Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Is the System Message Really Important to Jailbreaks in Large Language Models?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.14857 v2 pith:SNTBQGYE submitted 2024-02-20 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CR
keywords systemllmsmessagesjailbreaksjailbreakmessagepromptsdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has rendered them indispensable in modern society. While security measures are typically to align LLMs with human values prior to release, recent studies have unveiled a concerning phenomenon named "Jailbreak". This term refers to the unexpected and potentially harmful responses generated by LLMs when prompted with malicious questions. Most existing research focus on generating jailbreak prompts but system message configurations vary significantly in experiments. In this paper, we aim to answer a question: Is the system message really important for jailbreaks in LLMs? We conduct experiments in mainstream LLMs to generate jailbreak prompts with varying system messages: short, long, and none. We discover that different system messages have distinct resistances to jailbreaks. Therefore, we explore the transferability of jailbreaks across LLMs with different system messages. Furthermore, we propose the System Messages Evolutionary Algorithm (SMEA) to generate system messages that are more resistant to jailbreak prompts, even with minor changes. Through SMEA, we get a robust system messages population with little change in the length of system messages. Our research not only bolsters LLMs security but also raises the bar for jailbreaks, fostering advancements in this field of study.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SoK: Systematizing LLM Prompt Security: Taxonomies, Datasets, and Unified Evaluation of Attacks and Defenses

    cs.CR 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systemization of LLM jailbreak security that adds linked taxonomies, an evaluation platform, and JailbreakDB, while its main attack–defense comparison results remain deferred.

  2. IHEval: Evaluating Language Models on Following the Instruction Hierarchy

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    IHEval shows that current language models often follow lower-priority instructions over system messages, and simple prompting does not fix the problem.

  3. SafeLLM: Unlearning Harmful Outputs from Large Language Models against Jailbreak Attacks

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    SafeLLM detects unsafe outputs, traces them to specific feedforward-network components, and applies constrained optimization to unlearn harmful generation while preserving general capability.

Pith tools