pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26202 · v1 · pith:SBXXEZ4Lnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· hep-ph· math-ph· math.MP

Fermion Families and Pontryagin Class: Topological Field Theory via Colour Symmetry Extension

Zheyan Wan , Juven Wang , Shing-Tung Yau This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 20:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elhep-phmath-phmath.MP
keywords fermion familiesanomaly cancellationtopological quantum field theorycolor symmetry extensionPontryagin classstandard modeldiscrete symmetrybordism group
0
0 comments X

The pith

Anomaly cancellation via Z3 gauge TQFT selects exactly three fermion families and three colors when baryons must be fermions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines why the Standard Model has precisely three families of quarks and leptons by classifying four-dimensional fermionic anomalies with discrete Zn symmetry through the five-dimensional spin bordism group. It establishes that only the group-cohomology part of these anomalies can be canceled by a four-dimensional Zn-gauge topological quantum field theory, with the Pontryagin class term an exception only for n equals two or three. For n equals three the construction yields a specific TQFT that cancels the mixed baryon-lepton gauge-gravitational anomaly without needing extra right-handed neutrinos. Extending the analysis to general numbers of colors Nc and families Nf, the authors identify minimal symmetry extensions that allow the TQFT to replace missing neutrinos, and they prove that requiring Nc odd (so baryons are fermions) leaves only the case Nc equals Nf equals three as the unique solution.

Core claim

We prove that any cocycle in H^d(Zn, U(1)) for odd d at least three is trivialized by the symmetry extension 1 to Zn to Z n squared to Zn to 1, and we construct the corresponding symmetric anomalous boundary TQFT. For d equals five and n equals three this produces a Spin times Z3-symmetric four-dimensional Z3-gauge TQFT that cancels the mixed discrete (B plus L)-gauge-gravitational anomaly of the Standard Model in the absence of three sterile right-handed neutrinos. In the generalized model with Nc colors and Nf families we show that missing Nf copies of nu R can be replaced by the anomalous Spin times Z2^F Z 2 Nf, B plus L symmetric Z Nc-gauge TQFT via the color symmetry extension 1 to Z Nc

What carries the argument

The symmetry extension 1 to Zn to Z n squared to Zn to 1 that trivializes odd-dimensional cocycles, together with the four-dimensional Zn-gauge TQFT that cancels the group-cohomology anomalies H^5(Zn, U(1)) but cannot cancel the A Zn p1 Pontryagin class term except for n equals two or three.

If this is right

  • The Z3-gauge TQFT cancels the mixed anomaly for the Standard Model without sterile neutrinos.
  • Minimal viable color extensions are Nc equals three with Nf at least three, Nc equals four with Nf at least two, and Nc equals twelve with Nf at least six.
  • A Z3 p1 equals zero mod three holds for the mod-three cohomology class.
  • The uniqueness proof requires Nc odd so that baryons remain fermions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the bordism classification is complete, models with other family numbers would need additional fields or different discrete symmetries to cancel anomalies.
  • The TQFT construction may extend to other discrete gauge symmetries in extensions of the Standard Model.
  • The result suggests topological order could replace or supplement dynamical mechanisms proposed for the family number.

Load-bearing premise

The five-dimensional spin bordism group together with its group-cohomology subclass fully classifies all relevant four-dimensional fermionic anomalies with discrete Zn symmetry, and the constructed TQFT is the only mechanism needed to cancel the mixed anomaly.

What would settle it

Experimental discovery of four fermion families without three right-handed neutrinos, or a consistent model with Nc equals five and Nf equals three that satisfies all other Standard Model constraints while preserving fermionic baryons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26202 by Juven Wang, Shing-Tung Yau, Zheyan Wan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The E2 page of the LHS spectral sequence (66). The differentials will be explained later. The differentials in the LHS spectral sequence (66) are d p,q r : E p,q r → E p+r,q−r+1 r for r ⩾ 2, (69) and the pages Er are defined inductively from E2 by E p,q r+1 = Ker d p,q r Im d p−r,q+r−1 r . (70) The differentials dr vanish and the pages Er stabilize for sufficiently large r ⩾ N. The page EN is denoted E∞. T… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Family puzzle asks why the Standard Model (SM) features exactly 3 families of quarks and leptons. Motivated by topological constraints, we study 4-dimensional fermionic anomalies with discrete $Z_n$ symmetry, classified by the 5d spin bordism group. We show that only the group-cohomology subclass H$^5(Z_n,U(1))\cong Z_n$ can be canceled by an anomalous $Z_n$-symmetric 4d $Z_n$-gauge topological quantum field theory (TQFT), while beyond-group-cohomology $A_{Z_n} p_1$ involving the Pontryagin class $p_1$ cannot (except $n=2,3$). More generally, we prove that any cocycle $\alpha_d\in$H$^d(Z_n,U(1))$ in odd spacetime dimension $d\ge3$ is trivialised by the symmetry extension $1\to Z_n\to Z_{n^2}\to Z_n\to 1,$ and we construct the corresponding symmetric anomalous boundary TQFT. For $d=5$ and $n=3$, this yields a Spin$\times Z_3$-symmetric 4d $Z_3$-gauge TQFT that cancels the mixed discrete $(\bf B+L)$-gauge-gravitational anomaly of the SM in the absence of 3 "sterile" right-handed neutrinos $\nu_R$. We further analyze a generalized SM with $N_c$ colors and $N_f$ families and argue that missing $N_f$ copies of the $\nu_R$ can be naturally replaced by that 4d anomalous $Spin\times_{Z_2^F} Z_{2 N_f,{{\bf B} + {\bf L}}}$ symmetric $Z_{N_c}$-gauge TQFT under the anomaly cancellation, via an appropriate $Z_{N_c}$-color symmetry extension construction $1\to Z_{N_c}\to Spin\times Z_{N_cN_f}\to Spin\times_{Z_2^F} Z_{2N_f}\to1$ of anomalous topological order. For minimal nonzero positive integers $N_c$ and $N_f$, we find the minimal color extensions: $N_c=3, N_f \ge 3$; $N_c=4, N_f \ge 2$; and $N_c=12, N_f \ge 6$. If we further require that an SM baryon is a fermion so $N_c$ is odd, then $Z_{N_c}=Z($SU$(N_c))$ color center, we prove 3 families and 3 colors, $N_c=N_f=3$, is the unique case that stands out. We also prove that $A_{Z_3}p_1= 0\mod3$ for the mod 3 cohomology class in an appropriate context.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that topological constraints from 5d spin bordism groups classify 4d fermionic anomalies with discrete Z_n symmetry, showing that only the group-cohomology subclass H^5(Z_n, U(1)) ≅ Z_n is cancellable by a 4d Z_n-gauge TQFT constructed via the symmetry extension 1 → Z_n → Z_{n²} → Z_n → 1 (which trivializes any cocycle α_d ∈ H^d(Z_n, U(1)) for odd d ≥ 3), while A_{Z_n} p_1 terms are not (except for n=2,3). It constructs a Spin × Z_3-symmetric 4d Z_3-gauge TQFT to cancel the mixed (B+L)-gauge-gravitational anomaly without right-handed neutrinos, then generalizes via a Z_{N_c}-color symmetry extension 1 → Z_{N_c} → Spin × Z_{N_c N_f} → Spin ×_{Z_2^F} Z_{2 N_f} → 1 to a generalized SM with N_c colors and N_f families. This yields minimal pairs (N_c=3, N_f ≥ 3; N_c=4, N_f ≥ 2; N_c=12, N_f ≥ 6), and under the additional requirement that N_c is odd (so baryons are fermions), proves uniqueness of N_c = N_f = 3; it also proves A_{Z_3} p_1 ≡ 0 mod 3.

Significance. If the bordism classification and cancellation mechanism hold, the work offers a topological explanation for the observed three families and three colors in the SM by replacing missing right-handed neutrinos with an anomalous TQFT of topological order. Strengths include the explicit symmetry-extension construction that trivializes cocycles in odd dimensions, the proof that A_{Z_3} p_1 vanishes mod 3, and the derivation of minimal color-family pairs from anomaly cancellation. These provide falsifiable constraints on beyond-SM model building and link discrete gauge anomalies to Pontryagin classes in a concrete way.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract paragraph beginning “We show that only the group-cohomology subclass…” and the section deriving the minimal col] The central uniqueness claim for odd N_c = N_f = 3 rests on the assertion that the 5d spin bordism group decomposes such that only the H^5(Z_n, U(1)) subclass is cancellable by the constructed TQFT while A_{Z_n} p_1 terms are not (except n=2,3). The manuscript must supply the explicit bordism computation (or reference to a complete table of Ω_5^Spin(BZ_n)) that establishes this decomposition for general n; without it the selection of minimal pairs and the isolation of the (3,3) case under the odd-N_c condition cannot be verified as forced by the equations rather than by the modeling choices.
  2. [Generalized SM with N_c colors and N_f families; the paragraph stating “If we further require that an SM baryon is a fer] The uniqueness proof imposes that N_c must be odd so that an SM baryon is a fermion (identifying Z_{N_c} with the center of SU(N_c)). This additional requirement is not derived from the anomaly-cancellation conditions or the symmetry-extension construction alone; the manuscript should clarify whether other odd N_c values are excluded by the bordism or TQFT conditions or whether the (3,3) case is selected only after this external input.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Construction of the color symmetry extension] Notation for the symmetry-extension short exact sequences (e.g., 1 → Z_{N_c} → Spin × Z_{N_c N_f} → Spin ×_{Z_2^F} Z_{2 N_f} → 1) should be accompanied by a diagram or explicit cocycle data to make the extension class transparent.
  2. [Final paragraph of the abstract and the corresponding proof section] The statement “A_{Z_3} p_1 ≡ 0 mod 3 for the mod 3 cohomology class in an appropriate context” would benefit from an explicit definition of the coefficient ring or the precise cohomology theory in which the congruence holds.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the two major points below with clarifications and planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central uniqueness claim for odd N_c = N_f = 3 rests on the assertion that the 5d spin bordism group decomposes such that only the H^5(Z_n, U(1)) subclass is cancellable by the constructed TQFT while A_{Z_n} p_1 terms are not (except n=2,3). The manuscript must supply the explicit bordism computation (or reference to a complete table of Ω_5^Spin(BZ_n)) that establishes this decomposition for general n; without it the selection of minimal pairs and the isolation of the (3,3) case under the odd-N_c condition cannot be verified as forced by the equations rather than by the modeling choices.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit reference or short derivation of the relevant decomposition of Ω_5^Spin(BZ_n) for general n would improve verifiability. The manuscript already states that the symmetry extension 1 → Z_n → Z_{n²} → Z_n → 1 trivializes only the group-cohomology part H^5(Z_n, U(1)) while leaving the A_{Z_n} p_1 contribution intact (except for the special cases n=2,3 where we prove A_{Z_3} p_1 ≡ 0 mod 3). We will add a concise appendix or subsection citing the standard bordism computations (e.g., from the literature on spin bordism with discrete gauge groups) and explicitly tabulating the decomposition for n=3 and a few other small odd n to make the separation between cancellable and non-cancellable classes transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The uniqueness proof imposes that N_c must be odd so that an SM baryon is a fermion (identifying Z_{N_c} with the center of SU(N_c)). This additional requirement is not derived from the anomaly-cancellation conditions or the symmetry-extension construction alone; the manuscript should clarify whether other odd N_c values are excluded by the bordism or TQFT conditions or whether the (3,3) case is selected only after this external input.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the requirement that N_c be odd (so that baryons remain fermions under the identification Z_{N_c} = Z(SU(N_c))) is an additional physical input motivated by the observed fermionic nature of baryons in the Standard Model, rather than being enforced solely by the 5d bordism or symmetry-extension conditions. The anomaly-cancellation analysis alone produces the minimal pairs (N_c=3, N_f ≥ 3), (N_c=4, N_f ≥ 2), (N_c=12, N_f ≥ 6). Among these, the odd-N_c subset is then restricted by the external baryon-fermion condition, leaving only (3,3) as the unique solution. We will revise the relevant paragraph to state this separation of inputs explicitly and note that no other odd N_c satisfies the minimal-pair list derived from the TQFT cancellation. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses independent bordism classification and general symmetry-extension construction

full rationale

The paper derives the uniqueness of N_c=N_f=3 (under odd N_c) by enumerating minimal positive integers satisfying anomaly cancellation via the 5d spin bordism classification of Z_n anomalies, restricting to the H^5(Z_n,U(1)) subclass cancellable by the constructed 4d Z_n-gauge TQFT, and applying the color symmetry extension 1→Z_{N_c}→Spin×Z_{N_c N_f}→Spin×_{Z_2^F} Z_{2N_f}→1. These steps rest on standard mathematical inputs (bordism groups, group cohomology, and the general cocycle trivialization by the extension 1→Z_n→Z_{n^2}→Z_n→1) that are not defined in terms of the target result and do not presuppose the final uniqueness. The odd-N_c requirement is an external physical modeling choice, not a self-referential fit. No quoted step reduces the claimed prediction to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the completeness of the 5d spin bordism classification for Z_n anomalies, the existence of the stated symmetry-extension TQFT, and the modeling choice that the color center Z_{N_c} is the appropriate discrete gauge symmetry. No numerical free parameters are fitted; the values N_c and N_f emerge from the cancellation conditions.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The 5d spin bordism group classifies all 4d fermionic anomalies with discrete Z_n symmetry.
    Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract as the classification tool.
  • domain assumption Only the group-cohomology subclass H^5(Z_n,U(1)) ≅ Z_n can be canceled by an anomalous Z_n-symmetric 4d Z_n-gauge TQFT (except n=2,3).
    Stated as a key result that motivates the rest of the construction.
invented entities (2)
  • Spin×Z_3-symmetric 4d Z_3-gauge TQFT no independent evidence
    purpose: Cancels the mixed discrete (B+L)-gauge-gravitational anomaly without three sterile right-handed neutrinos
    Explicitly constructed for d=5, n=3 via the symmetry extension 1→Z_3→Z_9→Z_3→1.
  • Z_{N_c}-color symmetry extension 1→Z_{N_c}→Spin×Z_{N_c N_f}→Spin×_{Z_2^F} Z_{2N_f}→1 no independent evidence
    purpose: Generalizes the anomaly cancellation to arbitrary N_c and N_f and replaces missing ν_R copies
    Introduced to obtain the minimal color extensions listed in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6095 in / 1930 out tokens · 40102 ms · 2026-06-29T20:21:52.044783+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · 19 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Symmetric Gapped Interfaces of SPT and SET States: Systematic Constructions

    J. Wang, X.-G. Wen and E. Witten,Symmetric Gapped Interfaces of SPT and SET States: Systematic Constructions,Phys. Rev.X8(2018) 031048, [arXiv:1705.06728]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Precise Determination of the Z Resonance Parameters at LEP : Zedometry

    H. Harari,Three generations of quarks and leptons, inPresented at 5th Intern. Conf. on Exptl. Meson Spectry, pp. 29–30, July, 1977. [3]Particle Data Groupcollaboration, S. Navas et al.,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 030001. [4]OPALcollaboration, G. Abbiendi et al.,Precise determination of the Z resonance parameters at LEP: ’Zedometry’,E...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1977

  3. [3]

    Neutrinos And Big Bang Nucleosynthesis

    G. Steigman,Neutrinos And Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,Adv. High Energy Phys.2012(2012) 268321, [arXiv:1208.0032]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    B. D. Fields, P. Molaro and S. Sarkar,Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis,Chin. Phys. C38(2014) 339–344, [arXiv:1412.1408]. 36 [9]Planckcollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    Garcia-Etxebarria and M

    I. Garcia-Etxebarria and M. Montero,Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics,JHEP08(2019) 003, [arXiv:1808.00009]

    work page arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Wang,Family Puzzle, Framing Topology,c − = 24and 3(E8) 1 Conformal Field Theories: 48/16 = 45/15 = 24/8 =3,arXiv:2312.14928

    J. Wang,Family Puzzle, Framing Topology,c − = 24and 3(E8) 1 Conformal Field Theories: 48/16 = 45/15 = 24/8 =3,arXiv:2312.14928

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    Wang,Topological Quantum Dark Matter via Global Anomaly Cancellation,arXiv:2502.21319

    J. Wang,Topological Quantum Dark Matter via Global Anomaly Cancellation,arXiv:2502.21319

    work page arXiv

  8. [8]

    Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter

    X.-G. Wen,Zoo of quantum-topological phases of matter,Rev. Mod. Phys.89(2017) 041004, [arXiv:1610.03911]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Conformal Field Theory , ISBN =

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal,Conformal Field Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997, 10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9 1997

  10. [10]

    J. W. Milnor and J. D. Stasheff,Characteristic classes. No. 76. Princeton university press, 1974

    1974

  11. [11]

    Hirzebruch,Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry

    F. Hirzebruch,Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry. Springer, 1966

    1966

  12. [12]

    Pontrjagin,Characteristic cycles of smooth manifolds,Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR52(1946) 297–300

    L. Pontrjagin,Characteristic cycles of smooth manifolds,Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR52(1946) 297–300

    1946

  13. [13]

    Pontrjagin,Vector fields on manifolds,Matematicheskii Sbornik66(1947) 3–14

    L. Pontrjagin,Vector fields on manifolds,Matematicheskii Sbornik66(1947) 3–14

    1947

  14. [14]

    Rokhlin,New results in the theory of four-dimensional manifolds,Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR84 (1952) 221–224

    V. Rokhlin,New results in the theory of four-dimensional manifolds,Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR84 (1952) 221–224

    1952

  15. [15]

    Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun

    E. Witten,Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial,Commun. Math. Phys.121(1989) 351–399

    1989

  16. [16]

    Atiyah,On framings of 3-manifolds,Topology29(1990) 1–7

    M. Atiyah,On framings of 3-manifolds,Topology29(1990) 1–7

    1990

  17. [17]

    McNamara and C

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa,Cobordism Classes and the Swampland,arXiv:1909.10355

    work page arXiv 1909

  18. [18]

    Koren,A Note on Proton Stability in the Standard Model,Universe8(2022) 308, [arXiv:2204.01741]

    S. Koren,A Note on Proton Stability in the Standard Model,Universe8(2022) 308, [arXiv:2204.01741]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    J. Wang, Z. Wan and Y.-Z. You,Proton stability: From the standard model to beyond grand unification, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 025016, [arXiv:2204.08393]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Line Operators in the Standard Model

    D. Tong,Line Operators in the Standard Model,JHEP07(2017) 104, [arXiv:1705.01853]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  21. [21]

    B. A. Dobrescu and E. Poppitz,Number of fermion generations derived from anomaly cancellation,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 031801, [arXiv:hep-ph/0102010]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  22. [22]

    Davighi and N

    J. Davighi and N. Lohitsiri,Omega vs. pi, and 6d anomaly cancellation,JHEP05(2021) 267, [arXiv:2012.11693]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Z. Wan, J. Wang and et al.,Higher anomalies, higher symmetries, and cobordisms IV: Beyond Standard Models, Grand Unification, and Ultra Unification (202n),arXiv:2xxx.xxxxx

  24. [24]

    Discrete gauge anomalies revisited

    C.-T. Hsieh,Discrete gauge anomalies revisited,arXiv:1808.02881

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Anomaly of 4d Weyl fermions with discrete symmetries

    Z. Wan,Anomaly of 4d Weyl fermion with discrete symmetries,arXiv:2506.19710. 37

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    M. Guo, K. Ohmori, P. Putrov, Z. Wan and J. Wang,Fermionic Finite-Group Gauge Theories and Interacting Symmetric/Crystalline Orders via Cobordisms,Commun. Math. Phys.376(2020) 1073, [arXiv:1812.11959]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Cordova and K

    C. Cordova and K. Ohmori,Anomaly Constraints on Gapped Phases with Discrete Chiral Symmetry, Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 025011, [arXiv:1912.13069]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    Cheng, J

    M. Cheng, J. Wang and X. Yang,(3+1)d boundary topological order of (4+1)d fermionic SPT state, Phys. Rev. B113(2026) 125105, [arXiv:2411.05786]

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [29]

    T. D. D´ ecoppet and M. Yu,The Classification of 3+1d Symmetry Enriched Topological Order, arXiv:2509.10603

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Debray, W

    A. Debray, W. Ye and M. Yu,How to Build Anomalous (3+1)d Topological Quantum Field Theories, arXiv:2510.24834

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Wan and J

    Z. Wan and J. Wang,Anomalous (3+1)d Fermionic Topological Quantum Field Theories via Symmetry Extension,arXiv:2512.25038

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    Debray, M

    A. Debray, M. Yu and W. Ye,Symmetric Gapped States and Symmetry-Enforced Gaplessness in 3-dimension,arXiv:2602.12335

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    D. S. Freed, C. I. Scheimbauer and C. Teleman,Fully local Reshetikhin-Turaev theories,arXiv e-prints (Jan., 2026) arXiv:2601.05518, [arXiv:2601.05518]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    D. S. Freed and C. Teleman,The role of p 1-structures in 3-dimensional Chern-Simons theories, arXiv:2603.11291

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    C. L. Douglas, C. Schommer-Pries and N. Snyder,Dualizable tensor categories,arXiv:1312.7188

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [37]

    Eguchi and P

    T. Eguchi and P. G. O. Freund,Quantum Gravity and World Topology,Phys. Rev. Lett.37(1976) 1251

    1976

  37. [38]

    Alvarez-Gaume and E

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten,Gravitational Anomalies,Nucl. Phys.B234(1984) 269

    1984

  38. [39]

    Alvarez-Gaume and P

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and P. H. Ginsparg,The Structure of Gauge and Gravitational Anomalies,Annals Phys.161(1985) 423

    1985

  39. [40]

    Putrov and J

    P. Putrov and J. Wang,Categorical Symmetry of the Standard Model from Gravitational Anomaly,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 125028, [arXiv:2302.14862]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [41]

    Tomonaga,Mod 3 pontryagin class and indecomposability of differentiable manifolds,Tohoku Mathematical Journal, Second Series16(1964) 252–256

    Y. Tomonaga,Mod 3 pontryagin class and indecomposability of differentiable manifolds,Tohoku Mathematical Journal, Second Series16(1964) 252–256

    1964

  41. [42]

    Tomonaga,Some properties of pontryagin classes mod 3,Transactions of the American Mathematical Society117(1965) 37–48

    Y. Tomonaga,Some properties of pontryagin classes mod 3,Transactions of the American Mathematical Society117(1965) 37–48

    1965

  42. [43]

    Wang,Anomaly and Cobordism Constraints Beyond the Standard Model: Topological Force, arXiv:2006.16996

    J. Wang,Anomaly and Cobordism Constraints Beyond the Standard Model: Topological Force, arXiv:2006.16996

    work page arXiv 2006

  43. [44]

    Wang,Anomaly and Cobordism Constraints Beyond Grand Unification: Energy Hierarchy, arXiv:2008.06499

    J. Wang,Anomaly and Cobordism Constraints Beyond Grand Unification: Energy Hierarchy, arXiv:2008.06499. 38

    work page arXiv 2008

  44. [45]

    Wang,Ultra Unification,Phys

    J. Wang,Ultra Unification,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 105024, [arXiv:2012.15860]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [46]

    J. Wang, Z. Wan and Y.-Z. You,Cobordism and deformation class of the standard model,Phys. Rev. D 106(2022) L041701, [arXiv:2112.14765]

    work page arXiv 2022

  46. [47]

    Topological Leptogenesis

    J. Wang,Topological leptogenesis,Phys. Rev. Res.8(2026) L022024, [arXiv:2501.00607]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [48]

    S. L. Adler,Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.177(1969) 2426–2438

    1969

  48. [49]

    J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw,A PCAC puzzle:π 0 →γγin theσmodel,Nuovo Cim.A60(1969) 47–61

    1969

  49. [50]

    Belavin, A

    A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, A. Schwartz and Y. Tyupkin,Pseudoparticle Solutions of the Yang-Mills Equations,Phys. Lett. B59(1975) 85–87

    1975

  50. [51]

    ’t Hooft,Symmetry Breaking Through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies,Phys

    G. ’t Hooft,Symmetry Breaking Through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies,Phys. Rev. Lett.37(1976) 8–11

    1976

  51. [52]

    Jackiw and C

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi,Vacuum Periodicity in a Yang-Mills Quantum Theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.37 (1976) 172–175

    1976

  52. [53]

    C. G. Callan, Jr., R. F. Dashen and D. J. Gross,The Structure of the Gauge Theory Vacuum,Phys. Lett. B63(1976) 334–340

    1976

  53. [54]

    Fermionic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases and Cobordisms

    A. Kapustin, R. Thorngren, A. Turzillo and Z. Wang,Fermionic Symmetry Protected Topological Phases and Cobordisms,JHEP12(2015) 052, [arXiv:1406.7329]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  54. [55]

    D. S. Freed and M. J. Hopkins,Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases,arXiv e-prints (Apr, 2016) arXiv:1604.06527, [arXiv:1604.06527]

    work page arXiv 2016

  55. [56]

    J. C. Wang, Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen,Field theory representation of gauge-gravity symmetry-protected topological invariants, group cohomology and beyond,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 031601, [arXiv:1405.7689]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [57]

    J. Wang, K. Ohmori, P. Putrov, Y. Zheng, Z. Wan, M. Guo et al.,Tunneling Topological Vacua via Extended Operators: (Spin-)TQFT Spectra and Boundary Deconfinement in Various Dimensions,PTEP 2018(2018) 053A01, [arXiv:1801.05416]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  57. [58]

    Yang and M

    X. Yang and M. Cheng,Gapped boundary of (4+1)d beyond-cohomology bosonic SPT phase,Phys. Rev. B110(2024) 045137, [arXiv:2303.00719]

    work page arXiv 2024

  58. [59]

    T. D. Brennan and K. Intriligator,Anomalies of 4d Spin G theories,JHEP07(2024) 157, [arXiv:2312.04756]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [60]

    Davighi, B

    J. Davighi, B. Gripaios and N. Lohitsiri,Global anomalies in the Standard Model(s) and Beyond,JHEP 07(2020) 232, [arXiv:1910.11277]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [61]

    Wan and J

    Z. Wan and J. Wang,Beyond Standard Models and Grand Unifications: Anomalies, Topological Terms, and Dynamical Constraints via Cobordisms,JHEP07(2020) 062, [arXiv:1910.14668]

    work page arXiv 2020

  61. [62]

    Can One See the Number of Colors?

    O. Bar and U. J. Wiese,Can one see the number of colors?,Nucl. Phys. B609(2001) 225–246, [arXiv:hep-ph/0105258]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  62. [63]

    Implications of Anomaly Constraints in the $N_c$-Extended Standard Model

    R. Shrock,Implications of anomaly constraints in the N(c) extended standard model,Phys. Rev. D53 (1996) 6465–6476, [arXiv:hep-ph/9512430]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  63. [64]

    Witten,An SU(2) Anomaly,Phys

    E. Witten,An SU(2) Anomaly,Phys. Lett.117B(1982) 324–328. 39

    1982

  64. [65]

    Montero, C

    M. Montero, C. Vafa and I. Valenzuela,Neutrinos, B-L Symmetry and the Dark Dimension, arXiv:2512.09052

    work page arXiv

  65. [66]

    Hatcher,Algebraic topology

    A. Hatcher,Algebraic topology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

    2002

  66. [67]

    Explicit cocycle formulas on finite abelian groups with applications to braided linear Gr-categories and Dijkgraaf-Witten invariants

    H.-L. Huang, Z. Wan and Y. Ye,Explicit cocycle formulas on finite abelian groups with applications to braided linear Gr-categories and Dijkgraaf–Witten invariants,Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh A150(2020) 1937–1964, [arXiv:1703.03266]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  67. [68]

    On steenrod reduced powers in oriented manifolds

    F. Hirzebruch, “On steenrod reduced powers in oriented manifolds.” Princeton University, 1953. 40

    1953