Approach Intelligent Writing Assistants Usability with Seven Stages of Action
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:RY5OKZUNrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Despite the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) as writing assistants, they are plagued by issues like coherence and fluency of the model output, trustworthiness, ownership of the generated content, and predictability of model performance, thereby limiting their usability. In this position paper, we propose to adopt Norman's seven stages of action as a framework to approach the interaction design of intelligent writing assistants. We illustrate the framework's applicability to writing tasks by providing an example of software tutorial authoring. The paper also discusses the framework as a tool to synthesize research on the interaction design of LLM-based tools and presents examples of tools that support the stages of action. Finally, we briefly outline the potential of a framework for human-LLM interaction research.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
What Makes an AI Writing Companion a Good Fit? A Personality-Informed Co-Design Study
Co-design workshops reveal both universal needs and personality-specific preferences for AI writing companions in functionality, interaction style, and visual form.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.