Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 69 references

Edge Intelligence: The Confluence of Edge Computing and Artificial Intelligence

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey argues that Edge Intelligence is best organized as two research directions — AI for edge and AI on edge — joined under one quality-of-experience goal.

desk verdict Readable survey and position paper on Edge Intelligence whose central two-way split is a useful coarse map but not a clean partition, since the paper's own examples overlap. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00560 v2 pith:TB2DDRD3 submitted 2019-09-02 cs.NI cs.DC

Shuiguang Deng , Hailiang Zhao , Weijia Fang , Jianwei Yin , Schahram Dustdar , Albert Y. Zomaya This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NIcs.DC
keywords EdgeIntelligenceComputingArtificialAIforonFederatedLearningComputationOffloadingQualityofExperience
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Edge Intelligence — the integration of Edge Computing and Artificial Intelligence — has no formal definition, and the survey literature has grown piecemeal. This paper tries to establish a single organizing framework: split the field into "AI for edge" (using AI to solve edge-computing optimization problems) and "AI on edge" (running model training and inference on edge hardware), then map each direction onto a three-layer road-map with Quality of Experience as the shared goal. If the framework holds, it gives researchers a common vocabulary, exposes gaps (such as participator selection in federated learning), and separates the field's grand challenges into two coherent agendas. A sympathetic reader would take this as a proposal for how future edge-intelligence research should be positioned and compared.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the research road-map of Fig. 1: a single two-sided diagram with Quality of Experience at the top. Reading left to right, the 'AI for edge' side is decomposed bottom-up into Topology, Content, and Service layers — each with named problems such as wireless networking, service caching, and computation offloading — while the 'AI on edge' side is decomposed top-down into Model Adaptation, Framework Design, and Processor Acceleration. The map does the argument's work by showing that every edge-computing resource decision and every edge-AI model-lifecycle decision can be placed in a named cell, so that 'hot topic' papers become instances of a category rather than isolated results.

What would settle it

A reader could settle the matter by building a systematic corpus of edge-intelligence publications with explicit inclusion criteria and counting how many fit one of the road-map's cells: if a substantial share of papers falls outside both the AI-for-edge and AI-on-edge branches — or fits both — the claimed division would fail as an organizing framework.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that Edge Intelligence is not the simple combination of edge computing and AI but a field with an internal structure, best captured by a two-way division. On one side, AI for edge (Intelligence-enabled Edge Computing) treats AI as an optimization tool: deep neural networks, deep Q-networks, multi-armed bandits, and reinforcement learning supply near-optimal solutions to edge-computing problems in topology (edge-site orchestration, wireless networking), content (data and service provisioning, placement, composition, caching), and service (computation offloading, user-profile migration, mobility management). On the other side, AI on edge (Artificial Intelligence on Edge) asks how the full model lifecycle — training and inference — can run on devices and edge servers with device-edge-cloud synergy, organized top-down into model adaptation (compression, conditional computation, asynchronization, decentralization), framework design (federated learning, knowledge distillation, model splitting), and processor acceleration. Both branches pursue the same top-level objective, Quality of Experience, defined by performance, cost, privacy (security), efficiency, and reliability. If the road-map is right, the field stops being a scatter of disconnected optimization papers and becomes two research programs with their own states of the art and grand challenges.

Load-bearing premise

The road-map is only as trustworthy as the hand-picked sample of papers behind it: the authors focus on "hot topics" without a systematic search protocol or stated inclusion criteria, so if those examples are not representative, the map and its claims about the state of the art would mislead.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Researchers gain a shared taxonomy: a new result can be classified as AI for edge or AI on edge and located in one layer, which makes comparisons across papers easier.
  • The road-map exposes empty cells — the paper states that no work yet targets participator selection in conditional computation — thereby pointing to concrete research openings.
  • Each branch carries its own grand challenge list: model establishment, algorithm deployment, and the optimality–efficiency trade-off on the AI-for-edge side; data availability, model selection, and coordination mechanisms on the AI-on-edge side.
  • The two branches interact: schemes like over-the-air computation sit in wireless networking (AI for edge) yet accelerate federated learning (AI on edge), so progress in one branch can feed the other.
  • A shared Quality-of-Experience rubric (performance, cost, privacy, efficiency, reliability) gives both branches a common evaluation language for otherwise disparate results.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The clean two-way division may blur in practice: work at the communication–learning interface already straddles both branches, so the field may eventually need a third cross-cutting category, or an explicit treatment of such overlaps, as it matures.
  • The road-map's completeness is testable: a systematic survey with explicit inclusion criteria and a coverage metric could check whether published edge-intelligence work actually falls into the map's cells or spills outside them.
  • The five Quality-of-Experience criteria could be turned into a scoring rubric for comparing AI-on-edge systems across papers, since most current evaluations report only accuracy and latency.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a taxonomy for the emerging field of Edge Intelligence, dividing it into "AI for edge" (Intelligence-enabled Edge Computing) and "AI on edge" (Artificial Intelligence on Edge). It presents a research road-map (Fig. 1) with hierarchical decompositions: the AI-for-edge side is organized by Topology, Content, and Service layers, while the AI-on-edge side is organized by Model Adaptation, Framework Design, and Processor Acceleration. The paper reviews selected state-of-the-art works in several subtopics (wireless networking, service placement and caching, computation offloading, model compression, conditional computation, algorithm asynchronization, and thorough decentralization) and discusses grand challenges in both directions. The central claim is that this two-way division provides a useful organizing framework for an otherwise fragmented literature.

Significance. If the proposed taxonomy and road-map are accepted, they could serve as a useful conceptual scaffold for researchers entering Edge Intelligence, which is a real and rapidly growing area. The paper's distinction between using AI to improve edge systems and running AI models on edge systems is a natural and potentially clarifying framing. The paper also usefully collects representative recent work in both directions and highlights open challenges. However, the paper is a position/survey paper with no systematic methodology: it contains no derivation, no data, and no formal evaluation of its taxonomy. Its value rests entirely on whether the proposed categories are coherent and whether the selected examples are representative. The paper does not provide a systematic literature-selection protocol, and, more importantly, the two central categories overlap in the very examples used to illustrate them, which weakens the claim that Edge Intelligence "should be divided into" these two directions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section IV-A1 and Fig. 1] The central dichotomy between AI for edge and AI on edge is not a partition as claimed. In Section IV-A1, Learning-driven Communication is presented as AI for edge, yet the works cited there ([38], [39], [40], [41]) directly serve model training on the edge, which is the defining concern of AI on edge in Section III-C and Section V-A. The paper explicitly concedes this for [39], stating that "This contribution can also be categorized as Model Adaptation in AI on edge, but it accelerates Federated Learning from the perspective of fast data acquisition." If a representative set of cited works satisfies both definitions, the boundary is a choice of viewpoint rather than a property of the work, and the road-map in Fig. 1 cannot be used to classify a new paper without prior knowledge of the authors' intent. This undermines the abstract's claim that Edge Intelligence "should be divided into" these two directions. The authors should either provide classification criteria that make the branches mutually exclusive, or reframe the two directions as complementary facets of a design space whose overlap is explicitly acknowledged and analyzed.
  2. [Section IV-A and V-A] The selection of "hot topics" used to exemplify the road-map is not justified. Section IV-A states, without further support, that "we only focus on these topics" (wireless networking, service placement and caching, computation offloading), and Section V-A similarly narrows attention to Model Adaptation. There is no systematic literature-search protocol, inclusion criteria, or coverage metric, so the paper's claims about the "state of the art" and the completeness of its road-map rest on an unstated assumption that the chosen examples are representative. If the selection is biased, the road-map and the associated future-research guidance could mislead readers. The authors should describe how the surveyed works were identified and selected, or explicitly scale back the claim from "state of the art" to "illustrative examples."
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section V-A (introductory paragraph)] The phrase "Model Spitting and Model Partitioning" appears to be a typo; it should read "Model Splitting and Model Partitioning."
  2. [References [19] and [44]] References [19] and [44] refer to the same paper (Chen et al., "Spatiotemporal edge service placement: A bandit learning approach"). The duplicate should be removed and citations should be unified.
  3. [Table II] Table II lists "ProNN (based on Stochastic Neighborhood Compression)" but the text and reference [61] use the name "ProtoNN." The table entry should be corrected.
  4. [Section III-C2] The sentence "Algorithm Asynchronization trys aggregating local models in an asynchronous way" contains a typo: "trys" should be "tries."
  5. [Section IV-A1] Several self-citations ([20], [21], [25], [29], [45]) are used as representative examples of the proposed directions. In a survey with no explicit inclusion criteria, this creates an impression of selection bias, although self-citation itself is not inappropriate. The authors may wish to note how their own works were selected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the paper proposes a taxonomy rather than deriving a result, and its self-citations are illustrative examples, not load-bearing premises.

full rationale

This paper is a survey and research road-map. Its central claim, that Edge Intelligence should be divided into AI for edge and AI on edge, is a stipulated classification (the paper says 'we suggest to distinguish'), not a derived or predicted quantity. There are no fitted parameters, no equations whose outputs reproduce their inputs, and no uniqueness theorem imported from prior work. The self-citations such as [20], [21], [25], [29], and [45] are used only as examples of work that fits the proposed categories; the taxonomy does not depend on the correctness or acceptance of those cited results. The nearest thing to a circularity concern is the paper's own admission in Section IV-A1 that the work in [39] 'can also be categorized as Model Adaptation in AI on edge,' which shows that the two branches are not a strict partition. But an acknowledged classification overlap is a limitation of the taxonomy, not a circular derivation: no claim is justified by restating its own input. Accordingly, no circular step is present and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central contribution is a taxonomy; it rests on the unstated usefulness of that taxonomy, on the representativeness of the surveyed papers, and on the QoE framework. No numeric parameters are fit anywhere in the paper.

assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper The two-way division of Edge Intelligence into AI for edge and AI on edge is a useful and exhaustive taxonomy.
    Introduced in Section I as a proposal, with no derivation from data or prior theory.
  • domain assumption The selected cited works accurately represent the state of the art.
    No systematic search or inclusion criteria are provided; the paper states it 'only focus on these topics' in Section IV-A.
  • domain assumption QoE, decomposed into Performance, Cost, Privacy, Efficiency, and Reliability, is the appropriate top-level optimization goal.
    Presented in Section III-A as a belief, without evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Edge Intelligence: The Confluence of Edge Computing and Artificial Intelligence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TB2DDRD3

@misc{pith2026190900560,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Edge Intelligence: The Confluence of Edge Computing and Artificial Intelligence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TB2DDRD3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00560}
}
read the original abstract

Along with the rapid developments in communication technologies and the surge in the use of mobile devices, a brand-new computation paradigm, Edge Computing, is surging in popularity. Meanwhile, Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications are thriving with the breakthroughs in deep learning and the many improvements in hardware architectures. Billions of data bytes, generated at the network edge, put massive demands on data processing and structural optimization. Thus, there exists a strong demand to integrate Edge Computing and AI, which gives birth to Edge Intelligence. In this paper, we divide Edge Intelligence into AI for edge (Intelligence-enabled Edge Computing) and AI on edge (Artificial Intelligence on Edge). The former focuses on providing more optimal solutions to key problems in Edge Computing with the help of popular and effective AI technologies while the latter studies how to carry out the entire process of building AI models, i.e., model training and inference, on the edge. This paper provides insights into this new inter-disciplinary field from a broader perspective. It discusses the core concepts and the research road-map, which should provide the necessary background for potential future research initiatives in Edge Intelligence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.00560 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The research road-map of Edge Intelligence. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The utilization of AI technology for performance optimization. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Methods, approaches and technologies of Model Adaptation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [39]

    Federated learning via over-the-air computation,

    K. Yang, T. Jiang, Y . Shi, and Z. Ding, “Federated learning via over-the-air computation,” CoRR, vol. abs/1812.11750, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.11750

    arXiv 2018

  2. [40]

    MIMO Over-the-Air Computation for High-Mobility Multi-Modal Sensing

    G. Zhu, L. Chen, and K. Huang, “Over-the-air computation in MIMO multi-access channels: Beamforming and channel feedback,” CoRR, vol. abs/1803.11129, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/ 1803.11129

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  3. [41]

    Wireless federated distillation for distributed edge learning with heterogeneous data,

    J.-H. Ahn, O. Simeone, and J. Kang, “Wireless federated distillation for distributed edge learning with heterogeneous data,” ArXiv, vol. abs/1907.02745, 2019

    arXiv 1907

  4. [1]

    Toward a heterogeneous mist, fog, and cloud-based framework for the internet of healthcare things,

    M. Asif-Ur-Rahman, F. Afsana, M. Mahmud, M. S. Kaiser, M. R. Ahmed, O. Kaiwartya, and A. James-Taylor, “Toward a heterogeneous mist, fog, and cloud-based framework for the internet of healthcare things,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4049–4062, June 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [2]

    Iot connections outlook: Nb-iot and cat-m technologies will account for close to 45 percent of cellular iot connections in 2024

    Ericsson, “Iot connections outlook: Nb-iot and cat-m technologies will account for close to 45 percent of cellular iot connections in 2024.”

    work page 2024

  6. [3]

    Mobile edge computing: A survey,

    N. Abbas, Y . Zhang, A. Taherkordi, and T. Skeie, “Mobile edge computing: A survey,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 450–465, Feb 2018

    work page 2018

  7. [4]

    Application of Machine Learning in Wireless Networks: Key Techniques and Open Issues

    Y . Sun, M. Peng, Y . Zhou, Y . Huang, and S. Mao, “Application of machine learning in wireless networks: Key techniques and open issues,” CoRR, vol. abs/1809.08707, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.08707

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  8. [5]

    Deep learning for intelligent wireless networks: A comprehensive survey,

    Q. Mao, F. Hu, and Q. Hao, “Deep learning for intelligent wireless networks: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2595–2621, Fourthquarter 2018

    work page 2018

Show all 69 references
  1. [6]

    Machine learning for wireless networks with artificial intelligence: A tutorial on neural networks,

    M. Chen, U. Challita, W. Saad, C. Yin, and M. Debbah, “Machine learning for wireless networks with artificial intelligence: A tutorial on neural networks,” CoRR, vol. abs/1710.02913, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.02913

    2017 arXiv

  2. [7]

    Edge intelligence: Paving the last mile of artificial intelligence with edge computing,

    Z. Zhou, X. Chen, E. Li, L. Zeng, K. Luo, and J. Zhang, “Edge intelligence: Paving the last mile of artificial intelligence with edge computing,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 1738–1762, Aug 2019

    2019

  3. [9]

    Convergence of edge computing and deep learning: A comprehensive survey,

    Y . Han, X. Wang, V . C. M. Leung, D. Niyato, X. Yan, and X. Chen, “Convergence of edge computing and deep learning: A comprehensive survey,” CoRR, vol. abs/1907.08349, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08349

    1907 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01864

    [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.01864

    1906 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,

    H. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, “Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data,” in AISTATS, 2016

    2016

  6. [12]

    A survey on internet of things: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and applications,

    J. Lin, W. Yu, N. Zhang, X. Yang, H. Zhang, and W. Zhao, “A survey on internet of things: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and applications,”IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1125–1142, Oct 2017

    2017

  7. [13]

    Uav communications for 5g and beyond: Recent advances and future trends,

    B. Li, Z. Fei, and Y . Zhang, “Uav communications for 5g and beyond: Recent advances and future trends,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2241–2263, April 2019

    2019

  8. [14]

    Uav-enabled wireless power transfer: Trajectory design and energy optimization,

    J. Xu, Y . Zeng, and R. Zhang, “Uav-enabled wireless power transfer: Trajectory design and energy optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 5092–5106, Aug 2018

    2018

  9. [15]

    Towards an intelligent edge: Wireless communication meets machine learning,

    G. Zhu, D. Liu, Y . Du, C. You, J. Zhang, and K. Huang, “Towards an intelligent edge: Wireless communication meets machine learning,” CoRR, vol. abs/1809.00343, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00343

    2018 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Caching in the sky: Proactive deployment of cache-enabled unmanned aerial vehicles for optimized quality-of-experience,

    M. Chen, M. Mozaffari, W. Saad, C. Yin, M. Debbah, and C. S. Hong, “Caching in the sky: Proactive deployment of cache-enabled unmanned aerial vehicles for optimized quality-of-experience,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1046–1061, May 2017

    2017

  11. [17]

    Revenue-driven service provisioning for resource sharing in mobile cloud computing,

    H. Wu, S. Deng, W. Li, J. Yin, Q. Yang, Z. Wu, and A. Y . Zomaya, “Revenue-driven service provisioning for resource sharing in mobile cloud computing,” in Service-Oriented Computing , M. Maximilien, A. Vallecillo, J. Wang, and M. Oriol, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publis...

    2017

  12. [18]

    Deep reinforcement learning-based mode selection and resource management for green fog radio access networks,

    Y . Sun, M. Peng, and S. Mao, “Deep reinforcement learning-based mode selection and resource management for green fog radio access networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1960–1971, April 2019

    1960

  13. [20]

    Composition- driven iot service provisioning in distributed edges,

    S. Deng, Z. Xiang, J. Yin, J. Taheri, and A. Y . Zomaya, “Composition- driven iot service provisioning in distributed edges,”IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 54 258–54 269, 2018

    2018

  14. [21]

    Mobility-aware service composition in mobile communities,

    S. Deng, L. Huang, J. Taheri, J. Yin, M. Zhou, and A. Y . Zomaya, “Mobility-aware service composition in mobile communities,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems , vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 555–568, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC. 2016.2521736

    2017

  15. [22]

    Mobile service selection for composition: An energy consumption perspective,

    S. Deng, H. Wu, W. Tan, Z. Xiang, and Z. Wu, “Mobile service selection for composition: An energy consumption perspective,” IEEE Trans. Automation Science and Engineering , vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1478–1490,

  16. [23]

    Cooperative edge caching in user-centric clustered mobile networks,

    S. Zhang, P. He, K. Suto, P. Yang, L. Zhao, and X. Shen, “Cooperative edge caching in user-centric clustered mobile networks,” IEEE Transac- tions on Mobile Computing , vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1791–1805, Aug 2018

    2018

  17. [24]

    Qoe aware and cell capacity enhanced computation offloading for multi-server mobile edge computing systems with energy harvesting devices,

    H. Zhao, W. Du, W. Liu, T. Lei, and Q. Lei, “Qoe aware and cell capacity enhanced computation offloading for multi-server mobile edge computing systems with energy harvesting devices,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Ubiquitous Intelligence Computing , Oct 2018, pp. 671–678

    2018

  18. [25]

    Modern service industry and crossover services: Development and trends in china,

    Z. Wu, J. Yin, S. Deng, J. Wu, Y . Li, and L. Chen, “Modern service industry and crossover services: Development and trends in china,” 12 IEEE Trans. Services Computing , vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 664–671, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2015.2418765

    2016

  19. [26]

    Learning- based computation offloading for iot devices with energy harvesting,

    M. Min, L. Xiao, Y . Chen, P. Cheng, D. Wu, and W. Zhuang, “Learning- based computation offloading for iot devices with energy harvesting,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 1930– 1941, Feb 2019

    1930

  20. [27]

    Perfor- mance optimization in mobile-edge computing via deep reinforcement learning,

    X. Chen, H. Zhang, C. Wu, S. Mao, Y . Ji, and M. Bennis, “Perfor- mance optimization in mobile-edge computing via deep reinforcement learning,” in 2018 IEEE 88th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC- Fall), Aug 2018, pp. 1–6

    2018

  21. [28]

    A mobility- aware cross-edge computation offloading framework for partitionable applications,

    H. Zhao, S. Deng, C. Zhang, W. Du, Q. He, and J. Yin, “A mobility- aware cross-edge computation offloading framework for partitionable applications,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Web Services , Jul 2019, pp. 193–200

    2019

  22. [29]

    A density-based offloading strategy for iot devices in edge computing systems,

    C. Zhang, H. Zhao, and S. Deng, “A density-based offloading strategy for iot devices in edge computing systems,” IEEE Access , vol. 6, pp. 73 520–73 530, 2018

    2018

  23. [30]

    Wireless network intelligence at the edge,

    J. Park, S. Samarakoon, M. Bennis, and M. Debbah, “Wireless network intelligence at the edge,” CoRR, vol. abs/1812.02858, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.02858

    2018 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Service selection for composition with qos correlations,

    S. Deng, H. Wu, D. Hu, and J. L. Zhao, “Service selection for composition with qos correlations,” IEEE Trans. Services Computing, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 291–303, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2014.2361138

    2016

  25. [32]

    Edge intelligence: On-demand deep learning model co-inference with device-edge synergy,

    E. Li, Z. Zhou, and X. Chen, “Edge intelligence: On-demand deep learning model co-inference with device-edge synergy,” in Pro- ceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Mobile Edge Communications, MECOMM@SIGCOMM 2018, Budapest, Hungary, August 20, 2018 , 2018, pp. 31–36

    2018

  26. [33]

    Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfit- ting,

    N. Srivastava, G. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and R. Salakhut- dinov, “Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfit- ting,” Journal of Machine Learning Research , vol. 15, pp. 1929–1958, 2014

    1929

  27. [34]

    Not just privacy: Improving performance of private deep learning in mobile cloud,

    J. Wang, J. Zhang, W. Bao, X. Zhu, B. Cao, and P. S. Yu, “Not just privacy: Improving performance of private deep learning in mobile cloud,” CoRR, vol. abs/1809.03428, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.03428

    2018 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Adaptive precision cnn accelerator using radix-x parallel connected memristor crossbars,

    J. Lee, J. K. Eshraghian, K. Cho, and K. Eshraghian, “Adaptive precision cnn accelerator using radix-x parallel connected memristor crossbars,” ArXiv, vol. abs/1906.09395, 2019

    1906 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Over-the-air function computation in sensor networks,

    O. Abari, H. Rahul, and D. Katabi, “Over-the-air function computation in sensor networks,” CoRR, vol. abs/1612.02307, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1612.02307

    2016 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Efficient processing of deep neural networks: A tutorial and survey,

    V . Sze, Y . Chen, T. Yang, and J. S. Emer, “Efficient processing of deep neural networks: A tutorial and survey,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 105, no. 12, pp. 2295–2329, Dec 2017

    2017

  31. [42]

    A graph neural network ap- proach for scalable wireless power control,

    Y . Shen, Y . Shi, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “A graph neural network ap- proach for scalable wireless power control,” ArXiv, vol. abs/1907.08487, 2019

    1907 arXiv

  32. [43]

    Dynamic control of functional splits for energy harvesting virtual small cells: a distributed reinforcement learning approach,

    D. A. Temesgene, M. Miozzo, and P. Dini, “Dynamic control of functional splits for energy harvesting virtual small cells: a distributed reinforcement learning approach,” ArXiv, vol. abs/1906.05735v1, 2019

    1906 arXiv

  33. [44]

    Wireless data acquisition for edge learning: Importance aware retransmission,

    D. Liu, G. Zhu, J. Zhang, and K. Huang, “Wireless data acquisition for edge learning: Importance aware retransmission,” CoRR, vol. abs/1812.02030, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1812. 02030

    2018 arXiv

  34. [45]

    Data-intensive ap- plication deployment at edge: A deep reinforcement learning approach,

    Y . Chen, S. Deng, H. Zhao, Q. He, and H. G. Y . Li, “Data-intensive ap- plication deployment at edge: A deep reinforcement learning approach,” in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Web Services , Jul 2019, pp. 355–359

    2019

  35. [46]

    Deep reinforcement learning: A brief survey,

    K. Arulkumaran, M. P. Deisenroth, M. Brundage, and A. A. Bharath, “Deep reinforcement learning: A brief survey,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 26–38, Nov 2017

    2017

  36. [47]

    Online deep rein- forcement learning for computation offloading in blockchain-empowered mobile edge computing,

    X. Qiu, L. Liu, W. Chen, Z. Hong, and Z. Zheng, “Online deep rein- forcement learning for computation offloading in blockchain-empowered mobile edge computing,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology , pp. 1–1, 2019

    2019

  37. [48]

    Spatiotemporal edge service placement: A bandit learning approach,

    L. Chen, J. Xu, S. Ren, and P. Zhou, “Spatiotemporal edge service placement: A bandit learning approach,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 8388–8401, Dec 2018

    2018

  38. [49]

    Deep reinforcement learning for online offloading in wireless powered mobile-edge computing networks,

    L. Huang, S. Bi, and Y . A. Zhang, “Deep reinforcement learning for online offloading in wireless powered mobile-edge computing networks,” CoRR, vol. abs/1808.01977, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.01977

    2018 arXiv

  39. [50]

    Multi-user resource control with deep reinforcement learning in iot edge computing,

    L. Lei, H. X. andXiong Xiong, K. Zheng, W. Xiang, and X. Wang, “Multi-user resource control with deep reinforcement learning in iot edge computing,” ArXiv, vol. abs/1906.07860, 2019

    1906 arXiv

  40. [51]

    Vehicular edge computing via deep reinforcement learning,

    Q. Qi and Z. Ma, “Vehicular edge computing via deep reinforcement learning,” CoRR, vol. abs/1901.04290, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04290

    1901 arXiv

  41. [52]

    Optimized computation offloading performance in virtual edge computing systems via deep reinforcement learning,

    X. Chen, H. Zhang, C. Wu, S. Mao, Y . Ji, and M. Bennis, “Optimized computation offloading performance in virtual edge computing systems via deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4005–4018, June 2019

    2019

  42. [53]

    Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency,

    J. Konecn ´y, H. B. McMahan, F. X. Yu, P. Richt ´arik, A. T. Suresh, and D. Bacon, “Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency,” CoRR, vol. abs/1610.05492, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05492

    2016 arXiv

  43. [55]

    Memory-driven mixed low precision quantization for enabling deep network inference on microcontrollers,

    M. Rusci, A. Capotondi, and L. Benini, “Memory-driven mixed low precision quantization for enabling deep network inference on microcontrollers,” CoRR, vol. abs/1905.13082, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.13082

    1905 arXiv

  44. [56]

    Cache-aided noma mobile edge computing: A reinforcement learning approach,

    Z. Yang, Y . Liu, Y . Chen, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Cache-aided noma mobile edge computing: A reinforcement learning approach,”ArXiv, vol. abs/1906.08812, 2019

    1906 arXiv

  45. [57]

    Run-time efficient RNN compression for inference on edge devices,

    U. Thakker, J. G. Beu, D. Gope, G. Dasika, and M. Mattina, “Run-time efficient RNN compression for inference on edge devices,” CoRR, vol. abs/1906.04886, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1906. 04886

    1906 arXiv

  46. [58]

    Diving deeper into mentee networks,

    R. Venkatesan and B. Li, “Diving deeper into mentee networks,” CoRR, vol. abs/1604.08220, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/ abs/1604.08220

    2016 arXiv

  47. [59]

    Efficient hybrid network architectures for extremely quantized neural networks enabling intelligence at the edge,

    I. Chakraborty, D. Roy, A. Ankit, and K. Roy, “Efficient hybrid network architectures for extremely quantized neural networks enabling intelligence at the edge,” CoRR, vol. abs/1902.00460, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.00460

    1902 arXiv

  48. [60]

    Pca- driven hybrid network design for enabling intelligence at the edge,

    I. Chakraborty, D. Roy, I. Garg, A. Ankit, and K. Roy, “Pca- driven hybrid network design for enabling intelligence at the edge,” CoRR, vol. abs/1906.01493, 2019. [Online]. Available: http: //arxiv.org/abs/1906.01493

    1906 arXiv

  49. [61]

    Strategies for re- training a pruned neural network in an edge computing paradigm,

    P. S. Chandakkar, Y . Li, P. L. K. Ding, and B. Li, “Strategies for re- training a pruned neural network in an edge computing paradigm,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing (EDGE) , June 2017, pp. 244–247

    2017

  50. [62]

    Toward runtime-throttleable neural networks,

    J. Hostetler, “Toward runtime-throttleable neural networks,” CoRR, vol. abs/1905.13179, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1905. 13179

    1905 arXiv

  51. [63]

    Gossip training for deep learning,

    M. Blot, D. Picard, M. Cord, and N. Thome, “Gossip training for deep learning,” CoRR, vol. abs/1611.09726, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09726

    2016 arXiv

  52. [64]

    Gossipgrad: Scalable deep learning using gossip communication based asynchronous gradient descent,

    J. Daily, A. Vishnu, C. Siegel, T. Warfel, and V . Amatya, “Gossipgrad: Scalable deep learning using gossip communication based asynchronous gradient descent,” CoRR, vol. abs/1803.05880, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05880 13

    2018 arXiv

  53. [66]

    Protonn: Compressed and accurate knn for resource-scarce devices,

    A. Gupta, C. G. S. Suggala, A. Gupta, H. Simhadri, B. Paranjape, A. Ku- mar, S. Goyal, R. Udupa, M. Varma, and P. Jain, “Protonn: Compressed and accurate knn for resource-scarce devices,” in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, Sydney, Australi...

    2017

  54. [67]

    SCAN: A scalable neural networks framework towards compact and efficient models,

    L. Zhang, Z. Tan, J. Song, J. Chen, C. Bao, and K. Ma, “SCAN: A scalable neural networks framework towards compact and efficient models,” CoRR, vol. abs/1906.03951, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.03951

    1906 arXiv

  55. [68]

    Stochastic neighbor compression,

    M. J. Kusner, S. Tyree, K. Q. Weinberger, and K. Agrawal, “Stochastic neighbor compression,” in ICML, 2014. Shuiguang Deng is currently a full professor at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Univer- sity School of Medicineat as well as the College of Computer Science and...

    2009

  56. [71]

    Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.03949

    [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.03949

    arXiv

  57. [72]

    Auto-tuning neural network quantization framework for collaborative inference between the cloud and edge,

    G. Li, L. Liu, X. Wang, X. Dong, P. Zhao, and X. Feng, “Auto-tuning neural network quantization framework for collaborative inference between the cloud and edge,” CoRR, vol. abs/1812.06426, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06426

    2018 arXiv

  58. [2016]

    Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.04482

    [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.04482

    arXiv

  59. [2017]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2015.2438020

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2015.2438020

    2015

  60. [2018]

    Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.11494

    [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.11494

    arXiv

  61. [2019]

    Available: https://www.ericsson.com/en/mobility-report/ reports/june-2019/iot-connections-outlook

    [Online]. Available: https://www.ericsson.com/en/mobility-report/ reports/june-2019/iot-connections-outlook

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.