Fairness for Robust Learning to Rank
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:SMU5D2IJrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
While conventional ranking systems focus solely on maximizing the utility of the ranked items to users, fairness-aware ranking systems additionally try to balance the exposure for different protected attributes such as gender or race. To achieve this type of group fairness for ranking, we derive a new ranking system based on the first principles of distributional robustness. We formulate a minimax game between a player choosing a distribution over rankings to maximize utility while satisfying fairness constraints against an adversary seeking to minimize utility while matching statistics of the training data. We show that our approach provides better utility for highly fair rankings than existing baseline methods.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Scoring Is Not Enough: Addressing Gaps in Utility-fairness Trade-offs for Ranking
Scoring functions are sub-optimal for all utility-fairness trade-offs in ranking under a generic fairness formulation, but semi-greedy post-processing can approach the performance of exhaustive post-processing.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.