Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.14581 v1 pith:SVWKVFYA submitted 2024-04-22 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CR

The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarking

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.CR
keywords imagesdatasetariaadversarialai-artevaluategeneratedimage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative AI models can produce high-quality images based on text prompts. The generated images often appear indistinguishable from images generated by conventional optical photography devices or created by human artists (i.e., real images). While the outstanding performance of such generative models is generally well received, security concerns arise. For instance, such image generators could be used to facilitate fraud or scam schemes, generate and spread misinformation, or produce fabricated artworks. In this paper, we present a systematic attempt at understanding and detecting AI-generated images (AI-art) in adversarial scenarios. First, we collect and share a dataset of real images and their corresponding artificial counterparts generated by four popular AI image generators. The dataset, named ARIA, contains over 140K images in five categories: artworks (painting), social media images, news photos, disaster scenes, and anime pictures. This dataset can be used as a foundation to support future research on adversarial AI-art. Next, we present a user study that employs the ARIA dataset to evaluate if real-world users can distinguish with or without reference images. In a benchmarking study, we further evaluate if state-of-the-art open-source and commercial AI image detectors can effectively identify the images in the ARIA dataset. Finally, we present a ResNet-50 classifier and evaluate its accuracy and transferability on the ARIA dataset.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. VendorBench-100: A Unified Cross-Paradigm Benchmark for Deepfake Image Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A 36-model cross-paradigm benchmark on a hard 100-image corpus shows commercial APIs lead on MCC, open-source detectors trail on average, and a subset of strong rankers are miscalibrated at their default threshold.

  2. VendorBench-100: A Unified Cross-Paradigm Benchmark for Deepfake Image Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    A 100-image cross-paradigm benchmark of 36 deepfake detectors reveals that ROC-AUC and MCC diverge sharply, meaning strong class-separation ranking does not guarantee reliable default-threshold decisions.