pith. sign in

arxiv: 2001.03246 · v2 · pith:TCHHE523new · submitted 2020-01-09 · 💰 econ.GN · cs.CY· q-fin.EC

The Logic of Strategic Assets: From Oil to Artificial Intelligence

classification 💰 econ.GN cs.CYq-fin.EC
keywords strategicconversationsimportantartificialassetsexternalitiesintelligencelogics
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

What resources and technologies are strategic? This question is often the focus of policy and theoretical debates, where the label "strategic" designates those assets that warrant the attention of the highest levels of the state. But these conversations are plagued by analytical confusion, flawed heuristics, and the rhetorical use of "strategic" to advance particular agendas. We aim to improve these conversations through conceptual clarification, introducing a theory based on important rivalrous externalities for which socially optimal behavior will not be produced alone by markets or individual national security entities. We distill and theorize the most important three forms of these externalities, which involve cumulative-, infrastructure-, and dependency-strategic logics. We then employ these logics to clarify three important cases: the Avon 2 engine in the 1950s, the U.S.-Japan technology rivalry in the late 1980s, and contemporary conversations about artificial intelligence.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.