Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 38 references

MS2Mesh-XR: Multi-modal Sketch-to-Mesh Generation in XR Environments

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read MS2Mesh-XR lets a user sketch in mid-air, speak a prompt, and get a textured 3D mesh in under 20 seconds.

desk verdict A plausible and clearly described XR demo system that integrates ControlNet and CRM, but the headline 'high-quality mesh in under 20 seconds' is not actually measured end-to-end. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09008 v1 pith:SHWIRG7A submitted 2024-12-12 cs.CV cs.HCcs.MM

Yuqi Tong , Yue Qiu , Ruiyang Li , Shi Qiu , Pheng-Ann Heng This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.HCcs.MM
keywords sketch-to-meshextendedreality3DmeshgenerationControlNetmulti-modalinputvoicepromptsdiffusionmodelsXRinteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes MS2Mesh-XR, a pipeline that lets a person in an extended-reality headset draw a rough shape in mid-air and say what they want, then receive a textured 3D mesh they can grab and manipulate. The central claim is that this full loop, from sketch and voice to usable mesh, completes in under 20 seconds, with the paper reporting about 3.8 seconds for image inference and 12.4 seconds for mesh reconstruction. The authors argue that sketches and spoken prompts carry complementary information: the sketch fixes the general geometry, while the voice prompt supplies details such as material, pattern, or style. If the claim holds, non-specialists could create custom 3D assets on the spot in VR and MR settings rather than modeling them in advance.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the two-stage generation chain: a conditional diffusion step and a single-image reconstruction step. In the first stage, ControlNet (with Scribble, Canny, and IP2P variants) takes the user's sketch as spatial conditioning and the transcribed voice prompt as text conditioning to produce a clean object image, with a background-removal tool separating the object. In the second stage, the Convolutional Reconstruction Model diffuses six orthographic views and canonical coordinate maps, merges them into triplane-based representations, decodes signed-distance, color, and Flexicube parameters with compact multilayer perceptrons, and applies dual marching cubes to output a textured mesh. This chain is what converts natural inputs into a mesh in the reported time.

What would settle it

Run the pipeline with a deliberately crude sketch of a cube and the voice prompt 'sphere': if the reconstructed mesh follows the prompt and becomes a sphere rather than the sketched cube, the sketch is not carrying the geometric control the pipeline claims, and the central interaction premise would be undercut.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a working integration of three existing pieces into one XR-native creation loop: a hand-tracked virtual canvas captures the sketch, a voice SDK transcribes the prompt, ControlNet's Scribble, Canny, and IP2P models infer an object image conditioned on both, and the Convolutional Reconstruction Model converts that image into a textured mesh via six orthographic views, canonical coordinate maps, triplane features, and dual marching cubes. The authors show that the same sketch can yield varied objects when the spoken prompt changes, and they demonstrate the result in a VR asset-creation scene and an MR interior-design scene. They also state the pipeline's limits, noting that sketch line colors do not map well to the model because of ControlNet constraints and that results depend on the deployed algorithms and GPU.

Load-bearing premise

The pipeline assumes that a user's mid-air freehand sketch, as captured by XR hand tracking, is a reliable enough geometric control signal for ControlNet to infer an image that faithfully matches the intended object.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 20-second claim holds across objects and users, XR users can iterate on 3D assets during a live session without leaving the headset.
  • Because the sketch sets geometry and the voice prompt sets detail, the same drawing can generate multiple variants, such as 'hat' versus 'straw hat'.
  • The VR asset-creation and MR interior-design use cases indicate the pipeline could support on-the-fly game assets, avatar accessories, and furniture layout.
  • Since the mesh is transferred over HTTP and imported at runtime, users can immediately manipulate the object in the XR scene rather than waiting for offline processing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not quantify how much drawing skill matters; an obvious extension is a user study measuring how sketch quality affects final mesh fidelity.
  • Because the authors note that sketch line colors do not map well to the 3D model, a testable next step is to pass color or material cues through the voice prompt or a separate conditioning channel.
  • The same two-stage chain could be applied to other conditioning signals, such as depth maps or poses, to broaden XR creation beyond freehand sketching.
  • The reported speed depends on a workstation GPU; running the generation on the headset itself would be a harder but natural follow-up.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents MS2Mesh-XR, a pipeline that lets users sketch objects in mid-air within an XR environment and provide voice prompts, which are then converted into a text prompt and sketch-based conditioning for ControlNet to generate a 2D image. The image is subsequently fed into the Convolutional Reconstruction Model (CRM) to produce a textured 3D mesh, which is transferred over HTTP to a Unity-based XR runtime and made manipulable with MRTK3. The central claim, stated in the Abstract and Section I, is that the pipeline generates a high-quality 3D mesh in less than 20 seconds. The paper reports qualitative examples across several prompts and two use cases: interactive asset creation in VR and interior design in MR.

Significance. The paper is a system integration of established components (ControlNet, CRM, Meta Voice SDK, Unity/Meta Quest 3) rather than a new algorithmic contribution. Its potential value lies in demonstrating a practical end-to-end workflow for XR-based 3D content creation. If the 20-second latency claim were fully supported, the result would be of practical interest to the XR and AIGC communities. However, the current evidence is only qualitative, with no user study, no baseline comparison, and no end-to-end timing measurement that includes the XR-specific stages. The authors do provide a clear description of the system architecture and reproducible component choices, which is a useful starting point, but the main quantitative promise of the paper is not yet substantiated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Section I; Section IV.B; Fig. 3] The claim that the 'entire generation process takes no more than 20 seconds' is supported only by the 'Avg. Generation Time (Image + Mesh)' values in Fig. 3 (e.g., 3.65s + 11.44s), which sum to about 15.1-17.8 seconds. These timings omit the XR-specific stages described in Sections III-A and III-D: voice transcription via the Meta Voice SDK, rembg background removal, HTTP transfer from the workstation to the HMD, and the runtime OBJ importer. None of these stages are timed, no error bars are reported, and the number of trials is not stated. As written, the end-to-end latency claim is not established.
  2. [Section IV.B; Section VI] The 'high-quality' component of the central claim rests entirely on qualitative figures; there is no quantitative evaluation of mesh fidelity, no comparison to existing sketch-to-mesh or image-to-mesh baselines, and no user study. The Conclusion explicitly admits a limitation that 'the line colors in the sketch do not map well to the 3D model due to ControlNet constraints,' which directly bears on the sketch-to-mesh fidelity promised by the title and abstract. Without a fidelity analysis or user evaluation, the quality claim is unsubstantiated.
  3. [Section IV.A] The ControlNet ensemble weights (Scribble 0.55, Canny 0.05, IP2P 0.5) are reported as implementation details, but no ablation or justification is given for this specific combination. Because these weights control the relative influence of shape versus detail in the generated image, they are free parameters of the system. A small ablation study would strengthen reproducibility and support the claim that the chosen combination is effective.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section V-A] In Section V-A, 'This approach shows potential use in VR games' follows a comma splice and a capitalization error; the sentence should be revised for grammatical correctness.
  2. [References [3] and [32]] References [3] and [32] refer to the same work by Jackson and Keefe (2016); please consolidate or cite distinct works.
  3. [References [26] and [38]] References [26] and [38] have nearly identical titles and appear to describe the same publication; please clarify and avoid duplicate entries.
  4. [Section III-A and Reference [35]] The phrase 'Meta V oice SDK' contains a broken LaTeX spacing that splits the word 'Voice'; the same issue appears in reference [35].
  5. [Fig. 3] Fig. 3 would be easier to interpret if the exact input prompts and the number of trials per example were listed alongside the timing values, since the caption refers to 'different prompts' but the figure itself does not show them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; the paper is a system integration of externally trained models, and none of its claims are derived from its own outputs by construction.

full rationale

MS2Mesh-XR does not present a mathematical derivation or a fitted model; it composes ControlNet and CRM (external pre-trained systems) with XR input capture and HTTP transfer. The central claim ('generate a high-quality 3D mesh in less than 20 seconds') is an empirical timing assertion, not a prediction derived from an input. The timing evidence in Fig. 3 reports Image + Mesh generation times, omitting some XR-specific stages, but omission is a measurement-scope weakness, not circularity: no quantity is defined in terms of another quantity or fit to the target result. The paper's self-citations ([1], [2], [24], [25]) appear in scene-setting and related-work statements, not as load-bearing justification for the pipeline's behavior, and the load-bearing components (ControlNet [13], CRM [11], MRTK3, Meta Voice SDK, dual marching cubes) are external. The admitted limitation that sketch line colors do not map well to the 3D model qualifies the fidelity claim but again is not circular. There is no equation equating an input with an output, no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness or ansatz imported from self-citations. Honest finding: no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The pipeline rests entirely on the reliability of pretrained models (ControlNet and CRM) and on XR interaction components. No new theory, entity, or parameter is introduced. The only hand-tuned values are the ControlNet combination weights.

free parameters (1)
  • ControlNet weights = Scribble 0.55, Canny 0.05, IP2P 0.5
    These weights are chosen by hand to balance the three ControlNet models; they are not fitted to an objective in this paper, but they directly affect the generated image and hence the final mesh.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption ControlNet produces images that align with both the sketch and the text prompt.
    The entire image inference module relies on the pretrained ControlNet behaving as expected; this is invoked in Section III-B without verification in this paper.
  • domain assumption The Convolutional Reconstruction Model reconstructs a faithful 3D mesh from the generated 2D image.
    The mesh reconstruction module is built on CRM (ref [11]), and the paper assumes its output is a detailed, textured mesh suitable for XR, as described in Section III-C.
  • domain assumption XR hand tracking and voice transcription capture user intent accurately.
    The multi-modal input in Section III-A relies on MRTK3 hand ray and Meta Voice SDK; any inaccuracies in these components would degrade the final output.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MS2Mesh-XR: Multi-modal Sketch-to-Mesh Generation in XR Environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SHWIRG7A

@misc{pith2026241209008,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MS2Mesh-XR: Multi-modal Sketch-to-Mesh Generation in XR Environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SHWIRG7A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09008}
}
read the original abstract

We present MS2Mesh-XR, a novel multi-modal sketch-to-mesh generation pipeline that enables users to create realistic 3D objects in extended reality (XR) environments using hand-drawn sketches assisted by voice inputs. In specific, users can intuitively sketch objects using natural hand movements in mid-air within a virtual environment. By integrating voice inputs, we devise ControlNet to infer realistic images based on the drawn sketches and interpreted text prompts. Users can then review and select their preferred image, which is subsequently reconstructed into a detailed 3D mesh using the Convolutional Reconstruction Model. In particular, our proposed pipeline can generate a high-quality 3D mesh in less than 20 seconds, allowing for immersive visualization and manipulation in run-time XR scenes. We demonstrate the practicability of our pipeline through two use cases in XR settings. By leveraging natural user inputs and cutting-edge generative AI capabilities, our approach can significantly facilitate XR-based creative production and enhance user experiences. Our code and demo will be available at: https://yueqiu0911.github.io/MS2Mesh-XR/

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.09008 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. MS2Mesh-XR integrates hand-drawn sketches with voice inputs to rapidly generate realistic 3D meshes for natural user [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview for our MS2Mesh-XR pipeline. Multi-modal inputs from user sketch and voice feed into the image inference [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of images and meshes generated by sketches with different prompts. For each pair of generation results, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ssp: Semi-signed prioritized neural fitting for surface reconstruction from unoriented point clouds,

    R. Zhu, D. Kang, K.-H. Hui, Y . Qian, S. Qiu, Z. Dong, L. Bao, P.- A. Heng, and C.-W. Fu, “Ssp: Semi-signed prioritized neural fitting for surface reconstruction from unoriented point clouds,” in WACV, 2024, pp. 3769–3778

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Energy-based residual latent transport for unsupervised point cloud completion,

    R. Cui, S. Qiu, S. Anwar, J. Zhang, and N. Barnes, “Energy-based residual latent transport for unsupervised point cloud completion,” BMVC, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Lift-off: Using reference imagery and freehand sketching to create 3d models in vr,

    B. Jackson and D. F. Keefe, “Lift-off: Using reference imagery and freehand sketching to create 3d models in vr,” in2016 IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , vol. 22, no. 4. IEEE, 2016, pp. 1442–1451

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Text2mesh: Text-driven neural stylization for meshes,

    O. Michel, R. Bar-On, R. Liu, S. Benaim, and R. Hanocka, “Text2mesh: Text-driven neural stylization for meshes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.03221, 2021

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    StripBrush: A Constraint-Relaxed 3D Brush Reduces Physical Effort and Enhances the Quality of Spatial Drawing

    Anonymous, “Stripbrush: A constraint-relaxed 3d brush reduces physical effort and enhances the quality of spatial drawing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.03845, 2021

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Fine-Grained VR Sketching: Dataset and Insights

    L. Luo, Y . Gryaditskaya, Y . Yang, T. Xiang, and Y .-Z. Song, “Structure-aware 3d vr sketch to 3d shape retrieval,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.10008, 2022

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Luciddreamer: Towards high-fidelity text-to-3d generation via interval score matching,

    Y . Liang, X. Yang, J. Lin, H. Li, X. Xu, and Y . Chen, “Luciddreamer: Towards high-fidelity text-to-3d generation via interval score matching,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) . The Computer Vision Foundation, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Dreamscene: 3d gaussian-based text-to-3d scene generation via formation pattern sampling,

    H. Li, H. Shi, W. Zhang, W. Wu, Y . Liao, L. Wang, L.-h. Lee, and P. Zhou, “Dreamscene: 3d gaussian-based text-to-3d scene generation via formation pattern sampling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.03575, 2024

    arXiv 2024

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Dreamscene360: Unconstrained text-to- 3d scene generation with panoramic gaussian splatting,

    S. Zhou, Z. Fan, D. Xu, H. Chang, P. Chari, T. Bharadwaj, S. You, Z. Wang, and A. Kadambi, “Dreamscene360: Unconstrained text-to- 3d scene generation with panoramic gaussian splatting,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2025, pp. 324–342

    2025

  2. [10]

    Lrm: Large reconstruction model for single image to 3d,

    Y . Hong, K. Zhang, J. Gu, S. Bi, Y . Zhou, D. Liu, F. Liu, T. Sunkavalli, K. Bui, and H. Tan, “Lrm: Large reconstruction model for single image to 3d,” in ICLR, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Crm: Single image to 3d textured mesh with convolutional reconstruction model,

    Z. Wang, Y . Wang, Y . Chen, C. Xiang, S. Chen, D. Yu, C. Li, H. Su, and J. Zhu, “Crm: Single image to 3d textured mesh with convolutional reconstruction model,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05034 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Meshlrm: Large reconstruction model for high- quality mesh,

    X. Wei, K. Zhang, S. Bi, H. Tan, F. Luan, V . Deschaintre, K. Sunkavalli, H. Su, and Z. Xu, “Meshlrm: Large reconstruction model for high- quality mesh,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.12385 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Adding conditional control to text- to-image diffusion models,

    L. Zhang, A. Rao, and M. Agrawala, “Adding conditional control to text- to-image diffusion models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.05543 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Dreamfusion: Text- to-3d using 2d diffusion,

    B. Poole, A. Jain, J. T. Barron, and B. Mildenhall, “Dreamfusion: Text- to-3d using 2d diffusion,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Fantasia3d: Disentangling geometry and appearance for high-quality text-to-3d content creation,

    R. Chen, Y . Chen, N. Jiao, and K. Jia, “Fantasia3d: Disentangling geometry and appearance for high-quality text-to-3d content creation,” in International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Dreamwaltz: Make a scene with complex 3d animatable avatars,

    Y . Huang, J. Wang, A. Zeng, H. Cao, X. Qi, Y . Shi, Z.-J. Zha, and L. Zhang, “Dreamwaltz: Make a scene with complex 3d animatable avatars,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02463 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Magic3d: High-resolution text-to- 3d content creation,

    C.-H. Lin, J. Gao, L. Tang, T. Takikawa, X. Zeng, X. Huang, K. Kreis, S. Fidler, M.-Y . Liu, and T.-Y . Lin, “Magic3d: High-resolution text-to- 3d content creation,” in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Latent-nerf for shape-guided generation of 3d shapes and textures,

    G. Metzer, E. Richardson, O. Patashnik, R. Giryes, and D. Cohen-Or, “Latent-nerf for shape-guided generation of 3d shapes and textures,” in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Magic123: One image to high-quality 3d object generation using both 2d and 3d diffusion priors,

    G. Qian, J. Mai, A. Hamdi, J. Ren, A. Siarohin, B. Li, H.-Y . Lee, P. Wonka, S. Tulyakov et al., “Magic123: One image to high-quality 3d object generation using both 2d and 3d diffusion priors,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.15181, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Avatarverse: High-quality & stable 3d avatar creation from text and pose,

    H. Zhang, B. Chen, H. Yang, L. Qu, X. Wang, L. Chen, C. Long, F. Zhu, K. Du, and M. Zheng, “Avatarverse: High-quality & stable 3d avatar creation from text and pose,” 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Sketch2scene: Automatic generation of interactive 3d game scenes from user’s casual sketches,

    XRVisionLabs, “Sketch2scene: Automatic generation of interactive 3d game scenes from user’s casual sketches,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://xrvisionlabs.github.io/Sketch2Scene/

    2024

  14. [22]

    Worldsmith: Iterative and expressive prompting for world building with a generative ai,

    S. Amershi, D. S. Weld, M. V orvoreanu, A. Fourney, B. Nushi, P. Collisson, J. Suh, S. T. Iqbal, P. N. Bennett, K. Inkpen, J. T. Quinn, R. Kikin-Gil, and E. Horvitz, “Worldsmith: Iterative and expressive prompting for world building with a generative ai,” Proceedings of the 36...

    2023

  15. [23]

    Magic3dsketch: Create colorful 3d models from sketch-based 3d modeling guided by text and language-image pre-training,

    Y . Zhang, Y . Han, C. Ding, J. Zhang, and T. Chen, “Magic3dsketch: Create colorful 3d models from sketch-based 3d modeling guided by text and language-image pre-training,” Neurocomputing, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2407.19225

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Pcf- lift: Panoptic lifting by probabilistic contrastive fusion,

    R. Zhu, S. Qiu, Q. Wu, K.-H. Hui, P.-A. Heng, and C.-W. Fu, “Pcf- lift: Panoptic lifting by probabilistic contrastive fusion,” in European Conference on Computer Vision . Springer, 2025, pp. 92–108

    2025

  17. [25]

    Advancing extended reality with 3d gaussian splatting: Innovations and prospects,

    S. Qiu, B. Xie, Q. Liu, and P.-A. Heng, “Advancing extended reality with 3d gaussian splatting: Innovations and prospects,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06257, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Synthesizing 3d vr sketch using generative adversarial neural network,

    Y . Liang, X. Yang, J. Lin, H. Li, X. Xu, and Y . Chen, “Synthesizing 3d vr sketch using generative adversarial neural network,” in BDIOT’23, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Vrcopilot: Au- thoring 3d layouts with generative ai models in vr,

    L. Zhang, J. Pan, J. Gettig, S. Oney, and A. Guo, “Vrcopilot: Au- thoring 3d layouts with generative ai models in vr,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.09382, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Text2vrscene: Exploring the framework of automated text-driven generation system for vr experience,

    Y . Liang, X. Yang, J. Lin, H. Li, X. Xu, and Y . Chen, “Text2vrscene: Exploring the framework of automated text-driven generation system for vr experience,” in IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Speech to image and text (ar): Exploring the design space of employing ai-generated content for augmented reality display,

    Y . Hu, M. Yuan, K. Xian, D. S. Elvitigala, and A. Quigley, “Speech to image and text (ar): Exploring the design space of employing ai-generated content for augmented reality display,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16593, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Arsketch: Sketch- based user interface for augmented reality,

    Y . Liang, X. Yang, J. Lin, H. Li, X. Xu, and Y . Chen, “Arsketch: Sketch- based user interface for augmented reality,” in UIST’20, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    A compensation method of two-stage image generation for human-ai collaborated in-situ fashion design in augmented reality environment,

    ——, “A compensation method of two-stage image generation for human-ai collaborated in-situ fashion design in augmented reality environment,” in IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    Lift-off: Using reference imagery and freehand sketching to create 3d models in vr,

    B. Jackson and D. F. Keefe, “Lift-off: Using reference imagery and freehand sketching to create 3d models in vr,” in TVCG’16, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    2d/3d paint,

    Unity Technologies, “2d/3d paint,” Accessed on 2023-MM-DD, 2023, unity Asset Store. [Online]. Available: https://assetstore. unity.com/packages/tools/painting/2d-3d-paint-212475?srsltid= AfmBOopJrIk2WVuINSJFuwf6B3dg133OMuEqkh3MnjIaGL063hlVQbvy

    2023

  26. [34]

    Mixed reality toolkit for unity,

    MicroSoft, “Mixed reality toolkit for unity,” https://github.com/ MixedRealityToolkit/MixedRealityToolkit-Unity, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    V oice sdk overview,

    Meta, “V oice sdk overview,” https://developers.meta.com/horizon/ documentation/unity/voice-sdk-overview/, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    rembg: Remove images background,

    D. Gatis, “rembg: Remove images background,” https://github.com/ danielgatis/rembg, 2023

    2023

  29. [37]

    Dual marching cubes: Primal contouring of dual grids,

    S. Schaefer and J. Warren, “Dual marching cubes: Primal contouring of dual grids,” Rice University, Houston, TX, Tech. Rep., 2005

    2005

  30. [38]

    Synthesizing 3d vr sketch using generative adversarial neural network,

    W. Li, “Synthesizing 3d vr sketch using generative adversarial neural network,” in Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things , 2023, pp. 122–128

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.