrared and radio recombination lines rather than optical spectroscopy.
  • Even with no detected event, a wide-field search would place independent upper limits on the density of isolated black holes in low-density Galactic environments, constraining formation and natal-kick models.
  • Existing multi-epoch spectroscopic surveys separated by roughly a decade could be mined for discrete line-flux excesses even though they are too sparse to track continuous microlensing light curves.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: The achromatic ratio identity should work for any compact line-emitting source, not just H II regions—for example, extragalactic masers, planetary nebulae, or broad-line regions with angular sizes below the Einstein radius could be used, extending the method's reach.
  • Editorial: The single most testable assumption is the effective fractional contribution epsilon_i of sub-10-pc regions to a galaxy's line flux; the paper invokes values around 1% from nearby catalogs, but dust attenuation and blending in more distant galaxies could lower this by orders of magnitude. A measurement of the epsilon distribution for galaxies at z ~ 0.01-0.5 would directly set the real
  • Editorial: One could search archival narrow-band imaging for line-only transients—objects bright in H-alpha but absent from broad-band difference images—as a cheaper way to set upper limits before dedicated time-domain spectroscopy exists.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes detecting isolated Galactic stellar-mass black holes by searching for wavelength-independent, narrow emission-line excesses in the integrated spectra of background star-forming galaxies. A foreground BH with a milliarcsecond Einstein radius can magnify a compact extragalactic H II region with physical size ≲10 pc; the fractional line excess is m_i = (mu−1) epsilon_i, and the ratio of excesses between two lines equals the intrinsic line ratio, providing an achromaticity-based diagnostic (Eqs. 5–6). The authors derive the optical depth for disk and halo BH populations, estimate the event rate with a global optical depth and a typical Einstein crossing time, and then apply an impact-parameter correction to obtain N_eff,det ~ 10^-6 yr^-1 for N_gal = 10^3 and N_HII = 10^2. They also discuss archival multi-epoch spectroscopy and future infrared/radio surveys as possible search strategies.

Significance. If the central detectability assumption holds, the method would open a genuinely new probe of isolated stellar-mass BHs at high Galactic latitudes and in the halo, a regime where traditional stellar microlensing is inefficient. The lensing and optical-depth derivations (Eqs. 1–3, A1–A3) are standard and correctly executed under the stated approximations, and the finite-source magnification and impact-parameter correction are handled transparently. The paper uses public synthetic BH catalogs and PHANGS-HST/MUSE data, and it is explicit about the extremely low event rate and the dust-obscuration challenge. The main weakness is that the detection significance and the event-rate estimate rest on an unverified value of epsilon_i for the compact, size-selected H II regions that dominate high-magnification events; the manuscript does not report or bound this quantity for the relevant compact sample.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (5); Appendix C] The 7σ detection threshold is derived from (mu−1)epsilon_i ≈ sqrt(2) S_i/SNR_i with epsilon_i ≈ 1% and mu ≈ 10, giving SNR_i ≳ 110. This assumes the lensed compact H II region contributes 1% of the galaxy's integrated line flux. The 0.1–10% range quoted in Sec. 1 applies to the full H II region luminosity function and is dominated by extended giant regions; the compact, dust-obscured cores that satisfy Eq. (3) at high magnification are likely to have far smaller epsilon_i. Appendix C uses the PHANGS–MUSE/HST catalog to estimate N_HII but does not report epsilon_i for the size-limited (<10 pc) sample. If the typical epsilon_i of lensable compact regions is 0.1% or lower, the required SNR becomes ~1100 or higher, invalidating the stated detectability. Please quantify epsilon_i for the size-selected compact sample, or explicitly characterize the resulting uncertainty in the detection claim.
  2. [§2.2, Eqs. (8)–(9); Appendix D] The effective rate N_eff,det = b N_det filters only on impact parameter (mu > 10) and does not condition on the detection significance, which also depends on epsilon_i and SNR_i. Because compact region size gives high mu but likely low epsilon_i, the product N_gal N_HII tau/t_E is a geometric alignment rate rather than a detectable-event rate. The manuscript should either present N_eff,det as an upper limit or integrate over the joint distribution of H II region size, line flux fraction, and impact parameter. This is not a circularity issue; it is a missing term in the detectability calculation.
  3. [§2.1, observational strategy paragraph] The proposed two-stage strategy states that 'once a candidate is identified, follow-up observations can monitor the microlensing light curve.' For candidates found in archival multi-epoch spectra separated by ~10 years (e.g., SDSS vs DESI), the event duration is ~100 days and the event will have ended by the time the candidate is recognized. Archival searches can only reveal a past one-epoch excess and line-ratio anomaly; they cannot provide light-curve confirmation. Real-time spectroscopic time-domain surveys would be required for the monitoring stage. Please clarify this distinction, as it affects the practical search strategy.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (9) and Sec. 2.2 text] The numerical normalization is inconsistent: inserting the adopted fiducials (tau = 2.49e-10, t_E = 78 days) into Eq. (9) gives N_det ~ 7e-5 yr^-1, whereas the text says the predicted rate is 'at most 10^-5 per year'. Please harmonize the stated rate with the equation and with the effective rate quoted in the abstract.
  2. [Figure 3 caption/axis] The top panel y-axis label appears as '10 1' in the draft; this should be '10^-1' (i.e., 0.1 pc) to be consistent with the panel's range.
  3. [General] Given that the method's feasibility hinges on epsilon_i, the paper should include at least a rough uncertainty budget for the chain of inputs (epsilon_i, N_gal, N_HII, v_perp, tau). Currently Eq. (9) is presented as a point estimate without propagation of the order-of-magnitude spreads in the input catalogs.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derivation is self-contained, using standard lensing physics and external population data with no fitted parameters forced to produce the target result.

full rationale

The paper's core relation m_i = (μ−1)ε_i (Eq. 5) follows directly from the definition of ε_i as the fractional contribution of a single H II region to the total galaxy line flux, combined with the achromatic magnification assumption. The ratio m_i/m_j = ε_i/ε_j (Eq. 6) is a formal identity given that definition, but the physical content—that the same factor (μ−1) applies to all lines—is an independent consequence of gravitational lensing achromaticity, not an input fitted to the outcome. The event rate estimate (Eq. 9 and Appendix C) uses external synthetic BH catalogs (Olejak et al. 2020) and published H II region surveys (PHANGS, AMUSING++, CALIFA, VESTIGE) to set the BH density, number counts, and transverse velocities; no parameter is adjusted to make N_det or N_eff,det come out to a desired value. The impact-parameter correction (Appendix D) is a standard application of Witt & Mao (1994). The paper explicitly states the low rate and acknowledges the dependence on the assumed ε_i ~ 1% for compact, dust-obscured regions, which is an empirical uncertainty rather than a circularity. No self-citations are load-bearing, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked from the authors' prior work. The derivation chain is therefore independent of its conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is modest: no new physical entities are introduced. The main free parameters are order-of-magnitude choices (epsilon_i, N_gal, N_HII, v_perp) and the detection threshold. The derivation rests on standard lensing theory and an external synthetic BH catalog.

free parameters (5)
  • epsilon_i = ~1%
    Assumed fractional contribution of a single H II region to the galaxy's total line flux; used in Eq. (5) and the SNR estimate in Sec. 2.2. Not measured, varies by galaxy type.
  • N_gal = 1000
    Adopted number of survey galaxies from Table 1 compile; affects N_det in Eq. (9).
  • N_HII = 100
    Adopted number of H II regions per galaxy from PHANGS-MUSE catalog; affects N_det.
  • v_perp = 200 km/s
    Adopted transverse velocity; derived from Olejak et al. (2020) catalogs as roughly 206-255 km/s then rounded down; sets t_E in Eq. (8).
  • mu_thr = 10 (b_thr = 0.1)
    Chosen detection threshold for magnification; sets the effective rate correction in Appendix D.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Point-mass gravitational lensing with Einstein radius theta_E (Eq. 1).
    Standard lensing theory, cited to Mao (2008) and Witt and Mao (1994).
  • domain assumption D_LS is approximately D_S for extragalactic sources (source at Mpc-Gpc, lens at kpc).
    Used to simplify Eq. (1) to Eq. (2) and in the optical depth integral (A2); valid for the stated distances.
  • domain assumption H II regions can be approximated as uniform disks for magnification (Eq. 3).
    The paper acknowledges real H II regions have clumpy structure; the approximation sets mu_peak.
  • standard math Gravitational lensing is achromatic, so all lines are magnified by the same mu.
    Wavelength-independence of geometrical optics in lensing.
  • domain assumption The BH density and spatial distribution in the disk and halo follow the Olejak et al. (2020) synthetic catalogs.
    Used for rho_disk, rho_halo, L_disk, L_halo and the mass distribution in Figure 3; external model, not verified here.
  • domain assumption Only the target H II region is magnified while the galaxy continuum and other line-emitting regions are not.
    Requires the H II region to be a spatially distinct component; blending reduces this, as the paper notes in Sec. 2.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectral Microlensing of Extragalactic H II Regions by Stellar-Mass Black Holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RHHOOLWH

@misc{pith2026260800688,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectral Microlensing of Extragalactic H II Regions by Stellar-Mass Black Holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RHHOOLWH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00688}
}
abstract

Most of the Milky Way's predicted stellar-mass black holes remain hidden, especially at high Galactic latitudes or in the Galactic halo, where traditional dense-field stellar microlensing is ineffective. We propose an alternative method to map this isolated population via the spectral microlensing of compact, extragalactic H II regions. Projected onto the source plane, the physical Einstein radius of a Galactic black hole can match the typical core sizes of H II regions in distant galaxies. Microlensing triggers an achromatic magnification, producing distinct narrow emission-line excesses in integrated galaxy spectra. Because gravitational lensing is wavelength-independent, intrinsic line ratios are preserved, offering a robust discriminant against false-positive astrophysical transients. Notably, the efficiency of this method depends critically on the size of the H II regions: while extended regions suffer from low optical depth, compact regions with a physical size $\lesssim 10$ pc offer significantly higher magnifications. These compact cores, however, are heavily dust-obscured at optical wavelengths, making infrared and radio observations the primary windows for this method. Even so, the spatial sparseness of background H II regions and the stringent alignment requirement for high magnification limit the expected event rate to $\sim 10^{-6}$ per year. Nevertheless, this method offers a unique opportunity to detect stellar-mass black holes and constrain their abundance in such low-density environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00688 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Maximum physical size of H II regions Rmax S versus source redshift zs for different BH masses (5, 10, 20 M⊙) and distances (0.1, 1, 10 kpc), with the top x-axis showing the corresponding angular diameter distance DS in Mpc. Rmax S defines the upper size limit of the H II region within which significant lensing magnification can be produced. within the characteristic size scales of observed H II regions, indicating … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Peak magnification µpeak as a function of source redshift zS for different H II region sizes (diameters of 2RS=1, 10, and 100 pc), assuming perfect alignment between the source and the lens. Different line styles and grayscales represent various BH masses and distances, following the same convention as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Top panel: physical size upper limit Rmax S of background H II regions as a function of source redshift zS (or DS). The solid and dashed black curves denote the mean Rmax S for BHs in the Galactic disk and halo, respectively. The light and dark shaded regions enclose the full range (from minimum to maximum) of Rmax S for each component. Bottom panel: optical depth τ contributed by disk (solid lines) and halo (dashed… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2022, ApJS, 259, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414

    Abdurro’uf, Accetta, K., Aerts, C., et al. 2022, ApJS, 259, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 2022

  2. [2]

    2020, ApJS, 249, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e

    Ahumada, R., Allende Prieto, C., Almeida, A., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 2020

  3. [3]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.05569, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1902.05569

    Akeson, R., Armus, L., Bachelet, E., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.05569, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1902.05569

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.05569 2019

  4. [4]

    2025, Symmetry, 17, 1393, doi: 10.3390/sym17091393

    Bambi, C. 2025, Symmetry, 17, 1393, doi: 10.3390/sym17091393

    doi:10.3390/sym17091393 2025

  5. [5]

    T., Chandar, R., Kreckel, K., et al

    Barnes, A. T., Chandar, R., Kreckel, K., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A95, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555751

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555751 2026

  6. [6]

    K., Williams, T

    Belfiore, F., Leroy, A. K., Williams, T. G., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A129, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347175

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347175 2023

  7. [7]

    2025, A&A, 696, A78, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450963

    Boselli, A., Fossati, M., Roehlly, Y., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A78, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450963

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450963 2025

  8. [8]

    A Virgo Environmental Survey Tracing Ionised Gas Emission (VESTIGE). XXI. Statistical properties of individual HII regions in perturbed galaxies

    Boselli, A., Fossati, M., Roehlly, Y., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.02648. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02648 CSST Collaboration, Gong, Y., Miao, H., et al. 2026, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 69, 239501, doi: 10.1007/s11433-025-2809-0 DESI Collaboration, Aghamousa, A., Aguilar, J., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1611.00036...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Lazio, T. J. L. W. 2009, IEEE Proceedings, 97, 1482, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2021005

    2009

  2. [10]

    2023a, MNRAS, 518, 1057, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3140

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., Quataert, E., et al. 2023a, MNRAS, 518, 1057, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3140

    doi

  3. [11]

    2023b, MNRAS, 521, 4323, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad799

    El-Badry, K., Rix, H.-W., Cendes, Y., et al. 2023b, MNRAS, 521, 4323, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad799

    doi

  4. [12]

    2022, A&A, 659, A191, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141727

    Emsellem, E., Schinnerer, E., Santoro, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A191, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141727

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    F., Morisset, C., et al

    Espinosa-Ponce, C., S´ anchez, S. F., Morisset, C., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 1622, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa782

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al

    Fryer, C. L., Belczynski, K., Wiktorowicz, G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 749, 91, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/91 Gaia Collaboration, Panuzzo, P., Mazeh, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449763

    2012 doi

  7. [15]

    P., Mather, J

    Gardner, J. P., Mather, J. C., Clampin, M., et al. 2006, SSRv, 123, 485, doi: 10.1007/s11214-006-8315-7

    2006 doi

  8. [16]

    2023, MNRAS, 520, 4902, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad114

    Groves, B., Kreckel, K., Santoro, F., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 4902, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad114

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Guo, M., Inayoshi, K., Michiyama, T., & Ho, L. C. 2020, ApJ, 901, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abacc1

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    2016, MNRAS, 462, 1757, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1716

    Gutkin, J., Charlot, S., & Bruzual, G. 2016, MNRAS, 462, 1757, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1716

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    D., & Polnarev, A

    Hog, E., Novikov, I. D., & Polnarev, A. G. 1995, A&A, 294, 287 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    1995 doi

  12. [20]

    Lovell, C. C. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.17680, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.17680 16

    2025 doi arXiv

  13. [21]

    C., Edgar, B

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C., Edgar, B. K., & Hodge, P. W. 1989, ApJ, 337, 761, doi: 10.1086/167147

    1989 doi

  14. [22]

    Y., Lu, J

    Lam, C. Y., Lu, J. R., Udalski, A., et al. 2022, ApJL, 933, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7442

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    2013, ApJL, 778, L41, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/778/2/L41

    Liu, G., Calzetti, D., Hong, S., et al. 2013, ApJL, 778, L41, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/778/2/L41

    2013 doi

  16. [24]

    J., et al

    Liu, H.-L., Liu, T., Evans, II, N. J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 2801, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1352

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    K., et al

    Barrera-Ballesteros, J. K., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 6099, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae345

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    2008, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:0811.0441, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0811.0441 Mr´ oz, P., Udalski, A., & Gould, A

    Mao, S. 2008, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:0811.0441, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0811.0441 Mr´ oz, P., Udalski, A., & Gould, A. 2022, ApJL, 937, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac90bb

    2008 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    Murchikova, L., & Sahu, K. C. 2025, ApJL, 988, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ade7f8

    2025 doi

  20. [28]

    2020, A&A, 638, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936557

    Sobolewska, M. 2020, A&A, 638, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936557

    2020 doi

  21. [29]

    C., Anderson, J., Casertano, S., et al

    Sahu, K. C., Anderson, J., Casertano, S., et al. 2022, ApJ, 933, 83, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac739e

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    C., Anderson, J., Casertano, S., et al

    Sahu, K. C., Anderson, J., Casertano, S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 104, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adbe6e

    2025 doi

  23. [31]

    2022, A&A, 658, A188, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141907

    Santoro, F., Kreckel, K., Belfiore, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A188, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141907

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    E., Brown, J

    Sukhbold, T., Ertl, T., Woosley, S. E., Brown, J. M., & Janka, H.-T. 2016, ApJ, 821, 38, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/38

    2016 doi

  25. [33]

    X., Woosley, S

    Timmes, F. X., Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. 1996, ApJ, 457, 834, doi: 10.1086/176778

    1996 doi

  26. [34]

    J., & Mao, S

    Witt, H. J., & Mao, S. 1994, ApJ, 430, 505, doi: 10.1086/174426

    1994 doi

  27. [35]

    Wootten, A., & Thompson, A. R. 2009, IEEE Proceedings, 97, 1463, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2020572

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.