REVIEW 2 cited by
The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarking
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarking
read the original abstract
Generative AI models can produce high-quality images based on text prompts. The generated images often appear indistinguishable from images generated by conventional optical photography devices or created by human artists (i.e., real images). While the outstanding performance of such generative models is generally well received, security concerns arise. For instance, such image generators could be used to facilitate fraud or scam schemes, generate and spread misinformation, or produce fabricated artworks. In this paper, we present a systematic attempt at understanding and detecting AI-generated images (AI-art) in adversarial scenarios. First, we collect and share a dataset of real images and their corresponding artificial counterparts generated by four popular AI image generators. The dataset, named ARIA, contains over 140K images in five categories: artworks (painting), social media images, news photos, disaster scenes, and anime pictures. This dataset can be used as a foundation to support future research on adversarial AI-art. Next, we present a user study that employs the ARIA dataset to evaluate if real-world users can distinguish with or without reference images. In a benchmarking study, we further evaluate if state-of-the-art open-source and commercial AI image detectors can effectively identify the images in the ARIA dataset. Finally, we present a ResNet-50 classifier and evaluate its accuracy and transferability on the ARIA dataset.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
VendorBench-100: A Unified Cross-Paradigm Benchmark for Deepfake Image Detection
A 36-model cross-paradigm benchmark on a hard 100-image corpus shows commercial APIs lead on MCC, open-source detectors trail on average, and a subset of strong rankers are miscalibrated at their default threshold.
-
VendorBench-100: A Unified Cross-Paradigm Benchmark for Deepfake Image Detection
A 100-image cross-paradigm benchmark of 36 deepfake detectors reveals that ROC-AUC and MCC diverge sharply, meaning strong class-separation ranking does not guarantee reliable default-threshold decisions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.