Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Human-in-the-Loop Task and Motion Planning for Imitation Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.16014 v1 pith:SB776DQJ submitted 2023-10-24 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
keywords humansystemtaskdatahitl-tampimitationlearningmotion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Imitation learning from human demonstrations can teach robots complex manipulation skills, but is time-consuming and labor intensive. In contrast, Task and Motion Planning (TAMP) systems are automated and excel at solving long-horizon tasks, but they are difficult to apply to contact-rich tasks. In this paper, we present Human-in-the-Loop Task and Motion Planning (HITL-TAMP), a novel system that leverages the benefits of both approaches. The system employs a TAMP-gated control mechanism, which selectively gives and takes control to and from a human teleoperator. This enables the human teleoperator to manage a fleet of robots, maximizing data collection efficiency. The collected human data is then combined with an imitation learning framework to train a TAMP-gated policy, leading to superior performance compared to training on full task demonstrations. We compared HITL-TAMP to a conventional teleoperation system -- users gathered more than 3x the number of demos given the same time budget. Furthermore, proficient agents (75\%+ success) could be trained from just 10 minutes of non-expert teleoperation data. Finally, we collected 2.1K demos with HITL-TAMP across 12 contact-rich, long-horizon tasks and show that the system often produces near-perfect agents. Videos and additional results at https://hitltamp.github.io .

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Advancing Responsible Innovation in Agentic AI: A study of Ethical Frameworks for Household Automation

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review that argues ethical principles for household agentic AI must be converted into concrete design patterns for tailored explainability, granular consent, and user override, especially for vulnerable groups.

Pith tools